This was posted 8 years 7 months 28 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Sony End of Line/Damaged Box Sale: Xperia C4 $199, Clock Radio $19 + More @ Sony Online

12620
Sony End of Line/Damaged Box Sale: Xperia C4 $199, Clock Radio $19 + More @ Sony OnlineAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
tightarse on 24/03/2016 - 11:29 sites.sony.com.au (16232 clicks)
Last edited 25/03/2016 - 02:39 by 2 other users
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Another great clearance sale from Sony with up to 70% off goods. Happy Easter everyone :)

Deal examples:

  • Offer ends 11:59pm AEDT March 29 or while stocks last.
  • Some items may be box damaged.
  • Backorders may not be fulfilled, and will be notified during the checkout process.
  • As some items are end-of-line, Sony will not substitute in the event models are unavailable.
  • Not available in conjunction with any other offer. eCoupons & eVouchers cannot be used with this promotion.
  • Sony will not accept change of mind returns on orders purchased during this sale.
  • Due to expected high demand, there may be delays in shipping. Expect up to 5 days for orders to be processed.
  • Orders paid via BPAY may take additional time to process.

Get a further 3.0% cashback @ Cashrewards

Electrical & Electronics Alarm Clock Camera Hi-Fi LCD TV Mobile Phone Radio Sony TV Android

Related Stores

Sony Australia
Sony Australia

closed Comments

  • jva on 24/03/2016 - 13:51

    Any A7R II with broken box for $2000, I would buy two…

  • QuickToThePointless on 24/03/2016 - 13:52
    +10

    In so many ways, this 'deal' represents all the things that are currently wrong with this great site

    TA - ive never negged you before but youve really let yourself down here

    Neg from me for any/all of the reasons as outlined above

    If youd like to voice your opinion directly to the mods, please have a look at this thread regarding many of the issues raised in the link below - your comments here may not be read by anyone who needs to see them

    https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/240029?page=2#comment-3562…

  • bloom on 24/03/2016 - 13:53

    I bought the alarm clock for $19 shipped, bargain IMO
    Cheapest I could find is $29 + shipping

    +1 TA

    • jv on 24/03/2016 - 13:55
      +2

      It would have been a good deal if it was a Digital Radio and not analogue AM/FM

      • c0balt on 24/03/2016 - 14:31

        But this has a Sony logo on it, which costs ~$20 when it's on an AM/FM clock. So this guy actually profited 1 dollar.

        That's how all of this works, yeah?

      • mycke on 24/03/2016 - 15:03

        digital radio not much good outside select capital cities.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:04

          bloom is from Melbourne.

  • dealsucker on 24/03/2016 - 14:01

    How about Xperia C4? Is it a good buy at $200?

    • [Deactivated] on 24/03/2016 - 14:12

      Seems okay, I prefer the waterproofing of the M4

      • adr8 on 24/03/2016 - 14:57

        Interested in C4 do you know which 4G frequencies it supports? Nothing is mentioned in specs

      • PVA on 24/03/2016 - 17:01

        different size and res of screen though.

    • snook on 24/03/2016 - 15:20

      They were $500/400 new. While that should be a hint, you should google reviews on these phones before purchase.

  • Gehirn on 24/03/2016 - 14:21
    +4

    The votes would be pretty even if the 30+ negatives were not revoked. This post is exactly the same as the Dick Smith sale post that has 65+/65-. Both posts followed good Sony/Dick Smith sales, however this is the one that has negatives revoked for reasons that aren't good enough.

    • Dingus on 24/03/2016 - 14:27
      +3

      Still more getting revoked even now.

      • spackbace on 24/03/2016 - 14:39
        +3

        If people learnt how to formulate an argument as to why they negged, then the vote would stay. Simple really

        • SBOB on 24/03/2016 - 14:46
          +1

          why? you dont for a positive.

        • c0balt on 24/03/2016 - 14:50
          +1

          You mean like you 'did', by incorrectly negging for deceptive pricing but linking to a completely different set of items?

          https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/239986#comment-3557246

          TA isn't the only one getting a free pass around here.

        • spackbace on 24/03/2016 - 14:51

          @c0balt:

          Report it then.

          I chose not to argue with you then, I'm choosing not to now.

        • c0balt on 24/03/2016 - 14:52
          +3

          @Spackbace:

          Well you did choose to argue with me until I pointed out you incorrectly negged for deceptive pricing.

          I did report it, and nothing happened because certain people get free passes.

          Choose to do what ever you like.

          Just to clarify: I think certain people do deserve to be held in higher regard to others. You and TA have both put in a lot of time posting great deals and informative comments (you can look at my voting history to see how many times I have upvoted your deals and comments) and deserve to have that recognised. It's just when the things like this happen that I think no one should get treated differently.

  • KOBH on 24/03/2016 - 14:31
    +2

    I use PricePal from now on because Cashrewards don't pay up after 2 months even I sent them my invoices.

    • c0balt on 24/03/2016 - 14:37

      Don't give up getting your cashback from CR - it took me 5 months to get mine.

      I put in a ticket and sent the invoice on 22/10/15 and just got a reply on the 21/3/16.

      I actually forgot about it and wouldn't have corresponded with CR a week after putting in the support ticket, but the money did finally get put into my account - after 5 months.

      • KOBH on 24/03/2016 - 14:52

        Hope they do pay up in 5 months time, but I won't hold my breath after I read their FAQ page.

        http://www.cashrewards.com.au/faq

        "
        I want to claim for Missing Cashback, but my purchase was more than 60 days ago?

        If it is over 60 days since your purchase, then we are unable to investigate your claim.

        This is because, in our terms with stores we have agreed to only follow up on claims for purchases within the previous 60 days.

        If, however, you wish to claim because your transaction has recently been disallowed or declined by the store (i.e. your Cashback has been declined or crossed out and replaced with zero) – but your purchase is now over 60 days old, then under our terms we are able to accept your claim and look into this on your behalf.If this is the case please submit a claim despite the purchase having occurred more than 60 days ago. Some stores however will not accept enquiries on transactions that have been declined and in this case we will be unable to investigate further and will be unable to claim Cashback for you on transactions from these stores. Stores with a 'no enquiry policy' are displayed on the 'special terms' section on the store's page on the Cashrewards website.
        "

    • forkus on 24/03/2016 - 14:56
      +1

      Pricepal is not much better. I submitted my invoice and the rep said it could take months to confirm..

      • KOBH on 24/03/2016 - 15:19

        At least they responded to your ticket, but Cashrewards only sent out auto response with a generic email. They don't reply to ticket with an estimate pay out date.

        • snvl on 24/03/2016 - 15:30
          +1

          Same here, i have sent the invoice twice not a word from them :(

  • Make it so on 24/03/2016 - 14:35
    +1

    Pretty great prices on Z3 covers ($9 delivered). These are normally insanely expensive, and there aren't many good cheap alternatives.
    There are some good deals among the more "meh" ones. Not convinced this deal deserves that many negs.

  • MMM on 24/03/2016 - 14:36
    +5

    Lets hang him! his only posted 2572 posts with probably a 99% success rate… careful what you wish for guys TA stops posting because of this MOB mentality OzBargain will suffer.

    MMM on 24/03/2016 - 14:36 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
    • GameChanger on 24/03/2016 - 14:39
      +4

      TA won't leave as his company needs this website

      And most people are not hating on TA rather Sony

      • MMM on 24/03/2016 - 14:56
        +2

        Agree but TA posted here long before Cash Rewards, I saw the post didn't plus waited till active thought its not for me moved away just cant understand all the Hate & negs?

      • Make it so on 24/03/2016 - 16:31
        -1

        Uhm…. I think Ozbargain needs TA. Frankly, I need TA. Honestly, what else will I do with all that money?

  • strayan on 24/03/2016 - 14:41
    +3

    Was looking for another pair of SBH60 headphones for my girlfriend but what a rip off. I paid $46 and Sony want $69.

  • burningrage on 24/03/2016 - 14:49

    Things that matter, they are either more expensive or lightly discounted (eg: HDRPJ670 Camcorder)

    I have to agree, the sentiment is being overstated a bit.

    Although you shouldn't be surprised when it comes to Sony. For them 20% discount is a Clearance much like Dick Smith I went to yesterday.

  • webtherapist on 24/03/2016 - 14:50

    the beginnin of Fergie's London Bridge tuned on: oh … :)

  • Moderatorscotty on 24/03/2016 - 14:55

    For those voted negative, please check and make sure you are conforming to our voting guidelines. By simply stating "I agree" or targeting specific user will have your votes revoked. You shall also actually check the deals themselves — Xperia C4 $199, Xperia M5 $299, Xperia C5 $279 etc. Please find better deals to back up your negs.

    • Dingus on 24/03/2016 - 15:00
      +14

      No disrespect, but how come people have to follow voting guidelines, when TA doesn't have to follow posting guidelines?

      • Moderatorscotty on 24/03/2016 - 15:06

        TA posted 1/2 hours before the sale starts as a speculation of the clearance sale — the same sale that he has already posted twice previously (#1 #2) therefore most would trust him to have a reasonable idea that a 3rd sale is coming up. I do agree that if moderators have acted more swiftly we could have removed the deals before posting. However majority of the negative votes come after the deal becomes live, and have nothing to do with the deal itself.

        Finally, there's a rule breaker does not mean it's okay for you to break the rule.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:09
          +13

          TA posted 1/2 hours before the sale starts as a speculation of the clearance sale

          speculation isn't a bargain though.

          Can we pre-post all the supermarket weekly sales as 'speculation' there will be some items 50% off ???

          How are we supposed to vote on 'speculative' items? How do we compare prices if the items are not known?

          If we can't vote legitimately for a deal when it is posted, it belongs in the forums…

        • Moderatorscotty on 24/03/2016 - 15:12

          @jv: Did you fail to read the rest of the sentence? Did you have track records of getting both previous Sony Clearance deals and just tried to post the 3rd one 1/2 hour earlier?

          However I have also acknowledged that it's a fault on us the moderators that we should have removed the deal swiftly. But if you look at the vote history, the majority of neg votes happened when the deal is live.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:13

          @scotty:

          Did you fail to read the rest of the sentence?

          Probably… I tend to do that at times… :)

        • c0balt on 24/03/2016 - 15:14
          +1

          @jv:

          I kind of disagree. There have been many times in the past where great bargains have been posted before they are official (eBay sales comes to mind).

          It's just that it should have been removed once all the original negs came in for the TV's, headphones and more which were cheaper elsewhere.

          Then the deal could have been reposted with the alarm clock, mobile phones and camera. It looks crazy having this many upvotes and removed negs for the items on offer now. If they were instock but ran out that's understandable - but changing a deal because most the items were found to be bad can be dealt with much cleaner, that is to remove and repost with the new items.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:16
          +1

          @c0balt:

          there have been many times in the past where great bargains have been posted before they are official

          So what items exactly were the bargains when this was posted?

        • c0balt on 24/03/2016 - 15:18
          +2

          @jv:

          None, that's what I'm saying. If there's going to be a sale and someone gets wind of it (i.e. TA getting wind of this sale) then they should be able to post it.

          I would rather find out earlier about an upcoming sale and be disappointed (like this), than find out about it too late to get stock.

        • MMM on 24/03/2016 - 15:20
          +4

          @jv: How many times have we all benefited on early info posts from pre-discount eBay sales? I have:)

        • Dingus on 24/03/2016 - 15:23
          +2

          Not trying to argue with you just wanted clarification. I had a whole thing written about if this was another scenario blah blah, but you said admins were at fault for not initially deleting the deal.

          Finally, if that's the case it shouldn't be okay for anyone to break the rules in any case, whether bad language, wrongly negging, not following posting guidelines etc. But what is needed is consistency in my opinion.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:26

          @MMM:

          benefited on early info posts

          As I've said to Scotty many many times before…

        • Moderatorscotty on 24/03/2016 - 15:26

          @Dingus: You get consistency if the robots are doing the moderation. All moderators are also human and some of us have to juggle other tasks like developing the site, replying support emails, etc. We most definitely aim to have consistency, however regrettably it is not always achievable.

        • Dingus on 24/03/2016 - 15:27

          @scotty: That is fair enough. Thanks for your help.

        • Freighter on 25/03/2016 - 05:54

          @scotty: why can't you have a robot (can't think of the word) where if the post gets -5 votes or -3 or whatever then the post gets hidden and then a moderator has to manually approve the post?

        • KOBH on 25/03/2016 - 16:27

          why can't you have a robot (can't think of the word) where if the post gets -5 votes

          @Freyta

          That's a very good idea!

          Why not add a script to hide post or comment when it has -5 votes? Why waste your time to do it manually? I've seen many sites already implemented this function.

        • muncan on 25/03/2016 - 16:32

          @PW: because jv

        • Moderatorscotty on 25/03/2016 - 22:17

          @PW:

          Why not add a script to hide post or comment when it has -5 votes?

          Haven't we done that already? Comments with -4 or less votes get hidden, and deals with -2 or worse votes also disappear from New Deals list.

        • KOBH on 25/03/2016 - 22:34

          @scotty

          Yes, you did with the comment. Thanks! :)

          It was my mistake to use "or" rather than "and".

          I actually meant to say "to hide post AND comment"

          Cheers

      • DrStinge on 24/03/2016 - 15:12
        +2

        There's plenty of "starting in X" deals which turn out to be dudd.

        • Dingus on 24/03/2016 - 15:13
          +2

          Exactly and they should be deleted.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:15
          +1

          @Dingus:

          Often there are group-buy deals where you know the item and price, and can legitimately vote if you think it's a bargain, even though you can't buy it yet…

          This was not the case here though…

        • Dingus on 24/03/2016 - 15:15

          @jv: Oh that makes more sense. But yeah bit different to this.

    • MMM on 24/03/2016 - 15:06
      +1

      Wish I could + your comment scotty! most posts just disappear if a poor offer, this has got so many unnecessary negs? is hate Sony or Hate TA?
      THANKS TA!!! for posting 2500+ post to my benefit really appreciate your effort

  • auna on 24/03/2016 - 14:59

    Ignore the idiots, TA. When there are multiple items on sale and even one of them alone are a deal then the entire sale is a bargain. Simply voice in the comments the items that aren't a good price.

    • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:05
      -1

      the idiots, TA.

      No need to call him names…

    • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:06
      +10

      there are multiple items on sale and even one of them alone are a deal

      None mentioned when it was posted…

      then the entire sale is a bargain

      I don't think so…..

  • blehgg on 24/03/2016 - 15:00
    +4

    Can't wait for the long weekend ~

    Life's too short for negging ~ bring on the happy times 4 day weeks!

    • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:07
      +3

      Reported post as 'off topic'

      jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:07 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
      • blehgg on 24/03/2016 - 15:13

        like 80% of the posts are on this thread right now ~

        are you going to report them all? :S common man - lighten up ~

        Easter cheer and all…

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:17
          +4

          like 80% of the posts are on this thread right now

          links to them please ?

        • patchyz on 24/03/2016 - 16:23

          @jv: all of yours, if you have an issue, message TA personally or contact the mods.

          I came into the comments section to read what people bought and for what price, and to see if any of the items are good value.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 16:25
          +2

          @patchyz:

          all of yours,

          I suggest you re-read them then… obviously you haven't

        • patchyz on 24/03/2016 - 16:29
          -3

          @jv: Ok well I don't have all day to read all of your messages, but creating a fuss over it in the comments section is annoying and you often do it. I'd rather you contact a mod for them to take the deal down, or private message the uploader.

          Though maybe that's just me.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 16:30
          +3

          @patchyz:

          Ok well I don't have all day to read all of your messages

          Yet you know they are 'off topic' without reading them…

          Says a lot about the way you comment then….

        • patchyz on 24/03/2016 - 16:33

          @jv: I was implying that you have clearly posted a ton load of messages more than necessary, I read all of them up to here as now my eyes and brain hurts.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 16:34
          +2

          @patchyz:

          I was implying that you have clearly posted a ton load of messages more than necessary

          How would you know that, as you admit, you haven't read them….

        • patchyz on 24/03/2016 - 16:43
          -3

          Are you serious? You must be trolling? Ok, well every single one of your comments might be necessary from beyond his point of page 4. Though prior to this point, from page 1 to this last comment I will post, I think, they aren't necessary.

          You do this quite frequently, and to deals that I have purchased from, it's really annoying. I probably shouldn't have told you that though because that's probably why you do it lol.

          Anyway, I don't want to spam this chat anymore than I already have.

        • MJ1 on 24/03/2016 - 17:04
          +1

          @patchyz: You should see JV's posts all over the rest of the site for the last couple of hours - it's like JV has tasted TA's blood and has gone a bit nuts.

  • trevor99 on 24/03/2016 - 15:09
    +1

    Bought the little clock radio ICF-C1 for $19 delivered in the recent Sony sale. Nice design and handy little unit to put anywhere around the house. Came via courier, can't see how they'd make any money on that …

    • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:12
      +6

      Came via courier, can't see how they'd make any money on that …

      The couriers charge a fee for delivering the item. That's how they make money.

      • trevor99 on 24/03/2016 - 15:16

        I meant Sony, obviously.

        • jv on 24/03/2016 - 15:17

          oh….

          sony probably just want to clear out their warehouse… to improve their cash flow.

        • llama on 24/03/2016 - 16:59

          Courier delivery Australia-wide would be $10 (at most) for an item like that. Probably cheaper than using Australia Post.

          Courier delivery is expensive for casual users, but it's not under an account arrangement.

        • zsccat on 25/03/2016 - 08:19

          I never use radio on these clocks. But $19 for a digital tube clock is not too bad for me. I have a previous generation of this Sony clock radio and it is working fine after a few years use.

  • spy on 24/03/2016 - 15:12

    C4 or Xiaomi Redmi Note 2? Similar specs, thinking latter is better dus to ongoing software support.

    • aghafoorkj on 24/03/2016 - 15:47
      +2

      definitely a c4.local support and warranty.

      • spy on 24/03/2016 - 16:04

        Hmmm but software?

        • Make it so on 24/03/2016 - 16:36

          Xiaomi may not be a smooth ride all the way either, though. And the Sony one is waterproof.

        • spy on 24/03/2016 - 16:39
          +2

          @Make it so: C series is not waterproof.

        • Make it so on 24/03/2016 - 17:05

          @spy: My bad. Good phone though. The M5 is also pretty awesome.

        • spy on 24/03/2016 - 17:29

          @Make it so: G4 for $370 is MUCH better.

        • murkywater on 24/03/2016 - 17:59
          +1

          @spy: Until it starts boot looping and you have to send it back to your grey importer

        • spy on 24/03/2016 - 18:03

          @raven2000: kogan.

        • murkywater on 24/03/2016 - 18:04
          +1

          @spy: Is that supposed to be a positive?

        • spy on 24/03/2016 - 18:46

          @raven2000: depends, but I won't delve into the hypothetical as C4 has its documented weaknesses and C5 is still $549. Moreover the Sony C4 is more prone to faults (yes I've owned the Zs before) thanks to the non premium parts it uses (it Sony's budget phone which is meant primarily for the Indian/Asian markets whereas the LG G4 is the premium flagship product). M series specs don't measure up to G4. 6" is an attractive proposition though on the C5.

        • Kothos on 24/03/2016 - 23:14
          +1

          @raven2000:

          I've had that problem with two different LG phones. It's balls!

    • solidsnake on 24/03/2016 - 23:07

      Stay away from xiaomi ,had my note 2 and battery barely stays for 2 hours. Changed and installed all global roms, still same for me . apparently ongoing issue with note 2 which xiaomi has not fixed yet.

    • Pacify on 25/03/2016 - 01:01
      +1

      you can get a note 3 pro for 230… way above c4 in specs

  • burningrage on 24/03/2016 - 15:12
    +1

    My opinion is better for TA to post something like this and we figured out and judge ourselves rather than none at all.

    What do you think is going to happen next time?

    burningrage on 24/03/2016 - 15:12 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
    • stellaaddicted on 24/03/2016 - 15:33
      +9

      maybe:

      • posting and other guidelines will apply to all
      • users will wait till they can actually check the price and possibly buy a bargain before positive them
      • create a new deal for the real bargains of a deal that has too many items in itself and some of the items are not a bargain
      • users will not positive a deal because of the user who posted it (it should never be about the user anyway)
  • MJ1 on 24/03/2016 - 15:19
    +6

    Biggest case of turning a molehill into a mountain since……ummmm………..ever.

    MJ1 on 24/03/2016 - 15:19 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
    • fred nerk on 24/03/2016 - 15:35
      +1

      But jv needs precise order and function is his and everyone else's lives.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join