Moderation on "What Is a Woman?" Post

On recommendation from a moderator, I'm writing here to discuss/clarify on what I feel is inconsistent and insufficient moderation on this controversial post.
Please be civil in these comments - I don't want arguments, and am posting this in good faith in order to hopefully improve the site - not start fights.

There are two main issues I wanted to bring up here:
1) Inconsistency with deal being allowed to be posted in the first place
2) Genuinely problematic comments not being moderated effectively enough on a post which is clearly going to generate them.

Inconsistency with deal being allowed to be posted

The reason that a moderator gave in the comments as to why this deal was allowed is a "documentary which is not usually free thus meets the standards for a deal".

This inspired me to search for an almost identical circumstance (but intentionally not a political/inflammatory one). I truly posted what I would perceive a deal in the same vein. It was a documentary about YouTuber MrBeast, which has been professionally created by streaming service Curiosity Stream. It is available paid on their streaming service, and even has an official IMDB page.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt17008854/

Curiosity Stream has uploaded this for free to their YouTube channel - a documentary which is usually paid for, which is now available for free, thus qualifying for a deal under posting guidelines.
My post was immediately moved to the forums, then removed, and I even received an account warning for posting. ("Trolling level 1")

I personally see no differences between these two posts - this I Am A Woman documentary has been posted specifically to generate comments and outrage, and is by its nature no less genuine a documentary than the MrBeast one on Curiosity Stream's subscription service.

This makes me feel like the reason it has been kept up is for some sort of political point, or moderation bias. I'd love some clarification for whether this is not the case - but I do not see how my own post could have been seen as "trolling" or "inflammatory", when this original post is arguably one of the most inflammatory "troll" posts that has ever been posted on the site. Which brings me to point 2….

Problematic Comments on the Post

When the media posts an article that could attract inflammatory comments, due to the 2021 High Court ruling puting the onus on publications for comments published on their website, they ensure that they have full moderation capabilities to ensure there are no hateful comments. When this moderation capability is no longer available, comments are closed, either temporarily while they catch up, or for good.
However, given there has been moderation for the duration this post has been up (eg. on my post), there has been some level of moderation capacity during this time, despite it being Friday/Saturday.

There are quite a few substantially hateful comments in this thread. I am specifically talking about comments that are genuinely hateful.

Probably the biggest is there are a large number perpetuating the conspiracy theory that the LGBTQIA+ community as a whole grooms children.. This is a view with neo-Nazi roots, and is well documented.
I mean, there is a comment up there right now saying "Destroy pedo freaks", a slogan that the neo-nazi group recently held up in Melbourne.
This is absolutely not the only comment that is blatantly hateful, there are many like it there. Perhaps others can point out the worst offenders. (EDIT: Removed ~2.5hrs after commented - plenty more with similar rhetoric that have been up for a long time)

If it is OzBargain's decision that posts like these are allowed to be up there - they absolutely need to make sure that the comments published are not hateful, and are well moderated. Otherwise it certainly comes across as acceptance of these comments. This is not very welcoming of LGBTQIA+ members of this website.
It was clear from the get go that the decision to keep this post up would require incredible amounts of moderation, given it was posted with the intention of aggravation, and keeping comments such as this one up there is upsetting to see that OzBargain is happily publishing these comments.

TLDR: I am disappointed in OzBargain's decision to leave this post up, their decision to give me an account warning for a far less inflammatory version of the same type of post, and the fact that there are many hateful comments rooted in neo-Nazi ideology currently on the website, still not moderated. To be clear - I am not talking about all comments in favour of this as a deal, I am talking very specifically about the blatantly hateful comments.

Comments

    • Voting Guidelines

      Specifically, this part:

      Inappropriate uses of negative vote
      Any negative vote that falls into any of these reasons will be revoked by a moderator. Negative votes for any other reason will not be removed by a moderator. These are verbatim phrases.

      No explanation of the vote:
      “Not a bargain”

  • +4

    I had no opinion either way on the trans community. Decided to watch the documentary on the weekend after seeing all the comments on the deal. Still have no opinion after watching it.

    Fools become obvious when they talk nonsense and others with something reasonable to say will gain traction. I would like to think we live in a free society and unfortunatley this means feelings will sometimes be hurt. I'm not always happy with some of the chat here but everyone is entitled to an opinion.

    • -3

      I would much rather listen to an informed opinion.

      And I certainly do not understand why some people feel the need to broadcast their uninformed opinion.

      • +2

        Such is the beauty of free speech and open discourse. If you don't agree with someone else's opinion you're free to ignore it or challenge it. I couldn't stand a lot of the antivax nonsense and the various conspiracy theories which were tethered to it but I'd much prefer a society with freedoms being exercised than a totalitarian/authoritarian one. It's bizarre that so many on the far left crave for censorship and authoritarianism - why is this the case?

        • +1

          Australia is a signatory to the international charter of human rights. We do not, however, have a guaranteed right to freedom of speech.
          For proof of that, see libel law, official secrets act. and even more recent legislation making ideation — never mind vocalisation — which can see people imprisoned indefinitely.

          If you want freedom of speech, go to a country that offers it!

          • @Speckled Jim: "If you want freedom of speech, go to a country that offers it!"

            Wonder why ppl who believe /say this never do?

            • @Protractor: The eternal desire to impose their beliefs onto others? By taking up the cudgel of oppressed <insert racial / socio-economic groups> we have otherwise content people who wouldn't know hardship until their gambling money's down to $20, doing activisms.
              Life's just an empty, unfulfilling circle-jerk unless we have something to fight for, yeah?

              When I was a boy, political correctness had a simpler name: respect. There was even a song about it.

              • @Speckled Jim: When I was a boy I was surrounded by people who came back from wars, believing this was the last one, and the 'fair go' would never fade away.
                I guess they never factored in the rapacious stupidity and default violence of the gene pool to our right.

        • +2

          The point I was making is that I’m interested in considered opinions. I found very few considered or informed opinions in the ‘what is a woman’ thread. I’m not arguing against the existence of that deal just suggesting I wouldn’t look there to form my own opinion (because many comments appear to me to be uninformed and not considered).

          I would actually suggest that many from the right crave the censorship.

          • +1

            @Eeples:

            I would actually suggest that many from the right crave the censorship.

            Totally true, at least when you look at Australians politics both subtle and overt - raids on media, anti-bullying to unmask trolls, secret trials, laws that biased toward friendly media, abandoning Australian citizens, combined departments.

      • I certainly do not understand why some people feel the need to broadcast their uninformed opinion.

        Why are you here doing it then ?

        • +3

          I was speaking more generally.

          Social media (it seems to me) has given a loud voice to some very ignorant people.

  • We had a request of some stats about if new accounts were voting for this deal. The answer is no.

    Deal posted June 2, 9:34pm

    Accounts created within a couple of days of posting

    User Account Created Voted at
    kietory 19 hours 53 min ago 19 hours 53 min ago
    CaptainBarbel 03/06/2023 03/06/2023 - 11:55
    AussieBloke 03/06/2023 03/06/2023 - 14:22
    Raphete 03/06/2023 03/06/2023 - 21:01
    Patto55 02/06/2023 02/06/2023 - 23:17
    Beardy 02/06/2023 03/06/2023 - 08:16
    Cpt Kirk 30/05/2023 02/06/2023 - 22:08

    7 voters out of 1019 voters.

    You can look at the full data on Pastebin (too big to share in comment). All of this is publicly accessible if you want to bother clicking on everyone accounts.

    • -2

      thanks @neil. perhaps majority of people on ozb agree on the simple definition of a woman - an adult female human.

    • "Accuse your opponent of what you are doing, to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt"

      Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals

      Looks like the doco haters can't accuse ozbargain of sockpuppeting/astroturfing to artifically boost visibility.

  • +1

    NEWS:
    Popular Australian shopping site Ozbargain has come out swinging in direct competition with the 'members only', In The News lounge-areas over at Whirlpool Forum.
    "Free, as in speech?"
    "No free as in free-for-all"

    Gotta keep them turnstiles spinning.

    • Are people on whirlpool talking about the ozbargain controversy? Where?

    • +2

      I think the phrase 'slow news day' just found a new definition :)

    • +1

      like one person who implied another user was part of a foreign interference operation because they claimed not to know about the television show Home and Away

      Does anyone know which was this comment that ‘implied that’???

      Hahahah ‘foreign interference operation’
      I am a recent immigrant lol. Wow, the arrogance on these people to not even have considered that given how bloody ‘diverse’ Australian has gotten

      • +2

        ‘foreign interference operation’
        I am a recent immigrant

        You're not suppose to confess that easily ;)

        • Nyet, Dobry vecher..

          Btw I just had a quick glance of that ‘deal’ post and there wasn’t any user that implied anything of that sorts…
          That journalist just made that bit up to suggest his BS?

      • Yes, based on the questions we received from the reporter and some chatter on Twitter that the voting looked suspicious, I think some people thought there was a bunch of US accounts voting up the deal. This is why I posted the table above showing 7 voters out of 1019 voters were new accounts.

        • +1

          Clearly this an obvious flaw in Ozb upvoting and definition of deals.
          It's being gamed. Obviously

          • @Protractor: Sarcasm, I trust? Can't be sure these days

            • @bargaino: I'll make it easy. Not sarcasm.
              If I could write it in braille I would.

              • +2

                @Protractor: Why can't you accept that people honestly thought this was a good deal?
                I watched it because of this.
                I would disagree with the author on healthcare, gun control, abortion, gay marriage, etc, all those US conservative issues. But he presents a very good argument in this case.

                I don't expect you to agree, but why can't you accept other people's views as valid?

                • @bargaino: Because I don't expect you to agree, but why can't you accept other people's views as valid?

      • For anyone interested, the home and away discussion: https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/13838548/redir

        • +1

          Good grief that thread brought out some loonies. I'm surprised such personal attacks were left up. But that's a good system. Better to leave the insults showing with down votes, than to cancel them.

          The moderation system here works far better that most others imho.

        • The ones replying there are always the ones quick to shit on everyone else's deals. No wonder they're froot loops.

    • Woah… Scotty's name is actually Scott?!

      • +1

        The first letter of my surname is "Y" hence ScottY. I thought most people use their real name on the Internet, aren't they, Mr. Austria Bargain?

        • The first letter of my surname is "Y" hence ScottY.

          Mind blown 🤯

    • +3

      As I predicted a few days ago, the news media has latched onto the ozbargain doco issue.

      Absolutely typical left-wing journalist activist hit piece. My biggest criticism of this article is that it is completely formulaic: Matt Walsh bad, doco "transphobic" (just your opinion), ozbargain bad, ozbargain commenters nazis, etc).

      Yang dismissed claims by some users that there had been inauthentic behaviour — like one person who implied another user was part of a foreign interference operation because they claimed not to know about the television show Home and Away — by saying the website showed that most people responding were established OzBargain members.

      Is this some unintentional left-wing racism? Make up your own mind, the home and away discussion starts here: https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/13838548/redir

      • -1

        I'll give credit to Crikey though for leaving comments open so they can't isolate themselves completely into their echo chamber. I'm still going to archive the comments though in case change their mind. Be sure to check out the """"""journalist"""""'s
        definition of woman.

        29 COMMENTS
        Most voted
        Woke Woman
        7 hours ago
        Thanks Cam. I’d only heard about this outfit recently and now I know to avoid it.

        2
        The Oracle
        4 hours ago
        It’s a great Doco, much see viewing
        Watch the Wokies squirm when they cant even answer a basic easy question.

        2
        Munin
        3 hours ago
        Reply to
        The Oracle
        Unfortunately they won’t watch it, despite needing to do so more than normal people.

        0
        Les Malo
        8 hours ago
        This documentary was free on Twitter over the weekend. I watched it and thought it was a well-made, fair and respectful take on this polarising subject. It’s always good to see both sides.

        0
        Munin
        4 hours ago
        Reply to
        Les Malo
        That is transphobic – there is ONLY one side coz…reasons.

        -1
        Nigel Rawlins
        9 hours ago
        Your headline says it all: ‘OzBargain war breaks out over transphobic documentary ‘deal’’ You used the word transphobic, so, please tell us whether you have watched the documentary and whether you still think it transphobic? I watched it and thought it revealed some damning indictments of the people pushing for young people to take dangerous drugs and undergo horrific mutilations to their bodies. Please tell us Cam, what is a woman? Or is it transphobic to ask?

        -2
        Hamilyn
        8 hours ago
        Reply to
        Nigel Rawlins
        Agree Nigel. Thanks for posting. Yes exactly! What exactly is transphobic about stating scientific biological and observable fact?

        -5
        drsmithy
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        Nigel Rawlins
        It’s a piece of media created to stir up fear, hatred and discrimination against transsexuals by someone with a long history of doing so, for no other reason except because of his feels.

        Transphobia is its raison d’etre.

        6
        Privileged Starvation
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        drsmithy
        Indeed. These people never mention the far greater number of cis people that seek labiaplasty, breast reductions or implants, rhinoplasty, pec implants, etc. If they’re so concerned why are they totally silent on all the other cosmetic surgeries?

        -1
        drsmithy
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        Privileged Starvation
        They also often claim their concern is for the rights and safety of “real women”, yet are typically (as in this case) raving misogynists with gender stereotyped views that could be most politely described as anachronistic and rigid.

        3
        Privileged Starvation
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        drsmithy
        oh yes, most of the people they harass in toilets are cis women that don’t fit gender stereotypes

        3
        Robin
        4 hours ago
        Reply to
        Privileged Starvation
        That is possibly the most irrelevant argument I have ever seen in any context.

        -1
        Munin
        4 hours ago
        Reply to
        Robin
        It’s a speciality of P/S.

        -1
        Munin
        4 hours ago
        Reply to
        Privileged Starvation
        Just guessin’ but probably because they are stupid adults making stupid choices – ain’t freedumb grand!

        -1
        Privileged Starvation
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        drsmithy
        they also tend to support dehumanisation of intersex kids and encourage surgeries on intersex babies because their ideology does not allow for variations of sex characteristics.

        3
        Munin
        3 hours ago
        Reply to
        drsmithy
        “Transphobia is its raison d’etre.”
        Please explain.

        -1
        drsmithy
        2 hours ago
        Reply to
        Munin
        It exists because of transphobia, and to perpetuate it.

        Cannot explain any more clearly.

        0
        Mel Campbell
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        Nigel Rawlins
        It always puzzles me that transphobes can’t just own their transphobia. If you literally reject the idea that the social category of gender (e.g. woman) can exist separately to the biological category of sex (e.g. female), you reject transgender people a priori and believe they should not exist.

        That’s what transphobia is, but transphobes always seem super keen to avoid being called transphobic. It’s almost like on some level they accept that wanting a particular group of people not to exist is cruel and hateful.

        4
        Privileged Starvation
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        Mel Campbell
        And always aligns with sexist ideals – trans women are declared to be predators simply for being trans and trans men are viewed as perpetual children. At it’s core is a hatred of gender nonconforming people generally. They promote the parental and societal rejection of all kids that don’t fit gender stereotypes, not just trans kids.

        1
        drsmithy
        2 hours ago
        Reply to
        Privileged Starvation
        And as I’ve said before, it’s kind of surreal to see these “arguments” rolled out again when they were used the same ways about homosexuals decades ago (gays are going to assault you in the toilet, want to get near to your kids because they’re paedophiles, etc).

        Does make it quite clear that the real issue is not fitting into the nice easy buckets of “boy” and “girl”, though.

        0
        Woke Woman
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        Mel Campbell
        Yes. I have also thought the same thing about racists. I wonder if it might boil down to the simple fact that human beings aren’t born hating so there is always something innate hate mongering has to resist.

        1
        Cam Wilson AUTHOR
        Cam Wilson
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        Nigel Rawlins
        Hi Nigel, I am a tech reporter reporting on the broader controversy so I referenced appropriate critiques of the documentary if you’re interested in the evidence for this assertion. However, since you asked, a simple definition is a woman is someone who identifies as one. Thanks!

        2
        Nigel Rawlins
        7 hours ago
        Reply to
        Cam Wilson
        thank you for your reply, I think it was worth watching though.

        0
        Cam Wilson AUTHOR
        Cam Wilson
        4 hours ago
        Reply to
        Nigel Rawlins
        Not a worry, always happy to chat about my reporting.

        1
        Robin
        4 hours ago
        Reply to
        Cam Wilson
        An even simpler one is that a woman is a person born female. People born with penises are not women. Even if their penises have been cut off.

        3
        martz
        1 hour ago
        Reply to
        Robin
        Everyone I know was born a baby.

        0
        Munin
        4 hours ago
        Reply to
        Cam Wilson
        Any word on whether those identifying as Napoleon are really little Corsican warmongers?

        1
        Munin
        3 hours ago
        Reply to
        Cam Wilson
        You have previously claimed (to believe) that men give birth which is even crazier than the statement above.

        1
        Shane Filorgy
        14 minutes ago
        Reply to
        Cam Wilson
        That is a simply absurd definition.

        • credit to Crikey though for leaving comments open so they can't isolate themselves completely into their echo chamber. I'm still going to archive the comments

          Their comments aren’t really ‘open’ open.
          You need be a paid subscriber to be able to comment there.

          I still can’t believe that he’s lied about the ‘foreign intervention’ suggestion when literally on one’s said that.
          He’s disingenuously added that in there to discredit the whole post and it’s overwhelmingly positive reception from the public.

          Imagine if it was Sky news that did that, the libs here would go absolutely bonkers.

          • +1

            @Gervais fanboy: Pay for the privilege of sharing an opinion on crikey? 🤮

            But at least they can't completely dismiss opposing comments. After all,they are genuine paying subscribers. What are they gonna do? Ban their customers and go bankrupt like vice etc?

        • +1

          Crikey are a joke.

          Cam Wilson is probably ahead of his time. Other journos scour Reddit, thoughit won't be long until they pick up on Ozbargain and construct 'articles' out of forum posts.

      • +1

        Absolutely typical left-wing journalist activist hit piece.

        Can we please stop the tribal attacks?
        Matt Welsh is right, Crikey is left, so what?
        Is it too much to ask for a civilised discussion?
        By all means point out what Crikey did wrong, and I'll probably agree.

  • +1

    Great plan to expand membership. Allow controversial poll, and let socail and MS media do the rest.
    Ka'ching.

    Expect more conflict, more hate driven posts and less focus on bargains .

    • +1

      🎻
      Bottle those tears

    • The negs trying to suffocate the obvious truth as per usual. Another major flaw of this so called level playing field

      • +1

        Hi IH Free

        • -1

          lol, I bet you a $100 that whoever it is, it’s not @ihfree that’s negged ya..

        • +1

          Haha. Not this time. Here's proof.

  • +5

    I'm genuinely surprised that the ozbargain admins stood their ground. I was half expecting them to back down, delete the post and apologise.

    Give a few days and I promise the trans activists will find a new target/controversy to latch onto and the ozbargain controversy will be forgotten. Yesterday it was Harry Potter game bad, today ozbargain bad, tomorrow something else will be bad.

    Remember to never apologise. Apologies to leftist activists is like blood to piranhas.

    Also it's not a direct comparison but I don't see very many people demanding censorship of a trump-hater book: https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/779260?page=1#comment

    To the OP: your post makes you sound like a Karen demanding to see the manager of ozbargain for some minor perceived slight.

    • +1

      I'm genuinely surprised that the ozbargain admins stood their ground. I was half expecting them to back down, delete the post and apologise.

      They followed the guidelines. Otherwise it sets the precedent where anything we disagree with should be removed, regardless of meeting the requirements of a deal or not. The content of the deal is irrelevant.

      • -2

        No They don't. The MrBeast documentary post was deleted.

        • Because they followed guidelines. Always free is not a bargain.

          • -1

            @Clear: But it is not always free though. What's the prove that it is always free?

              • @Clear: If that was really the case, then the reason why the post is taken down should not be "trolling" and instead it should just be moved to forum.

                From the OP:

                Curiosity Stream has uploaded this for free to their YouTube channel - a documentary which is usually paid for, which is now available for free, thus qualifying for a deal under posting guidelines.
                My post was immediately moved to the forums, then removed, and I even received an account warning for posting. ("Trolling level 1")

                The release date of that movie is Oct 2021, the youtube video was uploaded on Mar 2022. So there were few months of period that it was not free.

                • @leiiv: Posting an always free documentary in response to a temporarily free documentary that the OP made very very clear they don't like is blatantly trolling. Like come on really don't play dumb. That's not going to work here.

                  Posting always free content and trolling is against the rules. There's no way around it.

                  • -2

                    @Clear: I beg to differ. The bigger trolling is the "What is a woman" post. There is no entertainment nor knowledge value in that content. And just because it was just made free recently, does not mean it will not always be free from now on, just like the MrBeast doco.

                    • +1

                      @leiiv:

                      I beg to differ.

                      Then go argue with the mods about it.

                      I personally didn't like the original doco either and nowhere have I shown any sign of support for it. All I made was the point that it was allowed as per the rules. My feelings are not the rules. If my feelings were the rules I'd have Aldi posts banned for the scum bag tactics they do against local brands.

    • +3

      Yeah I was quite proud of our mods tbh.

      It's nice to see integrity in this day and age.

  • -5

    Precedent was set on these forums long before this festering Trojan Horse was regurgitated.

  • -1

    What is a woman documentary was viewed hundreds of millions of times in a few days, and was making headlines.
    There is clearly an appetite from a quiet monitory for that sort of content.

    You cherry picked an indie YouTube tier production to make a political point. Do you want me to start posting links to "normally patreon only" wood working videos? No, it gums up Oz bargain

    Moderators need to ensure that this website maintains a certain level of quality. We cannot have every single 1 cent saving or unknown, unpopular service posted. Users are very good at self regulating for duplicate or "non" deals

    • -2

      What is a woman documentary was viewed hundreds of millions of times in a few days, and was making headlines.

      Not because the 'quiet minority' agreed with the views of the creator but because it's controversial, controversy attracts attention - hence click bait exists.

    • Then why not just let the community decide on that deal (with their votes) instead of removing it? The "bias" is very obvious from the perspective of a politically neutral person.

  • I do agree that the definition of woman is an adult female human. But I can say that the doco itself is created to generate controversy, hence a troll post, subjectively. Even the title is made like that. Why is it "What is a woman"? What about "What is a man?". It is like asking "what is a wave?", "what is a particle?", "what is light", then talks about something different just to advance own's agenda.

    I do think both the "What is a woman" and the "MrBeast" documentaries should not be removed as they both meet the standards for the deal.
    If the mods do not agree, can we at least have a poll to show that the community indeed supports such kind of decision?

    • -1

      The creator of the doco choose the title "What is a Woman" and in so doing, destroyed any sense of impartiality or objectivity right there.
      If they were fair-dinkum, the title "What is Gender" or something along those lines would lend credibility.

      But then very early on the narration states "I like to make sense of things". Well, someone should teach young padawan that not everything in life can be boiled down to binary states, as much as their limited capacity may demand such simplicity.

      Nor can everything be explained. But they know that only too well, given they can't explain how the universe is ~6000 years old when all scientific evidence says otherwise.

      So what we have in the gender issue is this: medical science is again challenging the comfort of binary genders as written in old religious texts.
      It's really as simple as that!

    • why are you still bothered by this? move on….

  • I think this speaks to the broader issue with society now

  • -1

    Hi, so that was my 'destroy pedo freaks' comment that was deleted by the mods.

    I stand by it since I was forced by an older male neighbor and told it was ok and 'normal' after my head was pushed down there when I was really young.

    I didn't like it and I just hate anything with at all with lgtq and sex

    • Sorry that that happened to you. Do you think it would be okay to make such a comment targeted at a church where the same things happened to children, but not at the actual perpetrators to anyone involved or part of that church community?

      • +1

        Abuse occurs in any environment where a sense of trust is established and there is a power imbalance (or a perceived one).

        These hypocrites should read up on the Skopsty religious fanatics and their gender-bending ways.
        Orthodox Christians 🤦‍♂️

        • +1

          And certainly awful things still happening in all kinds of institutions, religious or otherwise by people of any gender or sexual orientation.

      • -2

        Hardly that bad of a comment. Seen a few priests and pedo "jokes" around here.

Login or Join to leave a comment