• expired

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 $2,299, Watch GT 2e $199, FreeBuds Pro $263 Delivered & More @ Huawei eBay

761

HUAWEI official eBay Store Q1 SALE Event: up to $1,000 OFF
Easily click into the landing page in eBay then enjoy your new HUAWEI Product!

100% official HUAWEI Au stock. Coming with official warranty and GST tax invoice. Physical store in Sydney for VIP Service. Instock available for dispatching or picking up from HUAWEI Experience Store World Square.

[$1,000 OFF] HUAWEI MateBook X Pro 2020 NOW $2,299
(i710th 16G+1TB SSD 13'' 3K Touched Screen Laptop)

[$1,000 OFF] HUAWEI MateBook X Pro 2019 NOW $1,599
(i7 8th 8GB + 512GB SSD 13'' 3K Touch Screen Laptop)

[$600 OFF] HUAWEI P30 Pro NOW $799
(8G+256G Dual SIM, OLED, Leica Quad AI Camera);

[$230 OFF] HUAWEI Nova 5T NOW $469
(Kirin 980 8G+128G, 2340*1080)

[$150 OFF] HUAWEI Watch GT 2e NOW $199
(85 Custom Workouts, 2 Week Battery Life);

[$70 OFF] HUAWEI WATCH FIT NOW $179
(1.64 inch Vivid AMOLED Display, 10 Days Battery);

*More on sale products are available in HUAWEI Official eBay Store.

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
Huawei
Huawei

closed Comments

                                                      • @petry:

                                                        You rejected pakistan as being incapable of telling the truth and then denied being a racist.

                                                        Pakistan and India don't have good relations so any commentary from Pakistan side will be a bit biased and vice versa.

                                                        There is nothing to deny as you are the only racist here. You imply people are terrorists and the mods are biased.

                                                        You rejoice the fact that China can nuke Australia. I know your type very well… You enjoy your life in the western world and still hope the worst for it.

                                                  • +1

                                                    @petry: Just ignore them. They are just another regular troll like jv and PainToad. I'm bemuzzled how they remain on here

                                                    • @4agte: Lol. Pot calling kettle black.

                                                    • -1

                                                      @4agte: moderator protected in contravention of sites own published rules - this is how totalitarianism appears in the early stages - the deliberate attempt to stifle free speech and the promotion of lies through bullying and abuse. It is here now in front of your eyes.

                                                      • @petry:

                                                        this is how totalitarianism appears in the early stage

                                                        Maybe the mods have taken a lead out of CCP handbook.

                                                        • -1

                                                          @RSmith: haters gotta hate - clearly you're proud of the sites support for hate speech like yours.

                                                          ozbargain needs to change its name because it's giving australia a very bad public image in promoting hate speech.

                                                          • +1

                                                            @petry:

                                                            haters gotta hate

                                                            I know… Hatred is ingrained in people like you.

                                                            ozbargain needs to change its name because it's giving australia a very bad public image in promoting hate speech.

                                                            Maybe you need to take a break from this site. You seem to love picking arguments. Your comment history proves it conclusively.

                                                            Here is another example of you changing the conversation to politics when there was no need…

                                                            https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/10212936/redir

                                                            Seems like you are a part of 50cent army trying to sow the seeds of discord.

                                                            • @RSmith: mate you just keep on with the personal abuse in contravention of the sites rules - everyone knows what happens now - mods come along on and delete everything in your bullying tirade they are a party to - 'cept they are supposed to keep a copy because its federal crime.

                                                              @RSmith: 'Hate speech attacks or expresses prejudice against a person or a group on the basis of particular attributes (including, but not limited to: race, religion, ethnic origin, national origin, disability, sexual orientation or gender'

                                                              You rejected pakistan as being incapable of telling the truth and then denied being a racist. That means according to this site you are a hate speech writer, and for short a 'hater.'

                                                              • +1

                                                                @petry: I will keep highlighting your double standards. You abuse others but don't have skin thick enough to cope with the same when it is directed your way.

                                                                In a classic text book way, you start citing the rules when your own arguments start to fall apart. And lastly, you play your trump card… Racism, hate speech. Blah blah.

                                                                • @RSmith: @RSmith: 'Hate speech attacks or expresses prejudice against a person or a group on the basis of particular attributes (including, but not limited to: race, religion, ethnic origin, national origin, disability, sexual orientation or gender'

                                                                  You rejected pakistan as being incapable of telling the truth and then denied being a racist. That means according to this site you are a hate speech writer, and for short a 'hater.'

                                                                  • @petry: I will keep highlighting your double standards. You abuse others but don't have skin thick enough to cope with the same when it is directed your way.

                                                                    In a classic text book way, you start citing the rules when your own arguments start to fall apart. And lastly, you play your trump card… Racism, hate speech. Blah blah.

                                                                    You are nothing but a paid 50cent army soldier.

                                                                    • -1

                                                                      @RSmith: @RSmith: 'Hate speech attacks or expresses prejudice against a person or a group on the basis of particular attributes (including, but not limited to: race, religion, ethnic origin, national origin, disability, sexual orientation or gender'

                                                                      You rejected pakistan as being incapable of telling the truth and then denied being a racist. That means according to this site you are a hate speech writer, and for short a 'hater.'

                                                                      if you don't accept the sites definition of hate speech feel free to complain - I'm sure they will agree their published rules are wrong.

                                                                      • @petry: I will keep highlighting your double standards. You abuse others but don't have skin thick enough to cope with the same when it is directed your way.

                                                                        In a classic text book way, you start citing the rules when your own arguments start to fall apart. And lastly, you play your trump card… Racism, hate speech. Blah blah.

                                                                        You are nothing but a paid 50cent army soldier.

                                                                        • -1

                                                                          @RSmith: @RSmith: 'Hate speech attacks or expresses prejudice against a person or a group on the basis of particular attributes (including, but not limited to: race, religion, ethnic origin, national origin, disability, sexual orientation or gender'

                                                                          You rejected pakistan as being incapable of telling the truth and then denied being a racist. That means according to this site you are a hate speech writer, and for short a 'hater.'

                                                                          if you don't accept the sites definition of hate speech feel free to complain - i'm sure they will agree their published rules are wrong.

                                                                          I see lots of retrospective editing in your comments now lol why can't we all do that?

                                                                          • @petry: I will keep highlighting your double standards. You abuse others but don't have skin thick enough to cope with the same when it is directed your way.

                                                                            In a classic text book way, you start citing the rules when your own arguments start to fall apart. And lastly, you play your trump card… Racism, hate speech. Blah blah.

                                                                            You are nothing but a paid 50cent army bot.

                                                                            • @RSmith: @RSmith: @RSmith: 'Hate speech attacks or expresses prejudice against a person or a group on the basis of particular attributes (including, but not limited to: race, religion, ethnic origin, national origin, disability, sexual orientation or gender'

                                                                              You rejected pakistan as being incapable of telling the truth and then denied being a racist. That means according to this site you are a hate speech writer, and for short a 'hater.'

                                                                              if you don't accept the sites definition of hate speech feel free to complain - i'm sure they will agree their published rules are wrong.

                                                                              I see lots of retrospective editing in your comments now lol why can't we all do that?

                                                                              and the stalking around the site continues in a blatant attempt to intimidate, bully and provoke

                                                                              • @petry: I will keep highlighting your double standards. You abuse others but don't have skin thick enough to cope with the same when it is directed your way.

                                                                                In a classic text book way, you start citing the rules when your own arguments start to fall apart. And lastly, you play your trump card… Racism, hate speech. Blah blah.

                                                                                You are nothing but a paid 50cent army bot.

                                                                                • -2

                                                                                  @RSmith: @RSmith: Personal Attacks - Commenting guidelines

                                                                                  Abuse, name calling and malicious comments directed at a person or a group of people are unacceptable. Disagreements and debates are fine and encouraged but please respect everyone's opinion. Comments of this nature will be removed and if a vote is attached to the comment, then the vote will also be revoked.

                                                                                  nope you 're allowed to do that

                                                                                  Hate Speech

                                                                                  Hate speech attacks or expresses prejudice against a person or a group on the basis of particular attributes (including, but not limited to: race, religion, ethnic origin, national origin, disability, sexual orientation or gender). Hate speech includes spreading misinformation about a person/group with the intent to harm, create prejudice or create fear. Sexist, racist, xenophobic or similar comments will be deemed as a personal attack or hate speech depending on context.

                                                                                  nope you 're allowed to do that as well.

                                                                                  mods reckon you're all good in respect of both lol - so good job! hope your employment works out for you… and the others

                                                                                  every post, every stalk, proves there is no community here because the guidelines are ignored by the mods - the only double standards on display are this sites.

                                                                                  thats the point you've made repeatedly and continue to repeat.

                                                                                  • +1

                                                                                    @petry: I will keep highlighting your double standards. You abuse others but don't have skin thick enough to cope with the same when it is directed your way.

                                                                                    In a classic text book way, you start citing the rules when your own arguments start to fall apart. And lastly, you play your trump card… Racism, hate speech. Blah blah.

                                                                                    You are nothing but a paid 50cent army bot.

        • +10

          I come to ozbargains for deals and products not politics. I see no reason to mix the two. If you want to go down that route 95 percent of the deals on here you should never touch.

          • +2

            @gromit: I'm out of this conversation. My initial intent was not to get this brand involved in politics debates. It's sad to see it's one of the most innovative tech companies, produces great products, also a company criticized most politically. Analysis based on a few CVs were broadcast most, and more sadly is seeing what's happening here.

          • +1

            @gromit:

            I come to ozbargains for deals and products not politics. I see no reason to mix the two

            The problem with making these type of statememts is that it is easy to see ones previous comments to know that what you just posted is not true

          • +3

            @gromit: How is an atrocity like genocide considered 'politics' to you? Are you that apathetic to the plight of these people that you would ignore it to save a few bucks? If that is the case you need to take a good hard look at yourself mate.

            • @dogboy: not apathetic at all, just not a hypocrite like you that picks and chooses based on convenience. I leave politics out of it. This is not a company running around committing genocide so your analogy doesn't even apply.

              • +1

                @gromit:

                just not a hypocrite like you that picks and chooses

                So here you say politics should ne kept out of OzB posts, yet i easily found an anti-trump comment made by you in another deal.

                I'm off to look up the definition of hypocrite just in case i had it wrong.

        • +6

          Do you raise the same ethics question with companies known to use slave labour? Eg. Apple, Samsung and Nike. Or are the optics better when it is about the CCP?

        • +1

          Because of ethics/bullying I avoid western biased sources. Most devices are sourced from Asia/elsewhere.

      • +2

        @dogboy Talking about ethics, forget about Edward Snowden about US snooping incl on its allies? Of course, Australia is just a US lackey

        • +1

          Snooping is one thing, genocide a very different beast. Would you have supported the Nazi regime as well?

          • @dogboy: Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group.

            Ummm yeah the USA would never be guilty of that 🤷

          • @dogboy: the only alleged genocide that relies on muslim (isis et al) propaganda every seen - sold by America as a large part of its economic war on china.

            frankly australian quasi support of tens of thousands of isis/ al quaeda/et al currently is sickening, and those people posting that support in writing are hopefully being logged by the federal police - that would include most pollies in parliament currently.

            its an offence and they know it.

        • +2

          Whataboutism at its finest.

    • -2

      Do people actually buy this brand?

      Those that support China boycotting our products.

      • +5

        maybe the emperor Scomo should have considered australians before taking his washington orders…. gott mit uns

          • +3

            @FKG: 'A man who allegedly killed four children when his ute veered from the road in Sydney’s northwest had been drinking with friends before heading out to get cash, police will allege.

            Samuel William Davidson, 29, left his Oatlands share house shortly after 8pm on Saturday and allegedly jumped a red light as he headed for a nearby Caltex Service station

            The newspaper has reported that Davidson is the son of a retired NSW police detective' - so this white australian should be deported then?

        • maybe the emperor Scomo

          You're confusing him with chairman Dan…

          • @jv: ahhh the man that stopped covid in his state v the man who stopped funding bushfire services - even after hellfires…

            • @petry:

              ahhh the man that stopped covid in his state

              No, the man who's incompetence released the virus into this state resulting in the deaths of almost a thousand people…

              The one who continuously lies and refuses to take responsibility for his mistakes and instead throws those around him under a bus…

              The same one who has no idea who makes decisions about multi million dollar contracts that his government signs…

              • -1

                @jv: I think you are confusing him with gladys who has a far higher kill count, and shipped covid australia wide…

                • +2

                  @petry:

                  I think you are confusing him with gladys who has a far higher kill count

                  Nah… Dan is way ahead… He has the Gold medal in deaths…

                  STATE       DEATHS  per 100k
                  Victoria    820      12.4
                  Tasmania     13       2.4
                  NSW          54       0.7
                  ACT           3       0.7
                  WA            9       0.3
                  SA            4       0.2
                  Queensland    6       0.1
                  NT            0       0.0
                  
                  • +1

                    @jv: but that misplaces gladys spread deaths onto other states as you are well aware.

                    especially since dan also got the free gift with the melbourne grand prix that the emperor refused to cancel.

                    • +3

                      @petry:

                      but that misplaces gladys spread deaths onto other states as you are well aware.

                      Pretty much all the deaths in Vic were due to the incompetent hotel quarantine and contract tracing set up by this state government…

                    • +3

                      @petry:

                      the emperor refused to cancel.

                      you seem confused or lack understanding of our constitution and how little power the federal government has over the states.

                      • +2

                        @jv: 'Almost 2,700 passengers - some coughing and spluttering - were allowed to leave the ship at Sydney Harbour, catching trains, buses and even overseas flights to get home.'

                        gladys superspreader -

                        the emperor says our chief legal officer need no investigation so there is none.

                        australian national security isn't a concern of the emperor - got mit uns!

                        • +2

                          @petry:

                          'Almost 2,700 passengers - some coughing and spluttering - were allowed to leave the ship at Sydney Harbour, catching trains, buses and even overseas flights to get home.

                          yet only 53 deaths.

                          Meanwhile in VIC, one hotel quarantine security guard catches the virus, and the government allows him to 'cough and splutter' whilst delivering food in his 'other' job, resulting in 800 deaths…

                          Also, Gladys owned the mistake… Dan just pushed a colleague under a bus and claimed not to remember anything…

                          • +1

                            @jv: because 2,700 passengers - some coughing and spluttering - were allowed to leave the ship at Sydney Harbour, catching trains, buses and even overseas flights to get home.

                            catching trains, buses and even overseas flights to get home….. in other states .

                            haters don't want to understand facts or words they just want to hate and mislead.

                            why do you pretend the federal government has no control over airport closures for security concerns?

                            • @petry:

                              were allowed to leave the ship at Sydney Harbour, catching trains, buses and even overseas flights to get home.

                              Yet only VIC had almost 1000 deaths, no other state…

                            • @petry:

                              haters don't want to understand facts or words they just want to hate and mislead

                              Your favourite sentence.

  • +1

    Huawei

    Whoarewe?

  • +1

    Freebudz was like $230 @Amazon.

  • +4

    I spy with my little eye, something beginning with H.

  • can add code PMAR3 for additional 5.97 off the GT 2e not sure about anything else

  • +2

    when did Ozbargain become OzSpycraft?

  • -2

    Hey OP, any news whether GT2 Pro ECG watch will be available in Australia or not and possible ETA?

  • +17

    It's stupid how some people get on their high horse with irrelevant comments. This is OZBARGAIN, not ozPOLITICS.

    Personally I don't give a damn about the controversies. If anything, lots of American companies have cooperated with the CIA etc which have an even worse track record of experimenting on their citizens etc. So all these ideological statements are simply just bs. They make good products. The P30 pros are still outside my ideal price point, but if it is you can bet I will pull the trigger.

    • -2

      It's stupid how some people get on their high horse with irrelevant comments. This is OZBARGAIN,

      Read the OzBargain rules…

    • +1

      Hypocrite Apple, FB, Google, etc. have to cooperate with Patriot Act

  • +5

    The freebuds pro is awesome. I have been using the pair for almost three months now. They must have designed it so well that it never falls out unexpectedly like other competitors do. Highly recommended.

    • +7

      I've upvoted you. So many closet rascists or misinformed tools who watch Sky News on this thread.

      • +1

        Just ignore them. Don't reply just report.

  • +3

    Chinese govt, Korean govt or US govt - You have to decide which govt you are happy for your information going to.

    • +2

      its already been going to the US government, but no one talks about that. lol

  • Myanmar Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China

  • -1

    is the sale finished? P30 pro still shows as 1399 AUD?

    • p40 cheaper lol yeah not sure what happened there

  • +6

    So comments escalated quickly. Can we just admire the fact that Huawei makes really good products? My P30 Pro is still going strong.

    • +3

      absolutely

  • +3

    I cant believe this is ozbargain

    • late-night entertainment

    • +2

      What do you expect if the site admin does nothing? I think this is how the site attracts more traffic, some of which as you can see is not just trash but borderlines on hatred or racist slurs/innuendos

      • -3

        So people can make fun about China nuking Australia, but someone says anything against China, it becomes hatred/racist. Nice logic.

        • Go back and read the comments. This is a bargain site, not a political forum. If you want to make a political view, take it somewhere else.

          • -4

            @[Deactivated]:

            If you want to make a political view, take it somewhere.

            Jokes about nukes are never cool… Bargain or not.

            Did you downvote the person making those type of comments? Let me guess… You didn't.

        • +5

          What?! Did you even read what that person replied too?

          Damn Chinese phones on here, curse them.. They can go to hell with their pathetic intimidation tactics, can't wait for the war to begin

          Who's being racist now? The person using logic. Nukes or no nukes. What logic does one go to war with China?

          • -4

            @4agte:

            What logic does one go to war with China?

            China is the one 'punishing' Australia. Maybe you are better off asking the Chinese overlords.

            • +2

              @RSmith: Again your response doesn't make much sense. You managed to quote my question but unable to answer it. I never said we weren't unjustly punished but going to war has much logic as your response

              • -2

                @4agte: And when did I ever say that Australia should go to war with China?

                • +3

                  @RSmith:

                  So people can make fun about China nuking Australia, but someone says anything against China, it becomes hatred/racist. Nice logic.

                  Honestly I have no idea you are saying but you seem just as confused with the point you are trying to make. You twisted someone's response for your own agenda. Petry never suggested nuking was cool. They just made a point it makes no sense going to war.

                  • -1

                    @4agte:

                    Petry never suggested nuking was cool.

                    You should read the posts by Petry before coming to any conclusion.

                    • @RSmith: https://time.com/longform/pellet-gun-victims-kashmir/

                      'Their injuries weren’t caused by ordinary bullets. Security forces in the disputed region of Kashmir haven’t used those to police demonstrations since 2010, when they fired on protesters and killed 112 people. International outcry followed, prompting the Indian government to supply regional police and the army with pellet guns they called “non-lethal.”'

                      Since 2010, pellet guns have reportedly killed 14 people in Kashmir, according to Amnesty International. “The Indian forces call it a pellet gun, but it is a pump action shotgun,” says a spokesman from the Omega Research Foundation, a U.K. based charity that monitors military technologies.

                      In the seven months following Wani’s killing in July 2016, over 6,000 people were injured by pellet guns, including 782 who suffered eye injuries, according to Amnesty. '

                      According to you even Time lies about indias use of shotguns on protester's …as well as killing kids

                      • @petry: Fake news.

                        • @RSmith: Whats that got to do with calling every report on India's continued shooting of protesters including kids as lies over and over again?

                          You love india because its shares aussies values according to your mate from marketing the emperor Scomo… so all those dead and blinded people including kids that you deny ever existed well they just don't matter heh?

                          nice edit from the site again there…

                          • @petry: You love Emperor xi as he doesn't allow foreign media to cover news in China.

                            • @RSmith: Whats that got to do with calling every report on India's continued shooting of protesters including kids as lies over and over again?

                              You love india because its shares aussies values according to your mate from marketing the emperor Scomo… so all those dead and blinded people including kids that you deny ever existed well they just don't matter heh?

                              https://time.com/longform/pellet-gun-victims-kashmir/

                              • @petry: I will keep highlighting your double standards. You abuse others but don't have skin thick enough to cope with the same when it is directed your way.

                                In a classic text book way, you start citing the rules when your own arguments start to fall apart. And lastly, you play your trump card… Racism, hate speech. Blah blah.

                                • -1

                                  @RSmith: Mate you just deny everything that gets in the way of your hate - if there's a massacre of Asian women here what are you and your mates gonna do? call it fake news?

                                  • @petry: Mate, you can't even get uncensored news out of China… What are you talking about?

                                    • -1

                                      @RSmith: i dunno about that but your stalking me is getting a bit obvious mate…

                                      so Whats that got to do with calling every report on India's continued shooting of protesters including kids as lies over and over again?

                                      You love india because its shares aussies values according to your mate from marketing the emperor Scomo… so all those dead and blinded people including kids that you deny ever existed well they just don't matter heh?

                                      https://time.com/longform/pellet-gun-victims-kashmir/

                                      • @petry: I will keep highlighting your double standards. You abuse others but don't have skin thick enough to cope with the same when it is directed your way.

                                        In a classic text book way, you start citing the rules when your own arguments start to fall apart. And lastly, you play your trump card… Racism, hate speech. Blah blah.

                                        • -2

                                          @RSmith: double standards about pumpkins and pans?

                                          weird like calling all news on indias routine use of shotguns on protesters and killing kids as fake news…. who do you work for I wonder

                                          • @petry:

                                            double standards about pumpkins and pans?

                                            Just ask the age.

                                            Weird as we can't get uncensored news out of China. Everything must be hunky dory.

                                            50cent army bots are plentiful.

                                            • -1

                                              @RSmith: since you don't believe any news clearly you wouldn't know the truth about anything…

                                              some things are clear though - you're a site stalker and according to this sites rules - you write hate speech with impunity

                                              • @petry: You are just an attention seeker who loves to stir up controversy. You love in Australia but still hate it.

Login or Join to leave a comment