It's nearing the end of 2023, how many vaccines are you up to? Are you planning on getting more?
How Many COVID Vaccines Did You Get?
deme on 01/10/2023 - 12:00
Last edited 01/10/2023 - 12:00
Last edited 01/10/2023 - 12:00
Poll Options
- 222Zero
- 221
- 3782
- 7263
- 2974
- 2105
- 316
- 67
- 78
- 789+
Comments
Here's a closer look at the deaths in the original clinical trial, by the volunteer team of researchers at Naomi Wolf's Daily Clout site.
https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/86/224
An example:
“Subject #11621327 was found dead shortly after receiving dose1 of the BNT162b2 vaccine on September 10th.His body was found at home (with lividity) on the 13th of September when the police performed a welfare check. “According to the medical examiner, the probable cause of death was progression of atherosclerotic disease.” The cause of death listed in the 6-Month Interim Report of Adverse Events C4591001is “Arteriosclerosis”. However, there were multiple queries in the Case Report Form about the cause of death being ascribed to atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis was not documented in the Case Report Form as a comorbidity of the patient. The subject’s Case Report Form is only 127 pages in length and does not include the pre-screening portion of comorbidities, the section of the Case Report Form that would have provided evidence on whether the subject had a history of atherosclerosis. Moreover, if an autopsy had been done, progression of atherosclerosis would have been documented but autopsy results were not provided or available. Based only on the medical documentation in the Case Report Form, there is no basis for ascribing the subject’s death to advanced atherosclerosis or concluding that the death was unrelated to the vaccine. The following statement taken from the interim narrative document for the corresponding subject, in our opinion, is unfounded. “In the opinion of the investigator, there was no reasonable possibility that the arteriosclerosis was related to the study intervention, concomitant medications, or clinical trial procedures, but rather it was related to suspected underlying disease.” Pfizer/BioNTech concurred with the investigator’s causality assessment. It is likely that the subject died within a day or two of vaccination. This was a clear indication that his death could have been related to the BNT162b2 vaccine and this should not have been ruled out without a more rigorous investigation. In our opinion, this diagnosis was premature and an egregious misjudgment of the evidence at hand.”
There are other examples of an even more obvious nature, which show how the "deaths" were deemed "unrelated" to the jabs. A masterclass in how to hide unfavourable data.
And for the skeptics out there, I am fully aware the journal founder is James Lyons-Weiler who has been debunked as a "quack".
Malone from day 1 ripped the original study to shreds. That's how I first caught on to it. When I was researching about if I should get the jab after the fear propaganda got to me. I couldn't understand how they made a vax so quick, it's impossible (no HIV vax for 40 years, no RSV for 60 years). I knew this was the path they were taking and when it happened I looked as far as I could to find a definitive source. He is a hero to me. He really saved my mental health and gave me the ammunition to fight people who were spreading misinformation and ignorance. Bless that man!
how they made a vax so quick
ModeRNA had a patent to some genetic code,
many years before they made their SpikeVax,
but this genetic code appears part of the 'recipe' in their injection.
When asked why this 1-in-3-billion chance for a match appears in their 'recipe',
they just repied "muH cOinCiDENce".
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.29.23296354v…
Many people who receive mRNA Covid jabs wind up with profound changes in their immune systems that usually arise only after prolonged exposure to allergens like bee venom, a new study confirms.
The changes seem to reduce the immune response to Covid as the body adjusts to the unnaturally high antibody levels mRNA jabs initially produce. The immune system changes are unique to mRNA and not seen in people who get other kinds of Covid vaccines, the study found. The study also showed a powerful immunosuppressant given for eczema suppresses the changes – further raising questions about the potential relationship between skin and autoimmune disorders and the mRNAs.
Scientists in the Netherlands carried out the study, which included 604 patients and was funded by the Dutch government.
The researchers posted their findings online as a preprint weeks ago, but the paper has received no mainstream media coverage despite its implications. It confirms and expands upon two earlier papers that showed similar immune system changes. In each paper, scientists reported people who had received at least three mRNA shots showed a sharp increase in a type of antibodies called IgG4. IgG4 is generally the rarest, and the last the body makes. The IgG4 subtype does not recruit other parts of the immune system to attack the virus, though can still “neutralize” the virus by keeping the virus from attaching to cells. Usually, the IgG4 class make up less than 5 percent of all IgG antibodies, and often less than 1 percent.
But the scientists found that after a third shot, IgG4 made up about 21 percent of all the IgG antibodies they found in the average healthy adult. The levels varied very widely, though, and in 1 in 4 adults IgG4 was nearly 50 percent of all IgG antibodies. (My interpretation is that the immune system is now sending out it's last reserves?)
These are not the facts that science deniers want to be hearing about !
A new peer-reviewed scientific study has found the “presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose” in both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, directly contradicting the information given to the public by governments and regulators about the contents of the jabs. A pre-print of the highly-anticipated new study by researchers at the University of Guelph in Canada published on October 18 outlined the investigation into the “exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.” The study concludes “the data demonstrates the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of 61 DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the 62 guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188–509-fold.”
These findings are cause for concern because governments and regulators around the world have consistently reassured the public that both Moderna and Pfizer’s experimental COVID vaccines do not modify an individual’s DNA.
This is because, according to the regulator’s explanation, the vaccines contain only mRNA instead of DNA.
These are not the facts that science deniers want to be hearing about !
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-deta…
Authorized or approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines show increased risks of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart), particularly within the first week following vaccination. For COMIRNATY, the observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Seek medical attention right away if you have any of the following symptoms after receiving the vaccine, particularly during the 2 weeks after receiving a dose of the vaccine:
chest pain
shortness of breath
feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart
yeah but you can't believe anything pfister say hehe
Authorized or approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines show increased risks of
myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle)
and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart), particularly within the first week following vaccination.Who cares about those risks, because my eyes and ears
have been bombarded, to fear the most about the 'vid.
feeling a little peckish for another jab i reckon….
whats the go….? any recs for current boosters?
would prefer safe & effective ones only, though…so whats everyone taking these days???
If you need to claim a vaccine injury for you or a family member the info can be found here
https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccine-claims-s…
So far 199 claims have been paid out. Recently a Widow in Adelaide was paid over 600k due to her husband dying from vaccine caused complications. This is one of the largest medical pay outs in Australian history.
This is one of the largest medical pay outs in Australian history.
Nothing close to the largest, which was $9 Million.
Anti vaxxers are boring.. time to get off this planet and go live on mars. There you will not need any vaccines. In USA many parents are not vaccinating kids against anything .So they come down with smallpox, chickenpox etc.
https://whatreallymakesyouill.com/
The TL:DR is basically this: turn your attention to "poisons" instead of "germs".
It's a vax or a chance of getting long covid.
No one wants to be sick for years non stop.
"Long covid" is mainly a clever way of hiding jab injuries.
I think the mistake was these experimental COVID shots, I think they turned a lot of people anti vax. I was pro vax now I'm more you do you and I'll sort myself out.
NOT experimental.
"Largest global vaccination trial ever."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTndr9O4hbA
And it will protect your nonna too.
What do you think the emergency use exemption was for then?
@mrdean: Not familiar but I agree with the view that the best way to pull the will over the eyes of entire populations is one small under the radar change at a time.
@reactor-au: Truer words never spoken. It's little wonder there are constant distractions & crises & entertainments to deflect our attention away from the truly important events going on in the background, one brick in the wall at a time.
So many i cant remember
Another COVID shot side effect
🤕
Out of the 12000, only 4 have been approved so like the vaccine injury compensation board for all the other vax damage this is just another tax-payer funded sham to protect the vax makers from liability. Privatise the profits and socialise the losses. Great scam they've got going.