Is Speed Enforcement in Australia Absurd?

Just recently got back from a trip to California, USA and one thing I noticed is that despite the speed limit being technically 65 mph on the freeways, most drivers did around 80-85 mph, even straight past cops and they didn't care one bit. Whereas in Australia, doing such speeds would usually result in a heavy fine and licence suspension in some states.

Every year more and more hidden speed cameras are being used in Australia, yet the road toll is around the same. Other countries, for instance the UK, has a road toll substantially lower than ours, despite it being common (haven't driven there but from friends who have driven there) it's also common to do 80-85 mph in the 70 mph motorways. Australian governments and police are hell bent on speed being the biggest killer in road accidents, when we only need to look at our European counterparts to see it's not the case.

Comments

          • @I like freestuff: If they were restricting the speed to 100km/hr, then they should not have spent so much money building a state of art road. They should have just run a grater over the dirt and slapped down some tar. Then it would be no different to every other 100km/hr road. Everytime I drive that section I simply cant understand why so much money was spent for 100km/hr rated road.

  • +2

    Sounds like you should move overseas.

    • +1

      if only they offer jobs without so much hassle XD

  • +8

    Just the opening of the OP makes the rest impossible to take seriously.

    You are looking at the US as an example of admirable law enforcement or public behavioural practices- really?

    I've driven, and lived, in the US. Have relatives across the entire country. It is not a place to admire for driving.

    I've also lived in the UK. People are not speed demons. I and my circle of friends used to speed, but we were young and dumb.

    • -1

      usa might have a terrible road fatality rate, but uk is significantlly lower than ours, and they speed alot on the motorways
      your point?

      • +3

        but uk is significantlly lower than ours, and they speed alot on the motorways

        Evidence. My actual experience tends to disagree with you.

        • +1

          how fast do they drive in the 70 mph freeways in the uk then?

          • @speedingftw: From my experience, admittedly away from London, cars appeared to stick to the 70mph, light commercial 60 mph and heavy vehicles were sticking hard left lane and to their 50mph. Due to this separation traffic flowed very smoothly.
            Reasonable police presence, and average speed monitoring cameras may have been a strong influence.

      • +1

        UK drivers spend most of their time sitting in traffic due to roadworks /s

        • this

  • This is specifically the highways in LA. Everywhere else, you speed and a motorcycle cop lasers you, you're getting a ticket 100% of the time.

    There's also usually speed traps set up on the highways in and out of LA.

    Iirc the city of LA had speed or red light cameras at some intersections but not sure if they still exist.

    • +2

      speed cameras are illegal in california actually
      and even if you speed in california, you don't get demerit points until 10 mph above the limit
      the fines for speeding are super cheap too
      and america doesn't have ANPR like Australia, so it's super easy to drive without a licence there

      • Funny you keep mentioning California, they are proposing bills to introduce speed cameras.

  • I've driven, and lived, in the US. Have relatives across the entire country. It is not a place to admire for driving.

    I found the drivers in the US were far more courteous than the drivers here (in Melbourne at least). I've seen some pretty poor driving in both countries though.

    • +1

      driving standard in usa is pretty average as well, but once you doing 80-85 mph, people take driving pretty damn seriously

  • +1

    speed being the biggest killer in road accidents

    The issue I have with this is speed is labelled as a factor in fatalities even if it wasn't a cause. E.g. someone is going 10k over, but then a truck crosses the median and slams into them = speeding fatality.

    • +3

      if a car is moving, then speed will be a factor
      pretty simple really
      but is speed the leading factor in freeway accidents? in most cases it's not

    • -1

      Rubbish, only if the truck was speeding. If a truck is on the wrong side of the road, there's the primary cause.If the car was actually at a dangerously high speed,maybe

      • +1

        not rubbish, if either car is speeding it is counted as a factor, not just the one at fault.

        the stats on speeding never state that speeding was 'the primary cause', just that it was a factor in those incidents. Someone could be looking at their phone, drunk, sleepy, have bald tires in the rain, but if they were also speeding (or the person they hit was), it gets added to the speeding fatalities statistic.

        The reason is because there is not considered a 'safe level of speeding' so therefore any level of speeding is considered to contribute to the accident.

        • In the data the most it would reflect on speeding as a contributing factor, would be an estimate causal %.
          Don't think if there was a court case afterwards the truckies defence would argue the dead guy was 10KM over?

      • +1

        Rubbish, only if the truck was speeding. If a truck is on the wrong side of the road, there's the primary cause.If the car was actually at a dangerously high speed,maybe

        I guess if the car hadn't been speeding it wouldn't have been there when the truck crossed the medium strip.

        • Good luck with that in court.

          Your honour if I'd slept in I never would have been there.
          Yep hear that all the time. (not)
          This is the real world, not Judge Judy

          But if you ARE right, see what speeding does?

  • -1

    Leave earlier

    You're welcome

    • +2

      why comment if you have nothing useful to say?

      • +1

        Member Since
        3 hours 59 min ago

        you'll get used to it, its fairly common

  • ?
    Plenty have users have made the same observation about the premise of the thread.
    Justify cart blanche speeding? You haven't. You won't. You can't
    Now I know you're trolling.

    • uk is 2.9
      aus is 4.5
      so at the end of the day who wins? strict speed enforcement (aus) or common sense speed enforment (uk) ?

      • You think the rate would decrease if speeds were increased here? We need better driver education here first, people seem to think driving is a right.

      • I wonder if UK's low rate has more to do with everyone in cities and suburbs and even a lot of rural areas living less than 1km from a pub

      • well strict enforcement of course as UK has much stricter enforcement than Australia.

    • Imagine what the gun death map looks like.(Glowing red?)
      Maybe that's why they speed. getting away from shooter. And cops parked up cos, "I aint getttin' involved'.

  • +3

    Complicated topic.
    One of the interesting TVCs I have seen on road safety recently here in Victoria is the one in which old mate speeds up when he notices that the rozzers either can't see him or are busy with something else. Then when his missus distracts him with a map, he takes his eyes off the road, the Falcon runs into a ditch and rolls. The theme is, 'The lucky ones gets caught', presumably for speeding.
    Seems to me that the shunt has actually been caused by the driver dropping his guard. Would the outcome of inattentive driving be that much different at 78kmh rather than 82?
    But our state governments have demonised speed as a policy for decades, so that narrative would not be a good fit. I might also mention that in other countries, the happy family might have been making the trip to see Nonna and Pops by train or other means of public transport. If you have to go to regional Australia, that is a bit more of a challenge.

  • +2

    There is a middle ground that should exist. The amount of 30 and 40km/h zones are a joke here. We'll be doing 10km/h soon the way these Councils are running things.

  • +2

    Is Speed Enforcement in Australia Absurd? No

    Is Speed Limit too low in (most of) Australia? Yes

    Having proper law enforcement is a GOOD thing. We don't want end up in a situation where our police is so underfunded like America that they could not enforce all laws.

    • +1

      Police are not underfunded in America. They are overfunded. The difference is, they attend actual crimes. America has way more serious and violent crimes occurring and that's where their efforts are focused. Not on ridiculous trivial traffic offences like going 5km over the speed limit or looking at your phone whilst stopped at a stop light. The police in Australia are revenue raising clowns, they aren't real police and they don't do any real work.

      • +2

        Spot on
        Aussie cops need to look themselves in the mirror and admit to the general public that they're nothing but revenue raising tossers

      • Homicide clearance rate in the US has dropped over the years, so clearly something isn't up to scratch there.

  • I'm tired eyed from all the googling, but none of the dead people (victims of speeding ) or any credible data either justify the benefits of speeding, or condemn complying with the speed limit.
    I googled deaths by speeding in both the USA and here.(UK is not relevant to this pub test) Had the op done similar ground work or formulated any other reason than "America does it", or "I'm not happy, I'd hang around."
    American plod need to lift their game. (multiple fronts)
    The USA is not a role model. Period

  • Well, that's easy. It has zero to do with safety and one hundred percent to do with generating income for the grossly mismanaged government who spends recklessly on needless and inefficient public services. This country is obsessed with safety on the surface, to the point where it's nauseating. Though, if you look deeper there's always some sinister reason for these so called 'safety' measures, just like we saw during covid when this place turned into a authoritarian nightmare and people were being beaten half to death by police in the streets just for being outside their home.

    If you want freedom, civil rights, and a life with low government presence - stay well away from this place. It's like living in a highly supervised children's daycare centre. People who haven't travelled all over the world have no perspective on this topic, and don't understand because they are indoctrinated with this safety obsessed culture since birth.

    • +1

      bingo
      I really wanna move overseas, but it's really hard to get a work visa haha
      So looks like i'm stuck here in Aus

      • +1

        Good luck mate. I wont be here forever.

  • +1

    Yes, maybe (and I think penalties are little excessive, compared to other regions around world too). but I'd rather be in a region where people want to obey law more than people disrespect law.

    And yes that's why we have discussions like this
    https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/763263

    In NSW, government earns so many $$ from overspeeding/running red light tickets. They almost run them as a cashgrab than to actually slow drivers to the speed limit.

  • Basically revenue raising from scummy governments

  • The place where I experienced the most speed cameras was Italy. That shit was extreme. There would be five speed cameras across a 2km stretch in every town that you drove through.

    • +1

      isn't the speed limt in italy 130?
      atleast they have sensible speed limits
      And also, i'm pretty sure you don't get demerit points for low level speeding in Europe, and fines are alot cheaper
      Hell, in germany you don't get demerit points for speeding unless you're 20+km/h over the limit

  • Keep turning right and you'll always land in Cookerborough

  • Just drive the speed limit, if you find that difficult you shouldn't have a license.

    • +1

      Just have the speed limits set based on common sense, rather than trying to trap motorists and the motorist will not feel like a cash cow.

  • I recently had the opportunity to drive throughout Tasmania and found it quite refreshing the limited number of road speed signs and road signs in general.

    The onus seemed to be put on the driver to drive to the actual road conditions and actually concentrate, rather than have every little bend and turn signed.

    Yes there were parts outside the major townships where you could travel a little faster, but you did so at your own risk.

    • do people generally drive the speed limit in tasmania?

      • +1

        If anything, I found myself driving under the speed limit in the picturesque country areas, as the scenery was so magnificent. I'd pull to the side and let any car coming up pass.

        You had to be careful too once the sun went down, as lots of wildlife was out and about. Nearly ran over a wombat in Bicheno heading to see a Tasmanian devil show.

      • Everybody drives faster than them devils.
        Carnage there is still heartbreaking!

  • If you DO choose to speed, watch out for cows,frogs and horses. They pop up everywhere

    • India has a zero speed limit if cattle are present on freeways. Just kiss one and then you are free in speed till you find the next one, then repeat!

  • U.S definitely more relaxed about speeds, Japanese although one of the most law abiding people treat the speed limits as suggestions, 10-20k over was about average.

    Picked up a friend from the US at the airport, within the first few ks we saw 2 seperate road rage incidents, nothing serious, a bit of tailgating, horn honking, fist shaking etc she commented no one would dare do that in LA due to the high likelihood the other driver is armed and many would simply shoot first rather than argue the point.

  • Merged from While we are talking about speeding.

    Son in law received a ticket by mail in Feb. He was pinged by a mobile speed camera vehicle in NSW on Australia Day. Photo was stamped 52kph in a 50 zone.

    • +13

      Yes.

    • +5

      that's unaustralian

      • What's that mean again?

        • your comment is unaustralian

        • good

    • +13

      thanks OzDiary.

    • +11

      Given the Australian regs re speedos, & "Photo was stamped 52kph in a 50 zone." would imply his speedo was probably registering approximately 57km/hr whilst in a 50 zone, possibly higher.

      • +6

        100% this…^

        52km/h will be the final reading and the allowance would have been something like -3km/h. Making their “observed speed” at closer to 55km/h, so reading inside the car could easily have been 60km/h.

      • +1

        When did they switch away from 0-4km/hr over being the no-penalty zone?

        • When was that ever a thing?

          • @pjetson: In the past.

            Used to be from memory:

            0-4 was no penalty
            5-9 first penalty tier
            32+ was 'lose your licence on the spot'

            Anyway, it was the reason I generally drive a little over on my digital speedo. I've driven past HWP knowingly at +5. Though they probably wouldn't chase down a minor infraction like that

            • @ozbargainsam: I can't seem to find anything online that confirms your memory. Are you sure it was an actual thing? Lots of people seem to think that there used to be a 10% tolerance, but again, there doesn't seem to be anything official to confirm that.

              • @pjetson: Huh. I can't either. It's something I would've picked up on just after I started driving so it's been a while - can't say where I got it from. I could try dig up a fine or two from 15 years ago somehow to see what it says.

                I have a memory of a table of speeds and fines, so it seemed official. Not the allowances thing depending on the type of camera.

    • +19

      Should never have let him marry her.

      • +1

        But he so fine

        • -4

          or…..He's got frequent flyers at Pornhub?
          or A boat?
          A hot Mum?
          A hot Dad?
          Guns!
          A Tesla?
          A Tesla with a gun in the glove box?
          A life?

    • +10

      Thanks for letting us know.

      Keep us updated on whether this fine curbs his speeding or not.

    • +2

      But for those 10 seconds or less, i'm free

    • +5

      Very interesting point and quite informative…

    • Was he racing to KFC? Understandable

      • -1

        I don't care. I love it.

    • +1

      My wife saw a cop car the other day. Weird
      Is that a cloud?
      Wonder how many lizards there are in Botswana?

      • yes…
        at least 14…

      • I saw one this morning, one of their headlights was blown.

        I was almost going to stop and tell them.

    • +1

      Probably the best speeding post by anyone thus far this month on OZB.

      Feel free to forgo the MS Paint diagram, also a first for OZB.

    • +3

      Wait. That does not stack up.
      If he only JUST received a ticket in February 2023, and it came via Australia Post, it's well past the statute of limitations by now.
      Check if the cops have a photo. I bet it's black & white

      • +1

        What does this statute declare?

    • Well sucks to live in NSW then!

    • +1

      Someone inform the president!

      • -2

        no point! ……joe biden would just forget 3 seconds later anyway!

    • So many imposter hellopams.

      There will only ever be one hellopam!

    • So he passed a signed speed camera and didn’t slow down?

    • Yes…. ‘Son in law’. I suppose it’s more believable than your ‘friend’ doing it

    • Challenge it.

    • This needs to be stickied.

    • Your son may have been driving faster than 52km/h amd the fined speed was reduced.

      Eg. Detected speed of 55km/h but infringed speed of 52km/h.

      Not sure if it applies in NSW but in VIC a small amput of speed is removed, possibly to account for errors(?).

      In the past, VIC have also had 'zero tolerance' days for speeding, so even a little over is enough to be fined. Your son was fined on a major holiday.

      • This is why I set my car to 53 on cruise then gaze out the window while women and children scatter.

    • bugger.

Login or Join to leave a comment