Dr Nick Coatsworth Who Helped Lead Australia's Response to COVID - Recommends NO MORE JABS - OPINIONS

mickrb30 on 12/06/2024 - 21:12
Last edited 13/06/2024 - 08:06 by 1 other user

Dr Nick Coatsworth makes a STUNNING admission about the Covid jab

Dr Nick Coatsworth (left) who helped lead Australia's response to Covid-19, has made a shock revelation about vaccinations for the virus. And it's not the first controversial statement Dr Coatsworth - Australia's former deputy chief health officer - has made about the Covid vaccine. HE HAS WOKEN UP _ SAYS HE WILL NOT TAKE ANY MORE JABS - whats your SAY ? ?
Will you follow his lead, his advice ?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13520171/doctor-n…

sorry spelled typo, Opinion wrong in heading, wont let me fix it know.

Health & Beauty COVID-19 Vaccination

Comments

  • Imponte on 15/06/2024 - 10:02
    +3

    Get a new hobby and move on with your life

    • GachaGamer on 15/06/2024 - 15:29
      +2

      no. the agenda must be maintained.

      just search thru op's post history. they're fighting the real fight.

      it's kinda interesting to see ozbargainers try to out science science, with some good ol' armchair science.

    • Typical16-bitEnjoyer on 16/06/2024 - 11:17

      They probably dabbled with 'cash is king' and 'councils are illegal' but obviously got bored and went back to old faithful.

  • mrdean on 15/06/2024 - 16:24
    -2

    I wonder what Dr Nick would make of this:

    https://reporter.nih.gov/search/WNMviEkAEk-ohjdU9a9JTg/publi…

    "We have identified a highly promising lead candidate vaccine antigen, the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV spike (S) protein that can induce potent neutralizing antibody response and protection against SARS-CoV infection. Our objective is to develop a highly effective and safe recombinant RBD-based SARS vaccine that can be used in humans for prevention of future SARS outbreak and for biodefense preparedness."

    2012-2017

    Yeah, biodefense the tail that wagged the dog. Is it really defense though? Or more like bioweapon? Moderna seed funded by DARPA around 2012, the pieces fall into place.

    Just a reminder of Peter Hotez:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj6-QDVYbv8

    • MessyG on 15/06/2024 - 16:48
      +5

      Why do you keep spreading misinformation? The first link is in direct response to the 2002 SARS outbreak which is another coronavirus. How can you expect to be taken seriously when you do these things that are so easily refuted?

      And funny you should mention Professor Hotez whose work in developing countries has been second to none, and who was repeatedly doxxed and harassed by antivaxxers.

      • mrdean on 15/06/2024 - 16:53
        -3

        The first link is in direct response to the 2002 SARS outbreak which is another coronavirus.

        Well, yeah…hence the tail wagging the dog comment & the buildup of the biodefense/surveillance/pandemic industries. Are you grateful there were so many wonderful scientists, researchers, politicians, policy makers, heads of industries, philanthropies, ngos that accurately "predicted" a "pandemic" who had absolutely no vested interests? Lol.

        • MessyG on 15/06/2024 - 20:09
          +2

          …but that is just standard practice with novel viruses. Of course they predicted another pandemic…after there was a pandemic from a new virus that they'd not seen before, of course they expected it to happen again. Far out, that's literally how pandemics work.

      • EightImmortals on 18/06/2024 - 08:25
        -1

        Wasn't he the tool who denied millions of dollars to charity because he was too gutless and lacking beliefs in his own convictions in his own rhetoric to debate RKF on Rogan? For someone as vocal as him one would think he had at least 'some' scientific evidence to support his crusade. Guess not.

  • Mad Max on 15/06/2024 - 16:38
    +5

    I just think that it is great that the pro-vaxers keep getting boosted.
    I am even happy for my taxes to pay for their boosters!

    The more downvotes the better.

    • MessyG on 15/06/2024 - 16:49
      +2

      The thing is most people aren't getting boosted unless they fall into high-risk categories. Most of us don't know why you lot keep going on about it.

      • mrdean on 15/06/2024 - 17:00
        +1

        Don't worry the next pandemic will get peoples attention.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-kq4YpyFp0

        • whyisave on 15/06/2024 - 19:35
          +1

          Don't worry the next pandemic will get peoples attention.

          Bill Gates was just trying to improve his/their share-holdings in BioNTech,
          so that's why he's telling everyone to prepare for another pandemic.

          Billionaire’s Biotech Bets: 3 Stocks Dominating Bill Gates’ Portfolio (March 2024)
          https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/billionaires-biotech-bets:-3…

          BioNTech accounts for 17.5% of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation portfolio, which owns almost 148,000 shares valued at $15.7 million.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-kq4YpyFp0

          That video is old, circa 2020 ?

          Melinda Gates has already left the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation last week (June 2024).

          • May4th on 16/06/2024 - 16:48
            -1

            @whyisave: do you know how ridiculous it is to think bill gates would waste his breath to improve the position of a holding worth 17.5 million? the entire holding to him is like $50 to the average ozbargainer that's worth ~1m

            • whyisave on 16/06/2024 - 21:08
              +3

              @May4th:

              do you know how ridiculous

              I don't think it's ridiculous to talk about one's own investments,
              or cross-promote anything, if it will only bring benefit to one's own self,
              eg. people who buy certain crypto-tokens talk about those crypto-tokens in hope that others jumping into it will increase the price, people buying a house in a certain area and then talking up that area, politicians buying up properties and then talking about changing AirBNB rules, etc. etc. etc.

              Besides, Bill Gates had "wasted his breath", ie. given TED talks and went on innoculation campaigns in Africa and India for many years before 2020, and he's always talking about things that he's already invested in.
              India even got upset at Bill Gates many years ago, about his foundation's work in that country:
              https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/20/world/asia/india-health-n… [NYTimes, 2017].

        • MessyG on 15/06/2024 - 20:09
          +1

          FFS there's been pandemics since there's been humans…

        • smartazz104 on 17/06/2024 - 09:07

          If only it'd get more than their "attention"…

      • whyisave on 15/06/2024 - 19:29
        +3

        The original recipe that was offered for everyone to take up, was only for the alpha variant.

        The boosters were a different "recipe" for the newer variants (eg. delta, omicron, etc.).

        The alpha variant is not supposed to be effective for the newer variants.

        As the newer variants mutate and/or released (?), newer recipes are also offered to the population,
        so why do some people think now their alpha-recipe will be fine for the new variants?

        Maybe, we think that newer variants pose less threat because the virus is getting weaker
        or our body is developing the immunity , when it's learning how to fight the spike protein which is created inside the body.

      • EightImmortals on 16/06/2024 - 08:27
        -1

        Oh I know lots of young people who are hypnotised by the main stream narrative who, even though they are now constantly sick with various things are happy to rush down and get the next fix as soon as they can. Witness the power of the narrative.

  • serpserpserp on 15/06/2024 - 17:51
    +6

    Umm Nick Coatsworth did nothing but hinder the COVID response.

    Looking at what else he has been doing in life since 2020, I give him zero credibility on anything.

    • druex on 17/06/2024 - 09:32

      He didn't mask up with patients so that he could "empathise" with them better.

  • movieman on 16/06/2024 - 05:39

    Who would've thought… Hmmmm

  • cloudy on 16/06/2024 - 08:25
    +2

    FYI, Dr Coatsworth statement seems entirely consistent with current health advice.

    https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-05/recomm…

    • mrdean on 16/06/2024 - 10:26
      +1

      Why are the severely immunocompromised encouraged to get these countermeasures, when the messaging was focused on the general population getting the countermeasures to protect those immunocompromised who couldn't?

      These two links try to explain why those who "may" be at risk from "other conditions" should "consider" a primary or booster dose.

      https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/contents/vaccine-…
      https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/resources/tables/…

      • Typical16-bitEnjoyer on 16/06/2024 - 11:05
        +2

        Why are the majority of your posts vague conspiracy laden rhetoricals?

        • mrdean on 16/06/2024 - 11:15

          Because it IS a conspiracy by our Reptilian Overlords?

          • Typical16-bitEnjoyer on 16/06/2024 - 11:21
            +3

            @mrdean: Sorry you'll have to back that up with a YouTube video of some guy with 45 subscribers ranting for 1 hour 45 minutes with no citations.

              • Typical16-bitEnjoyer on 16/06/2024 - 11:27

                @mrdean: 1998? Yawn. Keeping cookin'

                • mrdean on 16/06/2024 - 12:49
                  +2

                  @Typical16-bitEnjoyer: Miles Mathis has corrected mainstream physics going back to the time of Euclid. Ignore sites like rationalwiki.

                  Latest example: http://milesmathis.com/evap.pdf

                  Spread the word.

                  • SBOB on 16/06/2024 - 13:53
                    +4

                    @mrdean:

                    has corrected mainstream physics

                    "corrected" indeed
                    from the same genius that brought you

                    Stephen Hawkins is a body double
                    http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf

                    and

                    and pi=4
                    http://milesmathis.com/pi7.pdf

                    While he might be a good creative writer, his entire premise is aimed at people that clearly don't understand maths or physics to show that "mainstream" maths/physics is "wrong" (not enough " symbols in the world to accurately air quote "wrong" accurately in this instance)

                    • mrdean on 16/06/2024 - 14:12
                      +1

                      @SBOB: Lol. You think I wasn't aware of his other writings? It's just his opinion based on research anyone can do, but doesn't. Which is what Mathis starts off those papers with. It's why I mentioned rationalwiki :)

                      • Ughhh on 16/06/2024 - 14:27
                        +3

                        @mrdean: Interesting that you're admitting that his pi=4 paper is an opinion piece.

                        • mrdean on 16/06/2024 - 14:47
                          -3

                          @Ughhh: No, Mathis' other papers on geneaology & general stuff are opinion pieces based on his research & his eye for detail (being a painter par excellence). The pi papers don't fall into that category, they are math/science, which I thought would have been self explanatory.

                          Miles is a modern day polymath. He's got one of the sharpest minds on the planet (not as poisoned & brainwashed as the rest of us you see), although he still has health issues.

                          • GachaGamer on 16/06/2024 - 15:33
                            +4

                            @mrdean: My brother in christ, your attempt at eloquence is wasted when the words that are coming out of your mouth (or via your keyboard in this case) is just pseudo intellectual garbage spouted by "geniuses" on the fringe. Is your next response going to be that terryology was right all along?

                          • Ughhh on 16/06/2024 - 19:28

                            @mrdean: Nice back peddling.

                            But his calculations of pi is based on a shape that we've been told to exist by the Gov. In another words, he's been brainwashed already, but posses the gift of being able convince people like you he's not.

                            although he still has health issues.

                            Must've been boosted 100 times.

                            • mrdean on 17/06/2024 - 11:57
                              +1

                              @Ughhh:

                              Nice back peddling.

                              Nice trolling, which seems to be your only raison d'etre for responding in these threads. No interest in constructive dialogue. Just a defender against "conspiracy theories"! Lol.

                              Mathis' other papers
                              Mathis starts off those papers

                              Keywords being "other" & "those".

                              • Ughhh on 17/06/2024 - 12:29
                                +1

                                @mrdean: The troll is the one contradicting himself. Apparently a person is only brainwash if you said so.

                                • mrdean on 17/06/2024 - 12:45

                                  @Ughhh: Just in case you weren't aware, Mathis has 2 websites.

                                  http://www.mileswmathis.com/ is his art & general site on which you'll find articles & pdf's related to geneaology, art criticism, essays including "conspiracy" stuff.

                                  http://milesmathis.com/ is his science site, which for your personal benefit, just so you aren't confused, says in bold "THE GREATEST STANDING ERRORS IN PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS."

                                  There is no "contradiction". Mathis' opinions are usually clearly visible, eg in this paper on Diana's Faked Death: http://mileswmathis.com/diana.pdf the quote is "as usual, this is just my opinion, based on internet research anyone could do."

                                  Anyone pointing to his "conspiracy" work as a means of denigrating his "science" work clearly is using it as a means of discrediting & not taking his science work seriously. In fact, Mathis does have some support from within "mainstream" science, one even wrote a short appreciation blurb for Mathis' self published book: http://milesmathis.com/tahir.html
                                  https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/bios/yaqoob.html

                                  "Physics is in desperate need of new and fresh ideas, across the board. You will find plenty of these in Miles Mathis' book. I have not verified the results, but as far as I know, Miles is the first person to propose and begin to investigate the idea that Newton's fundamental gravitational equation already has electromagnetism embedded within it, and that what is needed is decomposition, not unification. Such a possibility has profound implications. To quote Michael Faraday, one of the greatest experimentalists in the history of physics, "If you would cause your view… to be acknowledged by scientific men, you would do a great service to science. If you would even get them to say 'yes' or 'no' to your conclusions it would help to clear the future progress. I believe some hesitate because they do not like their thoughts disturbed." I invite you to have your "thoughts disturbed" by Miles' book, if you dare."

  • Eeples on 16/06/2024 - 10:29
    -1

    Getting a booster a few weeks before going on a Cruise imo makes sense regardless of your age or health conditions.

    • Mad Max on 16/06/2024 - 14:30

      YES!!!
      While you are there make sure you get the Flu vaccine and the RSV vaccine as well.
      One can never be too cautious!

      • Eeples on 19/06/2024 - 17:24

        Indeed. Those cruise ships are still a giant Petri dish.

        The mental gymnastics required to not acknowledge the tragedy of the Ruby Princess where at least 900 people tested positive and 28 died is astonishing.

        • Mad Max on 19/06/2024 - 18:00
          +1

          Those cruise ships are still a giant Petri dish

          I would not go on a cruise for that reason. To catch covid or the flu is somehow possible.
          Gastroenterites is about 50% chance.
          Top it with the fact that many cruises are often floating nursing homes full of old and frail, so you know why so many died.
          Unfortunately neither covid or flu vaccine will stop you getting sick.

          • Eeples on 19/06/2024 - 20:43
            -1

            @Mad Max: I know that 28 people don’t die nowadays on cruise ships per sailing and it would be the same clientele.

            The two main reasons are vaccinations and weaker covid strains.

            • Mad Max on 20/06/2024 - 11:03
              +1

              @Eeples:

              The two main reasons are vaccinations and weaker covid strains.

              Weaker covid strains would be the reason.
              Although covid vaccine may help for old and frail people with other comorbidities.
              That doesn't make it acceptable to force it on everyone else including younger and healthier people putting them at risk of known or unknown, short/medium/long term vaccine side effects.

              • Eeples on 20/06/2024 - 13:42
                -1

                @Mad Max:

                That doesn't make it acceptable to force it on everyone else including younger and healthier people putting them at risk of known or unknown, short/medium/long term vaccine side effects.

                Well it was effectively forced on younger and healthier people in some work occupations; but not all young and healthy people.

                Some people would argue by encouraging vaccination of everyone would help protect elderly and already compromised individuals; balancing that with the unknowns of vaccine side effects has polarised many.

                • mrdean on 20/06/2024 - 13:44
                  +2

                  @Eeples:

                  Some people would argue by encouraging

                  There's encouraging & promoting, & then there's coercion. The alleged protection of the elderly & health compromised is a myth.

                  • Eeples on 20/06/2024 - 15:06
                    -3

                    @mrdean: Polarised.

                    I think the idea at the time was lockdowns and vaccinate everyone to slow down the spread…. So ye olde people and already vaccinated have a chance to get fully vaccinated.

                    But, I guess you think this is rubbish too.

                    • mrdean on 20/06/2024 - 15:54
                      +4

                      @Eeples:

                      I think the idea at the time was lockdowns and vaccinate everyone to slow down the spread

                      No authority should ever get to decide to "vaccinate everyone" & then proceed to punish those who don't whilst underhandedly claiming "no one was forced". At best, they can "recommend" it.

                      Currently, flying under the radar of the masses, the same scenario is being rolled out in the farm/livestock sector.

                      • whyisave on 20/06/2024 - 16:34
                        +3

                        @mrdean:

                        No authority should ever get to decide to "vaccinate everyone"

                        I think the issue was the decision to lock all people and mostly healthy people
                        because usually, you would isolate / quarantine sick people away from the group,
                        eg. look at prisons…you take out the delinquents out of the society and put them into a cage, until they behave well.

                        So, someone decided that by locking everyone and then giving them a taste of 'freedom' the first round,
                        before the lock-up the second time,…and dangling the science so that everyone would participate to want to taste some freedoms again.

                        What's interesting is, in NSW, as the case numbers went from 20,30,40…to hundreds and 1000+ daily,
                        I remember on the 10th day of 1000+ cases (as Premier Gladys would announce),
                        I was telling people at that time, "hey…this is the 10th day of people with covid, …which means there was 10,000 - 15,000 people who were sick and told to isolate for 10-14 days at home (ie. outside of the hospital system) and then to watch their symptoms" (because coming to hospital all at the same time, would freak everybody out, etc. etc.

                        So, many of them (ie. 15,000) were just sick at home, resting with mild symptoms or with chest cramps,…and kind of were told (via SMS from NSW Health) that if they had breathing difficulties, to call an ambulance to take to the hospital.
                        Even with that kind of widespread infection, the hospital system was not inundated or collapsed, and people recovered with covid19 immunity within 7-10 days, to feel healthy again.
                        Some would have experienced "long covid" (which was just misunderstood 'inflammatory response'), and some would have lost their taste & smell, … but ALL of them would have already developed immunity.
                        However, their immunity was not acknowledged and still subjected to the emergency approved injections…until NSW Health amended the health mandates to include "previous covid infections" as a sign of immunity, with a limit of 3-months…which got extended to 6-months.

                        So, even at first, immunity was NOT recognised, and everyone MUST take 'something', to be able to leave the home…or unable to visit a private business space. After people complained, it was 3-month exemption…which also got changed to 6-months.

                        By the time Delta and Omicron were floating around, the Alpha recipe was obsolete, and people who took 2 shots of the Alpha recipe, were told that the SCIENCE said to take Alpha-recipe again…the 3rd time because the first 2 shots was inadequate.
                        ("Boosting" was the marketing term for keep repeating the same recipe again and again, and whose ingredients on the Pf1zer packaging was 'blacked out' but Astra was publicly known.

                        Then, the guy (with 0 shots), standing next to the 2-shot person, was being told ZERO is not good….
                        the Delta and Omicron is floating around,…so he better take Alpha recipe or he would be spreading…

                        So, ZERO-shot people were told 2 Alphas would be good for them and it would work, during Delta & Omicron
                        but TWO-shot people were told 2 is not working anymore, but 3 Alphas would be working for them (and after a while, they were told to take 4 Alphas for the next non-Alpha variants).
                        Repeating same recipe every 6 months, for variants that the recipe was not made for….but just to clear overcrowded medical fridges.

                        The fridges were full of the vials, because the Government had bought tooooo many, ie. to inject every Aussie 6times? 8 times?
                        So, the person who got duped to ordering so many, out of fear or losing the election, starting telling all their subordinates "you better push this products…as we got too many of them".

                        • Ughhh on 20/06/2024 - 19:36
                          -1

                          @whyisave:

                          you would isolate / quarantine sick people away from the group,

                          It initially was this, at least on my state form memory. Problem is tracking people and isolating people - both of which many of minority absolutely believe it's an infringement of their rights to freedom. There's no point isolating the sick, when you dont know and can't track who's sick/can spread anymore.

                      • bigticket on 20/06/2024 - 18:53
                        +1

                        @mrdean:

                        Currently, flying under the radar of the masses, the same scenario is being rolled out in the farm/livestock sector.

                        Don't know if you agree.

                        This is a false flag. There is not an issue of avian flu and poultry, as currently reported by the MSM, apart from the inhumane farming conditions.

                        Its purely based on the bogus PCR testing that was conducted during covid. The purpose is to cull livestock, but not just not limited poultry, but to also cattle that are potentially(read bogus) susceptible to avian flu.

                        Note: Similar reports coming out of Canada and potentially other countries.

                        • mrdean on 21/06/2024 - 08:01
                          +3

                          @bigticket:

                          Don't know if you agree.

                          Yes, I pretty much agree. Same playbook, testing, quarantining, culling. Enabled by relatively recently enacted legal framework (biosecurity, public health emergencies etc). It won't stop until the masses realise what is really being done, or they at least start to question the assumptions underpinning virology & outbreaks.

                          An example of a small victorian business called weseggs & how they were told by Agriculture Vic to cease trading even though their birds had tested negative.
                          https://files.ozbargain.com.au/upload/442669/113549/weseggs_…

                          • SBOB on 21/06/2024 - 09:22

                            @mrdean:

                            An example of a small victorian business called weseggs & how they were told by Agriculture Vic to cease trading even though their birds had tested negative.

                            Though 4 days after that, after another test and applying for a permit they are trading again
                            https://www.facebook.com/weseggs?fref=ts

                            So they were restricted while their test results verified and Ag Vic visiting site, but is the alternate solution free for all product release to the public and just trusting that farmers testing is thorough and doesnt need validating?

                            • mrdean on 21/06/2024 - 09:32
                              +2

                              @SBOB:

                              but is the alternate solution free for all product release to the public

                              Yes. Let farmers farm. Repeal the biosecurity legislation both state & federal that burdens & destroys businesses & exaggerates the so called threats of pandemics.

                        • mrdean on 21/06/2024 - 13:31
                          +1

                          @bigticket:

                          The purpose is to cull livestock, but not just not limited poultry, but to also cattle that are potentially(read bogus) susceptible to avian flu.

                          You can also read here about what is in store.

                          https://www.unsw.edu.au/news/2024/05/livestock-vaccine-manuf…

                          Note the last paragraph where they provide plausible deniability. I have no doubt very close scrutiny of those alleged trials would reveal disturbing results, & a lot of questions they didn't ask, which they should have. In other words, science done not in service of truth, but for other reasons.

                          I also have no doubt the Moderna facility in VIC will be a major player moving forward.

                          • Mad Max on 21/06/2024 - 17:22
                            +1

                            @mrdean: Is this MRNA vaccine going to have any effect/side effect in humans when the meat is consumed?
                            I mean it is not injected directly in the blood stream or inhaled. Would any MRNA components survive the gastric acids?

                            • mrdean on 21/06/2024 - 17:36
                              +3

                              @Mad Max: No idea. It's a risk that should be scientifically & transparently assessed without any fear or favor to corporate interests or government agendas.
                              What I think will occur is that more data massaging & bias will seep in to get them approved. They may even be expedited under emergency measures. The government is financially invested in mrna technology. They are making it happen.

                              • Mad Max on 21/06/2024 - 17:48
                                +1

                                @mrdean: May have to find a friendly farmer and see if they will sell the meat from like 1/2 animal from the ones that they keep separate for their consumption 😉

                              • whyisave on 22/06/2024 - 19:48
                                +1

                                @mrdean:

                                The government is financially invested in mrna technology

                                If it's the "government" , then it won't matter who you vote for, in the next election.

                                No matter who you vote for, the government always gets in.

                                Isn't there a ModeRNA facility being built near Melbourne ?

                • Mad Max on 20/06/2024 - 17:43
                  +1

                  @Eeples:

                  Well it was effectively forced on younger and healthier people in some work occupations; but not all young and healthy people.

                  Teenagers refilling shelves in Coles and Woolworths were forced, if they wanted to keep their jobs.
                  Students in university were forced if they wanted to complete their studies.
                  Young kids in schools were heavily pressured and told that parent's consent was not required.
                  These are all young people that didn't have any risk from Covid, but big risk from the vaccine.
                  It is CRIMINAL.

                  Some people would argue by encouraging vaccination

                  Encouraging? If you don't get it you can't go to uni, you can't go to work, you can't go to a restaurant, the pub, a cinema. Hell, if you don't get it we will not give you health care (dentist, specialists, surgical procedures in hospital, ecc). It is not ENCOURAGING! It is FORCING!!!

                  Never before in history people forcing other good people to do something that they didn't want to do were considered the "good guys". They were and still are tyrants, dictators, oppressors.

                  • whyisave on 20/06/2024 - 22:46

                    @Mad Max:

                    These are all young people that didn't have any risk from Covid, but big risk from the vaccine.

                    it was pushed on everyone, because someone or some group authorized the purchase of too many vials,
                    and to save their embarrassment, wanted to cover up their panic-buying.
                    That's what it looked like, … because during the "1st wave", children were not in the risk category at all.

    • bigticket on 16/06/2024 - 19:12

      Don't forget the shingles vaccine. Maybe the aptly named monkey pox vaccine if one is available.

      Googling will help sourcing multiple others if one doesnt mind been a pincushion. A small price to pay to be safe and effective(ly) like Superman.

  • takemymoney on 16/06/2024 - 12:36
    +1

    Well, it is time for him to retire. If a dr in his position and media responsibilities doesn't keep up with the latest research and evidence, he is not up to the job.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45953-1

    • bigticket on 16/06/2024 - 18:55
      +1

      He probably has common sense not place any significant credence on epidemiological papers funded by AZ and Pfizer.

      • takemymoney on 16/06/2024 - 23:19

        Read the paper strawman

  • SolitaryMan on 16/06/2024 - 13:58
    +3

    His comments do not in any way reflect the claims you’re making. You’re a filthy liar.

  • nicend on 16/06/2024 - 15:13
    +6

    Why are RANDOM WORDS in caps lock in THIS post? Is it really that DIFFICULT to write normally or DOES YOUR hand KEEP aCcIdEnTaLlY hitting shift somehow?

    • bigticket on 16/06/2024 - 18:40

      Some people like yelling.

  • whatgift on 16/06/2024 - 15:33
    +5

    Why are so many people engaging with this post? It's clear that it is pointless to engage with people who are completely caught up in a conspiracy mindset using confirmation bias as their "research" tool.

    • bigticket on 16/06/2024 - 18:39
      -2

      It's clear that it is pointless to engage with people who are completely caught up in a conspiracy mindset

      Totally agree. Here is a fairytail from Harvard to pander to your confirmation bias and anti-conspiratorial mindset.

      https://www.fqresearch.org/pdf_files/Harvard_institututiona_…

      • whatgift on 16/06/2024 - 19:55
        +1

        Wow, a single document hosted on a site devoted to "proving" that pharma is bad - well done for proving my point!

    • AustriaBargain on 16/06/2024 - 19:57
      -3

      To laugh at the cookers. Makes us feel, justifiably, superior.

      • whatgift on 16/06/2024 - 20:03
        -3

        That is a fair reason - I wonder if it's just giving them a platform to espouse their rubbish and appear on the home page of Ozb.

        • AustriaBargain on 16/06/2024 - 20:05
          +1

          the hallowed halls of the home page of Ozb.

  • big ol bargs on 16/06/2024 - 18:15
    +2

    Hide posts from user mickrb30

    • Typical16-bitEnjoyer on 17/06/2024 - 17:01
      +3

      These posts are like a car crash…can't resist having a peek

  • Wally on 16/06/2024 - 18:52
    +7

    Recent randomized study peer reviewed and published in the medical journal 'Vaccine' - shows 1 in 800 chance of a serious negative reaction to mRNA vaccine

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2…

    As the current symptoms of the latest mutant Covid virus is 'mild' .. is it worth the risk!?

    • SBOB on 16/06/2024 - 19:10
      +2

      Even risky being in a placebo group based on those tables.

      • Wally on 17/06/2024 - 15:57
        +2

        you mustve missed the fact it was peer reviewed prior to publishing :-)

        Here is a video of a Doctor (PhD in nursing) discussing the implications after a statement by the lead author of the study

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nq2qwql8xBs

        • SBOB on 17/06/2024 - 16:13
          -2

          you mustve missed the fact it was peer reviewed prior to publishing

          nope, just commenting that based on the table, even placebo groups had a relatively noticeable number of serious adverse side effects.

          You can keep your "Dr" John Campbell review and analysis of information though, that's about as impartial as going to Fox News to get impartial views on US politics.

          • Wally on 17/06/2024 - 16:48
            +6

            @SBOB: Campbell does hold .. a BSc in biology from the Open University, an MSc in health science from the University of Lancaster, and a Ph.D. in nursing from the University of Bolton

            and does largely express views based on analysis of studies published in the medical literature and discussions with other credentialled professionals

            • unlike Fox that just has opinionated biased 'talking heads'
            • SBOB on 17/06/2024 - 17:46

              @Wally: Didn't say he was uneducated. He's clearly got significant education, though does (or at least many that admire his videos) happily uses the dr term due to the additional 'weight' it adds to his 'views' with the underlying assumption of him being a medical doctor. (His PhD was gained on the use of videos to train nursing or something like that as a 'professional phd', not an academic phd)

              But there's a very very clear financial benefit to posting videos such as his, where impartiality or critical analysis of both sides regarding topic/research choices is not an engaging/click worthy feature.
              It's YouTube engagement 101.

              Go check his average video views from 'pre covid' times compared to his topic discussion and average view counts for videos from the last few years.

              While at the start of the pandemic many of his videos were informative and analysis based, he clearly found his niche , and monetising truly factual videos is way less profitable.

              Perhaps watch some well reviewed scientists that point out the flaw in his 'analysis', to get an impartial viewpoint

          • EightImmortals on 18/06/2024 - 08:31

            @SBOB: Can you tell me what the placebo was in this study? I looked through the study and couldn't find it. I have seen enough of these studies to know they they don't always use a real placebo like a sugar pill or saline injection. Cheers

    • whyisave on 19/06/2024 - 22:34
      +3

      https://x.com/dragonfishy/status/1802916816303579635

      A large study of 558,000 people given 2 shots of the Covid mRNA synthetic gene injections in South Korea has shown a more than doubling of MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment ) and a 22% increase in dementia compared with unvaccinated controls after 3 months.

      MCI is a prodromal condition of Alzheimer's Disease.
      https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/…
      "

  • AustriaBargain on 16/06/2024 - 19:56
    -5

    Should just be incorporated into the regular seasonal flu jab, which is also mandatory for certain professions.

  • PerthMan96 on 16/06/2024 - 23:55
    -1

    opinion. recognise post viral MECFS ( the worst of long covid) and get treatments for it ASAP.. ENOUGH OF THE GASLIGHTING

  • TheMindsetTraveller on 17/06/2024 - 08:59
    +3

    my body, my choice

  • Nkl on 17/06/2024 - 12:14
    -1

    Not enough capital letters for me to form an OPINION or SLAM Dr Nick based on the STUNNING headline.

  • frostee on 17/06/2024 - 15:16
    +1

    Ah the classic thinly veiled right wing agenda under the guise of 'Just asking questions' to seed misinformation.

  • EdenKai on 17/06/2024 - 18:03
    +1

    Personally, I agree with his statement. I dont think everyone needs it all the time consistently. I think if youre fit enough and relatively young, youre really fine. Youre body will fight it off well enough. The COVID strain that exists now isnt killing people as much as the initial strains. Having said that, if you have an immune system disorder or are relatively elderly, its probably not a horrible idea to have that extra protection.

    Time has moved on a bit and people are starting to get over the fact that COVID even happened, so im kinda shocked that this is still an issue.

  • EightImmortals on 18/06/2024 - 08:55
    +1

    lols…..

    https://x.com/JasonBlairNTD/status/1802765077637935284

    BREAKING: Kansas Attorney General sues Pfizer for "misleading Kansans on COVID vaccine."

    The announcement alleges Pfizer mislead Kansans on vaccine risks, such as with pregnant women and myocarditis, and that Pfizer claimed the vaccines protected against COVID variants when data showed differently. And additionally that Pfizer claimed their vaccines prevented COVID transmission, but the company later admitted they never did the proper studies to back up that claim, the statement says.

    The release also alleges that "Pfizer coordinated with social media officials to censor speech critical of COVID-19 vaccines and declined to participate in the federal government’s vaccine development program, Operation Warp Speed, to avoid government oversight."

    Kansas AG Kris Kobach said in the announcement, “Pfizer made multiple misleading statements to deceive the public about its vaccine at a time when Americans needed the truth."

  • mickrb30 on 18/06/2024 - 20:20
    -2

    yeah, complete cover up, from big pharma controlling the medical side, to politicians, docile governments, FULL cover up.
    Yet the simpletons keep taken it, then they are given it to school children, then in TOTAL disbelief, young babies.
    biggest scam the world has seen, yet to many short sided, blinded, innocent souls out there

  • EightImmortals on 30/06/2024 - 07:44
    -1

    Heh, 3 minutes.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeKdYHNyOgs

  • EightImmortals on 02/07/2024 - 07:57
    +1

    So the QLD government was asked to provide the medical evidence for all of the COVID tyranny they imposed on the state only to reply, ‘ve know nuzink’. We need 15 bits of paper all signed off (with fees applies of course) just to build a fence in our backyards but some people are free to destroy thousands of lives and businesses based on unrecorded lunchtime conversations?

    http://archive.today/OdunH

    At least 3561 Queenslanders recently petitioned state parliament to release the advice of the chief health officer that Dr John Gerrard and his predecessor Dr Jeannette Young provided to then premier Annastacia Palaszczuk that led to the vaccination mandates and movement restrictions. The petition called on the parliament to direct Premier Steven Miles to release “medical advice used to enforce the Covid-19 mandates that would discriminate against people on the basis of their Covid-19 vaccination status, isolate our most vulnerable from their families and force Queenslanders to have Covid-19 vaccinations that appear to have increasingly alarming safety and efficacy statistics”.

    In making these public health directions the chief health officer relied on advice from a variety of sources. “Specifically, the chief health officer met daily with doctors, epidemiologists, infectious diseases specialists and public health experts about Covid-19 and the extraordinary and emergency measures necessary to protect public health,” she said. In spite of all these meetings and advice from all these experts, it seems that nobody ever thought to write anything down.

    How extraordinary. How wonderful it must be to be blessed with a memory that does not require you to keep a record of the input which was received, according to Minister Fentiman, from “a variety of sources”. You might also wonder why, if the government was only following the medical advice which seems to have magically disappeared, it felt the need to spend $500,000 on polling to assess how its actions were affecting its popularity and whether rather than acting on medical advice, Palaszczuk’s actions were driven purely and simply by political considerations with scant regard for the cost in human suffering.”

  • EightImmortals on 03/07/2024 - 08:07

    New Peer-Reviewed Study : A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province - Alessandria et al,

    Published Date : 30 June 2024

    Findings :
    🔴"All cause death risks to be higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated"

    🔴"Subjects vaccinated with two doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population"

    🔴"The booster doses were ineffective"

    🔴"We should admit that vaccination increases the risk of death for causes other than Covid-19, or by direct damage (adverse effects) or by indirect damage, e.g : to immune system"

    https://t.co/Ko9xW8wE9t (link to PDF)

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join