LG 34WR50QK-B 34" WQHD Curved Monitor VA 3440x1440p 100Hz $349 ($328.06 with Coupon) Delivered @ LG IT eStore eBay

250
LG 34WR50QK-B 34" WQHD Curved Monitor VA 3440x1440p 100Hz $349 ($328.06 with Coupon) Delivered @ LG IT eStore eBayAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
pmoarg on 08/11/2024 - 21:14 ebay.com.au (797 clicks)
Last edited 08/11/2024 - 21:31 by 1 other user
NOVE24
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

On sale for $349 at a lot of places (Mwave, Umart, Scorptec, Centre Com), this is a bit cheaper and with free delivery.

LG 34WR50QK-B 34in WQHD 100Hz UltraWide Curved VA Monitor

  • 34in 21:9 WQHD (3440 x 1440) Curved (1800R)-
  • OnScreen Control
  • sRGB 99% (Typ.) with HDR10
  • Reader Mode
  • 100Hz Refresh Rate
  • Dynamic Action Sync
  • Black Stabiliser
  • MPN: 34WR50QK-B
Computing 34inch LCD Monitor LG

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
LG Australia
LG Australia

Comments

  • dbglt on 08/11/2024 - 21:19
    +1

    How does this compare to the Xiaomi curved one that was posted the other week?

  • Synticulous on 08/11/2024 - 22:06

    I suppose I could stack this one on top of my old Xiaomi UW?

    $319 if you have PLS250 available.

    • Mingles on 08/11/2024 - 22:17
      +2

      I ran 2x 34"s vertically stacked.. not sure how far back you'll be sitting but the top monitor was pretty much unuseable for me - too much moving neck upwards (uncomfortable). It certaintly looks cool though lol

      • ruprectaus on 08/11/2024 - 23:32

        What about side by side ? I need more screen space then my curved 34" Dell is providing

        • Mingles on 08/11/2024 - 23:59

          I was in the same situation about a month ago, when I realised 1x 34" wasn't enough screen space for work. Gaming is OK though.

          2x 34" IMO would be too wide for comfort. I've always liked a 2x 27" for work at my office as it gives me the best work productivity, but i couldn't do it for home as 1 screen would be too small for gaming and using both with the bezel in the middle would drive my OCD insane.

          I ended up with a 49" which is esentially 2x 27" in size without the bezel in the middle, so great for work and awesome for gaming that supports the 5120x1440 resolution. I'm pretty happy with it and I think you will too as long as your budget suits of course.

  • ashyboy on 08/11/2024 - 22:23
    +3

    Was just looking at this!
    MSY has $349 for pickup. https://www.msy.com.au/product/lg-ultrawide-34in-qhd-100hz-v…

    One thing to note there is no USB C port and its VA panel. Not that I'm complaining at this price point. Lowest 34 inch monitor with with USB C is ACER XV345CURV at $459

    • chunky on 08/11/2024 - 23:30

      You can get the Dell S3423DWC for $431.64.

  • DeeTrance on 08/11/2024 - 22:24
    +2

    I hate these short arse 1080p and 1440p monitors..

    Looking for a 34" 3840 x 2160p monitor.
    Any recommendations?

    • ashyboy on 08/11/2024 - 22:44
      +1

      You mean 32''?
      34'' usually refers to 'ultrawide' category that is 21:9 ratio, while 27'' and 32'' and standard 16:9 ratio monitors.
      Plenty out there. One of the good value is LS32D700EAEXXY https://www.msy.com.au/product/samsung-32in-uhd-va-monitor-l…

      Even at 1440P 34 inch is very sharp at 40cm away from the screen. I would recommend looking at IPS rather than VA if you are not a gamer

      • DeeTrance on 08/11/2024 - 22:50
        -1

        Yeah want a 34" 3840 x2160 monitor.
        Someone has to be able to make them.
        I want screen real estate rather than outright picture quality.

        • ashyboy on 08/11/2024 - 23:11
          +1

          Well not really, there aren't any even if you find one it will be odd one out. You cant just ask for any inch monitor at any resolution. There are industry standards, they arent exactly 'short arse' ing it.

          Let me elaborate.
          Pixel counts:
          1920 × 1080 = 2.07 Million Pixel
          2560 × 1440 = 3.69 Million Pixel
          3440 × 1440 = 4.95 Million Pixel (21:9 34 inch wide angle) 21:9
          3840 × 2160 = 8.23 Million Pixel
          Notice the difference between two 1440p options.

          If you want more real estate than 32 inch standard monitor then you go into region of 'TV's where monitor features are afterthought. Also when you beyond 32 inch even 4K will have lower pixel density. Due to exponential increase in 'area' of a screen.

          Your best bet is to look at 42 inch

          • DeeTrance on 08/11/2024 - 23:26

            @ashyboy: I think 42" is too massive for a computer monitor, sitting roughly 1m back. I think the human head would be rotating side to side all day.

            I currently use two 32" 2160p monitors for spreadsheets and Adobe work. I would upgrade to two 34" 2160p monitors, or even 35-36" monitors. But like you said, what I am after is not an industry standard size so that's sad atm.

            • ashyboy on 08/11/2024 - 23:41
              +1

              @DeeTrance: Even if 34'' existed I dont they would bring you good value my friend.
              I had similar setup as you then I used 34 inch 1440P monitor at work. I dont think I can go back to 2*32'' monitor ever again!
              One of the things always gets on my nerves is when I copy cells and click somewhere else before pasting and then it leaves the copies text. No more on widescreens! Cos you can stack windows on SAME SCREEN! Trust me you have to try it.

              Watch this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZZ7Gockrt8&t=822s
              Check PPI on this link - https://www.displayninja.com/what-is-pixel-density/

              Something like this is big investment. If you get time on the weekend go to JB and try their 34 inch widescreen demo screens (whichever) then you'll know how good this deal is at this price

  • edBARGAIN on 09/11/2024 - 00:16

    Pulled the trigger. Thanks op

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join