This was posted 10 years 3 months 24 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Unlimited Calls to India (Landlines and Mobiles) $19.99 for 30 Days @ KeKu

41
Unlimited Calls to India (Landlines and Mobiles) $19.99 for 30 Days @ KeKu
Go to Deal
auswriter on 29/07/2014 - 21:56 keku.com (272 clicks)
Last edited 29/07/2014 - 22:42 by 2 other users

Get 30 days of unlimited calls to India (mobiles and landlines) for only $19.99. You can make these calls from 2 Registered Phones.

I have been using their India Unlimited plan since Jan 2014, and that time it was $30! Just want to share the low prices. You can also try their service by purchasing credit. If you register using the link below you'll get double the credit, that is $10 credit for $5 recharge, $20 credit for $10 recharge. (https://www.keku.com/register.aspx?r=1446044)

The best thing I like about this service is that no internet is required, you just call a regular local phone number and they will patch you through. Or you can call using Wifi/3G from iphone or Android app or using their site online.

India Unlimited plan details at https://www.keku.com/Cheap-Calls-to-India

Mobile Asia Call Mobile India Telephone Call VoIP

Related Stores

keku.com
keku.com

closed Comments

  • [Deactivated] on 29/07/2014 - 22:04
    +6

    or pay $15 a month via telstra ( if you got Telstra Landline )for unlimited calling to number of countries include INDIA.

    http://www.telstra.com.au/home-phone/international-calling/

    or pay $15 a month via optus include number of countries

    http://www.optus.com.au/shop/home-phone/extras/international…

    • ozultimate on 29/07/2014 - 22:13
      +2

      I pay $10 for Telstra international calling pack signed up during promotion.

    • skinny on 29/07/2014 - 23:03

      Ditto with Optus for $15, except with Optus you get around 21 countries (mostly with landlines and mobiles with some exception).

  • King Tightarse on 29/07/2014 - 22:11
    +2

    So it sounds like a local call in to VOIP service.
    Might as well just get an unlimited out Skype subscription for $14.49 (Skype money often can be had cheaper) and call nearly everywhere.

    • [Deactivated] on 29/07/2014 - 22:15

      free trial for a month, world calling (exclude India for free calling and few others countries)

      http://www.skype.com/en/offers/free-unlimited-world-calling-…

      if anyone interested

      • King Tightarse on 29/07/2014 - 23:06

        Says Australia excluded.

        • oringal on 29/07/2014 - 23:58

          use a free vpn to change where you computer is located

        • King Tightarse on 30/07/2014 - 00:04

          Yeah you could do that but Skype are pretty serious about banning people if you ever forget to use it. Would rather stay legit.

  • Tuba on 29/07/2014 - 22:20
    -2

    Payback time.

    "Gday Gupta, do I have a bogan for you"

  • linoc66 on 29/07/2014 - 22:23
    +11

    I'd pay $19.99 to have India stop calling me ;P

    • mtfranklin on 30/07/2014 - 09:23

      Funny,but we know a true ozbargainer wouldn't spend $19.99 that easily

      • [Deactivated] on 30/07/2014 - 09:45
        +2

        They would if they were told the usual price was at least $21.04 ;)

  • MrZ on 29/07/2014 - 22:29
    +7

    I already make enough calls to India as it is - everytime I call a customer service number.

  • PresidentClinton on 29/07/2014 - 22:29
    -3

    cue casual racism

    • [Deactivated] on 30/07/2014 - 09:55

      Are people negging this because it's an uncomfortable truth, or because they think you're inciting racism?

      • Tuba on 30/07/2014 - 15:51
        +1

        Comments about race, are not of themselves racism. Hate, superiority regarding race, these are racist. The modern world is confused about racism, white folk are guilt ridden, thus the confusion.

        Fact is, nearly every telemarketing call I get, is from India. Thats not racism, its an observation.

        At a guess, people are sick to death of not being able to comment about some aspect of life, even if involving race, and being branded racist. Stereotypes exist for a reason. People cant relate to for example, Hungarian telemarketers. There might be a few, but they arent stereotypically something that people will relate with.

        • [Deactivated] on 30/07/2014 - 17:23

          Comments about race, are not of themselves racism.

          They are if it's a negative stereotype, or are you saying "Indian call centre" isn't?

          "Some associate racism with a belief in racial superiority or deliberate acts of discrimination. Casual racism concerns not so much a belief in the superiority of races but negative prejudice or stereotypes concerning race.
          Unlike overt and intentional acts of racism, casual racism isn’t often intended to cause offence or harm."
          https://www.humanrights.gov.au/casual-racism-faqs

          Fact is, nearly every telemarketing call I get, is from India. Thats not racism, its an observation.

          Just curious, how do you know for a fact that they're calling from India?

        • Tuba on 30/07/2014 - 21:10

          Well, I get several calls from various people 'representing' one organisation or another. Now I get these calls representing many organisations but I get calls from various marketers trying to sell me the same thing. Each time, there is an Indian accent despite a different voice. Sometimes I get two or three daily, then months without any at all. Its true they may be Sri Lankan, or maybe Nepalese, but these places are not known for telemarketing. Again, they may be in Australia or the UK for example, but they all have Indian accents so if they are here or in the UK, there is truth in the stereotype even when bountiful other opportunities are available, they still choose telemarketing. I would think the idea that Indian telemarketers in India would be less demonstrative of stereotypical behaviour than if they were located outside of India. If it werent true, surely the odds are that maybe 1 in 10 calls might be have an Indian accent while 9 do not. That does not happen though.

          Indian call centre is neither negative nor positive. Its simply a statement and currently the trend. The act of telemarketing is negative to most people just as is a tax auditor but where its located is simply a coincidence. I assure you, Id be equally annoyed at a British or Australian call centre. Its not that I dont want to speak with Indian people, I dont want them ringing me to sell me crap. I like calls from friends, family, you know normal calls. I dont like Myer or any other business that desires to tell me crap like they are having a 10% off sale.

          Lastly, its not hard to search and find why a large percentage of telemarketers are Indian. For one, a large number of organisations have laid off their own force of phone crews of all kinds and moved them offshore. The ones with Indian accents are likely even if not guaranteed to be, from India, a place known to be very well equipped for such services.

          So fact? Lets call it common sense. Its sad that needed to be explained to you though.

        • PresidentClinton on 05/08/2014 - 07:48

          @Tuba:
          Weasel words. Comments that generalises an entire nation is casual racism at its finest. This is also called stereotyping.

          There can be negative stereotypes and positive ones.

          Positive examples:

          "It's German made, must be good quality."
          "He's German, he must be an efficient worker."

          Negative examples:

          "It's Chinese made, must be crap."
          "He's Chinese, he must be a lazy worker."

          Whether you like it or not, I've found australia to be one of the most comfortably racist, sexist and homophobic western nations on earth. Yes this is a negative stereotype but unlike some, it's probably more worthy of being raised, examined and understood to overcome it.

        • King Tightarse on 05/08/2014 - 09:15

          Really President Clinton?
          How deep is the irony of making sweeping generalizations about Australia after spinning your wheels over stereotyping.
          And you have lived in every western nation long enough to be deeply familiar with prevailing attitudes and a reliable source of comparative data on "comfort" with homophobia, racism and sexism?
          Are you sure? Lol.

        • PresidentClinton on 05/08/2014 - 14:39

          @King Tightarse:
          I've heard every defensive reaction to this before. Let me help you in the right direction with my recent observations.

          Compare our women's national netball team with every other national netball team. Notice any distinct lack of visible minorities?

          Also I hope you're a "The Bachelor" fan. Notice a lack of visible female minorities too? Must have thought they filled that quota with a mixed race bachelor..

          There are plenty more examples if you're interested.

        • Tuba on 05/08/2014 - 17:49

          You should Google anecdotal evidence.

          As was said, you use your observations to draw a conclusion and that seems to be OK with you as it says well, exactly what you WANT it to say. But you dont like when others do the same however showing a different conclusion to what you had hoped for. Ill spelkl it out for you since you obviously need the assistance. I observed, along with others, that Indians seem to be overly represented in the telemarketing game. Its actually a researchable and measurable fact, they ramped up facilities for the exact purpose. People drew conclusions, not based on stereotypes, but experience and it fits with what we know, telemarketing and call centre desks are generally occupied by persons with an Indian accent, at least disproportionately to the general population in other interactions. You make some observations, and make conclusions based on your interpretation of that.

          Yours are AOK.
          Everyone elses that dont say what you want to hear, are terrible.

          Your hypocrisy is astounding.

        • [Deactivated] on 05/08/2014 - 18:09

          @PresidentClinton: Was there discrimination in the netball team selection process?

          Last Commonwealth Games, the Australian netball team included Tongan-Australian Mo'onia Gerrard. She was first selected for the Australian netball team in 2004 and represented Australia in the Netball World Championships. I'm pretty sure she was selected for her talent, not to fill a token minority spot.

          She would most likely have been in this year's national team, however she made herself unavailable for selection to pursue her dream of playing Rugby Sevens for Australia. Hopefully we'll see her at the next Olympics, Rio 2016.

          But for sake of comparison: Here are seven of the twelve netball teams that competed in the 2014 Commonwealth Games, can you point out the "visible minorities"?

          http://results.glasgow2014.com/team/netball/NBW400BAR01/barb…
          http://results.glasgow2014.com/team/netball/NBW400JAM01/jama…
          http://results.glasgow2014.com/team/netball/NBW400MAW01/mala…
          http://results.glasgow2014.com/team/netball/NBW400LCA01/sain…
          http://results.glasgow2014.com/team/netball/NBW400SCO01/scot…
          http://results.glasgow2014.com/team/netball/NBW400TTO01/trin…
          http://results.glasgow2014.com/team/netball/NBW400WAL01/wale…

          Including Australia, these teams made up 3/4 of those that competed in this year's Games.

          So, where is the discrimination?

        • King Tightarse on 05/08/2014 - 19:16

          @PresidentClinton:
          "Let me help you in the right direction with my recent observations."

          Lol really Obi Wan.

          Pres C, I loved your work with Israel and Palestine. You were absolutely awesome that time you got those girls out of North Korea but citing "the Bachelor" as a valid and representative source for anything is so silly it makes everything else you have said seem foolish.

        • PresidentClinton on 05/08/2014 - 20:48

          @Thrift:

          What a silly thing to say. Here's the countries you outlined by % of foreign born residents.

          Barbados- 11.3%
          Jamaica- 1.3%
          Malawi- 1.3%
          St Lucia- 6.7%
          Trinidad & Tobago- 2.4%
          Scotland- 7%
          Wales- 5.5%

          AUSTRALIA- 27.7%
          NZ- 25.1%
          England- 13.8%

          Hmm there seems to be plenty of visible minorities in NZ, England and even South Africa (white minority). Yet Australia with the highest foreign born % seems to have none.

          See a pattern emerging? Also similar in cricket.

        • PresidentClinton on 05/08/2014 - 20:52

          @King Tightarse:
          What the Australian entertainment media represents as "beautiful" isn't relevant? Ignoring a large part of the population based on race isn't relevant? I think I'm seeing part of the problem here.

        • [Deactivated] on 05/08/2014 - 21:35

          @PresidentClinton: So we're excusing most of the national netball teams because their country of residence is not multicultural enough.

          It seems the selection criteria is meant to be based on national performance, skill and physical fitness. How many international-level netballers of minority were considered or overlooked for the 2014 Australian national netball team?

          Edit: And before you say I'm being silly again, if I advertise a job and the qualified applicants all happen to be Australian-born males, then choosing an Australian-born male for the position doesn't mean I'm discriminating against race or sex.

        • King Tightarse on 05/08/2014 - 21:46

          @PresidentClinton:

          The only thing the Bachelor cares about is ratings so as to sell advertising. There is no conspiracy. No one is ganging up on you and the Bachelor doesn't claim to be a beauty pageant. The Bachelor is a sample group of one. A single TV show is hardly statistically relevant of anything.
          I dont know about you, but most of the catalogues I pick up have a diverse mix of racial groups represented. Especially shown are people of European and Asian decent as these are the dominant groups in Australia with the latter rising in prominence mostly in the last twenty years, from a base of virtually zero. Also please note that things have changed remarkably in my lifetime. When I was born, there was a white Australia policy.
          These days its about as integrated as it could be. There is always a time lag between arrival and assimilation with every major immigrant group. So if you see a recently arrived group as not fully assimilated, perhaps give it time. I see Australia as dynamic and very harmonious compared to most countries.
          You want to talk about a TRULY racist country? Look to India. Do you need me to qualify that? Its pretty easy. The caste system alone is astonishing.

  • canigetsometoo on 29/07/2014 - 22:35

    interesting will check it out

  • mobilemenia on 29/07/2014 - 23:04
    +2

    I have used thie Keku …Not good at all…Quality of call is worse. Currently I use Boss Revolution which is Virtual calling card concept.

    www.bossrevolution.com.au

    It is only good to use with local min. So this is only good for those who has unlimited local calls on their mobile.

  • jzx100 on 30/07/2014 - 08:46

    Reverse telemarketing here I come!!!

  • kaal on 30/07/2014 - 09:02
    +1

    I've tried using this and the quality is poor. People on the other side can't hear me while I can hear them. I loaded up with $5 and can't even use it. Be vary.

  • shaybisc on 30/07/2014 - 09:28
    +1

    Got a call from my Indian Microsoft guy last night. First in quite a while. Kind of miss the pest. Tip for getting rid of him- say "I don't have any Microsoft only Linux".

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join