Mikrotik RB5009UPr+S+IN 8xPoE/1xSFP+ Network Router $382 + $10.95 Delivery ($0 Pickup Fortitude Valley, QLD) @ Gigafy

170

$382 for the MikroTik RB5009UPr+S+IN is a great deal considering this PoE unit is a similar price as what the non-PoE unit (RB5009UG+S+IN) usually goes for.

The next cheapest price I've found for the RB5009UPr+S+IN was from Amazon US via Amazon AU for $502.53 delivered.

The RB5009UPr+S+IN may be overkill for your regular user but there is an Android/iOS app but I havent used it so maybe someone else can comment.

I might be worth it if you need/want…
  • 7 x 1gbe PoE ports (25w/port max)
  • 1 x 2.5gbe PoE port (25w max)
  • 1 x SFP+ port
  • A rabbithole of network customisation

Note: Maximum total PoE output is 130w

Postage
  • Pickup In Store: $0.00
  • Australia Post (Parcel Post): $10.95
  • Australia Post (Parcel Post Small Satchel): $11.30
  • Australia Post (Express Post): $14.45
  • Australia Post (Express Post Small Satchel): $14.80
Mikrotik's kitchy product video.
Specifications source
  • Product code: RB5009UPr+S+IN
  • Architecture: ARM 64bit
  • CPU: 88F7040
  • CPU core count: 4
  • CPU nominal frequency: 350-1400 (auto) MHz
  • Switch chip model: 88E6393
  • RouterOS license: 5
  • Operating System: RouterOS v7
  • Size of RAM: 1 GB
  • Storage size: 1 GB
  • Storage type: NAND
  • MTBF: Approximately 200'000 hours at 25C
  • Tested ambient temperature: -40°C to 60°C
  • IPsec hardware acceleration: Yes
  • Suggested price: $299.00
Powering
  • Number of DC inputs: 3 (DC jack, 2-pin terminal, PoE-IN)
  • DC jack input Voltage: 24-57 V
  • 2-pin terminal input Voltage: 24-57 V
  • Max power consumption: 150 W
  • Max power consumption without attachments: 16 W
  • Cooling type: Passive
  • PoE in: 802.3af/at (ether1), Mode B (ether2-ether8)
  • PoE in input Voltage: 24-57 V
PoE-out
  • PoE-out ports: Ether1-Ether8
  • PoE out: 802.3af/at
  • Max out per port output (input 18-30 V): 900 mA
  • Max out per port output (input 30-57 V): 440 mA
  • Max total out (A): 2.59 A
  • Total output current: 2.28
  • Total output power: 130
Ethernet
  • 10/100/1000 Ethernet ports: 7
  • Number of 1G Ethernet ports with Reverse PoE (PoE-in): 7
  • Number of 2.5G Ethernet ports: 1
  • Number of 2.5G Ethernet ports with Reverse PoE (PoE-in): 1
Fiber
  • SFP+ ports: 1
Peripherals
  • Number of USB ports: 1
  • USB Power Reset: Yes
  • USB slot type: USB 3.0 type A
  • Max USB current (A): 1.5
Details
  • CPU temperature monitor: Yes
  • Current Monitor: Yes
  • PCB temperature monitor: Yes
  • Voltage Monitor: Yes
Certification & Approvals
  • Certification: CE, EAC, ROHS
  • IP: 20

Related Stores

gigafy.com.au
gigafy.com.au

Comments

  • +7

    this was not something i expected to come up on ozbargain at all.

    For what it's worth I usually buy my mikrotik gear from duxtel (IT business) but when stocks are short I've bought from these guys and they've been great.

    The android app is decent.

    However I'm going to say that if you aren't in the field of IT do not buy this. Even if you are and you don't have a thorough understanding of how networks operate at a low level you're going to have a horrible time with this.

    They are amazingly feature rich, so customizable and amazing value for money. However they do not hold your hand through this process in the slightest.

    Need to setup bandwidth management? Well you'd better be quite familiar with mangle rules, the mikrotik way of using queues etc.
    Need to forward a port? Add a rule to the correct chain in the firewall, add a nat rule to forward traffic to where you need to go.

    The second one isn't overly complex, but 99% of users just want to jam the IP and port number in and call it a day.

    TLDR: I wouldn't use anything else, but if you're reading this chances are you don't have my skillset and won't have a good time.

    • +1

      Thinking of starting my first home networking setup, eyeing off an M1 Mac Mini to run Scrypted and get PoE wired to maybe 4 cameras, it’d be a fully new setup. Had been looking at the TP link switches until this post came up, thanks for your sage advice or I may have been tempted!

    • One other thing they can do that other switches often can't - handle higher temperatures. We use loads of these at work in dusty places where there is no cooling. They just keep chugging away.

      • they never die lol

    • Thanks for the heads up! Gonna try and set up a 5 camera, self-hosted recorder.

      Keeping the cameras and this router off the house internet, as a subnetwork just into the recording computer should make it harder to screw-up, right?

      • +1

        I'm not sure where the tik comes into this honestly. If you want to segregate networks and are a networking noob just slap another router behind your existing one and double nat it.

        If you wanted to segregate your networks it is better done on the router / one device.

        I have a middle ground for my CCTV gear though:
        -Cheapo chinese recorder taking constant footage, blocked from web access.
        -Homeassistant connected to the rtsp streams of the cameras and monitoring the onvif sensors. The sensors on these state of the art aliexpress chinese besder cameras detect people quite reliably, once HA receives this trigger it records some footage and sends me a video via telegram.

        • Good advise, I guess this is overkill. I just happened to be looking for a decent PoE router and this popped up so I got excited, but I can see there are plenty of "good enough" options for a third of the price.

          I have an unRaid NAS and was looking to add cameras to it, don't need remote access, so slapping in an extra router seems like a good option.

    • +1

      Lol yep!!
      I was playing around with some hAP acs we use at work. Loaded the factory UI, man, what a learning curve :(

  • “Suggested Price $299”, hope that’s USD or it’s pretty bold to put in the item description!

    • My buy price is around $500 as a business. This is dirt cheap

  • I understand Mikrotik is among the best when it comes to networking but just wonder if it’s because they provide the most customisable and configurable options, or it’s also because of the reliability. I’m more interested in the second part, i.e. how reliable can it be compared to an equivalent Omada or Unify router? Also can a Pfsense or Opnsense box be as good as a Mikrotik when it comes to features and reliability?

    • +1

      I've been using these exclusively as routers / p2p bridges where needed in my business for about 8 years now I think.

      See my above comment re complexity.

      Reliability wise I have not had a single device fail, outside of failed power supplies. I can still see an rb2011 I setup 7 years ago online and connected back to me. Omada I can't comment on, ubiquity have been reliable but I have had failures. I only use them for wireless though.

      Your pfSense box is never going to be as reliable as a Mikrotik, or at least not statistically as reliable unless you're buying supported hardware through pfSense. Mikrotik control the hardware and the software here so it's just going to be a better experience from that point of view.

      PF/OpnSense the answer is it depends. As these run BSD there are a heap more plugins / options etc available since you / others have access to the underlying OS etc (more on this shortly).. So say you wanted to run openvpn with both TCP + UDP you can on opnsense because hey that's normal and supported. RouterOS nope, one or the other. Want to run tailscale? I'm not even going to check but I know it'd be supported.

      This is kinda getting better in RouterOS now that we can run containers (ie docker) under it. So rather than having to have a separate container on a server / other device for my tailscale nodes, I can simply add a container running this under rOS..

      However bandwidth management and general customizability, making it bend to do whatever weird shit you need it to do etc is considerably better on routerOS at the cost of complexity.

      If you're dead set on running your own router in software I'd prefer openwrt over pfsense personally.

      Happy to answer any questions, I love this shit.

      • Thanks for your detailed answer. It’s appreciated.
        It makes sense to me that Mikrotik is probably the most reliable given they control both hardware and software and their stuff are enterprise grade.
        However your first comment scared me a bit admittedly, and I honestly don’t know if I’m willing to invest considerable time for it.

        I bought an overpriced Synology NAS to not have to build and tinker with a custom NAS, and hoped to find something similar that is reliable and “just work” I.e. Apple-like in the network domain as well, but I guess the Mikrotik is a totally different beast and there’s no such a thing when it comes to networking.

        I guess I should focus on building a network with Omada switches and AP and a mini PC with Opnsense for router for now. But I will keep an eye in case something better but simple enough that may be introduced from Mikrotik or another brand in the future.

        • Yeah, like if I gave you an address of 192.168.69.69/23 would you know what that refers to and what it implies? It's not so much investing time, it's can you actually do this.

          I'd be impressed if you managed to get it to do what you want, and more impressed if you didn't break things most of the time when you made a config change.

          You're gonna have a massive learning curve. I knew my stuff before I touched these and still had a hard time getting my head around the little intricacies. I will say the lack of hand holding made me much better at what I do though.

          I haven't touched omada gear, but if say you should be right with either / or them or ubiq. Why not use a router from one of those? I really think running a router on your own hardware is idiotic outside of a niche use case.

          They're cheap enough you can just buy one and add a cheap mini pc for the rest of your x86 needs. N100 boxes off aliexpress cost nothing these days, and at least when it shits itself you still have internet access.

          • @knk: Yeah I know what 192.168.69.69/23, have learned it back in uni and also occasionally have to touch them at work :) Still need those basic knowledge even for the Omada stuff I guess, but I don’t fancy going much deeper than that and too often after work.

            The main reason I planned to go with Opensense is its flexibility and features and community support which I assume a lot better than Omada and Ubi. Also heard they either can have spotty updates or simply abandon their hardware after a few years. Switches and APs are kind of ‘dumb” compared to the router so I don’t mind them as much.

            You raised a very good case about the backup router though. I already bought a 4-port mini PC as a backup for my Lenovo 720Q which I plan to use as the main one. And there’s always the good old Telstra Smart modem handy if things go really bad with the Opensense stuff I guess.

  • mmmm routeros 😋😋

Login or Join to leave a comment