29WL50S
29” IPS W-LED 2560 x 1080 pixels
250 cd/m²
sRGB 99% for premium colour reproduction
AMD Radeon FreeSync Technology for smooth gameplay
OnScreen Control and Dual Control for easy screen configuration
Speakers with MaxxAudio for an immersive experience
3 Year Warranty (Parts and Labour)
CamelCamelCamel.
Your thoughts are confusing.
Probably had to type it on a FHD monitor and was too stressed
sorry, i just meant to say i used to think FHD was ok and 4k was overkill, but after having experienced just 2k on a 26'' monitor, i would never go back to FHD. So for a 29 inch monitor, FHD would look pretty bad
I agree with Gonzule, and exactly in the same boat.
I was like "what's the point of 2k or 4k.
Since then I've got dual monitor 2k (34" 21:9 & 27" 16:9) , and last night I had to test an old 27" FHD monitor.
Plugged it in (3 monitors) and my first impression was "What crappy resolution is this?!". Turned out it was already FHD….
yep, they're personal alright
2560 x 1080 Pixels
This is not FHD tho, it is WFHD aka ultra wide.
Correct, it’s about the same pixels per square inch as a 1920 x 1080 at 23”
Maybe the better thing to say is this ultrawide monitor is 1080p (FHD in vertical pixels).
Because HD = 720p and FHD = 1080p right?
I think even though it has more horizontal pixels, it's still the same pixel density as a 1080p monitor because the vertical pixels are the same?
@n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm: FHD implies a 16:9 aspect ratio. WFHD is used to denote a 21:9 ultra wide aspect ration with a 1080p vertical height.
The pixel density of a 29” WFHD is equal to that of a 23” FHD
FHD implies a 16:9 aspect ratio. WFHD is used to denote a 21:9 ultra wide aspect ration with a 1080p vertical height.
Ok didn't know that. So I guess a ultrawide QHD monitor will be called WQHD?
The pixel density of a 29” WFHD is equal to that of a 23” FHD
Yeah this part makes sense, because the height is the same but the width of FHD is less than WFHD.
@n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm: Oops, just double checked. UWFHD for ultra wide 1080p and UWQHD for ultra wide 1440p but yeah other than that, it’s correct
UWFHD for ultra wide 1080p and UWQHD for ultra wide 1440p
lol. Too many letters.. makes things confusing. At least in both those example the horizontal pixel count still doesn't approach 4K (UHD) so why the U?? (not asking you directly)
I blame the guy making these up lol 😂.
@n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm: My guess is that the original standard aspect ratio was 4:3. Widescreen is 16:9 which makes 21:9 ultra widescreen.
So technically WFHD (wide full high definition) is just 1920x1080
On the note of confusing, my laptop has a WQXGA display (2560 x 1600). Lol
So technically WFHD (wide full high definition) is just 1920x1080
Hmm ok so WFHD 16:9 is technically wide?
My current monitor is 16:9 so I thought that was pretty standard together with TV's. I guess I am wrong though because I have seen monitors online which are 16:10, 5:4 and I think 3:2.
Funny how TV's with 16:9 are officially considered "widescreen" yet most films always have black bars on the top and bottom lol. Also I like it when certain movies take up the entire 16:9 TV, I dunno why it's just satisfying lol.
On the note of confusing, my laptop has a WQXGA display (2560 x 1600). Lol
Yeah to add to the confusion pretty sure I have seen display resolutions that don't match what you would expect from their aspect ratio's (usually just one of the two either horizontal or vertical pixels are less than you expect).
@n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm: Yeah so widescreen 16:9 is pretty much the standard for TVs and monitors but the name stuck even though standard 4:3 is uncommon nowadays.
Different ratio display’s definitely are sold but 16:9 is the most common. That being said 16:10 is making a comeback with lots of laptops using it.
And yeah, naming is sometimes used incorrectly. WQHD (2560x1440) is often shortened to just QHD. 2K was sometimes used too but I think that’s less common now.
WQHD (2560x1440) is often shortened to just QHD.
Yup that's what I believed until we had this conversation lol. (my current monitor is WQHD/2K/1440p)
I have confusing thoughts after reading gozule's personal thoughts
In Tom Cruise voice,..
‘You confuse me..’
Check OP name :)
OP told me that:
As an AI language model, I cannot provide personalized financial advice or recommendations for specific products. However, I can offer some general guidance that may help you make a decision.
The LG 29WL50S is a 29-inch UltraWide monitor with a 21:9 aspect ratio, an IPS panel, and a resolution of 2560 x 1080. It also has some additional features such as HDR10 support, a 75Hz refresh rate, and FreeSync technology to reduce screen tearing during gaming.
Here are some factors to consider when deciding whether to purchase this monitor:
Intended Use: Think about how you plan to use the monitor. If you plan to use it mainly for productivity, the UltraWide aspect ratio and high resolution can provide more screen real estate for multitasking. However, if you plan to use it mainly for gaming, you might prefer a higher refresh rate or lower response time for a smoother gaming experience.
Compatibility: Check if your computer or gaming console is compatible with the monitor. Ensure that your device has the appropriate ports, and check if the monitor's features such as FreeSync are supported.
Budget: Consider your budget and whether the LG 29WL50S falls within your price range. You might want to compare its features and price with other monitors in the same category to make an informed decision.
Reviews: Look for online reviews from customers who have purchased the monitor. This can provide insights into the product's performance and user experience.
By considering these factors, you can make an informed decision on whether the LG 29WL50S monitor is right for you.
Am I correct in it not having ANY DisplayPort?
I totally get not having DisplayPort if you only have one connector, but I'd really rather a DisplayPort connection over 2xHDMI especially at this kind of resolution.
Whats the point of having AMD Freesync when the specifications from https://www.lg.com/au/it-monitors/lg-29wl50s-b states that "*AMD Freesync™ is only available when it is connected to Display Port and used in conjunction with a compatible AMD graphics card." and this monitor doesn't have a display port?
Would be a great deal three years ago when I purchased it.
If anyone is interested, officeworks is selling a newer model of the same monitor 29WP500 for $249 with free delivery (2021 whereas the 29WL50S was released in 2019). However, the newer model does not have speakers unlike the 29WL50S. There is practically no difference between them other than that.
Above comment said the 2560 x 1080 resolution may not be adequate for a 29 inch ultrawide. Do realise that LG makes a 34 inch version of this monitor with the same resolution. Some people say 34 inch 2560 x 1080 ultrawide monitors are jarring while many others don’t. I have the 29 inch one and I would say its pixel density is great. At about 45cm from the screen, I can see text clearly and can’t see pixels at all. It is definitely an upgrade over a single typical 16:9 monitor as you can comfortably use two windows side by side without cropping anything out.
officeworks is selling a newer model of the same monitor 29WP500 for $249 with free delivery (2021 whereas the 29WL50S was released in 2019). However, the newer model does not have speakers unlike the 29WL50S. There is practically no difference between them other than that.
I am not interested in this monitor but that sounds good to me. I have no use for speakers in a PC monitor.
Above comment said the 2560 x 1080 resolution may not be adequate for a 29 inch ultrawide. Do realise that LG makes a 34 inch version of this monitor with the same resolution. Some people say 34 inch 2560 x 1080 ultrawide monitors are jarring while many others don’t. I have the 29 inch one and I would say its pixel density is great. At about 45cm from the screen, I can see text clearly and can’t see pixels at all.
Yeah I was also told something similar. That for 1080p the display size of 24 inch is the limit, and with 2K the display size of 27 inch was the limit. But I found a good deal on a 31.5 inch 2K monitor so I just bought it. Turns out no real issue at all at my viewing distance (similar to yours around 40cm+) I cannot see any pixels and if I moved the monitor any closer it would be too big so the display sits about 40% the distance from the back edge of the desk.
But as another comment above says, the 29 inch LG monitor in this deal has the same vertical height and pixel density as a 23 to 24 inch 16:9 monitor which fits into the recommendations I got told above so I don't think it's an issue. Unless you are the type to sit unusually close to your monitor or do some kind of task that pushes the limit of the pixel density (I don't know what this could be, coding? like staring at static lines of white text on a black screen maybe).
e.g. height of this monitor is 317.5mm and a random 16:9 23.8 inch I looked up the 24QP550-B is 321.1mm.
29WP500 in office works is for $367 not $249.
Correct, I can confirm that Officeworks increased the price to $367 after I made my comment
29inch UltraWide is essentially 23inch monitor with extra width, i would suggest to at least go for 34inch UltraWide (27inch with extra width) for productivity or gamging. 29inch UltraWide/23Inch Normal is bit on smaller side.
Yes the 34 inch variant is much larger than the 29 inch variant. However its typically around $150 more ($250 for 29 inch one) and you compromise pixel density substantially. The ones with 3440 x 1440 resolution (WQHD) are about $600. I think it would be better, perhaps overkill, to buy 2 29 inch monitors and have them side by side or one at the top and other at the bottom. This crazy dual monitor set up will probably cause neck problems.
I am interested in a 29" widescreen monitor.
Amazon delivery is first 9/3.
Any other good deals around below $300 ?
I purchased this one but I don't think it has inbuilt speakers.
Am I correct?
Personal thoughts on resolution, sharing before other decide to buy this monitor. I used to kind of laugh at people saying "FHD is too low, you need to get 4k or go home", especially for large monitors. I bought a 26' Dell that is 2k and i could never go back to FHD, and 2k is feels like just too big resolution for a 26' monitor. Even using older laptops at home that are just FHD hurt my eyes now, so can't even imagine what it would look like on a 29 monitor.