Dyson Zone Air Purifying Wireless over-Ear Headphones $199 (was $399) + Delivery @ JB Hi-Fi

1131
Dyson Zone Air Purifying Wireless over-Ear Headphones $199 (was $399) + Delivery @ JB Hi-Fi
Go to Deal
hg0414 on 04/01/2025 - 08:08 jbhifi.com.au (10344 clicks)
Last edited 04/01/2025 - 08:10

Key Features

Immersive, precision engineered high fidelity sound with advanced noise cancelling

Eight active noise cancelling microphones monitor surrounding noise 384,000 times a second, cancelling background noise

Two additional microphones for telephony and transparency systems

Beamforming enables crystal clear calls in noisy cities

Bluetooth connectivity

Purified air on the go - electrostatic filters removes pollutants as small as 0.1 microns¹ such as Pollen

Activated car bon filters capture city fumes²

Ergonomically engineered – angled and shaped to optimise acoustic performance and comfort that adjusts to fit all faces

Up to 50 hours ANC Audio³ with auto on-off to save energy when not in use

Monitor real-time sound exposure and air pollution with the My Dyson™ app⁴

IN THE BOX:

Dyson Zone air-purifying headphones
2 x single Electrostatic Filters
Quarter Turn Case
USB-C cable

Electrical & Electronics Air Purifier Dyson Headphones Wireless Headphones

Related Stores

JB Hi-Fi
JB Hi-Fi

Comments

  • hopper on 04/01/2025 - 08:13
    +65

    Too expensive for a Halloween costume property

  • shroomish on 04/01/2025 - 08:20
    +51

    Looking like a goose in public : Priceless.

    • PainToad on 04/01/2025 - 08:27
      +36

      I personally would just wear an N95 mask. But wouldn’t judge others for wearing one. Why do you care what other people wear in public? Did you forget the real world isn’t high school?

      • hoha99 on 04/01/2025 - 08:42
        +31

        Big difference between wearing a N95, vs $400 RRP monstrosity that no decent or rational person would unless they seeking much needed attention their parents denied them growing up.

        • BigDon on 04/01/2025 - 08:48
          +7

          I beg to differ

        • tightm8 on 04/01/2025 - 10:04
          +20

          Same can be said about $650 RM Williams, $500 Patagonia vests, $1000 Garmins

          • rumblytangara on 04/01/2025 - 10:09
            +8

            @tightm8: Pretty sure the headphones won't last 15 years, which is what my RMs and Patagonia vest are going on.

            • marcozmitch on 04/01/2025 - 11:25

              @rumblytangara: If you want to spend lots of money on something it is a choice.
              It does not mean it is a necessary choice.
              I like minimalist shoes, but I am happy to buy cheap ones.
              I am really after function, (though looks does matter).
              Does the mask work?

            • KRM123 on 04/01/2025 - 13:13
              +11

              @rumblytangara: RM Williams bought today will be lucky to last 2 years.

              There's a YouTuber who pulls apart boots for a living and he said the RM Williams were one of the worst he has seen yet for the price. The leather thickness has been downgraded so much that it now measures the same as a pair of Nike or Adidas sports shoe.

              The boot construction, materials used and stitching were extremely poor.

              • Hangryuman on 04/01/2025 - 15:02
                +7

                @KRM123: I once bought an expensive pair of Lloyds 'buffalo' leather lace-up office shoes

                within about 6 months something had come off - maybe the sole was worn or pulled off - I forget

                anyway I took them to an Italian craftsman-type shoe repairer

                he took one look at them and started getting angry - I was 'huh - what's going on … '

                he said 'These are rubbish!' - I was 'Huh !? - I paid top price for these' - he said they used to be good - but since some takeover, they had kept the price high and reduced the quality.

                so - 'you get what you pay for' is a phrase used by scam salespeople to select people who assume high price means high quality - sorry folks, it ain't necessarily so.

                • Droz on 04/01/2025 - 17:54

                  @Hangryuman: Did they suggest which brand was good?

              • Sythe on 04/01/2025 - 16:24
                +6

                @KRM123: That would be Rose Anvil who you're talking about who is useless as a reviewer.
                He has been doing those videos for like 3-4 years now and still either just makes shit up or spews misinformation.

                If you watch a few of his videos you'll also notice a lot of contradictions where the same thing on one pair of shoes is a positive whereas on the next pair of shoes its the worst thing in the world.
                Seems to completely depend on whether he is getting paid or not for a particular video.

                Whether you like RM or not, whatever.
                But, they're nowhere near as bad as you seem to be claiming and when you look at them vs comparable goodyear welted boots they're still competitively priced, made from quality parts and are made in Australia.
                This is especially true when there are regular deals for them that make them even more competitive compared to the budget options from overseas.

              • hotphil on 04/01/2025 - 17:22

                @KRM123: Yes, but they say RM Williams

          • DeToxin on 04/01/2025 - 11:23

            @tightm8: All of those things do what they advertise, this thing doesn't filter Jack and it looks stupid too

          • BusMan247 on 04/01/2025 - 14:06

            @tightm8: Yeha but RM williams look good and i dont own any.

        • garage sale on 04/01/2025 - 12:40
          +3

          read the details, you can detach the filter, then looks like normal headphones. question is do they sound good for $200 ? the filter is if you are crowded high risk locations, like peak hour train in winter people are standing and coughing and sneezing 30cm from your face and don’t cough into sleeve or hanky because they are holding the overhead rail with one hand and trying the use phone with the other hand.

          • Hangryuman on 04/01/2025 - 15:05
            -1

            @garage sale: so … you wear the headphone over your nose … ?

            otherwise a winky dinky something on your effing headphones ain't gonna filter nothing from a crowded moving train carriage

            I'm guessing Dyson headphones will sound as good as a Dyson vacuum cleaner of toilet fan hand dryer 😷

        • DTA on 05/01/2025 - 10:03
          +3

          Yeah sure. You have anyone in your family who has cancer and is immune suppressed? I thought not. It isn't funny for them getting infections like COVID-19! Nothing irrational about trying to stay alive.

        • PainToad on 04/01/2025 - 09:25
          +17

          It makes me feel better about myself

          🚩

          • garage sale on 04/01/2025 - 12:49
            -2

            @PainToad: i think about the lazy boy song “underwear go inside the pants” , go up to a bum in the street and say “why don’t you get a job” , get a girlfriend and a puppy and go for a run a long the beach, “if everybody grows up with high self esteem who will dance in strip clubs” the song mentions many. ways to make yourself feel good about yourself.

          • Hangryuman on 04/01/2025 - 15:06
            -2

            @PainToad: yes - wearing them helps you stand out in a crowd

            as the biggest sucker 😊

      • gakko on 04/01/2025 - 09:07
        +2

        I know it's wrong but sometimes I can't help but judge. Like with furries.

      • niggardly on 04/01/2025 - 10:33
        +4

        Whether this is effective at stopping viruses or not, there is an emerging new virus coming from china, using covid as an example, if this virus breaks out. The price of this item will increase/sell out.

        Maybe worth investing.

        • elektron on 04/01/2025 - 13:00
          -2

          Is there any evidence that it can prevent viruses when even face masks can't prevent Covid?

          • BinaryPirate on 04/01/2025 - 16:42
            +4

            @elektron:

            face masks can't prevent Covid

            is the new

            jet fuel can't melt steel beams

      • MEGASERVE on 04/01/2025 - 10:46
        -4

        Because people should be ashamed to wear dumb stuff

        • garage sale on 04/01/2025 - 12:52
          -1

          i said that to a homeless person on centre link that he should be ashamed to wear dumb stuff , not sure he can afford my stylist.

    • entropysbane on 04/01/2025 - 09:40
      +4

      Well yes, but an extremely useful extra for the typical gamer’s room.

    • guidedlight on 04/01/2025 - 09:46
      +15

      To be fair, AirPods looked like tampons in your ears when they first came out.

      • rumblytangara on 04/01/2025 - 10:10
        +26

        TBF they still do.

        • Sammyboy on 04/01/2025 - 10:41
          +11

          Airpons

        • outlander on 04/01/2025 - 14:00
          +2

          I used to think they looked like the Cameron Diaz scene from Theres Something About Mary

          I still do, but I used to, too.

      • garage sale on 04/01/2025 - 12:55
        -1

        i feel i need to invest in a wifi jammer for when i’m on a crowded train so people don’t have conversations into their airpods when standing next to me and speaking directly into my ear.

        • Hangryuman on 04/01/2025 - 15:07

          sounds like a job for your elbow

          • garage sale on 04/01/2025 - 15:55

            @Hangryuman: I sometimes talk into my phone although there is no call louder than the person next to me with statements like "so when I get home will we have sex before or after dinner or both before and after and are you on time or running late" and hope they get the hint … seems Vline for regional services has "quiet carriages" people can book, no phone conversations.

        • Psdsoft on 05/01/2025 - 13:31
          +1

          Better off with a Bluetooth jammer if you want the AirPods to stop working.

      • dukeGR4 on 04/01/2025 - 17:12

        you're not wrong but this is a bit too much still haha

    • Ryanmyo on 05/01/2025 - 20:20

      Geezus these are funny, though I also think ppl going for a run (or walk, but particularly running) in over ear headphones are also hilarious…

  • hopper on 04/01/2025 - 08:22
    +9

    Comic con here I come

  • djmm on 04/01/2025 - 08:25
    +38

    Mortal Kombat

    • IRON on 04/01/2025 - 08:53
      +8

      Flawless Victory!

    • Savealopoulos on 04/01/2025 - 22:22

      Get over here!

  • AlexF on 04/01/2025 - 08:28
    +14

    “Just because you can, don’t mean you should.”

    • blam6 on 04/01/2025 - 22:31

      “Just do it”

  • hopper on 04/01/2025 - 08:28

    Looks like only available on jbhifi online. Not even from dyson online store. May be they knew people will return these with 45 day money back guarantee offer if purchased.

  • Wiadro on 04/01/2025 - 08:29
    +3

    $199 too much still

    • Sancho123456 on 04/01/2025 - 09:06
      +3

      Yep, $99… perhaps…

      • cainen on 04/01/2025 - 09:25
        +4

        Would you wear it in public even if you were given them for free?

        • hopper on 04/01/2025 - 09:33
          +3

          If Free, yes

        • aparasher on 04/01/2025 - 10:32
          +4

          Sure, if for free. Definitely on a plane.

          • confidantduk on 04/01/2025 - 10:52
            +2

            @aparasher: man that's a good idea

            • aparasher on 04/01/2025 - 11:09
              +2

              @confidantduk: Flew to Bangkok amd a.lady in the cabin was coughing really badly. Would be great tonhave a personal air purifier in such a use case.

              • rumblytangara on 05/01/2025 - 09:03

                @aparasher:

                Would be great tonhave a personal air purifier in such a use case

                Have you ever heard of N95?

          • pongie on 04/01/2025 - 12:53

            @aparasher: What’s the runtime on a full charge? Most international flights are over 9hrs

            • aparasher on 04/01/2025 - 13:02

              @pongie: As I mentioned l, I will have it for free. So I don't have it.

              I simply use a personal purifier that hangs around neck.

            • Jonzay on 04/01/2025 - 17:49
              +1

              @pongie: Most international flights have usb ports for charging.

        • Smigit on 04/01/2025 - 18:32

          Without the mask, sure.

      • shraky on 04/01/2025 - 11:26

        $99 if they pay me to wear it

  • Autonomic on 04/01/2025 - 08:33
    +10

    Didn't this have some crazy rrp? The reviews for the audoo/ANC are good. Tempted to buy one.

  • mr chow on 04/01/2025 - 08:34
    +3

    i might give it a go, it has noise cancelling and the front part can be taken off to avoid looking weird.

    • hopper on 04/01/2025 - 09:33
      +1

      500+ grams

      • hippo2s on 04/01/2025 - 10:31
        +6

        In context that is twice the weight of other ANC headphones. Might not sound like much but it does make a difference on long listening sessions or when you are moving around.

        • OZKap on 04/01/2025 - 11:28

          yeah my gaming headset (gsp670) is on the heavy side and weighs 400grams. Fine for sitting down and gaming, but not something I'd wear if I was moving around a lot

        • Hangryuman on 04/01/2025 - 15:12
          +1

          my best ANC Bose QC45 headphones weigh 247gms and are very comfortable for my recent 10-hour flight and on special cost me $164

          these $199 on special Dyson headphones are likely to be uncomfortable when you realise other people in public looking at you like you're an idiot

          • hippo2s on 04/01/2025 - 15:54

            @Hangryuman: and apparently 650g on your head makes sure your neck gets a good work out pulling those Gs at take off and landing

        • mr chow on 04/01/2025 - 15:57

          Yeah weight is a let down even without the front air mask. Also battery life may not be as great. The bulky side of it is also a negative I do like to give these a go as I do collect headsets.

    • Sammyboy on 04/01/2025 - 10:44
      +4

      Theres so much weird out there, that nobody would even look twice

      • ak47wong on 04/01/2025 - 12:26

        I guarantee you’d get stared at wearing these. These are beyond weird.

    • edsnails on 04/01/2025 - 19:48
      +1

      Have tried them.
      Noise cancelling is great and a quick tap to go to transparency mode so you can hear is pretty amazing too.
      If you think it’s comparable at that price range go for it.

  • b0nd on 04/01/2025 - 08:37
    +12

    The correct Price for this should be $9.99 ($190 for the embarrassment)

  • Saul Goodman on 04/01/2025 - 08:46
    +2

    Apparently the sound is pretty decent, even or $500+ headphones. I'd give them a go but they seem too heavy to be comfortable.

  • peeppeep on 04/01/2025 - 08:49
    +6

    There are cheaper ways to cosplay as Bane, but to each their own I guess

  • musai on 04/01/2025 - 08:54
    +1

    according to the review the sound is surprisingly good. but its still too heavy.

  • sena86 on 04/01/2025 - 08:55
    +5

    Test your might

  • 2expensive4me on 04/01/2025 - 09:02
    +18

    Based on a quick round of various online reviews
    Pros:
    * build quality
    * sound supposedly not bad, competing with the top dogs in the category
    * top tier noise cancelling (we'll see about that)
    * price drop

    Cons:
    * Bane cosplay (pro?)
    * absolute massive unit of a headphone, even with the mask off
    * weight, more than half a kilo on your head
    * battery life is very short with purification on, not that anyone actually uses it

    Needless to say, bought

    • itsfree on 04/01/2025 - 09:13
      +2

      Same. It's a bargain for the headphones quality, especially given they were originally $1000

      • willz on 04/01/2025 - 09:19
        +14

        80% off and I'm still hesitating

        • elektron on 05/01/2025 - 02:23

          If it helps, they were 1000 Euros in Europe and 1000 USD in the US at launch.

      • mickeyjuiceman on 04/01/2025 - 09:28
        +9

        And this is exactly why they put these utterly ridiculous initial RRPs on things. Reactions like this.

        • itsfree on 04/01/2025 - 09:46
          +2

          It wasn't really an RRP – they were actually sold for that intiailly (and even still fairly high on most websites). This is a clearance price given they didn't sell well.

        • 2expensive4me on 04/01/2025 - 10:24

          To be fair, dyson never positioned themselves as a budget brand.

          And while this product is a major flop by any metric, they priced in the R&D cost and what you get is a funky engineering marvel.

    • garage sale on 04/01/2025 - 20:59

      i’m tempted at this price …

  • RipperOB on 04/01/2025 - 09:06
    +8

    Autobots, roll out!

    • abc on 04/01/2025 - 09:12
      +3

      It doesn’t protect against covid.

    • Buy2Much on 04/01/2025 - 11:27
      +1

      It is not N95 grade. But what it will definitely be useful for bush fire smokes which more likely happen every summer.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join