This was posted 1 year 1 month 24 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Free: "What Is a Woman?" Documentary @ The Daily Wire via Twitter

883195
Free: "What Is a Woman?" Documentary @ The Daily Wire via Twitter
Go to Deal
LArkan on 02/06/2023 - 21:34 twitter.com (8973 clicks)
Last edited 07/06/2023 - 11:38 by 3 other users

It’s the movie they really don’t want you to see: #WhatIsAWoman?

Watch the explosive documentary starring @MattWalshBlog FREE on Twitter for 24 hours extended to all weekend (US).

Mod Note:

After investigation, we determined that this documentary/video was released in June 2022 and required paid Membership to 'Daily Wire' to view the video on their website. At this time, membership starts from US$108/year (US$9/month), after discount. The now free content on Twitter, is therefore postable as a deal, under our Free Multimedia Content Deal Posting Guidelines.

To avoid personal biases from influencing moderation decisions, moderators adhere to our published guidelines. Guidelines are written based on the feedback of the community and the ability to moderate them consistently across the site. This deal has been determined to comply with our deal posting guidelines, in particular the Free Multimedia Content Guideline and the Banned Items Guideline. Community guidelines are always evolving and we welcome any discussions in our site discussion forum or Comments / Feedback / Suggestions Thread 2023 thread.

Entertainment Video on Demand

Related Stores

The Daily Wire
The Daily Wire

closed Comments

  • Jonova on 02/06/2023 - 23:50
    +5

    Ah the Daily Wire, my favourite satirical site on the web. Always good for some light hearted amusement at the end of day. High recommend Ben Shapiro, the guy is a hoot

    • TsundereGuy on 02/06/2023 - 23:58
      +1

      Wet ass P word.

      • ihfree on 02/06/2023 - 23:59
        +1

        Based on Ben's commentary, there's a strong case of DAP.

    • burns13 on 03/06/2023 - 00:04
      +1

      B-b-b-but it says it has NO agenda

  • adamm12 on 02/06/2023 - 23:51
    +3

    Great deal, whole family will be watching, the ones with gender dysphoria can pop some pills and ignore 😁

  • RocketSwitch on 02/06/2023 - 23:53
    +4

    lol, funny how we got here that we cannot define what a woman is!! When you think humanity cannot dig itself from the pooper, we get this. It's absolutely incredible how we even got to this point!

    • VictoriousBboy on 03/06/2023 - 01:33
      +3

      Incredible that people like you are so gullible you get distracted and angry about this, instead of actual injustices happening in the world. Pretty easy to keep the rednecks of America from complaining about awful govt policy and lowering standard of living if they're getting mad about trans issues, abortion and their perceived reduction in "rights".

      Apparently very easy to keep those same people in Australia distracted too.

      • RocketSwitch on 03/06/2023 - 09:17

        Missed the point. We're not discussing what you're on about. Off-topic.

  • ihfree on 02/06/2023 - 23:53
    +16

    Culture wars propaganda is not a bargain.

  • ducksmad on 02/06/2023 - 23:54
    +9

    Intentionally misgendered people in this movie. It’s disrespectful, harmful, and annoying. Walsh is also a horrible individual, and also intentionally annoying. Let people be, not a big deal, seriously.

    • hippyhippy on 03/06/2023 - 00:22
      +3

      You don't even believe trans women are actually women ..

      • ducksmad on 03/06/2023 - 00:30
        +1

        But I do… regardless, it is about being respectful.

        • hippyhippy on 03/06/2023 - 00:32

          So you would have sex with a trans woman?

          • ducksmad on 03/06/2023 - 00:48
            +9

            @hippyhippy: Weird question, and not really any of your business, is it?

            • hippyhippy on 03/06/2023 - 01:12
              +1

              @ducksmad: It's not weird because if you refuse to sleep with a trans woman… You are a bigot

              • 2expensive on 03/06/2023 - 01:19
                +7

                @hippyhippy: What a wild statement to pull out of your ass

              • ducksmad on 03/06/2023 - 01:40
                +3

                @hippyhippy: LOL! Yeah, nah, that is not how the world works. But, yup, still an extremely weird question to ask a stranger on the internet. And also a horrible and flawed question to support your initial ignorant question. Not a bigot, but you appear you be. You, me, not the same.

            • 2expensive on 03/06/2023 - 01:17
              +7

              @ducksmad: It's not a weird question from his perspective because the only value he attributes to women is as sex objects

              • ducksmad on 03/06/2023 - 01:47
                +5

                @2expensive: Exactly. I’m still stunned at how they thought that was a reasonable question to ask, and use as a follow-up to their original question. Just shows how out of touch with reality some people are.

              • hippyhippy on 03/06/2023 - 01:52
                +1

                @2expensive: And you value no attributes of an actual woman

            • gto21 on 15/06/2023 - 09:01
              +2

              @ducksmad: The question isn't weird; it can be challenging for some individuals who desire to perceive it as normal. Personally, I have a clear answer: I would engage in sexual activity with a woman but not with a transgender, as I hold the belief that transgender are not women.

          • chepsk8 on 03/06/2023 - 00:49
            +6

            @hippyhippy: wtf are you talking about, like seriously, are you just rambling off the first thing that comes to mind?

          • leiiv on 14/06/2023 - 20:23

            @hippyhippy: You wouldn't have sex with any woman either.
            Why everything needs to be binary?
            It's like saying there are only red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and purple colors in rainbow and being blind or refuse to acknowledge that there are actually million shades of colors.

            • hippyhippy on 14/06/2023 - 22:19

              @leiiv: Sorry to break it to you.. sex and gender is not a spectrum..

              • leiiv on 14/06/2023 - 23:26
                -1

                @hippyhippy: That's only because your mind is conditioned to categorise, to give label, and to see things as you want them to be instead to see things as they are. Assuming that you actually learn science in school.
                Genetically, there are multitude of other chromosomes combinations aside from XX and XY. There are other organism with non-binary sexual and asexual reproduction. Human is not that special you know.
                Psychologically and mentally, who knows how many shades in the spectrum.

                • hippyhippy on 15/06/2023 - 01:43
                  +1

                  @leiiv: Lol and you bring up science.. the only science you know about is pseudo science… You have no idea what you're talking about

                  • leiiv on 15/06/2023 - 08:23

                    @hippyhippy:

                    You have no idea what you're talking about

                    And you do? Then explain here the science that says biological sex is binary. Even a simple Google search will prove otherwise.
                    You did not refute any of the facts that I mentioned and instead just plainly concluded that I only know pseudo science.
                    That shows who actually knows only pseudo science.

                    • gto21 on 15/06/2023 - 09:10
                      +1

                      @leiiv: I did as you asked and conducted a simple Google search about the science that says biological sex is binary.

                      The first website says: "Biological sex is binary, even though there is a rainbow of sex roles"

                      Second one is a question: Is biological sex always binary in humans?

                      Males have primary reproductive organs organized around the production of sperm; females, ova. Because there is no third gamete type, there are only two sexes that a person can be. Sex is therefore binary.

    • mr_asstight on 03/06/2023 - 00:32
      +6

      Tolerance leads to these rainbows becoming intolerant and shoving these mental illness ideologies down our throats. You see the dilemma? Give an inch and they take a mile. Haram!

      • ducksmad on 03/06/2023 - 00:47
        +9

        What’s funny is that those that are intolerant, like you and Walsh, are the only ones who feel like it is getting ‘shoved down your throat’. The rest of us, just let the rainbow community be. It really is that easy. Literally makes no difference to my day-to-day life. No dilemma, you’re making a choice to let it bother you. Lol at adding Haram at the end, time for you to jog on.

      • leiiv on 14/06/2023 - 23:33
        -2

        There is no dilemma. That's only you making excuse to validate your intolerance. Everyone needs to make a conscious effort to be more tolerant.
        If you stop being tolerant just because fearing that others becoming intolerant, then where does it stop?

  • tawww on 02/06/2023 - 23:55
    +9

    where’s the bargain

  • quadrapus on 02/06/2023 - 23:58
    +12

    Posting a cringe culture wars video on twitter is not a deal.

  • Wiede on 03/06/2023 - 00:00
    +11

    A free trash is not a bargain

  • twjr on 03/06/2023 - 00:00
    +11

    Imported US culture war is not an OZbargain. Our country has enough of its own issues without importing ones designed to tear apart the US.

  • LegitBox on 03/06/2023 - 00:01
    +4

    it's a good watch. give it a good go

  • haru on 03/06/2023 - 00:01
    +3

    “A chair is the sort of thing made for a person to sit on, individuated by its matter (e.g., wood, plastic, glue, etc.) but known essentially by its form (i.e., chairness), which unifies its matter into a single object. Let's say someone were to change the chair. One could do so in one of two ways: substantially or accidentally. By incinerating the chair, one would change it substantially, and it would cease to be a chair. By altering only the chair's separable accidents, however (e.g., color, height, rod placement, etc.)—by "mutilating" it, let's say—one would not change the chair substantially, and it would remain a chair. It would remain a chair even if lots of people wished to pretend that it were a box of cereal—even if a craftsman carved a "Cheerios" logo into it with surgical precision. Still, it would be a chair, and pretending that it were a box of Cheerios would not conduce to anyone's flourishing. But in everyday life, we don't need to be so precise and pedantic about these sorts of definitions. And the reason is that we all pretty much just know a chair when we see it.” - Michael Knowles

    • ihfree on 03/06/2023 - 00:05
      +4

      My second favourite chair joke. Here's my first

  • rpy on 03/06/2023 - 00:02
    +17

    Depressing to see this hateful US culture war garbage here. Can’t we just stick to what unites us, like stacking coupon codes in a way the retailer didn’t intend and cooking risotto in the park using the neighbour’s electricity from their pool area.

    • Scythic on 03/06/2023 - 00:45

      I didn't try the second one yet but I'll look into it 😶

    • Techie4066 on 03/06/2023 - 01:52

      And disabled aged pensioners complaining about their brand new Toyota RAV4 not having roof racks for a kayak

  • realJuliusCaesar on 03/06/2023 - 00:04
    +6

    For everyone saying to just let people be what they want, don't forget that this has real world consequences.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-63823420

    This man raped two women and then changed to a 'woman' before being sentenced, in the hope of being incarcerated with females.

    Fortunately sanity prevailed and 'she' was sent to a men's prison.

    However, if this confusion is encouraged and spread further, it may not always be the case.

    • thangcuoi on 03/06/2023 - 00:49
      +7

      Woman are also capable of rape and other crimes. Why would a trans person be any different?

      Society evolve, so can the law.

      • jims2020 on 03/06/2023 - 10:03
        +3

        Feels like you are justifying the rape of women.

  • Pusheencat on 03/06/2023 - 00:09
    +7

    Political commentary, Twitter giving for free is the same as soapboxing. Not a deal.

    • jims2020 on 03/06/2023 - 10:04
      +1

      Get off, don't watch if you felt convicted.

  • titanity on 03/06/2023 - 00:13
    +10

    It’s often easy to forget that there’s a massive overlap between bargain-hunting consumerism and right-wing traditionalist values on this site.

    • tharlow on 03/06/2023 - 00:26
      +1

      If you are advocating for indulging people with mental illness, you’ve come to the right place

    • chepsk8 on 03/06/2023 - 00:55
      +2

      Seems like a case of the poor and uneducated to me.

  • Fybre on 03/06/2023 - 00:20
    +13

    I thought it was an interesting watch. The agenda was pretty obvious, but most documentaries do have a narrative they want to push these days so I was fine with that.

    From my perspective if a dude wants me to call them a she then that's fine, but I may very well forget halfway through the conversation. But just conforming with someone's preferred pronouns doesn't change the fact that they are still a dude biologically. Why does that matter to me? Because I like to classify things with some accuracy… I also care just as much if someone calls a dog an elephant, or says Ford is better than Holden… these are all delusional statements.

    • Wiadro on 03/06/2023 - 00:28
      +2

      Just call everybody “mate”

    • mr_asstight on 03/06/2023 - 00:28
      +1

      Haram!

    • whyisave on 03/06/2023 - 00:51
      +1

      doesn't change the fact that they are still a dude biologically

      doesn't this just mean, they will need to go for their prostate exam,
      when the person is at the 'risk age'?

  • spiff on 03/06/2023 - 00:23
    +4

    I thought ozb was full of libtards but the vote count has restored my faith in humanity

    • tharlow on 03/06/2023 - 00:28
      +2

      Don’t get too excited — we still haven’t apologised for kicking Djokovic out

      • christopher8827 on 03/06/2023 - 01:06
        +1

        I don't should we ever apologise for that either.

        • tharlow on 03/06/2023 - 01:09
          +1

          There’s nothing more dangerous than freedom of choice

  • muzzakus on 03/06/2023 - 00:28
    -1

    Not sure why this is a question, but reviews are solid

    • tharlow on 03/06/2023 - 00:32
      +6

      How can you find so many batshit-crazy people to interview on camera?! The irony is that they get to keep their jobs

  • Miso on 03/06/2023 - 00:30
    +4

    What? Absolutely not.

    • tharlow on 03/06/2023 - 00:33
      +1

      What about how, where, and why?

  • OfTheOverflow on 03/06/2023 - 00:34
    +16

    When did Ozbarainer become a hive of brain-dead culture war sh*t?

    Fk me dead, it's okay that there are people different than you in this world.

    • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 00:37
      +1

      All opinions are harmless and warmly welcomed until they start influencing policies, that’s when the sane minded need to start engaging too.

      Regardless, you could have very easily avoided this post but instead took all this effort to tell people about how you don’t approve of it?
      You neglect other people’s points whilst freely expressing yours
      You see the irony in that??

  • marbss on 03/06/2023 - 00:34
    +2

    looks like around 50 people can't figure out what a woman is either?

  • Phoebus on 03/06/2023 - 00:36
    +5

    A woman is someone who can have babies

    • ihfree on 03/06/2023 - 01:17
      +10

      What about people who go through menopause?

      • dBagDealer on 03/06/2023 - 03:11
        +4

        Classic whataboutism.

        Definition: a human being walks on two legs.

        The stupid Woke mob: but whatabout people with one leg??

        As I said before its Idiocracy at play in real life.

        • ihfree on 03/06/2023 - 09:01

          Whether you agree with the doco or not, it's a bad definition. There are plenty of women past menopause.

          Talking of bad definitions. It's that even a definition? Or is that more an attribute?

          Definition: a human being walks on two legs.

          Once again you're excluding any child aged under about one.

          Pretty funny bringing up Idiocracy here.

      • kumquat on 03/06/2023 - 08:15
        +4

        It’s the exception to the rule. A biological male can’t have a baby under any circumstances.

        If a woman can’t have a baby it’s due to medical issues.

        Just like a man can’t go through menopause.

  • scorpiovegas on 03/06/2023 - 00:38
    +11

    Here's the truth of what's happening in the world: The commoners are made busy fighting amongst themselves while the rich make off with their loot

    • Scythic on 03/06/2023 - 00:48
      +1

      Yes, all the sudden there are "new products" and certain group of people are tricked into buying it

  • letmesee on 03/06/2023 - 00:38
    +18

    taking anything this guy has to say seriously will ensure you never have physical contact with a woman..

    • tharlow on 03/06/2023 - 00:43
      +3

      If you aren’t a woman, at least you can pretend to be one, I guess. Then one thing leads to another, and the next thing you know… ooh la la!

      • ihfree on 03/06/2023 - 01:26
        +3

        You can paint lipstick on your hand but you can't guarantee your hand isn't actually a con-artist.

    • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 00:49
      +1

      this guy

      How very transphobic of you to assume that Matt’s a ‘guy’ in the first place??

      It could be a woman for all you know. Don’t be such a bigot, alright?

      • chepsk8 on 03/06/2023 - 00:57
        +9

        It's well established that Matt identifies as a man.

        • VictoriousBboy on 03/06/2023 - 01:38
          +10

          I love that this person thinks they're genuinely intelligent, when they're just delivering own-goals. Absolutely classic.

          • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 09:41
            +2

            @VictoriousBboy:

            delivering own-goals

            Great use of the language btw

            Anyways, I have got that one covered too
            All my own goals identify as Puskas worthy goals. Cheers

        • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 09:39
          +2

          well established that Matt identifies as a man.

          But isn’t gender a fluid concept that keeps changing?
          How could you be soo sure that’s he a man right now?
          Or now
          .
          .

          .
          .
          Or now??

          • Ninternet on 03/06/2023 - 10:19
            +2

            @Gervais fanboy: Holy cow, dude.

            What are you getting from this?

            Even if you're not hateful, your comments are definitely mean-spirited.

            • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 10:27
              +1

              @Ninternet:

              Even if you're not hateful,

              But you repeatedly said that I was hateful?
              Is this some sort of an apology then, apology for lying and trying to maliciously silence me?

              If yes, it’s a very piss poor attempt at it.

              • Ninternet on 03/06/2023 - 10:29

                @Gervais fanboy: I never said anything multiple times. I merely said you "seem" hateful which is a subjective perception on my behalf.

                I'm not apologising for what I've said as I don't necessarily think I've said anything particularly mean.

                However, if you have taken any offence from my statements and have felt belittled or degraded as a result of my comment, then I am sorry for that. I can empathise with that position. However I am trying to learn that I am not my ideas.

    • rilebags on 03/06/2023 - 01:22
      +2

      I don't want physical contact with what you refer to as 'a woman'

      • chepsk8 on 03/06/2023 - 02:33
        +3

        Don't worry, none of them want physical contact with you either, anything classed as a "woman" really.

      • Ninternet on 03/06/2023 - 10:31
        +3

        There are lots of men and women I don't want physical contact with as well. Luckily nobody is making anyone touch anyone else.

        That's the great part about consent laws! (Although I understand those can be a bit tricky to understand for certain groups of people)

        • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 10:37
          +1

          And yet i as a man could ‘identify’ as a woman and be able to access women only spaces, touching or not I am sure that would be an uncomfortable experience for most women.
          (Although I understand this can be a bit tricky to understand for certain groups of people)

          • Ninternet on 03/06/2023 - 10:50
            +1

            @Gervais fanboy: Are you speaking on behalf of women now?

            • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 10:52
              +2

              @Ninternet: Ohh yeah, quickly transitioned into one whilst typing my comment to get their opinions on this.

              • Ninternet on 03/06/2023 - 10:54
                +2

                @Gervais fanboy: You're getting pretty sad now, bro.

                I'm checking out of this as you've disregarded all of my questions towards you and even my apology which you effectively requested.

                • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 11:02
                  +1

                  @Ninternet: So you ask a daft question and throw a tantrum 👶🏻 when you don’t get a serious answer
                  You wanna leave, leave. Don’t need to announce it to me and everyone. lol

                  Anyways, I’ll humor you.

                  Are you speaking on behalf of women now?

                  Do I actually need to consider that before making a suggestion that most women would be very very uncomfortable with a biological male entering their private spaces?
                  If yes, please explain why,

                  even my apology which you effectively requested

                  More like begged** at this point. Anyways, I saw many triggered libs complaining the lack of censorship and yet there’s Herberts like…., who openly lie and slander, double down and pack the basic moral compass to Atleast apologise.
                  Shove that apology mate, it’d kill your pride and ego otherwise.

    • dBagDealer on 03/06/2023 - 03:13

      Ummm so how would you define the said woman….

  • SkyFinance on 03/06/2023 - 00:38
    +18

    Answer: A woman is someone who most people in this thread have trouble talking to

    • Scythic on 03/06/2023 - 00:49

      You are definitely not one lol

    • tharlow on 03/06/2023 - 00:50
      +2

      Always assume they’re smuggling a budgie until proven otherwise

    • whyisave on 03/06/2023 - 00:53
      +1

      Check if there's a prostate

    • Ghost47 on 03/06/2023 - 14:12
      +1

      Damn, now we need a deal for some aloe vera gel.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join