This was posted 7 years 6 months 11 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Dell UltraSharp U2415 24" Monitor (IPS, 1920x1200 16:10, 3-Year Warranty) $340 Delivered @ Dell eBay

470
Dell UltraSharp U2415 24" Monitor (IPS, 1920x1200 16:10, 3-Year Warranty) $340 Delivered @ Dell eBay
Go to Deal
Cashback
1bug on 20/06/2017 - 00:59 ebay.com.au (1218 clicks)
Last edited 20/06/2017 - 01:00
CTAX20

Current eBay price: $425.00 Less 20% off coupon = $340.00

Previous OzB deals:
https://www.ozbargain.com.au/search/node/U2415

Still selling for $499 at Dell online…
http://accessories.ap.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=au&c…

Display Specs
Diagonally Viewable Size: 61.1 cm | 24.1" (24.1 - inch wide viewable image size)
Aspect Ratio: Widescreen (16:10)
Panel Type, Surface: In-plane switching, anti glare with hard coat 3H
Optimal resolution: 1920 x 1200 at 60Hz
Contrast Ratio: 1000:1 (typical) | 2 Million:1 (Max) (Dynamic Contrast Ratio)
Brightness: 300 cd/m (typical) | 50 cd/m (minimum)
Response Time: Fast mode: 6 ms gray to gray (typical) | Normal mode: 8 ms gray to gray (typical) | On/Off: 19 ms black to white (typical)
Viewing Angle: 178° vertical / 178° horizontal
Color Support: Color Gamut (typical): 91% (CIE1976), sRGB coverage 99% | 16.78 Million colors
Pixel Pitch: 0.27 mm x 0.27 mm
Backlight Technology: LED

Connectivity
2 HDMI(MHL) connector
1 Mini DisplayPort
1 DisplayPort (version 1.2)
1 DisplayPort out (MST)
1 Audio Line out (connect your speakers)
5 USB 3.0 ports - Downstream (5 at the back, 1 with battery charging)
1 USB 3.0 port - Upstream

Warranty
3-Year Advanced Exchange Service and Premium Panel Guarantee
The Dell Premium Panel Guarantee allows a free panel replacement during the Limited Hardware Warranty period even if only one bright pixel is found.

Plus 1.3% Cashback via Cashrewards

Original 20% off Selected Stores on eBay Deal Post

Computing 24inch Computer Peripheral Dell LCD Monitor Monitor

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
Dell
Dell

closed Comments

  • matt-ozb on 20/06/2017 - 08:05
    -4

    P2416D has 2560x1440p which is perfect in 24".

    1200p is not sufficient.

    • edfoo on 20/06/2017 - 08:16
      +8

      That is subjective. I have a U2410 and I think FHD (1920x1200p) is perfect for a 24" monitor. QHD (2560x1440p) is too fine for a 24". I also have a U2715H which I think QHD is better for 27".

      • matt-ozb on 20/06/2017 - 09:47
        -2

        Yep, it is subjective.

        27" is too large for 2560x1440. The are two problems:
        a) everything is still quite large unless you have bad eyesight
        b) using the screen size of 27" requires me to very slightly move my head to view edges of the screen, rather than just my eyes.

        • TenaciousTom on 20/06/2017 - 14:14
          +2

          On what planet is 27" too large for 2560x1440? That's already ~109 ppi.

    • Last Seen on 20/06/2017 - 08:35
      +1

      I have two of these U2415's the office & am strongly considering them for home. I think they're great monitors.
      With that said, I haven't had any experience with P2416D.

    • icecream on 20/06/2017 - 13:41
      -1

      I don't find 2560 x 1440 perfect in 24". I'd say majority won't.

      Yes, it is subjective.

      But out into perspective (rough maths)

      1920 x 1080 on 24" screen that's about 7968 pixels per square inch. (Comfortable)

      1920 x 1200 on 24" screen that's about 8854 pixels per square inch. (Okay and nice)

      QHD on 24" screen is about 14166 pixels per square inch. (Super hard to read)

      QHD on 27" screen is about 10743 pixels per square inch. (Hard to read)

      You must have very very good sight!!

      • TenaciousTom on 20/06/2017 - 14:16
        +2

        Hard to read

        Are you actually taking the piss or do you not know how to resize things on a computer?

        • NobalaKoba on 20/06/2017 - 15:02

          I agree, when I read that I cringed so hard.

        • icecream on 20/06/2017 - 22:23

          If you need to resize that's not optimal resolution. At least for fonts.

          I run two UP2716D and two UP3216Q at work.

          Yes, I know how to resize.

        • JMC on 21/06/2017 - 06:47

          @icecream:

          It really depends on your eyesight. I use a 25" 1440p and for most applications I don't use any scaling. When I do, the improvement in sharpness is still visible.

      • DeToxin on 20/06/2017 - 14:55

        I don't understand how you came up with those numbers..

        1920*1080@24"= ~91ppi

        2560*1440@24"= ~122ppi

        Etc etc..

        • icecream on 23/06/2017 - 22:56

          I know majority use PPI to measure pixel density for monitor. It is a standard.

          It sound cooler as 27" inches monitoring instead of 343.4789 sq. inches monitor. (taking UP2716D as example, 14.27" x 24.07")

          Scientifically, pixel density of monitor is 2 dimensional, so "pixels per square inch" indeed makes more sense, however barely referenced or understood.

          When you talk about mass density, it is in kilograms per cubic meter, not kg/meter.

          PPI is a marketed standard not scientific standard.

      • ATangk on 20/06/2017 - 16:03

        Rip coz ive got QHD+ (3200x1800) on 13.9" =[

      • neostarsx on 20/06/2017 - 16:21

        Dont listen to this bloke.

        27" Min you want is 2560 x 1440 QHD else screen will look pixelated.

      • maxdba on 20/06/2017 - 17:57

        Retina display in macbook is basically QHD, isn't it very pleasant to read rather than hard? If you are happy with 1080p display, do not upgrade. Once you go up to 2k, you do not want to look back.

        • edfoo on 20/06/2017 - 19:04

          I also own a Macbook Pro 2013 model with Retina display. Yes it has QHD on its 13" screen but I sit with my eyes closer to its screen than with my PCs' 24" U2410 and 27" U2715H monitors. So the pixels on the two Dell monitors don't appear too big to my eyes in comparison the the Macbook's pixels. With smartphones, so many of them with 5" screen has FHD resolution before we are satisfied that is because our eyes are a lot closer to the smartphones than to desktops and laptops.

  • Saucy Morsels on 20/06/2017 - 09:02
    +5

    I picked up two of these when they were priced at $211 (with free shipping) at the DFO outlet. They sometimes pop up at that price. I'm happy with them when it comes to photo editing, movies and gaming. A great all rounder. Favourite part is the thin boarders. Perfect for dual or triple monitors.

    • jeeg on 20/06/2017 - 10:15

      hi mate when did u buy yours? I am wondering if i should pass this time and wait for the DFO offer like u did.

      • Saucy Morsels on 20/06/2017 - 11:26
        +1

        http://www1.ap.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/product…

        Goodluck! I forgot to mention they are not classified as 'brand new' instead they are 're-furbished' and 'as new'. Mine were 'as new' and I could not tell the difference at all. It was packaged as if it had never been touched.

        • jeeg on 20/06/2017 - 14:12

          Thanks mate. When did u buy?

        • Saucy Morsels on 20/06/2017 - 16:36
          +1

          Last October. Then shortly after maybe around Nov-Dec they went back to that price because I told my friend and they bought one.

        • jeeg on 20/06/2017 - 19:19
          +1

          @Saucy Morsels: cheers mate.

  • jeeg on 20/06/2017 - 09:03

    I already have two of the 2415 at home for my workstation. Wondering if i should buy another one to make this a 3 monitor setup…..not playing games. Just visual studio programming, excel, word, browsing etc.

    • ItsMeAgro on 20/06/2017 - 11:04

      Not sure why you'd go for the extra expense of an ultrasharp if just using it for office stuff, no games/movies/etc…

      • jeeg on 20/06/2017 - 14:10
        +2

        Ohh…I also use lightroom fairly extensively. The monitor is pretty good colour wise, plus the aspect ratio is more useful for photos processing…

  • nayfon on 20/06/2017 - 11:06
    +1

    I have 2 of these U2415 and love them. The DP monitor chaining is a nice handy feature as well.

  • drprox on 20/06/2017 - 13:30

    can anyone tell me if this has height adjustment?

    • 1bug on 20/06/2017 - 13:45
      +1

      Yep, as well as tilt, pivot & swivel. From the specs…

      Stand
      Height-adjustable stand (115mm), tilt, pivot (clockwise and counter-clockwise), swivel and built in cable-management
      Flat Panel Mount Interface: VESA (100 mm)

      Height (Compressed ~ Extended): 15.86" ~ 20.39" (402.9 mm ~ 517.9 mm)

      • drprox on 20/06/2017 - 14:00
        +1

        much appreciated, i think it's 2cm too tall at it's lowest! :(

  • gimli on 20/06/2017 - 16:43

    Don't cut yourself

  • O15 on 20/06/2017 - 17:14
    +3

    $340 isn't a good price for this monitor. The 1920x1080 model is about $100 less. As much as I like 16:10, it's not worth a ~%40 / $100 increase to cost.

    $340 should be getting you into 1440p territory.
    I picked up a BenQ 1440p IPS for $399 in late 2014.

    • Singu1arity on 20/06/2017 - 20:16
      +2

      I paid the extra for the 1920x1200 model. Well worth the extra vertical area in my opinion; although it will depend entirely on what you're using it for. I do a lot of photo editing, CAD modelling, document reading/writing, etc. If you're mostly gaming or watching movies, 16:9 is probably the better option.

      • O15 on 20/06/2017 - 21:22

        If you were happy to pay all that money for an extra 11% resolution, why did you not pay a bit more for an additional 60%?
        Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
        Sure, 2560x1440 may be 16:9, whereas 1920x1200 is 16:10, but the former is still more vertical and horizontal screen real estate.

        • Singu1arity on 21/06/2017 - 19:52
          +1

          Because at the time it wouldn't have been "a bit more" for a similarly sized display (physical, not resolution). There's a very noticeable difference in physical area between a 24" 16:9 compared to a 24" 16:10; and as I mentioned previously, the monitor was purchased for a lot of very different software, many of which, at the time, had issues running at WQHD resolutions. I don't like 24" 16:9 displays.

          I actually did end up purchasing a U2515H for "a bit more" earlier this year that is now used for our desktop (but it is a 25" 16:9, not a 24"), with the U2415 connected to our laptop when it's on the desk.

    • freesteakknives on 21/06/2017 - 20:05

      What's the model number for the 1920x1080 - I found U2414H and U2417H neither of which is $100 cheaper than the $425 online price for the U2415. I think I only need 1920x1080. Would be doing coding and office work as well as some gaming. Overwatch, Civ, Star Craft, PVZ2. Or is the 1920 x 1200 the still better option. Happy to go either way depending on what folks say about 16:9 vs 16:10

  • lzb1016 on 21/06/2017 - 00:52

    How does it compare with u2417 which is $20 cheaper?

  • NVidia Sucks on 21/06/2017 - 07:05

    im still using 2412m for more than 6 yrs…

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join