This was posted 5 months 7 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Tabletop Role-Play Games for Palestine - 643 Games for US$10 @ Itch.io

36251
Tabletop Role-Play Games for Palestine - 643 Games for US$10 @ Itch.io
Go to Deal
LMaxPanic on 27/06/2024 - 14:48 itch.io (3589 clicks)
Last edited 01/07/2024 - 17:12 by 2 other users

In response to the ongoing genocide in Palestine, we've created this bundle to raise funds for Medical Aid for Palestinians who work for the health and dignity of Palestinians living under occupation and as refugees. They provide immediate medical aid to those in great need, while also developing local capacity and skills to ensure the long-term development of the Palestinian healthcare system.

Additional resources

Update: We did it! A total of $203,767 USD (approx. $305,000 AUD) was raised for Medical Aid for Palestinians

Gaming eBook Tabletop Game

Related Stores

itch.io
itch.io
Marketplace

closed Comments

      • McFly on 27/06/2024 - 18:46
        +7

        Name checks out.

      • dBagDealer on 28/06/2024 - 09:24
        +4

        yesteryears' victims have become Nazis themselves. a total landgrab operation killing innocents.

  • n3dd on 27/06/2024 - 16:53
    +4

    Upvoted because regardless of what subject matter the deal may be under, it is still a deal. Seems lots of people here have forgotten what this website is for. I see this not what it stands for or contributes to, but for what it is - a deal. Wanderhome, for instance, is $25 USD, but in this bundle is $18 along all the other TTRPGs

    • ozbs25 on 27/06/2024 - 17:31

      There does seem to be a few interesting titles. I'm at least going to try to have a look at Wonderfall, Lone Eons, Lordsworn, Sovereign Slayer Solitaire and Fox Curio's Floating Bookshop. All are solo with Fox Curio's Floating Bookshop being a solo journalling game. That's definitely something way outside my comfort zone but I it might be something nice to try. I do have nice notebooks and stuff that I should actually try to use.

  • JoeBogan on 27/06/2024 - 16:59
    +30

    It’s not a genocide, it’s a war. You can’t start a war and then when you start losing, claim there’s a genocide. What’s happening in Sudan is a genuine genocide which has killed plenty more people than in Gaza.

    • FlyingMiffy on 27/06/2024 - 20:05
      -1

      The bogan reference checks out!

      • JoeBogan on 27/06/2024 - 20:12
        +7

        I’m actually of Indian descent

    • Save 50 Cent on 27/06/2024 - 22:56
      +1

      Are you serious? Just because someone started a war doesn’t give you a green light to commit endless war crimes..
      Besides, the war started a long time ago.. what happened last October was a battle.

      • McFly on 27/06/2024 - 23:11
        +9

        what happened last October was a battle.

        Speechless.

        • Save 50 Cent on 27/06/2024 - 23:39
          -3

          Cool.. come back when you have something to say.

      • JoeBogan on 28/06/2024 - 10:28
        +1

        You call Hamas r$$&ing women and microwaving babies a battle?

        • Save 50 Cent on 28/06/2024 - 10:58
          -1

          No doubt it was an atrocious battle. Point is the war did not start then.

      • Lurk Hartog on 28/06/2024 - 11:25
        +5

        Wtf. How is the targeted killing of several hundred civilians at a music festival a "battle"?

        • Save 50 Cent on 28/06/2024 - 12:16
          -1

          I’m not saying it was justified. But if you push helpless people beyond their limits with unfair restrictions and blockades for decades, they might do crazy things and take a cheap shot when they get a chance.
          And a battle is a battle.. I didn’t say it was a fair one.

          • JoeBogan on 28/06/2024 - 17:26
            +4

            @Save 50 Cent: Let’s for a moment follow your logic. In the same vein what Israel is doing is also a ‘battle’. A battle is a battle anyway isn’t it, even if it isn’t a fair one. How can you not see how flawed your logic is ?

            Also to the people that negged my comment about r$&$ing women and microwaving babies, good job siding with terrorists.

            • Save 50 Cent on 28/06/2024 - 18:28

              @JoeBogan: Yeah it is still the same battle.. im just saying the war started long ago and history did not start last October unlike what you seem to think. Im not justifying what either side has been doing. Never did. Never will.

              • dins on 28/06/2024 - 19:07
                +1

                @Save 50 Cent: Let's not get it twisted you have pretty much tried to justiy Hamas' terrorism in all of your posts.

                It wasn't some "battle"

                They deliberately targetted, brutally murdered, raped, tortured and abducted 1000s of innocent unarmed civilians, most of whom were just waking up that day.

                They even killed kids like it was nothing and took kids and a freakin baby hostage!

                They taped and released to the world a lot of it to further haunt the families and loved ones of victims and carried out most of it gleefully.

                They even took dead bodies into Gaza and desecrated them.

                It was not just terrorism.

                It was terrorism on a whole nother level.

          • Namesareapain on 28/06/2024 - 19:15
            +1

            @Save 50 Cent: Restrictions on a region controlled by a religious extremist dictatorship that wants to murder you are perfectly fair and moral!

            • JoeBogan on 28/06/2024 - 19:25
              +3

              @Namesareapain: Hamas, who were voted in by the people of Gaza. Like it or not the people of Gaza also have culpability in all of this. Almost 80 percent of the population supported what hamas did in October, they are culpable.

  • Shane043 on 27/06/2024 - 17:01
    +1

    Role Play for Rockets

  • Xizor on 27/06/2024 - 17:09
    +1

    These initiatives albeit well meaning very often actually just end up funnelling funds to groups like hamas or worse. Its been VERY well documented for those interested over the past decade. We're talking organized crime level amounts,huge dollars. Even when getting materials instead of dollars, getting repurposed by hamas. The creativity and level of intricacy can be really quite impressive… if it were not for hamas using civilians as human shields in every aspect of how they operate. Just thank my lucky stars not born into that never ending cycle of suffering, persecution, violence, brain washing, poverty etc.

    • Duck Mode on 27/06/2024 - 23:28
      +3

      Need to stop guzzling the IDF propaganda

      • dBagDealer on 28/06/2024 - 09:27
        +1

        lol there is no Hamas in westbank yet they keep killing civillians there. its part of the hasbara.

        • dins on 29/06/2024 - 01:44
          -3

          In the WB they support Hamas more than even the Gazans do just have a look at any of the polls carried out there. If there ever was an election in WB Hamas would win in a landslide.

          Also you would be foolish to argue that there are no Hamas elements in WB. There are plenty of videos and pics of them killing people they suspect of providing Israel with intel etc. The only difference is that Hamas operates on the down low because of Israel's military presence in the areas.

      • dins on 29/06/2024 - 01:48
        -2

        Quite clear that he's not the one guzzling down all the propaganda here. Outsourcing all your critical thinking to a vile terrorist organisation ain't healthy.

  • Believ3r on 27/06/2024 - 17:13

    Free Palestine

    • mr_alligator on 27/06/2024 - 17:43
      +1

      🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

      • McFly on 27/06/2024 - 18:42
        +9

        PS. Useful idiot alert.

  • giordan0 on 27/06/2024 - 17:22
    +20

    Keep politics out of OzB pls

  • xeri on 27/06/2024 - 17:29
    +24

    No issues with posting fundraising deals and but that description is just s* stirring - get this off ozb.

  • mr_alligator on 27/06/2024 - 17:43
    -7

    🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

  • snorklr on 27/06/2024 - 17:43

    Anyone else craving Hummus?

  • RecklessMonkeys on 27/06/2024 - 17:59
    +7

    Upvoted in protest at the zealots that descend with their BS re-imagining of what actually goes on over there.

  • defecat0r on 27/06/2024 - 18:42
    +8

    I fully support every JDAM dropped on Gaza. You don't put out 75% of a fire. The terrorists need to go.

    • GunnerMcDagget on 27/06/2024 - 19:57
      +7

      You support killing innocent, unarmed civilians?

      Hamas definitely needs to go. But (ignoring the fact that JDAMs aren't the bombs themselves, but the guidance systems, but I know what you meant) when you say that you support every JDAM dropped, then you're also supporting every innocent civilian killed by those munitions.

      • dins on 27/06/2024 - 20:35
        +2

        That's what actually happens in war let's not play pretend. Hamas are not going to get rid of themselves are they?

      • defecat0r on 27/06/2024 - 20:59
        +7

        Nobody was calling for the halt of the Allied advance on Germany in WWII, nor calling for a two-state solution with the Nazis because there were deemed too many German civilian casualties. The Nazis had to go.
        Now in Hamas we have a regime with the same ideology (hell-bent on the annihilation of Jews) and the majority of Palestinians support them in this.
        Hopefully at some point in the next 100 years Palestinians will learn the connection between "cause" and "effect'. Hopefully they can let go of their hatred. While we wait, we ought fully support Israel while they rescue their hostages and put out this fire completely.

    • WeeDeePotato on 27/06/2024 - 22:18
      +1

      Well aren’t you just a ray of sunshine.

      An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind

    • BewareOfThe Dog on 29/06/2024 - 00:42
      -1

      Yes, but the innocent should be spared.

      • defecat0r on 29/06/2024 - 09:35
        +1

        How do you propose that that is done?

  • vaper on 27/06/2024 - 18:50
    +18

    Supporting terrorists is never acceptable and I am surprised the mods are allowing this "deal"

  • combatant on 27/06/2024 - 18:53
    +17

    Genocide, pfft. So much evidence of the Pallywood productions. Many are also being put off by all the protesters/Hamas supporters who are blindly following like sheep.

    Not enough value in the bundle anyway, and there's no way the funds or benefit are going to reach the people that actually deserve it, rather it will be absorbed by administrative costs and end up in the hands of Hamas. NO DEAL.

    • FlyingMiffy on 27/06/2024 - 20:10
      +1

      Do u also believe that the Earth is flat?

      • McFly on 27/06/2024 - 20:29
        +3

        You're hilarious!

      • dins on 27/06/2024 - 20:39
        +3

        Definitely sounds like you do.

        Am I correct or am I right?

      • combatant on 28/06/2024 - 07:54
        +4

        Lol, mate…are you a sheep?

      • Clear on 28/06/2024 - 09:23
        +2

        Do u also believe that the Earth is flat?

        Can I blow your mind for a minute?

        My mum's friend, Gary was over and I was playing with his record collection. He knocked me right into the mini fridge but when I came up I was holding one of the records. The shape of the record? Flat. Guess what record it was? The biggest band in 1971…. Earth Wind and Fire! And what was their album cover? A pyramid - the symbol of the illuminati. And who's the drummer for Earth Wind and Fire? John Paris. What group is from Paris? The Templars.

        And when did the pope kill them? Friday the 13th. Who's the bad guy in Friday the 13th? Freddie Krueger. Who played Freddie Krueger? Robert Englund. What do you call an apartment in England? A flat. Who lives in an apartment in England? What satanist? Harry Potter. And what month did he go to school to become a Satanist? September. Who had the biggest hit called September? Earth Wind and Fire!

        Flat earthers! 🖐️

        • combatant on 28/06/2024 - 10:40
          +2

          I lol'd at this. Only one thing…it's Jason Voorhees from Friday the 13th, not Freddy.

          • Clear on 28/06/2024 - 11:35
            +2

            @combatant: I need to reconsider everything now.

            I don't suppose you know how deep the earth is? Let's say I need to bury some dogs. Are they going to just float into outer space?

            • combatant on 28/06/2024 - 12:46
              +3

              @Clear: That's a tough question. It would depend on the breed of dog and the length of its tail.

    • Duck Mode on 27/06/2024 - 23:30

      IDFwood is A-OK to gargle though

      • combatant on 28/06/2024 - 07:55
        +7

        I prefer facts over fiction.

  • bennybaubles on 27/06/2024 - 19:12
    +7

    If the Jews in Israel were starving after having the crap bombed out of them during this latest conflict I’d give to their charity as well.

    • dins on 27/06/2024 - 20:32
      +5

      Yup so let's fund hamas!

      • bennybaubles on 27/06/2024 - 21:14
        +3

        Or what you’re really saying is let’s not help the innocent people starving in the streets with no food, shelter or medical assistance because Hamas still exists.

        • dins on 27/06/2024 - 21:29
          +9

          How do you plan on helping them by funding hamas?

          Last I checked they're using Palestinians as human shields, digging tunnels under their houses, using schools and hospitals etc to store weapons and artillery etc and even hijacking aid trucks.

          Not to mention the war they started on Oct 7th.

          But hey I might be wrong. I'm sure they care about the Palestinians and will use your hard-earned to help them out.

          • bennybaubles on 28/06/2024 - 14:00
            +1

            @dins: So how do you think I should go about helping the Palestinians?

            • dins on 28/06/2024 - 18:16
              +1

              @bennybaubles: By not funding terrorists and speaking up against terrorist propaganda.

  • Buggy D Clown on 27/06/2024 - 19:20

    not rly a bargain but good cause it goes to the right people in need

  • FlyingMiffy on 27/06/2024 - 20:09
    +8

    Sounds like most on Ozbargain dont actually know what Hamas is and how it came about. But hey who needs facts in this day and age?

    • dins on 27/06/2024 - 20:45
      +4

      So in other words you support one of the most brutal and barbaric terrorist outfits the world has ever seen. Got it!

      • FlyingMiffy on 27/06/2024 - 21:01
        +4

        Oh so you read about them? Was it the 70 years of Israeli occupation that you thought was a furvy or perhaps you dont like the name which means zeal in arabic? Or maybe that you think the lineage tracing back to a medical clinic and charity for displaced Palestinians was a lie? Though i think most people focus on the 1989 incident when they attacked IDF soldiers rather than bombing Israeli civilians as the most cowardice act of terrorists? I mean, totally, why pick your fight with armed military when you could take a leaf out of the IDF and just bomb everyone. Better value for money that way, right?

        • dins on 27/06/2024 - 21:07
          +3

          It's 2024 now time to come back to reality.

        • Namesareapain on 28/06/2024 - 19:00
          +3

          Supporting Hamas is a federal crime!

  • em0r33 on 27/06/2024 - 20:19
    +4

    KHAMAAAAAS KHAMAAAAAAAS

    20000 dead kids and 20000 orphans aren't khamas, but now that you have mercilessly killed their families and occupied their land for 75 years, they will be.

    Free Palestine. Zios can go scream into the ether.

    • gto21 on 27/06/2024 - 20:34
      +5

      The Jews are currently winning the war against Hamas.

    • gto21 on 27/06/2024 - 20:40
      +4

      Hamas has developed the tactic of hiding among civilians. If terrorists cannot be eliminated because they use civilians as shields, it will send a message to all terrorist groups that they can kill and commit sexual assault without fearing consequences. Keep in mind that Palestinians voted for Hamas, and the majority support terrorist attacks on Israel.

      • FlyingMiffy on 27/06/2024 - 21:05
        +3

        Yeah shame on the Palestinians for wanting to break free from 70 years of occupation and displacement? How dare they want out? Round them up and bomb them. We can pick out the Hamas folks afterwards and pretend the rest werent there. Go IDF!

        • dins on 27/06/2024 - 21:20
          +3

          70 years?

          Last I checked Palestine was invented by Arafat in 1988.

          • McFly on 27/06/2024 - 23:17
            +7

            @dins: No, it was in the 60's. The Egyptian terrorist Arafat and his Soviet comrades came up with the idea of Palestine to get the Arabs on side to destroy Israel, get rid of the Jews and give the US a bloody nose, because their other strategies didn't work.

            • dins on 27/06/2024 - 23:25
              +1

              @McFly: Cheers bud yeah sounds about right. I was referring to the official Declaration of Independence of Palestine in 1988.

              "The Palestinian Declaration of Independence formally established the State of Palestine, and was written by Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish and proclaimed by Yasser Arafat on 15 November 1988."

      • GunnerMcDagget on 27/06/2024 - 22:15
        +1

        If a single terrorist uses a hostage as a human shield, and a police officer shoots that hostage to kill the terrorist, what do you think happens to the police officer?

        • gto21 on 27/06/2024 - 22:21
          +5

          Is the policeman aware that if he lets the terrorist go, the terrorist will return to attempt genocide of Jews, kill more people, kidnap, and commit sexual assault?

          • GunnerMcDagget on 28/06/2024 - 06:55

            @gto21: So you think the police officer should kill the hostage?

            • dins on 28/06/2024 - 07:20
              +1

              @GunnerMcDagget: The Police officer should first attempt to de-escalate and get the terrorist to release the hostage. If the terrorist is not willing to budge then there's no other option but to try and take the terrorist out as precisely as possible. If the hostage unfortunately gets hit even with all the precautions taken it is what it is. That's on the terrorist not the Police officer. You can't just let the terrorist leave with the hostage.

              • GunnerMcDagget on 28/06/2024 - 12:53

                @dins: And that makes sense. So Israel should take out the terrorists as precisely as possible. The options being:

                1) Send in the IDF. There will be some IDF soldiers lost, and some civilians casualties caught in the crossfire, but it will minimise the deaths of civilians

                or

                2) Bomb the area with "precision" strikes which will save the lives of a few IDF soldiers, but kill 10's of thousands of civilians including children

                I understand why Israel chose the 2nd option, but it's putting the lives of their soldiers ahead of the lives of unarmed, innocent children.

                • dins on 28/06/2024 - 18:12
                  +1

                  @GunnerMcDagget: From what I can gather Israel appears to be doing a remarkable job when it comes to minimising civilian casualties.

                  In such a densely populated area with all sorts of tunnels, traps, ambushes and fighting against terrorists wearing civilian clothing and using civilians as human shields, to have a 1:1-2 ratio of combatants to civilian deaths is insane if true.

  • Rialonda on 27/06/2024 - 20:33
    +8

    "Why can't we be friends, why can't we be friends"
    "why can't everyone just get along"
    …..
    well, simple. Not everyone shares the same moral compass as you do.

    Look top down palastine vs israel. One actively seeks out war, one doesn't. One actively preaches hate in state sponsored textbooks and education facilities, one does not. One has christians, muslims and jews who are registered citizens, one has absolutely no jews at all. One would throw LGBT off a building, one would not.

    It doesn't take much to see wholistically who is the aggressor and morally corrupt.
    And now to the issue of civillians: of course, if one could guarantee that a poor kind hearted civillian in gaza is in need, 99% of people on both sides of the war would help such a person. Zonist or not. (By the way, the same can't be said of the reverse -> when the innocent in Israel was attacked, vast majority of palastinians were celebrating. Talk about moral compass…)

    But who can make that guarantee such funds would be used in that way? Countless of times money has been poured into the palastinian cause, and it being siphoned off in various forms before getting to the actual people in need. And along the way, it passes hands of people whose sole aim is to continue such a war.

    Instead of war relief fund, it is a 'war continue' fund.

    • duluxe2000 on 27/06/2024 - 20:41

      Lol I laughed at your simplified argument. It likes in a society where the riches (1%) enjoy their lives using their own money and complain about the poor why they are so restless and aggressive, they (the riches) just want to live happily.

      • Rialonda on 27/06/2024 - 20:43
        +5

        maybe what you said made sense to you, but put it this way, it certainly didn't to me.

        • duluxe2000 on 27/06/2024 - 21:21
          +1

          You basically say these two groups of people are incompatible (I just ignoring you comments on which group, in your personal view, is superior because it's irrelevant). So if two groups are incompatible, what do you suggest or imply: either the Palestinians have to take refugees forever or genocide.

          The Israel needs to stop fire and pursuit the two state solutions.

          I know it's easier said than done but what alternatives are ?

          • Rialonda on 27/06/2024 - 22:01
            +2

            @duluxe2000: Well, there are essentially 5 potential outcomes: (in no particular order)
            1. Person A prevails
            2. Person B prevails
            4. Person A and B live next door
            5. Person A and B join together (single entity)
            6. Person A and B still at war

            Option 6 is off the table for this discussion (as we looking for alternatives here)…and hopefully all wars end eventually
            Option 5 is essentially 'lets create 1 state based off mutual respect for eachother'. This is actually in my opinion not possible. Just the influx of one race into the other territory will essentially erode everything unique about that territory. So essentially one culture would need to concede (making it either option 1 or 2) or both cultures ceases to exist (which neither side would have appetite for).
            Option 1/2: is obvious as an alternative - one wins the battle or one concedes
            Option 4: this is actually two options:
            4a. Traditional 2 state solution. Find some land Israel is willing to concede and Palastinians willing to accept for eternal peace. This is the traditional world view of the 'solving of the conflict'. However, this is unlikely to happen on both sides - on Israel side, they have been burnt by giving up land previously but no peace being returned, and on Palastinian side its that whole generational morality thing that will make it awefully hard for them not want to break any peace agreements (case in point: 'from the river to the sea palastine will be free' chant).

            That leaves option 4b, which is what I think the Israeli government is trying to achieve: keep borders where they are, but make sure one neighbour does not attack the other. Israel is trying to do that by uprooting parts of the enemy that they perceive seeks to undermine this option by disrupting the peace (i.e. aggression like rocket attacks and infiltrations during 'peace time'), and at the same time saying (at least on paper) that they do not intend to occupy gaza.

            And bonus option 5, which I think is the right way forward: Start with option 4b above, replacing the current palastinian leadership with something less war-hungry and inciteful. No territory movements yet. Once there is no longer any battles and living in relative peace, economy and trade begin to naturally open between them, borders go down, and then it merges into one of the other options above in a non-aggressive mutually beneficial way.

            • duluxe2000 on 27/06/2024 - 22:41

              @Rialonda: 4b. "Do you think that we can continue to control 4.5 million people without rights, with unlimited occupation? Do you think that can work?" former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. Thinking 4b works is delusional.

              4a. Israel doesn't trust Palestinians (esp Hamas) on their agreement on peace. But sometimes you are not going to decide things on what another person might or might not do in the future. You gotta decide on if the Palestinians has the righteous right on the land they are living on, past and future. They deserve the ownership of, at the very least, part of that land.

      • dins on 27/06/2024 - 20:47
        +3

        Paint sniffing ain't healthy.

    • DingoBilly on 27/06/2024 - 21:32

      Honestly don't know which side you're talking about.

      Israel has done some absolutely atrocious things.
      Hamas has done the same.

      Palestinians caught up in the middle lose out from both sides taking advantage of the.

      • dins on 27/06/2024 - 21:40
        +2

        You can't start a war and then act the victim.

        If it wasn't for Oct 7th none of this would be happening right now.

        Thought it would be obvious. Clearly not.

        • RecklessMonkeys on 27/06/2024 - 22:05
          +3

          Yes those dead Palestinian babies should hang their heads in shame.

          • dins on 27/06/2024 - 23:28
            +4

            @RecklessMonkeys: That's on Hamas, you know the ones who started the war on Oct 7th by brutally killing, raping, torturing and abducting 1000s of unarmed Israeli civilians.

            • RecklessMonkeys on 27/06/2024 - 23:38
              +3

              @dins: Yeah you sound so sad about it.

              "look what you made us do". We just had to drop a 2000 pound bomb on a crowd of civilians because some guy on a donkey looked suspicious.

              Strapped anyone to the bonnet of an armored car lately? Hows that for a human shield?

  • mrvaluepack on 27/06/2024 - 20:44
    +12

    No thanks.

    https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join