Federal Budget 2025 'Reply' Thoughts?

Peter Dutton, the Opposition Leader, has made several key promises in his budget reply speech as part of his campaign to become Australia's next prime minister. Here are the main points:

Gas Plan Specifics

Dutton's national gas plan includes auditing development-ready projects, particularly in southern states facing potential shortfalls. He also aims to halve approval times for these projects to expedite their development.

Gas Infrastructure Fund

The $1 billion critical gas infrastructure fund will not only increase pipeline and storage capacity but also enforce "use it or lose it" stipulations. This means gas drilling companies must actively develop their offshore gas fields or risk losing their rights to them.

Electricity Price

Dutton claims his plan will be 44% cheaper than Labor's, potentially saving Australians $263 billion. He argues that cheaper plans will lead to lower electricity prices as fewer costs are passed on to consumers.

Youth Mental Health Expansion

The expansion of the National Centre for Excellence in Youth Mental Health, which Dutton established in 2014, aims to enhance support and services for young people struggling with mental health issues.

Support for Businesses

Small and medium businesses in critical industries will receive $12,000 to support apprentices and trainees, aiming to boost the workforce in essential sectors.

Legislative Priorities

On the first sitting day of the next parliament, Dutton promises to introduce four critical pieces of legislation focusing on energy, immigration, housing, health, and community safety.

Public Service Cuts

By reversing Labor's increase of 41,000 Canberra-based public servants, Dutton aims to save $7 billion annually and over $10 billion over the forward estimates.

Defence Funding

While specific details were not provided, Dutton teased a significant funding commitment to defence, emphasizing the importance of national security amid rising geopolitical tensions.

Spending Cuts

The Coalition plans to cut $10 billion in spending by eliminating what they consider "inflationary, ineffectual and imprudent spending." This includes ending the $20 billion rewiring the nation fund, Labor's $10 billion housing fund, and $16 billion in production tax credits for critical minerals and green hydrogen.

Support for Vulnerable Australians

Despite the spending cuts, Dutton reassured that funding for health, aged care, veterans' support, the NDIS, and defence would not be reduced. Additionally, he pledged $50 million for food charities helping vulnerable Australians.

Dutton's speech builds on previous election pledges, including allowing first home buyers to use up to $50,000 in super for their deposit and promising a major housing policy during the campaign. He positions himself as a strong and steady leader.

This is following on from the Budget post https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/899250?page=1#comment-1638…

Poll thoughts on the budget and who do you think presents a 'better' way forward for Australia with the looming election

Poll Options

  • 560
    Very Poor
  • 22
    Poor
  • 17
    Average
  • 24
    Good
  • 46
    Very Good

Comments

      • -4

        Only idiots dislike migration anyway. I can understand people feeling uneasy about accepting migrants if those migrants have a criminal history or a chequered background. That is a minority. In general, migration is a great thing. Bringing smart, skilled people into the country with good work ethic can only help society. The ones who are worried about migration are signalling to the rest of us that they are insecure about their work ethic or their ability to compete in the job market. They're worried that they won't measure up. It's a bit pathetic.

        The more migrants the better. Australia is a big, welcoming country. We're not even close to full.

        • I mostly agree, however:

          insecure about their work ethic or their ability to compete in the job market

          "derr tookur jerbs" is rarely the concern these days, it is now "derr tookur housing." The concern is the lack of housing stock, which is quite legitimate.

          Hence it is not really worth trying to convince people immigration is good, and better to just point to the simple fact: Labor hasn't increased it. It is in fact, coming down dramatically right now.

          • @haemolysis: No one is entitled to a house any more than he is entitled to a job, so at the end of the day, the restless natives complaining about migration in either respect are just wrong. No point in diluting the message - the message should be simple: if someone else from another culture and with (most likely) worse language skills than you can take your job or your house, you have only one person to blame…and it's not me, or Albanese.

            • +1

              @justworld: I've upvoted this with the caveat though, that there are immigrants who are willing to live in conditions far poorer than what the standard of living in Australia should be but do so because it's well above what they would live in back in their country of origin… At some point, we need to ensure that the standard doesn't get dragged down.
              I would hope these immigrants coming to Australia could come here with the hopes of achieving the Australian dream. If we allow that dream to be dragged down to 10 people to a 2 bedroom apartment, working 3 jobs to pay rent while "studying". They will not be the only ones who will have to accept that Australian dream… Thats all their children could ever hope for too and probably all young native born Australians will have to settle for.
              Immigration policy should be driven by increasing standard of living and then economical benefits… not the other way round.

            • @justworld: It’s not about “diluting” the message, it’s about focussing on things that a) can actually fix the problem, and b) could actually sway opinion.

              You are not going to convince people who hate migrants that “migrants are actually totally cool.”

              But if they’re someone says “I’m not voting Labor because Labor did X” and you can quite demonstrably show… well, no Labor didn’t… that may be influential.

              Similarly there’s no point poopooing the housing problem when we have a choice of voting for a party doing some things that will matter (ie: measures not related immigration - HAFF, training builders at TAFE, etc) and the alternative is a party that’s telling us they’ll… let people inflate the market with super, “but hey, you’ll also see a few less brown people.” Oh hooray!

              • -2

                @haemolysis: But your idea of political expediency lets down migrants, silently allows the denigration of them to continue and also leads to bad policies (restricting migration when we should be increasing it if anything). Pretending to cater to a bunch of F-wits doesn't do anything other than allow Trumpism to gather momentum.

                People who hate migrants need to be put in their place. Not catered to. The message should be - Labor/Liberals are both for a big Australia because that is in Australia's interests. If we need more housing the solution is to build it, not to restrict other people's dreams of a better life in Australia.

                • +1

                  @justworld: @justworld

                  Yeah nah, not in first home buyers interest nor future generations interest at all for a big Australia. It is only for future governments and big business to keep wages low..

                  Have you had a look at the UK and EU at all the issues they are having? I'm happy to dump 5000 immigrants next door to your house, culturally different to you tho. I'm sure you will change your mind.

                  I feel you need to be put in your place, as it sounds like if people disagree with you. You will throw your toys out of the cot.

                  • @Dunks: If you're not good enough to compete with migrants then just come out and say it; don't bring red herrings like 'cultural differences' into play, unless you're actually just racist - I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

                    I don't want 5,000 migrants next door to me if they're from criminal backgrounds, but if they're skilled migrants or students with good character, by all means, ferry them over.

                    It's in everyone's interests except those who are shit at life and who can't compete.

                    Migrants also bring in a lot of money and taxes to the economy, which is important given Australians expect so much welfare.

                    • @justworld: You are forgetting migrants of different cultures tend to live all in the one area..

                      You happy for your area to culturally change?

                      It's not racist..

                      One example…

                      Cabramatta NSW today,- known for his large vietnamese community. Previously in the 1970s it was a large Italian community..

        • +1

          Migration is a little more complicated then that.

          Its sold as getting high quality migrants into the country, these days at least there is a large number of economic refugees pretending to be something else.

          We aren't getting skills in general but in particular you would think we would be prioritising migrants with construction/trade backgrounds.

        • +1

          Skilled worker has been flogged for the last 15 years.. government like them because it keeps wages low.

          Are we building and upgrading
          Schools?
          Hospitals?
          New roads?
          Infrastructure?
          Child care centres?

          What about teachers? Teach them Australian culture?
          What nurses and doctors trained with Australian standards?

          When do we stop? For our pop?

          50 million?
          100 million?
          500 million?
          1 billion?

          The fact is, albo wants green energy and cares about climate change. When PEOPLE have the biggest impact on the environment. Direct contradiction.

          • +1

            @Dunks:

            Are we building and upgrading
            Schools?
            Hospitals?
            New roads?
            Infrastructure?
            Child care centres?

            Yes we are. A couple of examples I've noticed recently in my local area:

            Hospitals: I noticed the Princess Alexandra (Public) Hospital in Brisbane has construction cranes and scaffolding around an area that was previously empty, they're extending the hospital. Plus the 87 "Urgent Care Centres" that have been set up around Australia, many in regional areas. Used one a month ago, much better for minor ailments than going to the hospital's emergency department, was seen within 15 minutes.

            Infrastructure:
            The "cross river rail" project is nearing completion, and will allow many more people to travel by public transport in peak hour. Will also makes it practical to catch a train to the Royal Brisbane Hospital, the largest hospital in Brisbane. Previously the closest stations were Bowen Hills and Fortitude Valley, both over a kilometre away, as they're extending Exhibition station and making it operate all year, instead of just ten days a year.

      • +1

        We had a cost of living crisis.. those on visas aren't leaving.

        Sounds like many in the forum already own their homes, so they don't care the impact demand has on housing.

        • I think you're right. And I suspect they don't much care about the long term impacts on their children's or grandchildren's lives.

      • -1

        That’s completely untrue no visa has a processing time of three years. Labor has overseen the largest increase in migration in history outside of wartime. Almost double the numbers that LNP let in during their 10 years in power. Are you too lazy to look up the numbers?

  • +4

    Dutton promising to sort out allocating more gas for local consumption when they did nothing about this very long standing issue during a decade in government is comedy gold. As is his flip flopping over things like WFH and taking on insurers.

    Yet he wants us to believe he's the tough guy?

    Albo isn't perfect by any means but Jesus he's a much better option than Dutton.

    • -1

      Where is the $275 Cheaper bill Albo promised me?

      • +2

        The electricity prices were increasing, which the LNP knew about, but they "deferred announcing" the increases until just AFTER the election.

        Labor didn't know about the increases, and did their modelling based on the "official figures" provided by the LNP, which the LNP knew were wrong and did nothing to correct.

        Read for more details: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/feb/10/angus…

        Yet another case where the LNP keeps denying knowing something, when they were SUPPOSED to know it. Amazing how well they psychically know which reports on their desk to not read.

        • -2

          It's all spin. Albo broke his promise and then back pedaled Never his fault as PM huh?

          • +1

            @Dunks: Albo wasn't PM when he made those statements, so your argument fails at the first hurdle.

            Never the LNP's fault for hiding information and lying about it, huh?

          • +1

            @Dunks: Dunks copied a line from social media and is now struggling to support his argument after being fact checked 🤣😭

  • +3

    Just a reminder to everyone that are confused about who to vote for, you can see how each party has generally voted historically, rather than listen to the BS they spout during election time.

    Link: https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/

    For example, Dutton has consistently voted against housing affordability, yet he said in his budget reply he will assist housing affordability.

    • Make sure to read and understand the Bills they voted against before passing judgement though. Just because a Bill is ostensibly about improving 'housing affordability' does not mean it would have worked or was the best way to do it or that there were not better ways spend money to help Australians.

    • -1

      For example Penny should be sacked because she only shows up for work 31% of the time.

  • Both parties are awful. The choice from South Park is real.

    • +1

      Surely that means better the devil you know and avoid Dutton?

      • -2

        No the devil is Albanese he’s pathetic on all levels

  • +2

    Dutton's gas plan is beginning to show why you don't design your energy policy on the back of a napkin

    Usually the Liberals run on economic management and free markets as their strong point. Manipulating the gas market to deliver below-cost gas to Australians is Venezuelan levels of economic management though.

Login or Join to leave a comment