This was posted 2 years 10 months 9 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition Video Card + Peripheral Bundle $1988 Delivered & More @BPC Tech

530
ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Edition Video Card + Peripheral Bundle $1988 Delivered & More @BPC Tech
Go to Deal
Store RepBPC Technology on 13/02/2022 - 16:28 bpctech.com.au (1697 clicks)

Good afternoon!

We released the 6900XT Gaming PC deal on Friday, but we believe the graphics card bundle deals are the best.

For $1988, you can get an Asus Tuf RX 6900 XT Top Edition with one of the peripheral from the bundle list.

You can check the $2288 Galax GeForce RTX 3080 Ti + 16GB Corsair ram Bundle if you prefer RTX 30 series.
https://www.bpctech.com.au/product/3080tibundle01-galax-gefo…

And other Graphics Card bundles as well!
https://www.bpctech.com.au/category/pc-parts/graphics-cards/…

Don't hesitate to contact us through PM or FB Chat if you have any questions!

Cheers,
BPC Team

Computing AMD ASUS Computer Component GALAX Nvidia Video Card

Related Stores

BPC Technology
BPC Technology

closed Comments

  • Brrrrt on 13/02/2022 - 16:42
    +6

    The bundled items along with their cheapest local pricing, I reckon the razer bundle is the best bang for your buck, could sell the ones you dont need:

    • MSI GC 30 controller ($69)

    • MSI gaming vigor GK30 rbg keyboard ($69)

    • Steelseries Arctis 3 Console edition 7.1 heatset ($89)

    • Razer powerup bundle-Cynosa Lite keyboard, Razer Viper, Kraken X Lite ($89)

    • Store RepBPC Technology @ BPC Technology on 13/02/2022 - 16:43
      +1

      Thanks for the detailed explanation!

      • Drewfus17 on 14/02/2022 - 07:26

        Hi BPC, considering purchasing this item, but having not purchased through you before (and seeing somewhat mixed reviews when googling) can you confirm both the GPU and associated bundle items are in stock?

    • kaikor on 13/02/2022 - 17:33

      What a nice breakdown in prices!

  • dbmitch on 13/02/2022 - 17:23

    At least its under 2k this time, and get free 'gamer gear'

  • Diji1 on 13/02/2022 - 17:35
    +1

    I don't know, doesn't 3080 make more sense at this price unless I'm missing something which is quite possible. I'd expect a lower price.

    • SammyK300 on 13/02/2022 - 17:37
      +10

      Pretty sure 6900xt is a level above a 3080, closing in on 3090

      • Pelicannn on 13/02/2022 - 17:45
        +2

        Correct if you care about raw performance. But DLSS is worth it’s weight in gold if you’re chasing frames.

        • Dvbargain on 13/02/2022 - 18:32
          +2

          FSR is coming to more and more games. Some people even prefer the visual look of it over DLSS.

          Personally the games I play have DLSS not FSR so my move from nvidia to amd was a disappointing one but eh lol

        • Forth on 14/02/2022 - 01:03

          RTX 3080 if you need CUDA cores for rendering.
          Blender now has AMD HIP/ROCm based GPU Acceleration so I'm happy.
          It's not all about gaming.
          BTW you can use FSR/NIS on any card or game with "Lossless Scaling" :)
          makes DLSS less of a selling point.

      • maxbon on 13/02/2022 - 19:16
        +3

        Very much depends on the game. In most games, the 6900XT slots in between the 3080 (10 GB) and 3080 Ti. Not sure how the new 3080 (12 GB) scores in comparison. That being the case, the 6900 XT remains overpriced. Raytracing performance is pretty poor and FSR isn't nearly as good as DLSS.

        • Forth on 14/02/2022 - 01:13

          It really depends RDNA has better multi threading for DX12 and Vulkan, while Ampere does most better in Dx11.
          Ampere has full dedicated Ray tracing cores, while RDNA has to off shot part of RT rendering thus the poorer Ray tracing on RDNA due to dye size constraints. Swings and roundabouts. So yes.

        • deeby on 16/02/2022 - 23:15

          I would discount ray tracing entirely as a feature until maybe 2-3 generations of hardware down the line. Ray tracing currently is extremely watered down and provides little visual impact because even the best hardware can barely run it. Ray tracing between AMD and Nvidia right now is like arguing who has the fastest bicycle when what you really need is a car to deliver the needed performance.

    • Casomme on 13/02/2022 - 17:56
      +11

      6900xt beats the 3090 at 1440p, falls just shy at 4k.
      Only time 3080 is better is when Ray tracing is turned on.

    • plmko on 13/02/2022 - 18:07
      +3

      TBH the price gouging on AMD cards never made sense, there was never any real demand. It's like they were just taking advantage of the Nvidia refugees trying to find better value products.

      • Jessie Ryder on 13/02/2022 - 18:14

        Say what… did you forget about mining.

        • movis on 14/02/2022 - 13:29
          +1

          The 3080 and 3090 are markedly better at mining compared to the 6800xt and 6900xt. The AMD cards have mining performance that's comparable with the non-lhr 3070, 3060ti sitting in at about 60-65mH/s compared to the 3080's 100mH/s and the 3090's 125mH/s. The nvidias are a bit more power hungry iirc but the difference doesn't make up for the much higher hashrate. TLDR: Nvidia 30 series (non-lhr) are much better for mining compared to the amd cards.

      • maxbon on 13/02/2022 - 19:21
        +2

        AMD really tried this time. And in all fairness, they almost succeeded. RDNA2 is fast, alright. But it's a generation behind in Raytracing support. Not to mention that AMD has no real alternative to Nvidia's DLSS. FSR doesn't compare favourably.

        • botchie on 13/02/2022 - 20:23
          +1

          a 10 gb card has no place in todays market, only fan boys would pay more for 10 gb card and few extra frames with rtx on
          heck 6800 xt is better then a 3080

          • SammyK300 on 13/02/2022 - 20:59

            @botchie: I would sell my 3080 and buy this but I've always had issues with AMD on the game I play the most.

          • [Deactivated] on 13/02/2022 - 23:20
            +1

            @botchie: 10gb is good enough if you are using a 1440p 144hz monitor or ultra wide monitor. 4K better look else where for future compatibility.

            • Juice-Wa on 14/02/2022 - 09:05
              +2

              @[Deactivated]:

              4K better look else where for future compatibility

              The fact DLSS exists would tell you that there is no decent compatibility for 4K at the moment. It's literally conceding that the hardware is not capable right now. If you want pure 4K resolution, well it's probably late enough through they current generation to warrant waiting for the next generation. RDNA2 is also the architecture for console games and Unreal Engine 5 will be released soon with greater support for AMD. I'd expect that the AMD architecture is ahead of it's time and with the release of more AAA games you'll begin to see the raw power that these cards have to offer. At least that's the reason I hedged my bets on a 6800XT :)

              • maxbon on 14/02/2022 - 10:01
                +2

                @Juice-Wa: True, but what does it matter? DLSS makes 1440p look like 4K, so what's not to like. 4K seems like an elusive target to me. Since 2016 or so, every new GPU generation promises that and then under-delivers. In all fairness, that's in part due to games adding more effects that make 4K even more expensive.

                And agree, the place for RDNA2 is in consoles. I wish we could buy an APU from AMD that is on par with what's built into consoles. But we got the 6500XT instead.

                • Juice-Wa on 14/02/2022 - 14:13
                  +1

                  @maxbon: These companies going for major cash grabs with the release of anything below the 6700 and the 3060. Higher profit margins if you spread the silicon in a way that produces the highest stock numbers. I was lucky enough to get my 6800xt to upgrade my GTX1060 before all this nonsense for <$1300. Elon's crypto market manipulation increased mining and scalpers took so much away from real consumers. Tbh I kind of feel like the neck beards who have to have the latest and greatest have a part in this ridiculousness too. Trying so hard to upgrade their 2080ti's and 5700xt's all to play league of legends, fortnight and COD on ultra settings.

            • ctg on 14/02/2022 - 09:35
              +2

              @[Deactivated]: I thought there wouldn't be much issue even after coming from an 11GB 1080Ti, until I ran up Far Cry 6 and tried to use the Ultra HD texture pack which stated a need for >11GB VRAM. Starts out OK but eventually some significant frame drops / stuttering. Uninstalled the pack and all good.

              • [Deactivated] on 15/02/2022 - 07:37

                @ctg: At 4K?

      • Jiv on 14/02/2022 - 13:51

        Regardless of cryptocurrency mining, I think the trend is that potential buyers are given up on their 1st preference GPU model, and purchasing a lower GPU model.

        In other words, there is a knock-on effect where buyers from the higher tier GPU model get pushed into the market for lower tier ones.

        Which is also why the GT 1030 (a cheap, affordable, GPU for video playback, nothing to do with mining) is also going up in price.

        • [Deactivated] on 15/02/2022 - 07:39

          It’s all because of crypto mining.

    • [Deactivated] on 13/02/2022 - 23:23
      +2

      Completely agree. It’s got slower raw performance but good rtx and dlss makes it better imo. Not to mention dlss keeps getting better. More games get realistic rtx eventually. If you don’t care either of those, then 6900xt and 16gb is a good combo.

  • OThePestO on 13/02/2022 - 18:11
    -4

    The irony of a username "budgetpc" posting a "deal" for a $2000 video card.

    • [Deactivated] on 14/02/2022 - 07:31
      -1

      found a HODLer here.

  • groook on 13/02/2022 - 18:16
    +7

    Really don't like this bundling together of crap they can't sell with an item people actually want. Gamers Nexus did a video on it

    • Brrrrt on 13/02/2022 - 19:23
      +4

      I would have negged this deal for this, however, the price, even with the bundled items, is still the cheapest I believe we have seen on ozbargain at least within the last half a year. So definitely an good deal for those who are on the lookout for the 6900xt.

      • groook on 13/02/2022 - 21:07
        +2

        Yeah the prices aren't too bad even with all the included junk so same, no neg. However without the bundle surely prices could be even better

        • ctg on 14/02/2022 - 09:36
          +3

          Useless bundles promote e-waste too.

    • Masakari on 13/02/2022 - 19:24
      +5

      This. I just want a gpu but I'll hold until the prices are not extortionate and it's not bundled with ewaste landfill.

      • [Deactivated] on 14/02/2022 - 08:03
        +1

        Just sell it off, nothing will be ewaste if you sell them. But yes, no bundles please.

  • nfusion on 13/02/2022 - 23:37
    +1

    Bought the RX 6800xt off Scorptec Ebay the other day for around $1680, this rx6900xt is close to 19% more. Would you get that much extra in perf gain? I know people say you can sell bundle items but that's a hssel in its own sometimes

    • Dealf Hunter on 14/02/2022 - 07:26
      +1

      I had an MSI Gaming Z Trio 6900 XT (XTXH) and now have a Powercolor Red Dragon 6800 XT. There is not much difference between them at all in terms of the speeds I was/am able to reach air cooled.

      The 6900 reached about 2500-2600Mhz during gaming but I had to send it back because it's hotspot was hitting 100C all the time and causing thermal throttling (so maybe it could have run a bit faster if it wasn't throttling). My current 6800 runs at about 2450-2550Mhz and 85C max hotspot. The fan on the Powercolor is quieter too (and it has a better heatsink).

      If the 6900 only costs 10% or so more than the 6800, then I'd say it's worth it but only if it's NOT MSI. Although a 6800 is definitely good enough to last you for a few years yet if you're already happy with it's performance so far. You may only see an additional 100-200Mhz gain with the 6900 unless water-cooling.

      • ctg on 14/02/2022 - 09:43
        +1

        Whilst yes the performance between the two cards isn't huge, you're comparing core clocks which is an odd metric. The stock cards have the same base clocks, but will adjust based on temps and power draw limits.

        Shader config is different between the two, and this leads to the performance difference.

  • neolithic on 14/02/2022 - 13:47

    I've got this card and just wanted to let people know that it is big (330mm length) - I just slotted this into a SFF-style build and it was a mission.

    If you are slotting it into a standard ATX case you'll probably not experience any major issues but anyone looking at a mATX or ITX build will want to do their homework.

    YMMV

    • Drewfus17 on 14/02/2022 - 18:50

      Hey Neo, what case was this by chance? I am considering it for mine and I have a NR200P MAX. How are thermals on the card for in your build?

      • neolithic on 14/02/2022 - 19:12
        +1

        Popped it in the Cooler Master MasterBox MB311L as I'm running an mATX mobo now. The front mount doesn't support any radiator as the GPU is 330mm and the available space is 346mm - Don't think there's any radiators out there that thin. Ended up mounting a 240mm radiator in the top mount position and managed to squeeze in two 120mm fans (one front and one back) to draw in air from the front and exhaust out the back (AIO is set to exhaust out the top)

        At load when gaming I'm getting about 65C on the card - fans are audible but not crazy. I did undervolt the card and change the fan curve though to be fair.

        My initial plan was to slot this in a SSUPD Meshlicious and whilst it does fit I had other issues with AIO and mobo that I couldn't resolve - might revisit in the future when the mobo bios has had more fixes applied (the z690i by Gigabyte is incredibly unstable right now)

        Hope that helps

        • Drewfus17 on 14/02/2022 - 20:30

          Thanks for the elaborate explanation that little tip at the end does help significantly. I have a Gigabyte Z690i haha. So maybe might be worth avoiding the card for now? I had an RX 5700 XT a year and a half back and ended up returning it as it was getting BSOD's super frequently.

          • neolithic on 15/02/2022 - 10:53
            +1

            @Drewfus17: All good - coincidentally that's exactly what I was upgrading from too haha.

            The issue I had was with the z690i mobo - the bios is riddled with issues but YMMV.

            Also, if you are AIO cooling it, the z690i has pretty limited clearance around the CPU socket due to the heatsink placement so do your research on that too.

            Good luck!

            • Drewfus17 on 15/02/2022 - 15:13
              +1

              @neolithic: Haha great minds think alike then :p

              Yeah I have read that the PCI-e 4.0 is real unstable and people are having to set bios to run PCI-e 3.0 for the time being which sucks. I’ve got the NR200P max which has a included AIO and that fit perfectly. I’ve built the whole PC except the GPU due to the state of the market.

              But the bullet so hoping I get minimal instability, and decent thermals with an undervolt.

  • fedaykin on 14/02/2022 - 16:04

    Of course these deals come 1 month after I buy all the components for a new PC…

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join