• expired

2018 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLX Automatic $44,990 Driveaway + Free $2,000 Fuel Card @ Mitsubishi Motors

531

Came across the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLX 5 seater model in Automatic for $44,990 Driveaway. It also comes with a free $2,000 fuel voucher. Most of us savvy OzBargainers should be able to negotiate a bit more on this price.

It comes with Mitsubishi's 5 year warranty, 4 year road side assistance and 3 years capped price servicing included.

Normally this car is priced at for $46,000 (without any on-roads cost - registration, stamp duty etc).

Related Stores

Mitsubishi Motors
Mitsubishi Motors

closed Comments

  • +3

    When first impressions count..

    • +1

      A Pajero for all the pajeros out there.

  • +28

    One of the ugliest cars in the world

    • +8

      It's all personal taste, but I agree.
      Closely followed by the BMW X6.

      • +1

        Fiat Multipla

      • +3

        X6 is uglier and I don't even need to look at this ;)

    • +11

      Front is pretty mediocre bland but that rear is absolutely atrociously horrendous. What on earth were they thinking?

      https://inm-baobab-prod-eu-west-1.s3.amazonaws.com/public/in…

      • +1

        You wanted to say what on Earth were they smoking? :)

      • +6

        Looks like it's crying…

      • +2

        yes, my 6yr old told me he does not want to see the back of the car because its crying… hehehe

      • yeah, don't know what they were thinking! I reckon the non-sport Pajeros have a better rear.
        https://www.mitsubishi-motors.com.au/uploads/vehicles/pajero…

      • Looks worse than a prius

    • +10

      the whole Mitsubishi range is ugly lol

    • -2

      And Volvo XC and CRV and the reasons : it would be a very expensive parts to replace when accidents happened and that’s how Mitsubishi Volvo and CRV can make more money :)

    • +4

      As ugly as a bag full of scott morris'

      • Which one ugliest?

    • +2

      Honestly I was like "ugly car"? It doesn't look that bad, but then i looked at the rear….yup

      • Looks like a drunk disgruntled designer drew something half passable and spilled the rest of the beer over the rear perspective page. Red ink bled all over that page and the decision makers couldn't wait to get out of that room and okayed everything.

    • I…… kinda like it…..

    • Mazda 121 bubble clear winner

  • +3

    Oh they're still in business

    • -1

      Wow why shouldn't they be? They have an excellent engineering team.

      Don't see Hyundai or Kia being able to build Lancer evos

      • +7

        They have

        Had*

        They built Evos..
        Everything should be in past tense

        • +5

          Just to add, Hyundai now builds the i30N, and Kia the Stinger. While Mitsubishi builds… Umm, the mirage?

          While the Evos were good cars, they required premium petrol (98 RON IIRC?), AND required to be serviced every 7500 KMs. No wonder it's history.

        • +1

          @CocaKoala: And the market has shifted quite a bit. It's all high powered hot hatches now.

        • @Rizflip: Which market are you talking about? I know in Australia, the market is dominated by utes - Hilux and Ranger.

        • +1

          @Rizflip: The WRX Sti was the Evo's chief competition and it hasn't gone anywhere. As a matter of fact, the WRX has gone in the exact opposite direction and does not offer a hatchback variant now, but is selling well and good.

        • @edfoo: I meant the performance car market. Of course in the normal vehicle sales, Hilux and the Ranger are killing it.

        • @CocaKoala: Yeah I know the WRX and the Civic Type R still exist. You rarely see the WRX on the roads though (compared to the Golf R, Audi S3, Hyundai i30N, Renault Megane RS etc)

        • @Rizflip:

          You rarely see the WRX on the roads though (compared to the Golf R, Audi S3, Hyundai i30N, Renault Megane RS etc)

          I don't think so. Do you have any data to backup your claim, for example, that the Golf R outsells the WRX?

        • +2

          @CocaKoala: Funnily, you'd rather be seen in a Kia or Hyundai nowadays considering that driving a WRX or Evo makes people think you're a try-hard westie wannabe gangster.

        • @CocaKoala: I don't know if either of these statements are worthy of any praise. Dropping the hatchback from the lineup was an objectively bad thing and the STI may still be around, but it's old now (and AFAIK won't be getting any substantial upgrades till 2020).

          To be honest, both Subaru and Mitsubishi have become uninteresting brands from an enthusiast perspective. When Volvo starting getting cool with it's turbo 5, straight 6 and Yamaha V8s a decade ago Subaru stepped in and filled the 'boring' void.

        • @CocaKoala:

          Hyundai now builds the i30N

          Dude, don't say it, I got nowhere to hide my erection

        • +1

          @imurgod:

          Funnily, you'd rather be seen in a Kia or Hyundai nowadays considering that driving a WRX or Evo makes people think you're a try-hard westie wannabe gangster

          Not me though, and I don't really think too much about what people have to think about me. Especially, those who think that they could know something about me based on the car I drive, I do not care about; like, at all.

        • @remedycrd:

          @CocaKoala: I don't know if either of these statements are worthy of any praise. Dropping the hatchback from the lineup was an objectively bad thing and the STI may still be around, but it's old now (and AFAIK won't be getting any substantial upgrades till 2020).

          The argument wasn't about whether dropping the hatch version of WRX was a good idea or not, but about the WRX being the Evo's competitor, and outliving it notably well.

        • @CocaKoala: That's good but I do. Whether you like it off not, first impressions last. I have to visit clients, take my kids to school, etc. So it matters to me.

          Besides, I'd never drive anything less than high end euro. Japanese cars just don't have the quality.

        • @imurgod: I understand what you're saying, but that was not the discussion was about. The discussion was about how hot hatches are the thing of the day, and that's why Evo died. I pointed out that the Rex is doing quite well in spite of dropping the hatch version.

        • @imurgod: Although I'd have to agree your personal situation may have an influence on certain choices (clients, business, etc. that I do not question at all). Besides all of that, you may even personally prefer an euro/jap/'murican car for whatever reason, and I don't question that either. I simply don't agree with someone telling me what I would rather be seen in, may it be a Kia or a Batmobile. :)

        • @CocaKoala: apologies for going off topic. The true hot hatches are gone now. Back when they were awesome was when they were lightweight. Mid 80s to mid 90s.

        • @imurgod: I've to agree with your opinion on true hot hatches of the 80s!

        • @CocaKoala: like a swift gti?

  • same looks as outlander

  • +10

    Bought a 2017 GLS model a few months ago. Very good 4WD and much better value than most on the market.

    • +3

      We've had ours for almost 2 years now, great cars (trucks).

      • How often do you guys go off-road? Like Fraser Island?

        • edit..

        • @lovbargain: Huh? Aren't all 4x4 cars can be used for off-road purposes.

        • Only been to Stockton Beach once so far. Have joined Triple Diamond 4WD Club, once I have done their offroad training weekend, I will be able to join many of their trips. Can't wait.

        • Infrequently. I would if I could but it's a way away.
          Great option for towing 2T caravan.

        • +1

          @Homr: No, they certainly can't. Most smaller SUVs with tiny 4cyl engines are usually not 4x4 to start with. There's a difference between AWD and 4WD, not the same thing. Any vehicle that doesn't have a 4WD Low Range shouldn't be used offroading. Straight gravel roads are not considered offroading.

        • +2

          @Homr: To be fair, you can potentially take any vehicle 'off road'.

          4x4 usually benefit from low/high range gearboxes, higher ground clearance, etc. Not that all of those are essential for most 'off road' excursions.

          2x4 SUVs usually have some extra ground clearance, and even something like a VW Passat or Audi 'Alltrack' could get you most places.

          Growing up in the country, all of our vehicles went 'off road' at some stage (in the bush, mud, through floods, etc), but we knew the limitations. Even a Datsun 120Y was ok most of the time.

    • Yeah they are really good value for money (for a new 4WD). Did you buy it from a dealer or privately?

      • Bought from a dealer Alto at Artamon, after a recommendation by a fellow Facebook member to a good deal.

        • @Rizflip: Is that GLX or GLS for $46,500? I paid $45,000 for my 2017 GLS in May, including rubber mats, tow bar, tailgate spoiler and metallic grey paint.

        • @edfoo: That's for the GLX in metallic grey paint too but without any options. $45k is pretty good with those options.

        • @Rizflip: Hmm maybe your friend bought a 2018 model GLX, that's why it's so expensive in comparison.

        • @edfoo: Yes it is a 2018 model car and at that point in the year, that was the best price he could get in the area.

    • Also bought one this year and have driven it across the country towing a trailer, over QLD and NT offroad and into the kimberleys. No problems so far. Have a bullbar which blocks most of the front and the ass looks better dirty (red dust) all over it.

  • +9

    Ozbargain savvy should not buy brand new cars given how much it goes down in value in the first year =)

    • +2

      but… new car smell <3

      • +3

        The smell actually is quite poisonous for young human

        • +19

          Lucky for me, I am old human!

        • -7

          The Japanese cars are actually okay in that regard. Some of the Kias out of Korea are actually hazardous

    • +4

      Buy used from a dealer and the same $ dive also happens. Plus with used you have to pay rego tf fee, have used tyres, brakes, battery, and no new car warranty. You also have no idea how the car has been treated.
      There are + & - for all vehicle purchases.

      • +2

        not on 1 year old demo or ex novated lease with like 12K on ODO. And 5 year warranty does not disappear when you change owners

        • +1

          You've lost a year of warranty.
          You may need new tyres, brakes or fluids.
          You need to make sure it's dealer serviced properly.
          You need to make sure any recalls or repairs needed are done.
          You've had someone else drive it for 12,000 KM.
          You'll have plenty of farts, sweat, skin and hair all over interior.
          You may have swirl marks on paint and other imperfections from normal use.

          Some people would rather pay slightly more for a brand new experience. 1 year old cars aren't actually a huge discount from brand new here. To each their own.

  • -1

    Whats the cheapest car loan around at the moment??

    • +11

      Loan from mom. Interest free :) I'm joking it is boring at work :(

      • There is truth to that :)

    • +7

      No loan is the cheapest loan.

      • good point

        • Carloans.com.au

    • Mostly business loan , around 5.85 comparison rate .

    • My bank (IMB) is doing 6.24% comparison rate.

    • If you have the option, then novated leasing IMO is generally the cheapest way to finance a car. Associated leasing is even better, but unfortunately most employers don’t support it. Obviously, many factors come into play when deciding how beneficial novated leasing is for you; like your taxable income, tax bracket, how many kms you drive in a year, length of the lease, whether you keep the car at the end of the lease etc.. But generally speaking, if you have an above average income and manage to negotiate a good deal with your leasing provider, it is quite easy to do better than 0% interest / paying cash!

  • "Normally this car is priced at for $46,000 (without any on-roads cost - registration, stamp duty etc)."

    I thought it was illegal to advertise the car without its drive away price.

    • +2

      No, because it varies state to state.

    • +1

      That's the recommended retail price - RRP

  • +3

    Honest question. Why are SUVs so popular? Compared to some hatchbacks, they're not more fuel efficient and they're not more roomy.

    Some hatches have just as big a boot space. The only difference I can see is that they're taller and give you more vertical space in the seating area and boot.

    As you can probably tell, I have a hatchback. Went from a sedan to a hatch because the SUVs were more pricey, and what I've said above was the impression I got when test driving them.

    • +4

      They have more space inside so it's not so cramped, there's a perceived greater safety factor (may or may not be true depending on model), higher driving position gives you better road control and visibility, roof racks can be used for additional storage, generally better in adverse weather and offroading where applicable. Some SUVs are not front wheel drive, don't have tiny 4-pot engines and proper ones usually have low range gears and terrain settings. Looks are a subjective preference as well. List goes on. I would never have a hatchback personally.

      • I guess price was my deciding factor in the end. Those things are nice and tall, I admit.

      • +3

        Not sure if yu're being serious re: 'better road control' in an SUV.Their increased ride height often sacrifices handling ability. I wouldn't pick a hatchback either but my Skoda Superb 206 4x4 beat out the SUV of the year (last year) Mazda CX9 in occupant space, performance, handling, ride, etc. etc.

    • +2

      Better visibility, easier access, better ride (those that are on larger wheels), more car around you which is better in most accidents than a squeezy coke can little car.
      Put 2 full size bikes and a laundry tub in the back of you "equivalent" spaced hatch..?
      They are popular for a reason.. not just for looks or image.
      You admitted you even looked at one but could not afford it.
      Had one for over 6yrs and cringe every time I have to squeeze into a sedan type car.

      • Got a Honda Civic. With the back seat down, I can fit 2 bikes in there… but not a laundry tub on top of that.

        And that car accident thing is a good point.

        • saw 2 accidents badly with Hatch at King Georges road Sydney in last 2 years.

          3 car accident, the hatch was at the middle. Terrible sandwich.

          another one, the hatch went under the Kluger in the accident. driver was trapped. don't know how.

    • +3

      This is a 4x4, whereas most SUVs are the same shape but either 2 wheel or all wheel drive, a 4x4 has low range 4 wheel drive and diff lock and can go off road. I've got one of these, the exceed and I live mid north coast and drive on the beach all the time. a good set up.

      • … and my hatch is definitely no match for a beach. I guess it's down to use. That was a really stupid question, I now realise.

        • +6

          Do not confuse an SUV with a proper 4WD. Pajero Sport is a proper and very capable 4WD. SUV is more suitable for soccer mum and mall crawling.

    • whatever @xywolap said. for us it's definitely easier access - the oldies and disabled sis. much easier for them to get into and out from a higher car than say a wagon which sits a fair distance closer to the road.

      plus the bikes - for 27.5", the wheels stay on :p (yes, maybe it's cheaper buying a nicer wagon and a towbar+bike carrier….

    • more cargo space to put the bodies

  • +1

    Still one of the worst warranties in the industry :(. And if I remember correctly, it wasn't that long ago that only 3 year warranties were offered- so this is an improvement.

    Most car makers however now offer at least 5 years UNLIMITED km.

    https://www.whichcar.com.au/car-advice/which-car-manufacture…

    Capping a car warranty to 100,000km is pretty weak…. you'd expect a car to function correctly for a lot longer than that, and it doesn't scream confidence in their product when they only cover you for 20,000km per year. "We'll back our product, but only for average k's per year. If you want to use our utes in rural areas where you rack up highway km's, then no…. you're on your own".

    • +1

      Yep they should cover it if I do 500,000km's a year for 5 years. Makes sense…

      • If most other big car makers can do it, then yes… perfect sense to match it!

    • Warranty can't supersede consumer law, several years ago consumer law around cars was beefed up. There are many resources out there to help you understand its benefits to consumers and the responsibility of car dealers. You will find car dealers a LOT more flexible than the lawyerly language on their website, especially after the recent headlocks carmakers have gotten into with the ACCC and the smattering of court enforceable actions handed down.

    • +4

      Let's just compare apple with apple. Which other 4WDs on the market have much better warranty than Mitsubishi?

      • Yes, lets.

        You mean other than Mazda/BT50, Ford/Ranger, Holden/Colorado, and Hyundai's AWD SanteFe… all offering 5 year unlimited warranties?
        And they are just the ones that I can recall off hand. I'm sure there are others.

    • +1

      Such a shame really. They did have one of the best warranties at the time with 10 years on Drive train until it was dismantled in late 2012..

      https://www.carsguide.com.au/car-news/mitsubishi-drops-10-ye…

      Mitsubishi just hasn't been the same since..

  • -2

    Friend's experience with Pajero:
    had Prado for 6 years, almost no issue.
    sold that and bought Pajero 5 yrs ago because of good price with 5 years warranty etc.
    it was great car for the first 3 years. after that, trouble never ends (oil leak, lose power etc).
    end up sold the car on June this year soon the repair done by dealer and trade in to Prado.

    Colleague's life experience with outlander:
    driving 110 on M5 few months ago, and the car suddenly lost all power. steeling wheel was extreme heavy. took him 10 mins to stop the car safely (very lucky). Check everything by roadside assistant. no issue. restart the car and drive home. call dealer, drop the car for repair, came back no issue at all. he feels like driving a bomb now.

    • +1

      how much extra is the equivalent prado?

      • another 15-20K dealer(or 10-15 private)

Login or Join to leave a comment