This was posted 11 years 11 months 10 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

{SOLD OUT} LG 50PA6500 50" Full HD Plasma TV $498 (Save $100) @JB

750
{SOLD OUT} LG 50PA6500 50" Full HD Plasma TV $498 (Save $100) @JB
Go to Deal
[Deactivated] on 21/02/2013 - 05:39 jbhifionline.com.au (2056 clicks)
Last edited 23/02/2013 - 17:54

Good morning all
Bargain of the morning is here.
Great price. A brand name 50" full HD plasma for under $500.
LG 50PA6500 50" Full HD Plasma TV $498 (Save $100) @ JB.
Pick up at store or to ship anywhere in Australia per unit: $50.00

LG's latest and most advanced Triple XD Engine brings the highest level of excellence in Colour, Clarity and Contrast that LG has to offer. Enjoy optimum picture quality and performance with the powerful Triple XD Engine.

Key Features

  • 1920 x 1080p Full HD Resolution
  • 3,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio
  • 600Hz MAX Sub-field Driving
  • Triple XD Engine
  • Protective Skin Glass
  • Intelligent Sensor
  • Energy Saving Modes
  • Invisible Speaker
  • SIMPLINK Connectivity
  • Metal Line Razor Frame Design
  • 2 x HDMI inputs
Electrical & Electronics 50inch LG Plasma TV

Related Stores

JB Hi-Fi
JB Hi-Fi

closed Comments

  • snappy1234 on 21/02/2013 - 07:06

    When do they usually update the price online ? (still has $598) when you click to buy- not the main pic…

  • [Deactivated] on 21/02/2013 - 07:18

    Probably in next hr or so. I will update the link when they updated.

    • CVonC on 21/02/2013 - 07:29
      +1

      link to LG website

      http://www.lg.com/au/tvs/lg-50PA6500-plasma-tv

      support playback via USB (found on the pdf manual):

      Movie DAT,MPG,MPEG,VOB,AVI,DIVX,MP4,MKV,TS,TRP,TP,ASF,WMV,FLV)

      Movie(*.mpg / *.mpeg / *.ts / *.trp / *.tp / *.vob / *.mp4 / *.mov / *.mkv / *.divx / *.avi / *.asf / *.wmv / *.flv / *.avi(motion-jpeg) / *.mp4(motion-jpeg) / *.mkv(motion-jpeg)

      Video format: DivX3.11, DivX4.12, DivX5.x, DivX6, Xvid1.00, Xvid1.01, Xvid1.02, Xvid1.03, Xvid1.10 beta-1/beta-2,
      Mpeg-1, Mpeg-2, Mpeg-4, H.264/AVC, VC1, JPEG, Sorenson H.263
      Audio format: Dolby Digital, AAC, Mpeg, MP3, LPCM, HE-AAC, ADPCM
      Bit rate: within 32 kbps to 320 kbps(MP3)

      doesn't seem like you can record to usb though :/

      • JayCeeJay on 21/02/2013 - 09:31
        -3

        Of all formats, no rmvb :(
        Why asians need to encode to those!!

        • Arcticfox on 21/02/2013 - 11:27

          Never even heard of that? Won't be missed!

        • bgbrendan on 21/02/2013 - 14:23
          +3

          its realplayer…terrible player terrible format pretty much died out when x264 came in

        • 4agte on 22/02/2013 - 01:47
          +1

          +1 I'd never expect a tv to support it. Usually found on anime and Asian movies. If you need obscure codecs use the $100 you save on the tv and buy a dedicated media player that supports it.

    • swimmingtoad on 21/02/2013 - 08:32
      +15

      What the hell does Austalia's power production got to do with the value of this deal? Damn hippie movement is on the rise again.

      • irajohn90 on 21/02/2013 - 08:51

        because its ozbargain. whats a deal if you end up spending more on the overall cost. but i do say $500 for a 50" LG is tempting. just like the the Free baby Cot from Ikea. http://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/93921#comment-1253353
        Save $98 on a Plasma but spend double the amount in electricity over the lifespan of the tv.

        • swimmingtoad on 21/02/2013 - 09:30
          +1

          Hal his post is referring to the type of energy and production. Not cost.

    • izzeho on 21/02/2013 - 09:11
      +8

      "A Plasma television does cost significantly more electricity than a LED TV. However, the resulting cost at the end of the year is not very big, about 40$ more for a 50" plasma. On a 5 year period, the total amount saved would be 200$.

      As mentioned previously here, a Plasma TV cost on average 350$ less than a LED TV for the same size. Based on this, it will take 8.75 years for the total cost of ownership (initial cost + electricity cost) of a plasma television to surpass its LED counterpart. If you plan to own and use your television for more than 8.75 years, a LED television will end up costing you less in its lifetime than a Plasma TV."

      Source: http://www.rtings.com/info/lcd-vs-led-vs-plasma/power-consum…

      Somehow I think 9 years is a pretty shitty RoI getting the LED…

      • dein_gesicht on 21/02/2013 - 09:28
        +7

        And this analysis doesn't even take into account the time value of money; the NPV would be negative

      • Hoju on 21/02/2013 - 09:55

        Is that a US website?
        I think we pay at least double the electricity cost they've used in their analysis, though i don't have a bill handy to check

        • VeganJerky on 21/02/2013 - 14:25

          I pay $0.22 per kWh, double the default value they have there.

      • IJustKnowStuff on 21/02/2013 - 10:07
        +2

        Plasma are also better quality as well. Just need a darker room that's the only bad part.

    • IamEzza on 21/02/2013 - 15:51
      +1

      The power consumption of plasma has been massively improved over the past few years due to the pressure from LCD TVs.

      Plasmas used to use WAY more than LCDs now the difference is so much smaller it really doesn't matter for most situations.

    • evol on 21/02/2013 - 18:58
      +1

      Can -you- please not -type-
      like -this-?

    • [Deactivated] on 21/02/2013 - 20:34
      +1

      By using insane amounts of electricity I'm forcing the government to switch to nuclear. Now everyone wins!

  • dbrent12 on 21/02/2013 - 07:42

    Source of bargain?

    • berger on 21/02/2013 - 08:32

      half page herald sun advert in VIC

  • anabol on 21/02/2013 - 08:01
    +1

    just a reminder once again…it's very glossy,check in store before you buy if this is an issue for you

  • Keef on 21/02/2013 - 08:04
    +6

    http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/lg-50pa6500/4505-6482…

    for those interested in more detail

  • [Deactivated] on 21/02/2013 - 08:42

    does it have a LAN connection?

    • cypher67 on 21/02/2013 - 09:05

      Bargain* … Plus this is not a reason to neg a deal, L2P

  • killergreely on 21/02/2013 - 08:55
    -5

    2 x HDMI is a bit 2005 really.

    • OzzyMozzy on 21/02/2013 - 09:23
      +3

      How much did this TV cost in 2005?

      • Keef on 21/02/2013 - 09:48
        +6

        No AV receiver (which only requires one HDMI input) is so 1995

    • iratepirate on 21/02/2013 - 16:47

      Two on the side + One on the back

  • CyberMurning on 21/02/2013 - 09:26

    amazing price for big screen from known brand.

  • Berg on 21/02/2013 - 09:27

    Thinking LG or Samsung

    • stripe on 21/02/2013 - 09:57

      Go Samsung.

  • David Hasslehoff on 21/02/2013 - 09:28

    my 2004 plasma has 1 x DVI input + 1 x Analouge tuner

  • WatchNerd on 21/02/2013 - 10:04
    +2

    I think this Samsung 51" plasma is a better buy for $50.00 more -
    http://www.appliancesonline.com.au/samsung-ps51e450-series-4…

    It uses 119 kWh/annum (10hrs a day) less than the LG, Which is about $29.00 less a year.

    • mattypoika on 21/02/2013 - 10:11
      +1

      If you watch 10 hours of TV a day it is probably worth it… I hope there aren't people out there that do.

      • WatchNerd on 21/02/2013 - 10:15
        +1

        Yes this is one of the reasons why the plasma vs led power usage argument is so pointless.
        An led is going to cost a lot more to buy, which can pay for a lot of run time on a plasma.

        • MATTDAMON on 21/02/2013 - 10:46
          -1

          It's not so much the power consumption, it's the heat from plasma's, they pump out a lot of heat in comparison to a led tv.

        • Graybags on 21/02/2013 - 17:20

          My 51" Samsung Plasma is cooler than my 32"lcd. It the is barely noticeable.

        • MATTDAMON on 22/02/2013 - 01:58

          Cathode backlit or LED, if its the former then you would be on the money, I was referencing the heat output compared to an equivalent LED tv to which the led runs significantly cooler.

        • WatchNerd on 22/02/2013 - 11:39

          It's the same thing, heat equals power consumption.
          It works out about $0.12-$0.15 a day more for 10 hours use to run a new model Samsung 50" plasma.This LG is probably a bit more.

    • [Deactivated] on 21/02/2013 - 10:23
      +5

      @luke73
      The Samsung you mentioned above is not Full HD ( O)

      • WatchNerd on 21/02/2013 - 10:31
        +1

        I missed that, thanks for the heads up.
        Still ok if you mainly watch free to air, but not a fair comparison.

    • krisspy on 21/02/2013 - 11:18

      Not full hd

  • martyn on 21/02/2013 - 10:38

    I have this TV, very happy with it overall, PQ is great and sound is not as tinny as most modern TV's. If you have windows opposite where your TV sits then glare will be an issue. Also it's not a "Smart TV", you need to bring your own set top box type device if you want to use iView etc.

  • cornbeef on 21/02/2013 - 11:41
    -1

    Does it come full of smurfs?

    • cornbeef on 21/02/2013 - 19:18
      +1

      wow - feel the smurf love!

      • berger on 22/02/2013 - 08:04

        I'm not sure how that comment was expected to attract positive votes. I'm not sure i get the smurf reference myself?

        • mattypoika on 22/02/2013 - 10:46

          There are smurfs on the screen in the picture of the TV.

  • Dealer12345 on 21/02/2013 - 12:45

    Looks like we're getting ready for 55''+ as the standard tv size or 4k tvs?

  • akte on 21/02/2013 - 14:55

    Looks like Bing Lee is having deal on the same TV but slightly more expensive:
    http://www.binglee.com.au/lg-50pa6500-50-127cm-full-hd-plasm…

    • Mr Haj on 22/02/2013 - 01:39
      +3

      thanks for the heads up. now i know where to shop if i want to spend an extra $57

      • akte on 22/02/2013 - 16:07
        -1

        Seems to be free shipping, so it will be extra 7 bucks?

  • Squ1shy on 21/02/2013 - 22:59

    Here is a review…
    http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/lg-50pa6500/4505-6482…

    The bottom line: The LG PA6500 is a decent plasma television if you'll have nothing less than 1080p for cheap, but it's not the best value at this level.

    • skazclaw on 22/02/2013 - 00:22
      +4

      at $500 it might be the best value

    • Mr Haj on 22/02/2013 - 01:41
      -1

      can we have an example of "best value"?

  • thunderlips on 23/02/2013 - 02:36

    According to LG's website, this TV has 3 HDMI inputs, not 2.
    It has 2 on side and 1 on the rear.

  • Prav on 23/02/2013 - 09:47

    expired

  • petebern on 26/02/2013 - 17:45

    This deal has only sold out online - some stores still have stock. I just picked one up from Morayfield in Qld and they had a few left. I bought it as a gift so haven't tested for image quality but one in store looked good for the price. Tested for heat too and it was hardly warm - although the store was freezing so this may have been a factor. Considering the price, I may go back for another one for the child.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join