Got a code through store rep. Cheapest yet Price: AU$17.59/US$13.89 delivered. Select Unregistered Air Mail (No Tracking Number)
Coupon:Andy731
Great Deal for those who bought the Google Home from this Deal
AFAIK this will work with IFTTT & Google Home Setup.
Don't forget Cashrewards.
PS:Limited to first 100 stock. one per account,AU & NZ only.
LOOMINARTI CONFIRMDE
Go watch catalyst in your space blanket weaboo
@Anchll:
Go read the countless studies trying to be refuted by Big Money.
I don't have a space blanket. Did I miss a sale?
It gives you a warm glow? Just like the lights
I wouldn't want a warm glow 'down there', if you follow.
https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/mens-repr…
Save me a fortune in buying glow in the dark condoms then.
@supabrudda:
france has no glow, bro.
well, except the nuclear kind, which will be an issue.
https://ehtrust.org/france-new-national-law-bans-wifi-nurser…
Banned, bitches.
@cheepwun: no they surrendered to witchcraft & mystical wisdom of the internet. Or they watch Catalyst.
no…no you aren't
please quote peer reviewed scientific papers in your future ramblings, preferable sourced from google scholar instead of youtube
Why are you linking to crazy nutcases?
You just keep popping up around ozbargain with your crazy don't you.
How's GearBest's service these days?
Personal experience has been gr8! So far. Some items have reasonable tracking charges which is safer bet! However I can't really comment on their after service circus.
I find delivery is uniformly slower than ordering the same thing from a high-rated seller on ebay (by days or weeks), but when I had one of these exact globes fail 50 days after purchase they refunded me.
I still use them often.
this will work with IFTTT & Google Home
You need to setup an Singapore MI a/c & add the light to that before IFTTT will work. Alas with a Singapore a/c many other Xiaomi devices don't work with :-(
Oh and when doing the IFTTT trigger phrases like "lights on", "turn the lights on" wont actually work (google seems to keep these for direct integration). So you might have be creative. Such as "luminate" "darkness".
2 claps on, 1 clap off.
Bonus is if you have it your bedside lamp you can measure your performance in the bedroom based on how much the light turns on and off.
thanks for the supa-tip-brudda ;-)
Haha, that annoyed me a little too.
Set IFTTT to toggle on phrase "Turn lights on" for Google Assistant. It responds "There are no lights set up"…
Yeelight 'actions' are now available on google home for direct integration(home automation section). Just added a few hours ago I guess. I just noticed it in my google home app; so ordered more of yeelights ;-)
woohoo thanks UncleLeo…you can cross Google off your Anti-Semite list then.
Not that I can work how how to set it up.
Meaning no need for ifttt? And no need to set app to Singapore (so can leave as China to suit other xiaomi stuff)?
Gr8 news! Phew
Then how are you sending this? Ethernet cables in your space blanket? You're lucky to be alive!
I'm not sure. I have thoughts and then write them. I haz still been alyve.
Peer-reviewed research studies on wi-fi
https://ehtrust.org/science/peer-reviewed-research-studies-o…
Downvote again people. Downvote.
But none of those studies ha e any proof that there's any issues with wifi?
My fav is the UN one applies to RF-EMF in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz which includes not just wifi, but AM/FM/SW/MW/analogue tv/digital tv range. So we're all buggered, not just now, but have been for over a century!!! We're doomed, so were our parent and their parents & possibly even their parents!!!!
But none of those studies ha e any proof that there's any issues with wifi?
Better check it again. Even a cursory glance shows there are very real biological effects.
@cheepwun: yep there are biological effect, but no proven deterimental ones. Of course 10min of sunlight covers all those frequencies & more, with as much power as wifi does in several days. I also has biological effects. So don't go out in the sun either.
@supabrudda:
you clearly haven't been reading if you think there are no detrimental ones. I don't know why I am responding. Sunlight isn't pulsed.
This light also releases harmful visible radiation (light)!
Here are a bunch of studies that show vapourisation of the urethra due to exposure to green light (532nm).
https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=532…
:p
@cheepwun: Well your Youtube scientists disagree with that.
Or is that some sort of bought science trickery?
Yes it is astounding that some people think they can understand science they didn't even attempt to understand in high school.
Wifi is far from the only radiation you're currently being bathed in. Stop using the websites, blogs and youtube videos of lunatics and morons as research and read a couple of actual scientific papers.
Wifi is far from the only radiation you're currently being bathed in. Stop using the websites, blogs and youtube videos of lunatics and morons as research and read a couple of actual scientific papers.
So now the peer-reviewed links are from morons and lunatics? Can't please some people. They simply don't want to open their eyes to the possibility something they presumably use every day is damaging them.
Oh well. I tried. And will continue to.
But they really deserve what they get.
No the morons are those who see one study for a specific thing, and lots of others for other specific things, and think that proves something. It doesn't.
All sorts of reasons could exist for why a study shows something, hence reproducibility being a really key part of something you're not that familiar with, the scientific method.
You haven't got the faintest idea how many studies with the same methodology as the ones you've cited showed no harm. I don't either, but I know they could well exist and not to make any wild claims without looking for them. That's the difference between a lunatic/moron and a sound and reasonable person. One tries to prove their ideas wrong, the other wouldn't even know how to start proving their ideas wrong, but that doesn't matter because they don't want to.
@Rutger:
Yes, the studies showing no harm have been funded by…
Same story with so many other threats throughout history. Same thing. Designed to shape popular opinion. And to not upset those making truckloads of money off it. To keep the masses accepting what they've been fed.
In the end, it's down to your beliefs isn't it. Who do you believe? Oh god, belief. Such an unscientific word…
@Rutger: He has a belief that he sets out to find evidence for, nutcases provide the evidence online and then he pretends it's scientific evidence.
@cheepwun: By? You certainly have no clue, just feelings and it says a hell of a lot that you think that cuts it. You'd be amazed at what information is available online and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if you can find the funding source for a few studies. But want to know what the real kicker is? If the study is bullshit it can be proven as bullshit and probably won't even get published because journals are peer-reviewed, another new concept for you to learn.
But do you want to know who made "truckloads of money" off wifi?
The Australian f'ing Government.
CSIRO holds the patent on wifi. It's now royalty free so no more truckloads of cash but it was our government who made a fortune off it.
@Diji1:
reading comprehension time…look above. Then come back. For the lazy, I provided countless links to scientific studies.
CSIRO are just one of the beneficiaries of wi-fi patents…thanks for proving a point. And thanks for your insulting tone, again.
You certainly have no clue, just feelings and it says a hell of a lot that you think that cuts it.
And you do? Please enlighten me, like you did about the ancient CSIRO info. Industry bodies fund research to promote their industries all the time. ALL THE TIME. Nobody gets that. It's clear both of us have made up our minds. We both have beliefs. You fail to entertain the thought that it can cause damage.
The ignorance is astounding
Don't be so hard on yourself…
Don't be so hard on yourself…
Don't worry, I have soft furnishings. https://ehtrust.org/science/peer-reviewed-research-studies-o…
Code seems to be no more; still seems to be a good price. (until you factor in gearbest reputation).
I have ordered a truckload of things from Gearbest. All arrived, No problems.
Worried about wifi? Then we make a call on our mobiles glued to our heads. We're all stuffed so enjoy life.
Then we make a call on our mobiles glued to our heads.
Precisely what you shouldn't be doing. Nor putting it in your pocket.
Maybe it's just natural selection at work?
Frying the parts of the brain which make sensible decisions
Nor putting it in your pocket.
But at least it won't be hereditory. As I assume wifi is responsible for this?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40719743
No single reason for reduction in sperm counts, I reckon. Though I think wi-fi and phones is definitely part of the problem.
When I say there is a depopulation agenda at work, people think it's tinfoil stuff. We are being bombarded on multiple levels. Food and water supply, chemtrails, vaccines, RF, psychological…etc.
@cheepwun: That's the problem when only looking for the bad, you don't appreciate all the good that has/does happen as a result.
Though I think wi-fi and phones is definitely part of the problem
Thankfully just thinking something doesn't make it true…
The fact you wrote 'chemtrails' as one of your contributing factors excels you to the level super troll… Congratulations!!
The fact you wrote 'chemtrails' as one of your contributing factors excels you to the level super troll… Congratulations!!
The fact that you haven't noticed scientists talking about geoengineering operations worldwide, nor noticed it in your neck of the woods, perhaps places you in a category I wish not to mention.
But thanks for showing me how much you know. I love responding to your kind.
9 millions lives saved each year because of vaccines
https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm
Fluoride in the water, for ever $1 spent, saves $38 in dental bills
https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/pdf/natures_way.pdf
Not sure what the food supply issues are, we are now so much more efficient at producing food, lowering costs, making it more readily available and reducing malnutrition
http://aegic.org.au/agricultural-productivity-is-helping-fee…
@supabrudda:
for every article, there is at least one anti-article. Who do you believe?
vaccines
http://www.healthfreedoms.org/has-bill-gates-polio-vaccine-p…
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/study/bill-gates-eugenics-r…
fluoride
http://fluoride.mercola.com
food production
Yeah, the oft-quoted 'efficiency'…in other words, huge profits for agri-business. The quality? Way, way, way, downhill. 'Eat shit and die, muppets' (new corporate policy).
Fact: Uncle Bill (Gates) profits from vaccinations.
Fact: Uncle Bill (Gates) wants to depopulate. Mentioned many times. Put 2 and 2 together, man. What about those shares in Monsanto? Add that up too.
Fact: vaccines are used as a method to control population…vaccines (safe ones, uncontaminated ones) are not in and of themselves 'evil'. But there are no clean vaccines.
@cheepwun:
then we get back to the circular arguement.
"That's the problem when only looking for the bad, you don't appreciate all the good that has/does happen as a result."
you ask for evidence, I provide it, you provide counter negative evidence. and we do the cement mixer dance :-)
it has been fun!
@supabrudda:
Truth is blinded by anti-truth daily. For various reasons (power and money and control-related, usually). We just have different opinions about who is telling the truth, based on the evidence at hand.
@cheepwun: we ceratinly do, but more power to us I say, always good to question & be polite to each other when discussing. anyway we're ventured way off topic, so lets meet again in another deal
The fact that you haven't noticed scientists talking about geoengineering operations worldwide, nor noticed it in your neck of the woods, perhaps places you in a category I wish not to mention.
feel free to find some supporting evidence on 'chemtrails' in scientific literature. You could start here:
https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=chemtrail
i'll stick to my logic based, critical thinking category, whether you wish to mention it or not, but enough rambling down your rabbit hole
@SBOB:
Logic-based, critical thinking…
Hilarious.
Best if I don't say what I want to say now. Good luck popping that bubble. When you do, come back.
cheepwun on 01/08/2017 - 21:46 Comment score below threshold.
