Oakley Frogskins Lite - Black Bright Green $79.60 (RRP $199) + $9.95 Shipping Only ($0 with $99 Order) @ Myer

110

Go to Deal

Cashback

Link on 10/07/2023 - 22:40 myer.com.au (883 clicks)
Last edited 10/07/2023 - 22:48 by 1 other user

Looks like these are on clearance. Ordered myself a pair to replace my damaged Oakley Stringers (dirty Oakley discontinued these)

Details:
Name: OO9374 Frogskins™ Lite 50/50 Collection
Shape: Square
Frame material: O_matter
Frame colour: Black Bright Green
Lens material: Polycarbonate
Lens Technology: Prizm
Lens color: Prizm Jade
Lens height: 48.2

Category: 3 - General purpose sunglasses – high protection against sunglare, good UV protection, not suitable for driving at night or under conditions of dull light

Description:
Influenced by sport and pop-culture, Frogskins™ Lite is the next evolution of the brand’s most iconic lifestyle sunglass, the Frogskins. Sporting a classic semi-rimless frame design, it features Oakley’s leading performance technology to keep up with every on-the-go adventure.

Related Stores

MYER

• 

  belongsinforums on 10/07/2023 - 22:42

  +6

  $200 rrp with no polarised lenses is criminal

  • 

    Link on 10/07/2023 - 22:48

    Well you can get polarised sunglasses from the servo for $20, but they’re not Oakley’s.

    • 

      belongsinforums on 10/07/2023 - 22:49

      ah. my mistake. these are top tier sunglasses. i see they have prism technology!

• 

  Link on 10/07/2023 - 22:52

  I actually prefer non-polarised for driving.

• 

  Bujji11 on 10/07/2023 - 23:03

  +1

  Color looks ungly

• 

  DashCam AKA Rolts on 10/07/2023 - 23:06

  replace my damaged Oakley Stringers

  If it's damaged lenses, but the frame is good, Google "replacement lenses for Oakley Stringers". I have purchased lenses for my Jawbones and Frogskins at a fraction of Oakley prices. Can get choice of tints & polarised or not. Last lot of lenses for Frogskins came from Amazon, even had a video on how to fit.

  • 

    chriaj2689 on 10/07/2023 - 23:38

    Yeah sunglassfix lenses are really good for me and have refreshed a few scratched ray ban lenses/feames and the quality appears to be better (although this is probably revisionism)

  • 

    Link on 11/07/2023 - 07:47

    Yeah I first went looking for original replacement lenses, which is how I found out they had discontinued the Stringer (maybe the common theme here is I like the more random Oakley models haha)

    I’ve used third party lenses before in a previous set of Oakley’s but I found the fit and finish not great in the end. They would rattle around inside the frame and they started to delaminate on the edges. They were from Sublime Optics and still cost me like $45.

• 

  Lets Go Brandon on 10/07/2023 - 23:28

  +2

  It's remarkable how cheap and tacky the frames of these feel. What you'd expect to find in an Easter Show showbag.

• 

  Ozjoey on 10/07/2023 - 23:31

  +2

  Last time I saw Oakleys Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible 2. Opening credits…
  https://youtu.be/K0KzvD-0rx0

  • 

    Gunnar on 10/07/2023 - 23:52

    +1

    You think that’s the worst thing about the movie until you realise it was a Limp Bizcuit heavy soundtrack…

  • 

    Lucille Bluth on 10/07/2023 - 23:59

    Side note, the new Mission Impossible movie is 10/10. Honestly best movie perhaps I have seen this year.

    • 

      Golly1153 on 11/07/2023 - 04:05

      Better than John Wick 4?

• 

  Lucille Bluth on 10/07/2023 - 23:36

  Appreciate the deal post, but I agree with most people's sentiments here. These are not great looking sunnies, and that coupled with them not being polarised are two massive deal breakers, regardless if they are or aren't Oakley's.