2024 Mazda CX-5 from $37,990 Drive-Away (Save up to $3,134) @ Mazda

4520
2024 Mazda CX-5 from $37,990 Drive-Away (Save up to $3,134) @ Mazda
Go to Deal
lordra on 23/06/2024 - 15:02 mazda.com.au (14768 clicks)
Last edited 24/06/2024 - 12:15 by 2 other users

Looking at how all these car deals are getting over 100+ upvotes, I thought I'd do one myself (please don't flop).

A base-spec Mazda CX-5 now costs less than an entry-level version of the smaller CX-30 with a Vision Technology package.
The biggest savings is on the top-spec CX-5 Akera AWD; discount of (up to) $4,400.
The CX-5 is now about the same cost(ish) as a Kia Sportage.

*depending on where you live.

These are "temporary price reductions"; I don't know how temporary.

Edit:
Mazda also has other models on discount.
Starting from (drive-away)
CX-3: $29,990
Mazda CX-30: $35,990
Mazda 3 hatch and sedan: $32,990
Mazda 6: $37,990
CX-60: $59,990

For ABN Holders:
Select 4x2 BT-50: between $2,063 to $3,438
Select 4x4 BT-50: between $4,813 to $7,563

Automotive Car End of Financial Year Sale Mazda SUV

Related Stores

Mazda
Mazda

Comments

      • educalifa on 23/06/2024 - 22:16

        yeah I'm in the same boat but looking at diesels since work will pay for fuel and I need a car that can tow… the engine on the CX-60 seems to be very decent (6cyl 3.3L TD) but the overall the car is a bit bigger than what I want.

        It's only me, my gf and the dog so that's a lot of empty car to be driving around all year!

        • 1st-Amendment on 24/06/2024 - 08:35
          +1

          It's only me, my gf and the dog so that's a lot of empty car to be driving around all year!

          Similar story, I'd like a small/mid SUV with a torquey engine, and most 4cyls don't cut it unless it's hybrid to get the off-the-line torque boost.
          The Germans do this format (SQ5/ the old GLC43 - new one has gone 4cyl/X3 M40 etc)but you're paying $100k+ for the privilege.
          My ideal car would be an Ioniq5 N but with Hybrid instead of BEV. Hyundai are about to release a 2.5l turbo hybrid which could be the answer.

          • Rimas on 24/06/2024 - 11:42
            +1

            @1st-Amendment: Try Ford Escape. Cracker car. You won't believe Ford could not sell enough of this in AU.

          • educalifa on 24/06/2024 - 13:56

            @1st-Amendment: If they do release the that Ioniq5 I would definitely be interested!

    • W0tZup on 23/06/2024 - 21:26
      +1

      1.6L turbo (80 kW/t) vs CX-5 2.5L turbo (98kW/t)

      The Kia is sluggish and lacks cornering/turning characteristics. Plus the CX-5 engine/transmission is refined whereas KIA’s long term is questionable.

      I disagree on the engine, safety, build/ride quality; Mazda is well refined and will last a long time. KIA is yet to prove itself but it’s getting there.

      • SupeNintendoChalmers on 23/06/2024 - 21:34

        Have you ever driven the Sportage?

        I have a diesel GT-Line and the 2.0l diesel pulls like a train, and its very smooth with its beautiful 8 speed auto.

        A good mate has the GT-Line in the 1.6T and despite the power to to weight ratio it requires very little revs to get going, and the DCT on the 1.6, having an extra gear means that the car doesn't need to rev as hard as the older (though decent) Mazda 6 speeder.

        No way CX-5 ride quality is better, I've had the privilege to drive the CX-5 (non turbo) for extended periods and there is no contest, the Sportage absorbs corrugations better, has less tramlining and feels more secure. That said, I dont think the CX-5 is terrible, its just old and it shows it.

        • W0tZup on 23/06/2024 - 21:54
          +3

          I’m comparing petrol with petrol. Diesel will always have more grunt on the lower revs and hybrids also improve the 0-100.

          The Kia 1.6L turbo (petrol, non hybrid) is ~10s meanwhile CX-5 2.5L turbo is 7.7s 0-100.

          I suspect your friends kia is a petrol hybrid which does 0-100 in ~8s.

          As for the DCT transmission. It’s not tuned well for this vehicle and the turbo makes it worse. It tends to want to sit at higher revs when cruising, lags, and doesn’t know which gear to engage due to the turbo and how much you push the pedal.

          Yes the CX-5 is ageing and the KIA is a good (more modern) alternative but if we’re talking about long term reliability then Mazda wins. The engines/transmission is well refined and the resale value of CX5 in Australia is one of the best.

          • Muscles on 23/06/2024 - 22:13

            @W0tZup: Although the petrol 2.5T has the torque of a diesel, including most of the power within the low end revs.
            I read the kw increases when using premium as well.
            Interesting car

          • tromboc on 24/06/2024 - 08:07

            @W0tZup: CX5 still uses a standard slushbox, when the rest of the world has moved on. It's as unrefined as a gearbox can be in 2024. I might be slightly bitter as our 2020 recently had the gearbox replaced under warranty because it blew seals and destroyed bearings…

            • SupeNintendoChalmers on 24/06/2024 - 11:07

              @tromboc: The CX5 has a decent box, would it help if it had 7 or 8 gear, of course, but its solid.

              • tromboc on 24/06/2024 - 21:28

                @SupeNintendoChalmers: It has some weird direct drive business going on which locks up the torque converter at a certain speed, it's definitely the jerkiest car I've driven around a carpark. One of its least endearing features.

        • payless69 on 24/06/2024 - 09:28
          +1

          Had many rides un ubers with both CX's and Sportages.
          Korea is miles ahead, even Musk is looking to stock nappies with tech help from Germany it is quite a race.
          Japan is better for jelly blossom cruising.

  • cyrax83 on 23/06/2024 - 15:20
    +7

    Shame they got rid of the CX-9. Cx-90 too expensive.
    Decided to look at the Kia Sorrento GT instead

  • donman92 on 23/06/2024 - 15:21
    +12

    May as well sell em cheaper before the EV takeover

      • UltimateAI on 23/06/2024 - 22:47
        +1

        Except those who drive and want to save money. People whine about depreciation, but in reality most of that is behind and it's offset by the real word savings now. (no servicing, charging at home).
        Such an awesome feeling knowing you are going to drive round drip 300km to the country for the cost of peanuts.

        • badjazy on 24/06/2024 - 09:56

          If you want to save money EV is a terrible choice. Get an old second hand reliable car. No EV owner will ever come close in terms of saved money even with cheaper fuel.

          • UltimateAI on 24/06/2024 - 11:27

            @badjazy: Neighbour has one, costs around $10 to charge from home after a 300k trip, costs me about $60. While that's only $50 a trip, it's a massive mindset change.
            No annual servicing (yes you cay pay or get that bundled in) but also time cost.
            No brakes, slightly worse wear on Tyres, mainly due to how you drive.

            • badjazy on 25/06/2024 - 00:31

              @UltimateAI: Idk a lot of 10k cars that can last just as long even if much older too. it would take a crazy amount of time to make up the difference.

      • Nillionaire on 24/06/2024 - 08:47

        Yes, people do. But of course "freedomofspeech" type people don't.

    • commiewealth on 23/06/2024 - 21:01
      +2

      Government mandated EV takeover*

      • frewer on 24/06/2024 - 09:50

        Govern me harder!

        • KSMLJ on 24/06/2024 - 19:06

          As if the government hasn't bent you over enough.

  • Broden on 23/06/2024 - 15:22

    Is a new car ever a bargain? You lose a chunk driving it off the lot.

    Imagine if you bought a house and the moment you put the key in the lock you lose 20% of its value

    • SupeNintendoChalmers on 23/06/2024 - 15:24
      +10

      You kind of do, in the sense that the house itself deteriorates over time. It's the land that rises.

      • Feeblely on 23/06/2024 - 15:25
        +7

        Nothing in a new car rises

        • swiggity123 on 23/06/2024 - 15:30
          +3

          unless its a once in a lifetime "opportunity" where you have a pandemic

        • ilikeit on 23/06/2024 - 15:44
          +2

          Unless you have a desirable car that has extremely limited stock or configuration. For example Toyota Yaris GR

      • WatchNerd on 23/06/2024 - 15:27

        No because tradies wages & materials go up over time hence it will cost more to build the same house in the future.

        • swiggity123 on 23/06/2024 - 15:31

          and you just proved SuperNintedos point…

          • WatchNerd on 23/06/2024 - 15:35

            @swiggity123: Please explain?

            • swiggity123 on 23/06/2024 - 15:38
              +2

              @WatchNerd: To a smaller extent because as a home gets older theres more things to break, go faulty and replace. Hence depreciation goes down in the actual value of the home. Eg. I work at a hospital that is so old and double bricked that any additions to any wiring or plumbing they are better of at knocking it down and building it brand new.

              Literally same thing as a car - older it gets the more it costs to repair and fix.

              This is a general assumption of course.

          • xmail on 23/06/2024 - 15:35
            +2

            @swiggity123: No, he is saying that because it costs considerably more to build something similar, people are willing to spend more to buy an existing house despite it being above the original cost. i.e it doesn't go down in value.

            If car costs were rising 2x every year then you'd also be able to buy a car as an investment and not lose money when you sell it… but that's not the case.

            • greatlamp on 23/06/2024 - 19:44

              @xmail: That situation can arise when the money you use to buy a car loses value faster than a car, like in Argentina for example.

      • Alzori on 23/06/2024 - 17:05
        +2

        With the construction costs heading up, the house price can be going up after purchase too. Friends who are building are being asked to form out more money or accept delays on their new builds currently with the trades shortages.

    • Jimothy Wongingtons on 23/06/2024 - 15:49
      +3

      The week of having a new car is unreal tho, that new car smell is unbeatable and the only thing that comes close is brand new out-of-the-box steam deck vent-ussy.

    • Cluster on 23/06/2024 - 17:33
      +2

      Yes, if you buy a car and then immediately sell it back to the dealer you'll get 20% less.

      Now the question is, has anyone ever done this? I'm sure someone, somewhere has, but 99.999% of buyers wouldn't even contemplate it.

      I bought a new Mazda last month and plan to keep it 8 years. Like I did my previous car that I also bought new. In 8 years I really won't care what it's worth.

    • UltimateAI on 23/06/2024 - 22:48

      While I get and relate, I typically only purchase new and run them into the ground.
      Probably not the most financially savvy move, but excellent peace of mind.

    • Mr Frodo on 24/06/2024 - 06:40

      Isn't that basically stamp duty?

  • Mregmi on 23/06/2024 - 15:23

    The turbo model drinks a lot of fuel, that discount can make up some fuel cost

    • rooster7777 on 23/06/2024 - 18:51
      -2

      adding a turbo with no other factors will reduce fuel consumption. Dunno about the vehicle you're talking about….maybe it has other stuffs in a higher state of tune = stuffing more fuel into the engine regardless of cost to get more power.
      However, if your lead foot gets the urge to drive like a bat out of hell rather than at the same speed as a non turbo model….then your fuel costs rocket. Never been a regen system on a petrol engine.
      Heavy vehicles have turbos primarily to increase efficiency, rather than power.

      • Vaiels on 23/06/2024 - 20:00
        +2

        2L NA 115 kW 6.9L/100km
        2.5L NA 140kW 7.2L/100km
        2.5L turbo 170kW 8.2L/100km
        Pretty average showing. Considering VW is making 235kW from a 2L turbo petrol in the tiguan that drinks 8.8L/100km (it is 98RON though lol)

  • ChibsQT on 23/06/2024 - 15:25
    +2

    Thanks for posting, bought 3

    • DaveD on 23/06/2024 - 15:32
      +12

      But 5 was on discount

  • Bii on 23/06/2024 - 15:25
    +5

    Remember people had to wait for over 1 year for their CX5 during COVID.

    • tromboc on 24/06/2024 - 08:10

      If you were picky with colour… We chose ours off the lot in late 2020.

  • onlinepred on 23/06/2024 - 15:26
    +7

    The thing with the CX5, is it's not that roomy at all. Better to go Mazda 6 wagon if you are on the Mazda train.

    • Rimas on 23/06/2024 - 16:13
      +1

      It's as big as a Cerato from the inside. The 6 is not much roomier either only the wagon has a more practical boot. Mazda's are generally too squishy for their body size.

      • onlinepred on 23/06/2024 - 16:42

        Agreed. I used to love Mazda, but the last decade has been pretty disappointing.

    • seanfoite on 23/06/2024 - 16:23
      +1

      Yeah i would agree. The rear space is not huge and the head room isn't great for adults. I still love my CX5 though, its a great car to drive and super reliable.

    • UltimateAI on 23/06/2024 - 22:50

      Depends on age, I have a 6 but have driven a CX5 and the CX5 is far easier to get in and out and much better visibility.
      I wanted to upgrade, but inside just feels so dated compared to a modern EV, just couldn't do it. Turbo model is pretty expensive to run though.

      • onlinepred on 24/06/2024 - 06:04

        Yes but not easier for kids, less space and smaller boot.

        Agreed other points. Model y is a great option at the moment

        • UltimateAI on 24/06/2024 - 06:15

          Thanyou, I didn’t actually check the boot space of the CX5 and I struggle with the 6.

  • SpaceNinja on 23/06/2024 - 15:31
    +16

    These cars are so, so far behid the curve that its not even funny.

  • sunyuanxin on 23/06/2024 - 15:35

    My biggest impression when driving a Mazda is: why do they make the driver's side mirror a magnifying glass?! Does this really make it safer?

    • TEER3X on 23/06/2024 - 17:46
      +1

      So you can burn ants while driving.

      • Wizballs on 23/06/2024 - 20:05

        It needs to be at least three times bigger for this to work.

    • Tim Mc on 24/06/2024 - 17:36

      Mazda drivers become conditioned into relying on sensors when merging lanes, the reversing camera when reversing, or pressing the View cameras button when trying to see directly in front of the car (e.g. short pedestrians).

      I got used to the mirrors, or not using them, after a month.

  • bargain6969 on 23/06/2024 - 15:35
    +7

    Current gen came out in 2017, definitely in a need of a facelift

  • Lit Homie on 23/06/2024 - 15:38
    +5

    People are still buying cars like this in 2024?

    • benjoon on 23/06/2024 - 15:41

      Do you mean like this oppposed to electric?

      I believe only 25% of new vehicle purchases are EV's

      • Lit Homie on 23/06/2024 - 15:53
        +12

        oh copy paste design, very bland, no improvements and yes also not ev but that's fine. Just saying i think these companies need to work harder they are putting out same thing out every year just changing the date and somehow people are buying it again

      • freedomofspeech on 23/06/2024 - 19:42

        10% are

    • Duece1995 on 23/06/2024 - 18:12
      +1

      Unless you want an electric car that will be worthless in 10 years.

      • Wizard on 23/06/2024 - 18:41
        +4

        EV's wont be worthless. You will be able to sell them at a scrap yard for $100.

      • rooster7777 on 23/06/2024 - 18:52
        +6

        a comment likely to age like green cheese

        • choofa on 23/06/2024 - 19:15
          +1

          10+ year old Nissan leaf’s are becoming much sort after and still selling for over $10k in good condition

          • easternculture on 23/06/2024 - 19:21
            +1

            @choofa: Battery replacement is $10k. That's why

            • greatlamp on 23/06/2024 - 19:48
              +4

              @easternculture: The point is the leaf is literally the worst case scenario and is still worth what you would expect for a car that age. A modern EV isn't going to have such low range after 10 years.

    • UltimateAI on 23/06/2024 - 22:52

      I don't think they are, visited a few other dealers and the CX5 appeared the only medium SUVs with plenty of stock.
      Perhaps more room to negotiate? But usually not during these deals.

  • mikelp on 23/06/2024 - 15:40
    +3

    Cx5 is very old car haven’t been updated for over decade.

    • Save Medicare on 24/06/2024 - 09:53

      Wow Mike what's it like over there in 2027? Have the interest rates come down yet? Any stock tips?

  • WwDesi on 23/06/2024 - 15:40
    +3

    I would rather get a Outlander

    • Signet on 23/06/2024 - 17:43
      +1

      This is the way!

      Better value, longer warranty, transparent servicing cost, PHEV option

  • igerstep on 23/06/2024 - 15:40
    +2

    Incredibly outdated platform.

    • Mregmi on 23/06/2024 - 15:46
      +4

      Still looks way better than the most

      • ilikeit on 23/06/2024 - 15:51
        +4

        It’s not bad looking, but it looks outdated. The simplicity of the design will probably help it long term. Very modern and edgy designs often date quickly, like some of the OTT Chinese cars.

    • Brianqpr on 30/06/2024 - 09:21

      MG cars are selling very well despite being very outdated and boxy looking.

  • paloverde88 on 23/06/2024 - 15:41

    Only 17" loys sigh

    • Presence on 23/06/2024 - 16:05
      +10

      Why would you want bigger than 17" on a family SUV? Tyres cost more and ride quality is worse. This thing is no sports car no matter what you do.

      • rooster7777 on 23/06/2024 - 18:54

        Something about fashion stakes…. what a car "speaks to people"…. dearly beloved by the tyre industry!

  • IBendTrolls on 23/06/2024 - 15:49
    -1

    Saving is up to $3,134. If paid cash they will round up to $3,135. Very sneaky, they are aiming at 1 cent! So not a good deal.

  • I Smell Pennies on 23/06/2024 - 15:49
    +1

    I have little interest in cars but +1 purely for the first paragragh!

    • Jimothy Wongingtons on 23/06/2024 - 15:58
      +1

      I forecast over 100 updoots by Monday morning.

    • lordra on 23/06/2024 - 16:49

      Thanks you guys! Means a lot! 😍

  • vash12 on 23/06/2024 - 15:53
    +2

    The petrol variant is reliable but gutless.

    Hybrid/EV, turbo or diesel is the better choice.

  • hopper on 23/06/2024 - 15:59
    +5

    MX5 baby

    • easternculture on 23/06/2024 - 16:19
      +2

      Just in time for mid life crisis

      • Cluster on 23/06/2024 - 17:34
        +7

        Buy the car you want. Don't give a flying F what anyone else thinks. It's your money, not theirs'.

      • onlinepred on 23/06/2024 - 18:08
        +1

        That sucks it takes you half your life to get a fun car.

        • easternculture on 23/06/2024 - 18:57
          -3

          Always see mid aged guys with custom plates driving mx5's trying to impress younger females

          BTW, your Username is suss AF

          • onlinepred on 23/06/2024 - 19:37

            @easternculture: Well you seem to notice, must like the look of the mx5 to pay that much attention. Are you a young female? One day mate, one day you will trade the sport utility vehicle in for a sports car.

            I feel like most old people I see are driving SUVs.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join