• expired

Buy 1 Solar Powered Waving USA President $6.95 & Get 1 Dancing Mexican Cactus Free + Shipping (Free MEL C&C) @ Smooth Sales

33376

My Fellow OzBargainers,

It’s HUGE. It’s TREMENDOUS. You won’t believe this deal – believe me, you just won’t. We’re talking about the best deal in the history of deals. You know it, I know it, everybody knows it.

For a limited time only, get your hands on a Donald Trump Lookalike Solar-Powered Waving USA President Figure for just $6.95 + shipping. This little guy waves at you, just like the greatest American president waves at all his tremendous fans. And guess what? That’s not all, folks.

Buy this fantastic, incredible, amazing figure and you get a FREE Solar-Powered Dancing Mexican Cactus(smoothsales.com.au). That’s right, folks – a FREE Mexican cactus that dances. It’s like a fiesta on your dashboard. The best part? This is all for you, my fellow OzBargainers.

Deal Details:

Price: $6.95 + shipping
Free Click and Collect: Melbourne Warehouse (for the locals)
Metro Shipping: Flat rate $7.95

This deal is going to be yuuuge, believe me. Don’t miss out – get yours now before they’re all gone. It’s going to be tremendous. You’re going to love it, I guarantee* it.

Make your dashboard GREAT again!

*no actual guarantees will be made.
Cactus will be added to your order when shipped. One cactus per order.

Related Stores

Smooth Sales
Smooth Sales

closed Comments

            • +2

              @JohnHowardsEyebrows: I know, but not for insurrection.

              • +3

                @unity1: Is it better that he was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States, witness tampering, conspiracy against the rights of citizens, and obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding?

                Just for a note, the official proceeding was the certification of Joe Biden's win. The obstruction was the supporters he encouraged to protest the Capitol, which turned into them illegally forcing their way inside. That is often called the insurrection.

            • +5

              @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

              He's being indicted you cabbage

              You don't seem to know what words mean. An indictment is not a conviction.

              The only thing getting in the way is his hand picked supreme court judges.

              Oh dear… The Supreme Court doesn't hear criminal cases directly it is an appeals court. The trial, if it proceeds will happen in Washington DC District Court which is an all Blue district. Hardly Trump's allies.

              Also, none of the four charges he has been indicted for containn the word 'insurrection'. You can read it here: https://apnews.com/trump-election-2020-indictment
              You posts to this thread sum up TDS very nicely. All the bluster with no information based on reality.

              • +2

                @1st-Amendment: The supreme court ruled presidents can't be charged for officials acts. That's the only reason he won't be convicted. You really are full of the same stuff Trump's diapers are.

                • +1

                  @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                  The supreme court ruled presidents can't be charged for officials acts. That's the only reason he won't be convicted.

                  If there was an actual 'insurrection', which there wasn't, but if there was then it wouldn't fall under 'official acts'. An insurrection by definition cannot be an official act. Do you understand how that works?
                  Sounds like someone's been swallowing media lies again… Stay angry! Feed the algorithm!

                  You really are full of the same stuff Trump's diapers are.

                  Bro, you're the guy spouting all the media headlines at us… Try thinking about these things rather than just repeating them…

                • +1

                  @JohnHowardsEyebrows: And not just any Supreme Court - one so partisan, corrupt, and ethically bankrupt that the majority of the country is out of favour with them and POTUS has deemed it a top priority to reform before he is out of office.

                  Anything they are ruling in shouldnt be used as any sort of barometer for anything having to do with "right" and "wrong".

          • +5

            @unity1: Well, one single case would be the US House of Representatives impeaching Trump with the charge of incitement of insurrection. He wasn't found guilty, of course, but all you asked for was levelling the charge and they did that.

            But the logical step from sedition (which plenty of people were charged for, and carries a longer sentence) is an insurrection. The difficulty is proving that those there were actually trying to carry out the overthrow of the government and not just having a riot for fun. That they failed so horribly badly suggests most weren't really engaged in much more than angry stomping of feet.

            Anyway, on topic, what's with the mouth of Donald looking like a blowup sex toy?

        • +1

          Project2025, champ.

          Lol, tin foil hat alert…

          • @1st-Amendment: Regurgitation…

          • +3

            @1st-Amendment: JD Vance wrote the foreword. Think your knowledge of the notion of conspiracies is even worse than your knowledge of what constitutions are.

            • +1

              @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

              JD Vance wrote the foreword.

              Even CNN know that is fake news: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/30/politics/fact-check-harri…

              This is comedy…

              Think your knowledge of the notion of conspiracies is even worse than your knowledge of what constitutions are.

              Tell us more about this Project 2025 conspiracy lol… Grab your tin foil hats folks..

              • -1

                @1st-Amendment: You really must have struggled with reading comprehension at school. Here's the evidence of him writing the foreword for the 2025's author's book. Or are you so deficient upstairs that you believe he'll write all that and not be aware of the program in detail?

                https://newrepublic.com/article/184393/jd-vance-violent-fore…

                • +1

                  @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                  You really must have struggled with reading comprehension at school

                  One of us has, that is quite clear.

                  Here's the evidence of him writing the foreword for the 2025's author's book.

                  'The Author's book' which is not 'Project 2025'. Different things are different lol…

                  I'll chalk that up on the scoreboard of yet another thing you got wrong. You know if you stopped just blindly believing everything you read from Left wing media(allsides.com) you wouldn't be in this hole you keep digging deeper into.

        • 'fascists'

          lol!

          champ

    • +9

      Yes… everyone that disagrees with the left is automatically a fascist.

      • 2024 mic drop comment

        • -1

          You're very easily pleased. Trump said he wants to be a dictator on day one. But keep deluding yourself. Either result you're going to look very stupid post November.

          • +1

            @JohnHowardsEyebrows: The future's bright only if it's right.

            But the poster I was replying to was correct - disagreeing with the left doesn't mean you're a fascist. Just as someone disagreeing with the right is not necessarily a communist.

            I think you need to read a history book and try and understand what fascism really is. In your case I think you'll learn something.

            • +1

              @R4:

              disagreeing with the left doesn't mean you're a fascist

              Indeed. Which is why so many conservative/sensible right people are siding with Harris, as they are against a fascist like Trump. The brains of the right are not with Trump. Only pseudointellectual f****** morons like Tucker Carlson.

    • "I am certainly grateful for Trump outing the low IQ fascists among us." Yep, it's enlightening seeing all the lefty loons with TDS outing themselves over anything orange man related.

      • -1

        Yes. I'm no particular fan of DT (although I was in 2016) but I too also love how any mention of him arcs up all the lefties and wokesters. It's also funny to see them bring him into a discussion or post where he's not mentioned by the originator - just so that they can have a little whine.

        • It's on par with what covid revealed about the behaviour/potential and thoughts of those we live amongst.

        • -1

          An ambivalent Trump fan painting himself as a voice of reason. "I only voyed for Mussolini the first time".

  • +1

    why would anyone buy rubbish?!?!?! even if trump him self is for this price, i wouldn't buy him to clean my 5h!t!!!! this also goes to all USA presdents!!

    • -1

      Name 5 US presdents………

      Go!

      • Really not that hard lol

        • -1

          Go for it.

          I couldn't name one US presdent but you give it a crack.

          • @R4: can!
            George Washngton
            John Quncy Adams
            Abraham Lncoln
            Rchard Nxon
            Bll Clnton

            And a bonus one: Joe Bden

            • @McFly: Cool.

              Those are presidents. I was hoping to get 5 presdents.

              Alas, still waiting…..

              • @R4: Those are presdents.

                • @McFly: Err, okay, if you say so.

                  It's good to learn something new every day.

          • @R4: JFK
            Nixon
            Bush snr
            Bush jnr
            Clinton
            Obama
            Trump
            Biden

            Also were these guys presidents too?
            Hoover
            Jefferson
            Rosevelt
            Lincoln

            Just remembered while driving before was eisenhover a president? Didnt they just make about him year or two ago?

      • Benjamen Netanyahu
        Yair Lapid
        Ariel Sharon
        Ehud Barak
        Shimon Perez

        • I may be mistaken, but please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but those are Israeli, not US, presidents (or even presdents).

          Next.

          • @R4: you are correct, but isn't any israeli PM is a US president? they are just bitches.

  • +9

    Absolute trash.

    Might buy though if it came in an orange jumpsuit and prison bars variation.

    • +3

      Or one (accurately) wearing an adult nappy and struggling to walk down a ramp.

      • +5

        Are you asking OP if they sell a Biden version?

        • +6

          Biden's not running for president, Einstein. Trump is the oldest presidential candidate in history. Already on nappies, and another 4.5 years on the throne (ironic given he can't hold on to get to the throne).

          • +3

            @JohnHowardsEyebrows: But age is just a number!

            Thanks what Kamala and all of Democratic Party said, only about a month ago!

            Are you calling Kamala a liar?

            • +8

              @Loki556: Yeah I don't think anyone's buying your limp wristed attempt to make the diaper man camp look honest, bud.

          • +1

            @JohnHowardsEyebrows: TDS is a terrible affliction.

          • +2

            @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

            Trump is the oldest presidential candidate in history

            Oh man the clangers keep coming. Up until 10 days ago, Joe Biden was a 'Presidential Candidate' and the oldest. Does you version of history only extend back 9 days? Or did you just read that little tidbit on the Internet then automatically believe it? Because thinking to a step too far for you?

            • +1

              @1st-Amendment: Everyone agreed Biden was too old. Except fanatics like you can't agree anything that doesn't suit your team.

              Anyway, arguing with you is like playing chess with a pigeon. Whatever happens come November, history won't be kind to the stupidity you eagerly buy into.

              • +1

                @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                Everyone agreed Biden was too old.

                So older than Trump right? So when you said "Trump is the oldest presidential candidate in history." You now accept that you were wrong. Again.
                That makes a it clean sweep. Wrong about what a criminal conviction is. Wrong about what fascism is. Wrong about Project 2025. Wrong about the Constitution. Wrong about the Supreme Court. Every contribution you have made here so far has been 100% wrong.

                Anyway, arguing with you is like playing chess with a pigeon

                That is the Dunning Kruger effect. Wrong about everything but still thinking you are winning. Classic…

                • +1

                  @1st-Amendment: Indeed you are a Dunning Kruger exemplar. I'm somehow impressed you know of the phenomenon whilst demonstrating a seemingly unwitting intransigence on all available evidence that the diaper wearing felon wants to jettison democracy. Have a good one, Trumpet.

                  • -1

                    @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                    Indeed you are a Dunning Kruger

                    Wrong about everything but still thinking you are winning. Classic…

                    all available evidence

                    You haven't provided any. The evidence which is all above in black and white shows that you've been wrong about everything you've said.

                    wants to jettison democracy

                    Oh man another clanger, how are you able to do keep doing this? Even a broken clock is right some of the time, you are at another level.
                    So the party that ousted their democratically elected leader in coup, and replaced him without any vote or ballot, that is the 'democracy' you are standing up for?

                    This has been a great experience. I never knew someone so out of touch with reality. You are the new champion.

                    • @1st-Amendment: Parties are entitled to select their candidates however they want. Democracy demands the people select the officeholder. You deny the Jan 6 insurrection happened, you deny Trump demanded that Georgia's secretary of state 'come up with' the votes he needed to win, you deny that Trump is denying an iron clad election loss.

                      Yet you think you have the facts, and that everyone else - and especially those with more education, and higher IQ, than you - are the dumb ones. I feel sorry for people around you. You must make family gatherings intolerable.

                      • @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                        Parties are entitled to select their candidates however they want

                        Yes and they both do that via democratic primary elections according to the party rules.
                        But one party decided to jettison that democratic process and allow a handful of elites in the party to just anointing their chosen person… All those regular Democrat party members who voted against Harris all just got shat on by the elites in the party and you think this is the party that is upholding democracy? If they shit on their own party members, what do you think they will do to the regular people?

                        Do you ever ask yourself how 'weird' it was that Biden just resigned out of the blue, with giving any personal or in-person update at all? Not even on official letterhead? The signature as clearly faked (I used to work in bank where signatures were verified every day and I can tell you as someone who did it for job that that would've failed the test). So the Democrats just deposed a democratically elected candidate, and self-appointed their own person, and you think these people are the 'champions of democracy'?

                        These same 'champions of democracy', instead of challenging their opponent at the ballot box, decided to use the legal system to try and have him put in prison? This is not ringing alarm bells to you about who is really 'jettisoning democracy'?

                        you deny the Jan 6 insurrection happened

                        No insurrection charges have been proven in any court. You seem not not understand how the legal system works. So yet another thing you are clearly wrong about.

                        You can't just wish things to be true, they have to proven to be true. And media lies do not count no matter how many of them you swallow. That is all you bring to table, fake news story after fake news and I've debunked them all.

                        Yet you think you have the facts

                        I present facts rather than just my opinion or regurgitated media headlines. That's where you get confused.
                        There's an easy test for this, you just claimed an insurrection happened, please provide the court transcript where this was proven. You can't because it never happened. The media said it did and you believed it, because that's what gullible people do. But facts are not decided by lying media headlines. Can you provide a single source of information that isn't the media? Join the dots here mate, they are lying to you.

                        that everyone else - and especially those with more education, and higher IQ, than you - are the dumb ones

                        I have no idea what you education level or IQ is, nor made this claim. This comment implies a lot though.

                        If you make obviously false statements, I will correct them.

                        I feel…

                        Facts vs feelings. You really need to learn the difference.

                        • +1

                          @1st-Amendment: Biden resigned, after Democrat voters, lawmakers, and people like you rightly pointed out he wasn't up to it.
                          Then fanatics like you demand he be reinstated lest you don't win. You're pathetic.😂

                        • +1

                          @1st-Amendment:

                          Do you ever ask yourself how 'weird' it was that Biden just resigned out of the blue, with giving any personal or in-person update at all?

                          You can listen to his reason in the address(youtube.com), and any follow up since.

                          The signature as clearly faked (I used to work in bank where signatures were verified every day and I can tell you as someone who did it for job that that would've failed the test).

                          'There's an easy test for this, you just claimed fraud happened, please provide where this was proven. You can't because it never happened.'

                          I present facts rather than just my opinion.
                          You can't just wish things to be true, they have to proven to be true.

                          • -1

                            @Gehirn:

                            You can listen to his reason in the address

                            The link you posted was from before he quit. Did you even watch it? Nothing in it mentions it, which makes it even more suspicious.

                            and any follow up since.

                            Lol, there hasn't been one, that is the 'weird' part.
                            A sitting President literally got taken away, forced to resign under radio silence and hasn't been seen much since, and a successor appointed with any vote. Is there not anything inside you that thinks, that looks a bit 'weird'? We could've just witnessed a coup of a sitting president and everyone just pretends there's nothing to see here? Or is the TDS so deep that the anything to get Orange Man is now acceptable?

                            'There's an easy test for this, you just claimed fraud happened,

                            No I didn't. The words are all up there. I said it's 'clearly faked' - in my opinion as someone who used to check signatures for a job..

                            please provide where this was proven

                            I just gave you my justification. Please learn to read.

                            • @1st-Amendment:

                              The link you posted was from before he quit.

                              I'll admit it was the wrong link. Here(youtube.com) it is, clear reasons, uniting the party to win and younger voices needed.

                              Is there not anything inside you that thinks, that looks a bit 'weird'?

                              Well I believe your dramatisation is a pretty weird view of reality.

                              I just gave you my justification.

                              Yes and is that a fact or opinion?

                              • @Gehirn: The guy is brainwashed. The danger of YouTube algorithms and gullible minds, I guess. Incapable of absorbing reason.

                                • @JohnHowardsEyebrows: Gotta love when people clearly brainwashed by right wing media outlets and never heard a conspiracy theory they didnt like, claim those using facts and critical thinking are living in fantasy land. Its hilarious, yet cringeworthy pathetic at the same time.

                                  The guy above said the insurrection didnt happen because no insurrection charges have been proven in court. Never mind a Federal judge ruled Trump was guilty of inciting an insurrection - those facts dont matter because it doesnt support his brain warped mind. And certainly what people saw with their own eyes should be ignored too, so it fits with his angle.

                                  I blame Murdoch for hollowing out half the populations brains in America and here.

  • +3

    Instant landfill

  • +2

    Seems extremely useful useless

  • +1

    Garbage item and political statements.

  • +5

    OP is persistent I'll give them that much.

    Has posted 146 "deals"… and none of them have really taken off.
    https://www.ozbargain.com.au/user/125482/nodes

    Was due for a win I guess?
    But unfortunately all the plus votes are coming from political voting- not because this is a deal.
    This junk is available at other retailers for the same price… no deal.

    • +4

      Fake News!

      Other websites have higher freight for metropolitan shipping.
      You also don't get a FREE Solar Powered Dancing Cactus.

      Also, just interesting to note, one of our most popular deals was the Solar Powered Dancing Jesus.
      106 Upvotes!

    • +3

      unfortunately all the plus votes are coming from political voting

      Can’t say the same about the negative votes?

      • +2

        Nope. The can also be attributable to the fact this isn't a bargain.

        Same junk doll available elsewhere for same price.

  • +3

    In case you need to tell them apart, the cactus is the green one, the trump one is the orange one.

  • +3

    Is this able to press a keyboard key like a drinking bird so it still looks like im active on teams?

  • -1

    Trigger - it should be a name of a horse but when it comes to stuff like this……….

  • +2

    I did not… have… sexual relations… with that cactus.

    I came for this.

  • +1

    Hey @ArcherVice, is it a free cactus per Trump? Or per order?

    • +1

      Hi There,
      It's per order.

      • Damnit, I was gonna' grab a few and was hoping I got a few Cacti aswell.. 😅

  • +6

    Thanks for the great deal, OP! Keep them coming. Next up, how about a deal on a giggly Kamala Harris?

    • +3

      It's KACKLING KAMALA. 😁

      • +2

        And her cats!!

  • +7

    Must be the revised model

    • matches his expression when he found out he is no longer competing against Biden
    • mouth open ready to inhale more corporate donor money
    • Face when he saw footage of JD Vance and the couch
    • +6

      The rhetoric on the democrat side has reached a new low

      • +3

        Maybe you're right. It's probably Trump demonstrating to Stormy Daniels how he wants her. 🍄

      • +12

        Isn't Newscorp going on about Kamala's laugh?

        If that's not a new low, I don't know what is.

        • +9

          SkyNews in Australia is going at it even harder than Fox News over there. It's such an fascinating window into the minds of the idiots in Australia who idolise Trump. I even saw a few of them suggesting Trump should and would (and could) pull rank and take over Australia back in 2020, that's the kind of dimwits we're dealing with.

  • +4

    i bought 5000 to own the libs

  • Can't wait to have these dancing to the Official Donald Trump Anthem(youtube.com)

  • I can try this as a bid scarer

  • +4

    Classic smooth brain stuff

  • +5

    I’m eagerly awaiting a peter Dutton version powered by mini reactor

    • +2

      There's a DIY version powered by a potato if you find yourself waiting a long time for the reactor version.

    • +6

      See if this were an Australian politician everyone would band together to downvote it to hell. For some reason there are people who view Trump as some sort of stable genius when he can’t even drink water properly.

  • +4

    The polling on this product is 3 to 1, just saying…

    • +2

      We do also sell Poles(smoothsales.com.au) :D

  • +1

    The cactus sounds good, any other bobblehead deals? not interested in USA politics.

  • +1

    Disgusting. You can't pay me enough to have this orange turd placed in my house.

  • +8

    It's a piece of crap. Just like the real thing.

  • +2

    Funny. Trump’s NOT president. Solar powered former guy.

Login or Join to leave a comment