• expired

[Refurb] Dell Optiplex 7070 SFF PC i5 9500 16GB RAM 256GB SSD Win 11 Desktop PC Wi-Fi $259 Delivered @ Metrocom

150

Hi all another SFF PC for sale.
Dell Optiplex 7070 SFF PC i5 9500 16GB RAM 256GB SSD Win 11 Desktop PC WIFI

Specs
Processor
Intel® Core i5-9500 (6-Core, 9MB Cache, 3.0GHz to 4.4GHz, 65W)
Operating System
Windows 11
Memory
16GB DDR4
Storage
256GB SSD
USB Port
10 USB Ports (Front 1 x USB C, 1 x USB 3.0, 2 x USB 2.0, Rear 4 x USB 3.0, 2 x USB 2.0)
Connectivity
Ethernet; Dual Band USB WIFI and Bluetooth

Also got Dell Optiplex 7060 SFF PC i5 8500 16GB RAM 256GB SSD for $229 Delivered

And monitors to pair with.
Dell P2217H $82.99 Delivered
Dell P2219H $91.99 Delivered
Dell P2317H $91.99 Delivered
Dell P2319H $100.99 Delivered
Dell UltraSharp U2421E $165.99 Delivered

Have a nice weekend!
Jun

Related Stores

metrocom
metrocom

closed Comments

  • Do either of these 7060 or 7070 have space for 2 X 3.5" drives?

    • +1

      You can install 1x 2.5" or 1x 3.5" with the correct cradle. Example showing blue holding cradle. You would likely need to purchase the 3.5" adapter on eBay (They are cheap)

      • Probably won't fit 2x 3.5" but you can fit 2x 2.5" for sure. Or you can use zip ties for hdd and double sided tape for the ssd if mixing 2.5" and 3.5". As long as it's connected to the sata ports with power and jammed in somewhere it'll work.

        Recommend the M2 ports for ssd instead though.

        • +1

          I was just trying to point out to smokenmirraz what the cradle can hold (design). There are 4 sata ports, so yes 2x 2.5" wouldn't be an issue with a zip cable.

          100% agree with M.2. I use the M.2 as my primary drive and a 2.5" for backup. Love my M.2s

          • -1

            @Froot Loops: Yeah the cradle is nicer. I could only see 2 Sata ports on the SFF motherboard when googling images.

        • I can only see 2 SATA ports in the manual and one m.2 (2230/2280)

  • Is there any difference between the two models, aside from the 3% benchmark margin?

    • One is an 8th gen, where the other is a 9th gen CPU

        • +3

          The sarcasm wasn't needed. 300MHz increase in boost clocks resulting in around 8% faster multicore. Google is right there, use it.

          • @ldd-mn: Sorry for the sarcasm. Which benchmarks show 8%? They must be very specific. Mind you, 3% or 8% is indistinguishably insignificant in the real world.

            • @bargaino: According to nano review it's 8% faster in Cinebench R23 single core: https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/intel-core-i5-9500-vs-…

            • @bargaino: I agree with you, marketing hype. From memory when i looked it up when buying a 7060 micro (8500t) there was a 10% increase (with the. 9500t) in processing power. Assuming it's relative for the non-t, the negligible performance increase it isn't worth 25% more money.

            • +1

              @bargaino:

              I'm going to ask again, typing more slowly. What is the difference?

              "asking for help with an a-hole tone and that attitude" does not go well together and no one will be interested in helping you.

              if people didn't understand your question then ask again more clearly or more specifically.

              • @pinkybrain: Which part of my apology did you not understand? … Dammit! There i go again. I gotta stay off social media.

                • @bargaino:

                  Which part of my apology did you not understand?

                  There you go again with that a-hole attitude and tone…

                  Did I say I didn't understand your apology?

                  Was giving you some useful advice about how ask for help
                  which you clearly have not taken on board
                  and going back to being a snarky sarcastic a-hole (which is what you actually are deep inside) …

        • +2

          9th gen was pushed out the door quickly to fix the meltdown and spectre vulnerabilities. The software fixes for those slowed down the CPU. I'd make sure if you're looking for benchmarks that you find one post-fixes

          Also they had better thermals in the 9th gen.

          As for Dell upgrades, why don't you slowly type it into google and let us all know?

          • +1

            @freefall101:

            As for Dell upgrades, why don't you slowly type it into google and let us all know?

            LOL, hope @bargaino gives us the answer.

    • IMHO the nice processor with these 7070s is the 12-thread i7-8700, same 65w TDP

      • +1

        Notwithstanding the vulnerability software patch, which I didn't realise was a thing until reading the above

  • +1

    I would have bought this if I can have 2x 3.5".

    • +1

      I don't think the SFF has had room for that since they dropped the floppy drive. But you can find the tower version easily for a bit extra.

      https://ebay.com.au/itm/195837867031

      They will always cost extra, as the supply of used models is far smaller.

  • Not better to buy a similar priced nuc with better specs? There was a beelink on sale at Amazon that was posted here the other day… $260 for a N100, 16gb ram with 500gb SSD…

    • That's far slower

    • +1

      A new NUC is not cheap. Will cost at least $350, and that is for a Celeron that is 30% as fast as these.

      N100 is a good alternative, nearly as fast and lower power. But Beelink is a long way from Dell. I have not been impressed by their quality or support.

  • How much can I hack this to have a whole bunch of drives in this one? Or is that not an option with an SFF?

    • +1

      They'll have to sit on the outside I'm afraid.

    • Define "bunch". Will take 1x m.2 NVMe, 3x SATA 2.5". After that you are on to USB, or a PCIe to m.2 card.

      • Classic NAS amounts I guess 4,5+

        Pcie card is fine but I guess that means a new case.

        Surprisingly finding a case with a lot drive bays that is not too expensive is really hard lol

  • Does this come with a DVD drive (as shown)?

Login or Join to leave a comment