Intel Core i5-13600K CPU with Intel UHD Graphics 770 $469 ($459 Targeted) Delivered @ Computer Alliance eBay

220

Go to Deal

Cashback

[Deactivated] on 28/02/2023 - 15:30 ebay.com.au (417 clicks)
Last edited 28/02/2023 - 15:43 by 1 other user

FEBSNS23SNSMD3...

BX8071513600K

Product Line: 13th Generation Intel Core i5-13600K (Raptor Lake)
Turbo Clock Speed: Up to 5.1GHz on Performance-Cores || Up to 3.9GHz on Efficient-Cores
Base Clock Speed: 3.5GHz on Performance-Cores || 2.6GHz on Efficient-Cores
CPU Socket: S1700
CPU Cores: 6 Performance-Cores || 8 Efficient-Cores
CPU Threads: 12 on Performance-Cores || 8 on Efficient-Cores
Cache L2 Cache: 20MB || Intel Smart Cache (L3 Cache): 24MB
Memory Support: DDR4/DDR5 (Dual Channel)
Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 770
Manufacturer Warranty: 3 Year

Original Coupon Deal

Related Stores

eBay Australia

Marketplace

Computer Alliance

• 

  superforever on 28/02/2023 - 15:35

  What is the difference with K, F and without?

  F no graphic but K and without both have graphic.

  • 

    JerraJones on 28/02/2023 - 15:39

    +1

    K is overclockable, F means no igpu.

    So a 12900 would be a 12900 with an igpu but not overclockable while a 12900kf would be OCable but has no igpu.

    • 

      [Deactivated] on 28/02/2023 - 18:36

      +1

      Also worth noting on the 13xxx range, anything below the 13600k is using alder lake cores, not the newer raptor lake ones.

      • 

        Dienk on 01/03/2023 - 02:03

        13600kf is not raptor??

        • 

          [Deactivated] on 01/03/2023 - 14:05

          +1

          @Dienk: I wouldn't class the 13600kf as 'below' the 13600k, it's just the variant without the onboard GPU.

          So yes, it is raptor lake! But the 13600 non-k and below use alder-lake cores I think.

• 

  Italkdigital on 28/02/2023 - 15:42

  The I7's fetch a fair price lolz

  Edit: wonder what the onboard graphics is like compared to latest Ryzen CPU onboard graphics 🤔

  Edit again,.. whoops I5 👍😁🤣

  • 

    BROKENKEYBOARD on 28/02/2023 - 15:48

    latest Ryzen CPU onboard graphics

    The latest Ryzens have slower onboard graphics than the previous gen so it's actually pretty similar to the Intel ones.

    • 

      ShrewdBargin on 28/02/2023 - 17:05

      +1

      This is not accurate. Vanilla/True Ryzen desktop variants pre 7000 had no onboard graphics. What you are referring to were APU’s like the 5700G and a majority of the time were either rebadged Zen last gen or a frankensteined current-gen-but-not-exactly.

      The onboard graphics on 7000 series intended only for troubleshooting and desktop output, IIRC it’s one single Vega core or whatever they call em now

• 

  Aobegral on 28/02/2023 - 15:45

  What's better these days? AMD or Intel?

  Was thinking and looking for AMD but the motherboards are much more expensive then Intel boards (cause a z690 gigabyte master on computer alliance on eBay is $519 with targeted code)

  Was atleast looking at the ryzen 9 7900x or the Intel i7 13000k but the Intel is more power hungry..

  Any suggestions that anyone has? used for gaming and productivity

  • 

    BennyHe2018 on 28/02/2023 - 15:50

    AM5 socket will last longer while Intel will change its sockets every two gen. Would prefer Ryzen though.

  • 

    binary101 on 28/02/2023 - 15:53

    I think the general consensus is AMD, Zen4 or Zen3 if you're on a budget, for gaming and general purpose and Intel for specific productivity applications that benefit them.

  • 

    OMGJL on 28/02/2023 - 16:24

    +1

    13700k vs 7900x
    Intel Pros:
    generally better gaming performance, better single thread performance, better memory tuning ability. Intel QuickSync if video encoding is your thing. Better Memory OC and generally more OC headroom.
    Intel Cons:
    big.LITTLE cores, can have scheduling issues, it has improved though not perfect.

    if your workload each runs on its own thread without needing to wait for each other, Intel have very decent multi-thread performance too. But good luck if a critical task just happens to be running on E-Core and everything else hangs to wait….

    AMD Pros:
    12 actual real cores, no difference across cores.
    less power consumption, low end board like B650m DS3H can still do all OC and still power the CPU fine.
    non-conditional great multiple thread performance.
    Cons:
    around 10% slower than Intel in single thread performance, though still decent enough and better than anything else than the latest Intel. Memory OC suck a little. Boosting algorithm pushes CPU straight to 95c degrees, so manual fan curve is required.

  • 

    Lordeee on 01/03/2023 - 02:16

    I know this is a deal for a cpu but, going with amd, does anyone know if this memory would work? CMH32GX5M2B6000Z30K (https://www.corsair.com/us/en/Categories/Products/Memory/VEN…)

    It's not in the memory list for an asus x670e - e gaming motherboard whereas I was thinking about this one before I discovered the one above(https://www.pccasegear.com/products/59380/g-skill-trident-z5…)

• 

  CrazyBargainCatcher on 28/02/2023 - 15:56

  Worth spending almost double from a 12400F?

  • 

    BennyHe2018 on 28/02/2023 - 16:07

    -1

    Not really for gaming.

  • 

    OMGJL on 28/02/2023 - 16:30

    +1

    For CPU Cores, 13600k without OC = all core 5.1Ghz, with OC easily hitting 5.6Ghz, with luck maybe even 5.8Ghz
    12400f — 4.0Ghz all core.

    L2 cache: 13600k have about 0.75MB more per core. Can increase single core performance.

    Memory Controller: 12400f have locked SA voltage meaning it likely won't hit 3600Mhz with gear1. 13600k can hit 4000+ easily.

    all combined you could get just shy of 50% more performance (super tuned), your call…

• 

  vnt on 28/02/2023 - 16:24

  -3

  I would go new AMD which can run Gen5 for M2. and M2 Gen 5 is about to hit the market 128GB/s speed

  • 

    Phlume on 28/02/2023 - 16:42

    Where are you getting 128GB/s speeds? All the showcased PCIE 5.0 NVMe SSDs at CES this year are rated from 10-15GB/s.