This was posted 1 year 5 months 23 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Free: "What Is a Woman?" Documentary @ The Daily Wire via Twitter

883195
Free: "What Is a Woman?" Documentary @ The Daily Wire via Twitter
Go to Deal
LArkan on 02/06/2023 - 21:34 twitter.com (8983 clicks)
Last edited 07/06/2023 - 11:38 by 3 other users

It’s the movie they really don’t want you to see: #WhatIsAWoman?

Watch the explosive documentary starring @MattWalshBlog FREE on Twitter for 24 hours extended to all weekend (US).

Mod Note:

After investigation, we determined that this documentary/video was released in June 2022 and required paid Membership to 'Daily Wire' to view the video on their website. At this time, membership starts from US$108/year (US$9/month), after discount. The now free content on Twitter, is therefore postable as a deal, under our Free Multimedia Content Deal Posting Guidelines.

To avoid personal biases from influencing moderation decisions, moderators adhere to our published guidelines. Guidelines are written based on the feedback of the community and the ability to moderate them consistently across the site. This deal has been determined to comply with our deal posting guidelines, in particular the Free Multimedia Content Guideline and the Banned Items Guideline. Community guidelines are always evolving and we welcome any discussions in our site discussion forum or Comments / Feedback / Suggestions Thread 2023 thread.

Entertainment Video on Demand

Related Stores

The Daily Wire
The Daily Wire

closed Comments

                  • p1 ama on 03/06/2023 - 00:16
                    +7

                    @amiafish:

                    I wouldn't conflate that with the notion that "there's nothing to see here".

                    Okay, so let's get back around to the key question - someone is born male, but wants to dress and act like a female. What do you think society should do about it?

                    The reality is that the law needs to be black and white, you either say that this is criminal and you punish people for doing it, or you say that it's okay and people can do whatever they want here.

                    Truth matters, and historically, bad things happen when society collectively subjugates truth to the "feelz".

                    Example?

                    I don't think the trans issue amounts to all that much (outside of sports), but it is emblematic of a general epistemic drift away from a rationalist/empiricist modes of justification towards identity/sentimentality modes…and that is definitely a troubling thing…no?

                    What do you mean by the "trans issue"? What exactly is the issue?

                    For someone who is not political (in the sense that I don't ascribe to a certain political philosphy), I just don't see this issue. I don't even know anyone who is trans and it just doesn't affect me. If, tomorrow, my best mate said he wants start living as a woman, I'd find that a bit odd, but it's just not really something that I'm bothered by.

                    And to be honest, I just don't care about any of that rationalist or sentimentalist whatever bullshit. Like whatever fancy words you're using are not going to help put food on the table, give me better healthcare, or make the trains I take to work run more reliably.

                    • twjr on 03/06/2023 - 00:35
                      +5

                      @p1 ama: Genuinely good effort trying to have a rational and reasoned discussion. You're taking a sensible position. But you're also talking to people who are arguing from bad-faith or ideological positions who are unlikely to engage you with rationale and reason, no matter how persuasive your arguments are.

                • bobbified on 03/06/2023 - 14:06
                  +3

                  @p1 ama:

                  Can you point to where people are being "forced" into using someone's preferred pronouns?

                  In Canada, a law was passed a law to force people to use someone's preferred pronouns.

                • 1st-Amendment on 04/06/2023 - 12:25
                  +1

                  @p1 ama:

                  It's never been the job of governments to regulate sporting codes.

                  Yet here they are getting involved in shit they shouldn't be, hence the backlash.

                  Can you point to where people are being "forced" into using someone's preferred pronouns?

                  This whole subject come to light because Canada was proposing new laws (look up C16) to make misgendering someone a hate crime. Jordan Peterson was just a regular professor doing his day job when he spoke out against 'compelled speech' and this kicked off the culture war we are currently in and made him famous.

                  Since that time the law passed, so it's now a hate crime punishable by prison time for misgendering someone in Canada.

                  The UK has similar 'hate speech' laws and they are getting stricter here too. The US is the last bastion of free speech in the West hence why American politics is so important in the culture war.

                  The issue is the over-politicisation of everything

                  Correct. One of the core principles of Conservatism is that the government should play less of a role in you daily life because it is shown time and time again that the more they interfere, the worse everything becomes. Liberals (Left wing, not Liberal party) want the govt controlling more and more things, so this is why we have these constant battles.

          • beeze on 03/06/2023 - 22:04

            @Almost Banned: New ideas take momentum. Breast cancer awareness needed it, so does this. It will fade and normalise, be less controversial.

        • poppingtags on 03/06/2023 - 01:37
          +2

          One additional point that's lost on a lot of our beloved cookers is the idea that the gender binary is some sort of divine universal truth is a laughably ignorant, puritanical, Anglo centric way of considering the topic. In many countries and cultures, throughout history, gender has been seen and accepted as being more complex than just a binary - but of course, asking these people to imagine a world beyond their own bubble, let alone the Anglosphere, would be too much.

          • p1 ama on 03/06/2023 - 02:02
            +3

            @poppingtags:

            One additional point that's lost on a lot of our beloved cookers is the idea that the gender binary is some sort of divine universal truth is a laughably ignorant, puritanical, Anglo centric way of considering the topic.

            The fact that I know a language which uses gender-neutral pronouns (i.e. there is simply just one word which means he/she) makes the whole pronoun thing just seem so amazingly hilarious.

          • Almost Banned on 03/06/2023 - 09:26
            +3

            @poppingtags: Right - believing that men are men and women are women is now also RACIST!!!
            Good one.

            • poppingtags on 03/06/2023 - 10:32
              +1

              @Almost Banned: Congratulations you’ve just proved my point - and found a new way to be offended, all in one morning! What a productive life!

          • 1st-Amendment on 04/06/2023 - 12:33
            +1

            @poppingtags:

            The idea that the gender binary is some sort of divine universal truth is a laughably ignorant…

            It's called science. Male and Female are scientifically definable classes of almost all life. But anyone who disagrees with you is Hitler, we know the routine…

            gender has been seen and accepted as being more complex than just a binary

            You're deliberately misrepresenting the debate. What you believe in your head is entirely up to you, and if it doesn't impact anyone else then you are free to live your dreams. That is what makes freedom so great and why all humans pursue it so vigourously, everyone gets do do what they want if it doesn't objectively hurt others.

            However, the part you are deliberately missing, is that when your illusion requires others to participate in it, then it is no longer freedom, it is you imposing your subjective reality on others.

      • FlyingMiffy on 02/06/2023 - 23:16
        +3

        Yeap and for a few thousand years the majority of people thought the world was flat too!

        • Almost Banned on 02/06/2023 - 23:17
          +7

          Are you really trying to argue that people can't just change their sex is the same thing as thinking the world is flat?

          • FlyingMiffy on 02/06/2023 - 23:30
            +3

            @Almost Banned: Nope my argument is that peoples thinking change over time. Science understands about 10% of the human brain. One day, we'll know more than that, and when that happens, what seems unreasonable or odd may no longer be so.

            • Almost Banned on 02/06/2023 - 23:40
              +3

              @FlyingMiffy: So, you think that when we understand more of the human brain somehow we will also think that people CAN just change their sex by changing their clothes and hairstyles?
              That's a strange idea.

              • p1 ama on 03/06/2023 - 00:04
                +7

                @Almost Banned:

                That's a strange idea.

                Is it really though?

                I'm sure that 300 years ago, the idea that one could change their hair colour would have been considered a "strange idea".

                These days, people broadly understand that if you are born with blonde hair, but you really wanted black hair, you can just dye your hair and it's not that big of a deal. Nobody discusses ad nauseum whether someone with "dyed black hair" really has black hair or not, or whether they are someone with blonde hair "pretending" to have black hair.

                There exist some people who, for whatever reason, want to have different characteristics to what they are born with. For example, hair colour, or eye colour, or how they look (e.g. cosmetic surgery), or their sex. Someone who is born a man, and wants to be a woman (and takes steps to realise that want, e.g. dressing like a woman) is no different to someone who is born with blonde hair and wants to have black hair (and takes steps to realise that want, e.g. dyeing their hair).

                Yet we don't go around asking "what is a person with blonde hair", and trying so hard to distinguish between who "really" has blonde hair and not.

                • Almost Banned on 03/06/2023 - 09:27
                  +1

                  @p1 ama: Not even remotely.
                  Ancient Egyptians dyed their hair.
                  Want to try again with your weak analogies?

              • dBagDealer on 03/06/2023 - 01:22
                +7

                @Almost Banned: Science says there are only two sexes and both are very different and immutable.

                Woke mob conveniently ignores science and says men can become women and that there is no difference between a biological woman and a dude in a dress. So them pretending to keep up with science is ironic.

                • p1 ama on 03/06/2023 - 02:05
                  +6

                  @dBagDealer:

                  says men can become women and that there is no difference between a biological woman and a dude in a dress

                  Can you link to a source where someone has actually said this?

                  The reason why cuckservatives are always going to win in any culture war battle is because they are willing to shamelessly lie. If the left were as willing to say that you guys just want to round up all the gays and trans people and throw them in gas chambers, then maybe they'd stand a chance, but they actually feel shame.

                  The curse of being the more intelligent side ;)

                  • 1st-Amendment on 03/06/2023 - 09:11

                    @p1 ama:

                    Can you link to a source where someone has actually said this?

                    Sure:

                    https://twitter.com/Lin_Manuel/status/1271061918837616640?la…

                    The curse of being the more intelligent side

                    Dunning Kruger in full effect…

                  • Ghost47 on 03/06/2023 - 22:47
                    +2

                    @p1 ama:

                    The reason why cuckservatives are always going to win in any culture war battle is because they are willing to shamelessly lie. If the left were as willing to say that you guys just want to round up all the gays and trans people and throw them in gas chambers, then maybe they'd stand a chance, but they actually feel shame.

                    The curse of being the more intelligent side ;)

                    If only I could upvote this more than once.

                • chepsk8 on 03/06/2023 - 02:09
                  +4

                  @dBagDealer: Christ, if I had a nickel for every right winger too stupid to figure out the difference between gender and sex.

                  • 1st-Amendment on 03/06/2023 - 09:14

                    @chepsk8:

                    I had a nickel for every right winger too stupid to figure out the difference between gender and sex.

                    Just because you believe they are different doesn't make it so. This is where you are going wrong…

            • 1st-Amendment on 03/06/2023 - 09:08
              +2

              @FlyingMiffy:

              Science understands about 10% of the human brain

              Lol what?

              What science is this? The same 'science' that told us that the Vaccine prevents you from getting Covid? Or the 'science' that said the Arctic will be Ice free in the year 2000, then again 2007, then again in 2014 and again 2023?

              I have a science degree. What most people call 'science' really means what they heard in the media. This is not science.

    • markathome on 02/06/2023 - 22:37
      +4

      Haha, it's 2023 and we need a documentary for such a complicated topic rolls eyes

      Keep in mind, for some viewers as well as its creators, this documentary may be their only way to find out what a woman is.

      • Pixie13 on 02/06/2023 - 22:44
        +1

        Waiting for someone to quote kindergarten cop

  • Pace210 on 02/06/2023 - 21:44
    -5

    probably don't watch this, 5 minutes in I was ready to smash the TV, FFS!

    • BoltThrower on 02/06/2023 - 22:31
      +13

      I'll save you a TV. It's an adult human female.

    • Almost Banned on 02/06/2023 - 21:47
      +9

      That is not a proper basis for a neg vote.

  • pharcyde on 02/06/2023 - 21:44
    +13

    This will get the Labor/yes voters crawling out of the woodwork

    • Almost Banned on 02/06/2023 - 21:46
      +9

      Albo shared the exact same definition recently.
      Now if only all the people in his party shared the same philosophy.

      • 7ekn00 on 02/06/2023 - 21:54
        +3

        Keep up with the times, lefties are now not only redefining "woman", but also "female"!

        So the left can parrot: woman = adult female (when asked, to sound reasonable), but now believe female = anything you choose ;)

        Follow up documentary: What is a Female :P

        • FlyingMiffy on 02/06/2023 - 23:17

          Im pretty sure before that we needed a debate for the righties to have a right to being a bigot too!

    • Sammyboy on 02/06/2023 - 22:39
      +3

      They already out in full force on ozb lol

      • pharcyde on 02/06/2023 - 23:12
        +2

        Of course. Not like they work or anything.

    • soymeat on 03/06/2023 - 08:35
      +2

      Still proudly clinging on to your 'no' vote?

  • Gervais fanboy on 02/06/2023 - 21:45
    +29

    Report (4)

    Look at the Libs, false reporting this post.
    Triggered 🤣🤣

    Edit - 5 false reports now.
    Ideally users like these should be penalised by the mods but who am I kidding here lol.

    • GrueHunter on 02/06/2023 - 22:53
      +9

      You: muh freeze peach harden up
      Also you: help mods do something

    • 2expensive on 02/06/2023 - 23:35
      +9

      libs

      Time to stop watching fox news for a couple of days and touch grass

      • Gervais fanboy on 02/06/2023 - 23:50
        +1

        Can’t refute the argument, so nitpicks one word and adds conjecture about me watching Fox News? (Typical lib)

    • jakmon777 on 03/06/2023 - 08:01
      +4

      If you're capitalising 'Libs' on an Australian site, one would assume you're talking about the LNP.

      • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 08:11
        -1

        Cool, you can assume whatever you want

        If you really wanted to know, you could have just asked what I meant by it but that would have required some basic emotional maturity, I am asking for too much I know…

        • soymeat on 03/06/2023 - 08:42

          Happy for you to keep rattling off statements about 'Libs', but you do realise Ricky Gervais is a liberal vegan?

          • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 09:00
            +1

            @soymeat: What does being a vegan got anything to do with this topic at hand?
            You are just assuming that I am not one too and for some reason I should be coz Gervais recently turned into one??
            Ricky G like any human is a vast, complex being there’s more to him than just what he does/doesn’t eat🤦🏻‍♂️
            And can I am a ‘fan’ you expect me to do everything he does, You okay?
            How about you have some darn integrity and stick to the topic?
            Libs and liberals not the same thing.
            I am a liberal too but the libertarian kind.
            What’s the difference?
            I stick to the topic and I don’t try to silence people that I might disagree with.
            Libs are the opposite.

            • soymeat on 03/06/2023 - 09:21
              +1

              @Gervais fanboy: Fine, just interpret my post as saying 'Ricky Gervais is liberal'. And I highlighted it because you are making massively blanket statements that, in theory, encompass the guy you dedicated your username to.

              • Gervais fanboy on 03/06/2023 - 17:27
                +1

                @soymeat:

                you are making massively blanket statements

                Like what?
                You talk sh*t but never cite anything
                In its full context, give me a few example of what have I said that are ‘massively blanket’ statements?

                you dedicated your username to.

                You make it sound like I have named
                In my will or something
                It’s a self-derogatory username, not a bloody tribute to Ricky, I didn’t even use his full name.

  • Almost Banned on 02/06/2023 - 21:55
    +26

    Serious question folks…
    What is the basis of the negs?
    The criteria for negs are:
    1. Not the cheapest - it can't be that, its free.
    2. Issue with product - well, it could be that, but I'm guessing most of the negs haven't watched it
    3. Issue with retailer - again, could be that, but don't see how disliking Twitter or The Daily Wire is relevant to the vote.
    If it isn't one of these reasons, the negs should be revoked.
    I can see this movie isn't for everyone - but what film is?
    There's an even bigger issue with the reports. The criteria for a report are even less applicable.

    • bdl on 02/06/2023 - 21:57
      +12
      1. Not a bargain :)
      • Almost Banned on 02/06/2023 - 21:58
        +18

        Not a bargain is not one of the criteria.
        https://www.ozbargain.com.au/wiki/help:voting_guidelines

        Anyway, its a free movie. That's a bargain if the other SUBS movie posts are.

        • markathome on 02/06/2023 - 22:51
          +2

          They say this, but the Bargainpedia also advises:

          If the offer you posted is not deemed a bargain by the community, it will be voted down.

          Clearly the community has some standard of a bargain and, in the past, I've found OzBargain to be mostly accepting of negs for non-bargains. There is one point of difference: I've negged bargains which contained broad dates, not easily identified, with significant unspecified blackout days/periods. The community didn't feel that was neg-worthy but I hope one day they change their mind.

          Cathay Pacific and IHG - I'm looking at you!

        • markathome on 02/06/2023 - 23:58
          +1

          Having now watched a bit of the movie. Very tempted to hit the "not a deal" button. 😁

      • wisdomtooth on 03/06/2023 - 11:01
        +1
        1. Verdict.
    • Gervais fanboy on 02/06/2023 - 21:58
      +26

      Your #1 mistake - Trying to reason with the unreasonable..

      There’s nothing you could say or express that would compel this lot to self-reflect even once. My critical thinking professor at Uni used to call them ‘functioning zombies’.

    • snoopydoop on 02/06/2023 - 22:26
      +26

      Because there's literally millions of free "movies" on YouTube. They don't get posted. Is there any other similar deal that's ever been posted?

      Am I free to post any YouTube video I want because it is free to watch now? I'm confused what the deal truly is beyond people upvoting to make a point.

      The closest I can think of is blockbuster movies coming to streaming services, which is definitely not the same because they are paid products that many may purchase if they didn't know they came to a streaming service. There's potential money to be saved, because there is a paid option available to watch what is a very different media to this.

      Are we actually going to start posting YouTube videos now?

      • Gervais fanboy on 02/06/2023 - 22:29
        +2

        Go ahead then, you post one and I’d +1 it.
        Good lad.

      • BoltThrower on 02/06/2023 - 22:35
        +4

        Free Youtube movies don't get posted? https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/775098
        Yes you are free to post, but you'll be relegated to an existing post, like the one above.
        Hope that cleared up your confusion.

        • snoopydoop on 02/06/2023 - 22:55
          +4

          Nah, your link is blockbusters that are available elsewhere for a paid fee. Very different media.

          This doesn't seem to apply in the most legit of circumstances - I tried to post a documentary that is available paid on a streaming service, and they've uploaded a free documentary through their official channel.

          It immediately was moved to the forum.
          https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/779027

          I fail to see how this one is still up when it's literally just a twitter post of a free video. The only difference I see is that it's an attempt to start arguments in the comments.

      • markathome on 02/06/2023 - 22:54

        Am I free to post any YouTube video I want because it is free to watch now?

        Quick snoopy let's turn on monetization and crack out the camera.

        (And I absolutely upvoted your comment because you are absolutely right).

        • snoopydoop on 02/06/2023 - 22:56
          +3

          Let's do it!

          But unfortunately the logic doesn't seem to hold up, a paid elsewhere, free on youtube documentary was immediately moved to the forums:
          https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/779027

          Confused how this deal differs!

          • kickling on 02/06/2023 - 22:59

            @snoopydoop: What was your deal post?

            It got removed for "Trolling"

            • snoopydoop on 02/06/2023 - 23:02
              +6

              @kickling: It was a MrBeast documentary by Curiosity Stream that is paid on their subscription service, that they've uploaded free to their YouTube channel.

              Really upset that I received my first ever warning for this, given this post is allowed up.

              • kickling on 02/06/2023 - 23:04

                @snoopydoop: Interesting. I don't know the doco, but it sounds like a deal. Like a computer game that becomes free/re-released for free. I'd count that as a deal.

                • snoopydoop on 02/06/2023 - 23:06
                  +7

                  @kickling: Yeah, apparently not. It was immediately moved to the forums, then a few minutes later removed and I received an account warning.

                  Feel this post should absolutely be in the forums, and since there's the precedent here, I'm really upset that my post was not only removed as a deal but that I've also been given an account warning.

                  • twjr on 03/06/2023 - 00:54
                    +6

                    @snoopydoop: On the face of it, there seems to be little between this deal and yours other than this one is controversial and likely driving clicks to the website. That your post was removed and you got a warning is disappointing and sets a poor precedent in moderation.

    • FlyingMiffy on 02/06/2023 - 23:21

      Simple, it'll cost me more to watch it.

    • s1Lence on 03/06/2023 - 16:28

      What is a bargain?

  • Trying2SaveABuck on 02/06/2023 - 21:57
    +4

    Oz-woke propganda

    • 7ekn00 on 02/06/2023 - 22:03
      +16

      Yes, it's such propaganda to know what a woman is these days!

      I would say it's far more propagandist to redefine already established words to mean something else (like Woman and Female) ;)

      Even Orwell 1984 tells us propaganda is redefining words …

      Lets ponder, which side has redefined these words, then we will know who the actual propagandists are!

        • gentlekoala5906 on 02/06/2023 - 22:25
          +27

          It's hypocritical that the left say "look at the science" when it comes to climate change, but ignore it completely when it comes to gender.

          • Jollystacker on 02/06/2023 - 22:28
            +4

            @gentlekoala5906: oathhhhhhh

          • Trying2SaveABuck on 02/06/2023 - 22:29
            +6

            @gentlekoala5906: I support action against climate change - i do not support any of the parties in Australias ideas in combating it esp the Greens as the all have almost no idea how to make the problem better or use fear and misinformation for political PR

            ie there is no point Australia stopping coal if we are letting China and the Europeans burn it….we all live in the same f—ken planet

          • inasero on 02/06/2023 - 22:38
            +2

            @gentlekoala5906: That's why they introduced social "science"

          • JandersC on 03/06/2023 - 06:06
            +1

            @gentlekoala5906: Gender is the social and cultural differences, not scientific sex. You are confusing the 2 to be the same.

            • 1st-Amendment on 04/06/2023 - 12:41
              +1

              @JandersC:

              Gender is the social and cultural differences

              So let's roll with this then. In a diverse and multicultural society, we must embrace and tolerate different points of view. In my culture you are a either biological man or women, and tiny percentage of these people have a mental illness that makes them think they are something different to what they are. And while they can continue to believe what they like in the free society we create, I'm also free not participating in the illusion.
              Why are you denying me my diverse and multicultural viewpoint?

        • Fredorishi on 02/06/2023 - 22:53
          +9

          Science > Feelings

          1. You're talking about SEX not gender.
          2. There are more SEXES than just male and female.
          3. There are more variations than just XY and XX
          4. You make yourself look like a complete idiot when you claim to be quoting science but you clearly have ZERO clue what the science says. Lol.
          5. If you think it's everyone else that's a "mentally unwell nutter" then it probably means you need to try a little self-reflection.
          6. You won't. That's OK.
          • Almost Banned on 02/06/2023 - 23:19
            +8

            @Fredorishi: No, there are not more sexes than male or female.
            There are more chromosomal variations than just XY and XX - but there are still only two sexes.
            And the radical gender ideologists certainly have no problem with conflating sex and gender when it suits them.

          • Trying2SaveABuck on 03/06/2023 - 08:43
            +3

            @Fredorishi:

            sex not gender

            I stopped reading there, they are the same thing the only ppl saying they arent are those mentally unwell trying to justify their mental illness and the woke idiots who have no clue about science like urself

            Your born a man or a women which dictates your sex and gender via your physical biology and your endocrinology (hormons)

            You can take hormons have surgery to change your physical biology and take drugs to affect your hormons but soon as you stop taking said drugs your body goes back to its natural condition evening you cut off you sexual organs a man cannot become a women and vice versa

            One day we might evolve and change like Certain frog species (they can change gender/sex) do but until then you're all lunatics to me

            Get over it!

          • 1st-Amendment on 04/06/2023 - 12:42

            @Fredorishi:

            Science > Feelings

            Yet all you presented was your feelings…

            Cue the canned laughter…

            • Fredorishi on 04/06/2023 - 17:58
              +1

              @1st-Amendment: Nahh. There were facts as well as the laughter. And i was really just pointing the irony of mentioning science when its clear they have zero understanding of what it says. I dont have a lot either but i know sex =/= gender and that sex is more complex than xx and xy. That part really isn't that hard.

              • 1st-Amendment on 04/06/2023 - 18:13

                @Fredorishi:

                but i know…

                And this is what passes for 'science' to you?

                You know it so it's true. Interesting…

                • Fredorishi on 04/06/2023 - 18:18
                  +1

                  @1st-Amendment: Huh? You've got the logic backwards. Its true (according to experts/the science) so I know. Kind of like i dont have to fully understand the physics of gravity to know that if i jump of a tall building I'll fall and die..Again. the basic concept isnt hard to grasp.

        • skinnytie on 02/06/2023 - 23:08
          +4

          The movie’s called “What Is a Woman?” not “What is a Female?”

          Your post described biological sex (male/female), not gender (man/woman).

          As I understand it, the movie argues that gender can be defined in terms of biological sex. I don’t think that’s an argument supported by science, as neither sex or gender is strictly binary.

          • Trying2SaveABuck on 03/06/2023 - 08:33
            +3

            @skinnytie:

            The movie’s called “What Is a Woman?” not “What is a Female?”

            they are the same thing

        • FlyingMiffy on 02/06/2023 - 23:25
          +1

          You are going to get upset when science redefines what sentinent means (and thats not that far away…). At the moment, the right wants to hang their hat on physiology, the left on psychology. If you boil it down to the basics its not science versus feelings, its science of the mind versus science of the body…

          • Trying2SaveABuck on 03/06/2023 - 08:24

            @FlyingMiffy:

            If you boil it down to the basics its not science versus feelings, its science of the mind versus science of the body…

            Psychology does not support self harm or mutilation which is what this is…there is 'no scienfic' arguement outside these individuals are mentally ill - the issue is when people say it out loud it offends someone

            thus is why i say Science > Feelings

            Science also dictates men are 'stronger' in general then women and more athletic which again tells us the arguement 'trans-women' have an advantage but no one says it out loud because 'feelings' if you want to talk science it destorys anything the woke tell you

            it also destorys the Right on topics like the environment ie deforresation is bad ….

            Hard science doesnt change only 'stupid' humans refuse to accept facts - sadly politics, Greed and in ability to call 'crazy ppl crazy' anymore is why the humanity will ultimately doom itself

            • 1st-Amendment on 04/06/2023 - 12:45

              @Trying2SaveABuck:

              it also destorys the Right on topics like the environment ie deforresation is bad ….

              What?
              I'd love to hear this argument but something tells me it will be just as retarded as your spelling…

    • Gervais fanboy on 02/06/2023 - 22:05
      +16

      You serious right now? I thought you’d be the last person to get this one wrong

      It’s the absolute silence and cowardice of the silent majority that allowed these nutters to take over every institution that used to be once unbiased and holy.
      It’s this exact attitude of ‘who cares, let’s just only worry about working like dogs and pay off our mortgages’ that’s got us here in the first place

      • FlyingMiffy on 02/06/2023 - 23:28
        +3

        You lost me at holy? Are you going to sprinkle holy water on the devils (woke folks)??

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join