Howdy, I have a portfolio up for review. Any insight would be greatly appreciated!
I'm age 25, M, single with no dependents.
Portfolio:
Stock Market: $455,000
Superannuation: $100,000
Emergency fund: $40,000
Property (paid off): $650,000
Debt: $0
Approximate size of total portfolio: $1.25m
Current Asset allocation (it's the same inside and outside of superannuation)
- VGS: 70%
- VAS: 20%
- VGE: 10%
This works out to be 100% Stocks (80% International / 20% Australian.) Besides my emergency fund I do not hold bonds directly.
In general, increasing the money supply devalues the existing money in the system.
If money can be created by pressing a few keys on a keyboard, without the associated increase in productivity, then this is devaluing of money (the new money adds to the total pool of money in the system, but the amount of goods or services in the system has not increased by the same proportionate amount).
As a very basic example, if we had a system which had $5 in it, and also 5 identical items in this same system, then each item will have a price of $1 each.
Now if we create some more of these items, so now there are 10 identical items in the system, but decide to increase the amount of money in the system to $20, then the price of each item will increase to $2. The items are exactly the same, so their value has not changed, however because of the disproportionate increase of money supply compared to the item supply, we have devalued the money (so the price of money is the same, that is $1 is still $1, but we have changed the value of the money, as we now need $2 to purchase an otherwise identical item which could have previously been purchased for $1, prior to the inflating of the money supply).
That is just a basic example and does not take into account a whole lot of other variables. In the real world it does not work exactly like this as our system is so much more complex.