• expired

ixtra 96W USB-C Charger with 5A USB Type-C Cablefor MacBook Pro $29.98 Delivered @ ixtra

42

Super Fast Charger: iXTRA 96W USB C Macbook charger has a high charging efficiency of up to 100%, the charger can fully charge most laptops in about 1 hour and 30 minutes.Mac Pro Charger Works with 5W, 10W, 15W, 18W, 27W, 36W, 45W, 60W, 80W, 96W PD/QC model.
Designed for All USB C Devices:The Macbook Pro Charger is compatible with MacBook Pro 13 14 15 16 inches, Macbook Air 13 inch (2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021), MacBook Retina 12 inch (2017/ 2016/ 2015), iPad Pro 11 inch, 12.9 inch(2021/ 2020/ 2018), iPad Air 4 10.9 inch (2020), iPad mini 6 8.3 inch (2021) Charger, Compatible with iPhone, tablet, smartphone, game console, headphones, cameras, Laptop Charger and more.
Safe And Reliable:iXTRA Mac Charger built-in automatic voltage adjuster, provides protection of over-current, over-heating, over-voltage, short-circuit, lightning-protection and supports QC3.0, QC4.0, PD3.0 charging protection protocols.

Related Stores

iXtra
iXtra

closed Comments

  • +11

    Buys $3k laptop to use $30 off brand charger……
    If you can afford a MacBook Pro, you can afford a genuine charger.

    • I haven't got the MacBook, I bought this for my laptop and phone.

    • Not even "genuine". I wouldn't buy an apple charger. Anker is a great option.

      Brandless, completely unaccountable, products. Wouldn't even connect a $500 phone to them.

  • +12

    One to avoid, IMO. Cheap unknown chargers are potentially dangerous.

    • +3

      Wait, but it has 100% efficiency, nothing lost to resistance, heat, or any other losses - it's the world's first! 🤭

      • Where does it say that?

        • Up to 100%, its in the first line lol.
          So they are saying at a certain wattage its 100% efficient ahaha.

          On this statement alone this should be avoided.
          Really not worth the risk to your electronics.

          • @Jessie Ryder: I'm just being pedantic, in my mind I just associate up to 100% != 100% since they just do it to claim bigger numbers. Like some cars claiming up to X range but of course having less than X.

          • @Jessie Ryder: They’re probably counting 0W in their calculations.

            • @Mitch889: 92% for the best chargers, this would most likely be 75% efficient.

  • Bought one. Thx for PO. Amazon got this at 50 bucks. Same one

    • i am so regretful to buy this cos i still havent got any delivery on 4th March and tried to chat with them and i got totally brushed/ignored.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Be aware of this seller.

Login or Join to leave a comment