• expired

20% Off School Report Comment Writer Subscription ($15.20 Monthly, $23.20 for 6 Months, $39.20 Per Year) @ SchoolReportAI

04
OZBARGAIN24

Hi guys, first time posting a deal as someone associated.

Our tool writes report comments for various subjects using AI.

Teachers know how tedious it could be to write those comments and some schools use comment banks, which is still time consuming, and sometimes doesn't result in uniquely personalised comments.

Educators who use our tool have said that it not only saves them time but also makes their comments sound more personalised to each student's performance.

Using coupon "OZBARGAIN24", you'll get 20% off whichever subscription you choose (monthly, 6-monthly or yearly), for as long as you stay subscribed.
The first 7 days are free. If you cancel before the trial ends, you won't be billed.

Related Stores

SchoolReportAI
SchoolReportAI

closed Comments

  • +3

    If teachers prepare student reports using AI, does that make it fair for students to use AI to do their schoolwork?

    • Using AI to prepare student reports and allowing students to use AI for their schoolwork raises questions about fairness and educational integrity. While the use of AI by teachers may streamline the reporting process and help ensure consistency, it doesn't necessarily justify students relying solely on AI for their assignments.

      Fairness in education involves ensuring that all students have equal opportunities to learn and demonstrate their understanding of the material. While AI can be a valuable tool for research, organization, and even generating ideas, it shouldn't replace the critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills that are essential for academic growth.

      If teachers are using AI to prepare reports, it's important for them to also emphasize the importance of students developing their own skills and understanding of the material. Students should be encouraged to use AI as a supplement to their learning, rather than a shortcut or replacement for their own efforts.

      Ultimately, the goal of education is not just to produce high grades or impressive reports but to foster intellectual curiosity, independent thinking, and a deep understanding of the subject matter. While AI can certainly aid in this process, it should be used thoughtfully and in conjunction with traditional learning methods to ensure that students are developing the skills they need to succeed in the long term.

      Written with Chat GP

  • +1

    So is anyone actually writing anything anymore?

    • +4

      More important question, "is anyone actually reading anything anymore?"

  • +8

    ChatGPT wrapper

    • +1

      $15 monthly.. I would just get an API key from Open AI and use https://www.typingmind.com on an Ad Hoc basis. Costs like $0.05 a prompt

      • +1

        Or just use copilot?

        Also hugely unethical. Completely impossible for this to know little Foo Foo Cuddlypoops is really trying his best, and just needs more support, or if he's a distracted little nightmare.

        Our school system is already going down the toilet. Let's not accelerate that more ah?

  • -1

    teacher gets a D-

  • +1

    How is it better to fake up “uniquely personalised” comments? People’s beef with statement banks is that reports made that way don’t contain any useful information. Having AI write the comments is just as useless, but also misleading

  • +1

    My wife is a teacher her school report comments are generated based on grades you award and other factors and get spat out, she then uses AI to check and fix grammar and spelling and offer improvements and even then you have to check each one because AI will go rogue and add/change details.

    I don't think it's a good idea to have AI write it from scratch but I don't have any problem with using it to streamline the process, if you have 30 kids and ten subject/behaviour areas to comment on that takes a lot of time which is unpaid time at home after work, teachers don't get time off clas to write reports.

  • +1

    "Teachers know how tedious it could be to write those comments"

    The accuracy of those comments you so casually deride as "tedious" is what made it possible for a psychiatrist to diagnose one of my children as having ADHD (inattentive type) that wasn't picked up while they were at school.

    Had those comments been generic LLM-generated garbage provided by your rentseeking attempt to insert yourself into a relationship between a teacher and their students, those comments would have been useless as an assessment indicator.

    Anything to make a few bucks, eh? Who gives a rats about the incidental consequences.

    • Thanks for the feedback, I understand the importance of teachers providing personalised feedback.

      I do think, though, that your response is a bit harsh and I feel that you haven't really looked at the product and which inputs a teacher gives to generate said comments.

      The fact of the matter is that a lot of teachers in the past 1.5y have been using something like Chat GPT formulate the report comments that they've been putting on reports. The idea with this LLM is to simply make it easier by asking certain inputs from the teacher, instead of them that trying to engineer a prompt themselves that would be usable.

      I understand that the use of AI by teachers is a controversial subject (and maybe not well suited to be advertised on OzzyB), but I can assure you that any teacher worth their salt would use these tools to improve individual output and not just batch-write 30 report comments per subject and send them off (a la "LLM-generated garbage"). Besides, this specific product doesn't allow that sort of batch generation anyways.

Login or Join to leave a comment