This was posted 2 years 2 months 21 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

[Prime, SUBS] Lord of The Rings - Rings of Power @ Prime Video

30246
[Prime, SUBS] Lord of The Rings - Rings of Power @ Prime Video
Go to Deal
Cashback
Iwantthebestprice on 01/09/2022 - 12:03 primevideo.com (1620 clicks)
Last edited 01/09/2022 - 14:06 by 2 other users

This is unlike other SUB deals posted here, because this show is the biggest thing coming to streaming this year! And like 90% of Ozbargain has PRIME so no one should complain about having to pay to watch this!

Description:
Beginning in a time of relative peace, we follow an ensemble cast of characters as they confront the re-emergence of evil to Middle-earth. From the darkest depths of the Misty Mountains, to the majestic forests of Lindon, to the breathtaking island kingdom of Númenor, to the furthest reaches of the map, these kingdoms and characters will carve out legacies that live on long after they are gone.

LOTR haters can stay away from this post please :)

Mod: Users who wish to Block "Additions to Streaming Services" can do so by clicking on the Streaming Service Addition tag, then clicking the 3 dot menu, then clicking hide on new deals and/or front page. Ensure that on the home page, the new front page is selected for customisation to show. Video Instructions here or More info here.

Entertainment Streaming Service Addition TV Series

Related Stores

Prime Video
Prime Video

closed Comments

      • Muten-Roshi on 02/09/2022 - 14:00

        Is Wheel of Time worth watching/skimming through before reading? Because it could explain the lore and characters a bit even if it's crap?
        And then you'd have the books which would be much better?

        • Menzoberranzan on 02/09/2022 - 14:52

          Honestly it depends.

          If you aren't much of a reader then just watch the TV show and enjoy what you can because the books will take you quite a while. If you enjoy reading and really getting into a long journey of a story, ignore the show and start on the books as the show has ruined certain key concepts of the universe that would make you very confused translating that to the book universe.

  • mattomatic on 01/09/2022 - 12:07
    +13

    Is there any way to stop these 'PSA's that aren't deals but just tell you when a TV show is streaming?

    • clandestino on 01/09/2022 - 12:09
      +3

      Apparently not.

      I've tried blocking them, per the instructions on earlier posts… yet it doesn't seem to work.

    • Moderatorscrimshaw on 01/09/2022 - 12:17

      GIF animation on how to block a certain tag. Works with any tag, not just Streaming Service Addition
      https://imgur.com/S8pNWug

      You can also add SUBS into your list of Title tags and then de-prioritize it by dragging the slider all the way to the left. See Animation

      If the OP forgets to tag Streaming service addition, then having the subs title tag blocked will also do the trick. It's best to apply both types of filters if you want to catch everything in the net.

      If you prefer to not see any Prime Video deal posts at all, just click the "Hide" link under the deal post and click "Hide Deals from Amazon Prime Video".

      • mattomatic on 01/09/2022 - 12:20

        Thanks :)

      • Muten-Roshi on 02/09/2022 - 14:21
        +3

        I've got a suggestion - what if there was a calendar section that you could check?
        All these new releases, updates to subscriptions (e.g Amazon First Reads, Humble Bundle etc.), and things open for pre-orders could be added there, and we could manually select what we wanted a reminder about.
        Not sure how hard that would be to implement.

      • quickreactor on 07/09/2022 - 15:22

        It still shows up on Top deals, when it's not even a deal. Is there any way to stop that do you know?

    • dano on 01/09/2022 - 12:20
      +18

      Just scroll past them, perhaps? It's not like the entire site is flooded with these deals.

      • wangsk on 01/09/2022 - 13:09
        +1

        exactly

      • Domingo on 01/09/2022 - 13:30
        +4

        But then where will they complain?

        These comments elicit memories of this classic Simpsons moment

      • itstuan on 01/09/2022 - 14:23
        +2

        More like the entire site is flooded with computer parts

        • wangsk on 01/09/2022 - 15:18

          PS5 and SSD

    • GandalfTheCheap on 01/09/2022 - 13:15
      +1

      It's literally right there in the description of every one of these deals.

      • Big Sexy Unit on 01/09/2022 - 13:36
        +5

        Not reading, just negging

        • mattomatic on 01/09/2022 - 15:04
          +4

          OP didn't use "Streaming Service Addition" tag. See above.

  • slowmo on 01/09/2022 - 12:10
    +7

    rather this than sending old rich men into space and then having them coming back again.

    • ThatsCheap on 01/09/2022 - 12:34
      +6

      Exploring space with Bezos: There and back again, a dildo's tale.

      • slowmo on 01/09/2022 - 16:06

        if you ask me, i rather it be "There and keep going" with the bugger off and then some more bit…

  • nosytt on 01/09/2022 - 12:10
    +20

    OH LAWD DEM RANGS OF POWER!

    • gorge on 01/09/2022 - 12:48
      +10

      https://i.redd.it/5g6bqr76h9h81.jpg

      • [Deactivated] on 01/09/2022 - 15:48
        -5

        ITT a bunch of pasty neckbeard snowflakes throw a collective tanty. It's pretty amusing ngl.

        • GrueHunter on 01/09/2022 - 20:41
          -2

          Same. Enjoy those downvotes, every one of them was somebody saying REEEEEEEE

          Imagine being this angry about something but it's happening anyway despite clenching their tiny fists and stamping their tiny feet, and that's true of pretty much everything in their lives 🤣

          • Daz91 on 01/09/2022 - 21:07
            +2

            @GrueHunter: Your cope is palpable

            • GrueHunter on 02/09/2022 - 18:59

              @Daz91: Sorry, am busy watching awesome show

              • Daz91 on 02/09/2022 - 20:10
                +3

                @GrueHunter: I just watched it, absolutely terrible. Must be embarrassing for you

        • Daz91 on 01/09/2022 - 21:04
          +1

          How does it feel to be ratio’d this hard for that smoothbrain take

          • [Deactivated] on 01/09/2022 - 22:37

            @Daz91: Muh muh ratios, seethe some more neckbeard :)

          • GrueHunter on 02/09/2022 - 19:00

            @Daz91: So like the 7:1 positive votes for this post? LOL

            I wonder what's black dwarvish for "suck it up princess"

            • Daz91 on 02/09/2022 - 20:11
              +2

              @GrueHunter: Wow you’re really invested in shilling for this terrible show. Must be exhausting

  • solidsnek on 01/09/2022 - 12:17
    +43

    Thoughts and prayers to all the OzBargainers who didn't want to see this SUBS post and were inconvenienced by it so much that they felt the need to post about it.

    • krushgroove on 01/09/2022 - 12:31
      +6

      F

    • Randolph Duke on 01/09/2022 - 12:51
      +2

      *click into the thread and then post

    • RecklessMonkeys on 01/09/2022 - 12:56
      +5

      nOt a dEal!!!

    • thesainter on 01/09/2022 - 13:03

      Only way it’s going to change it ay,
      The results of the poll on this issue were ignored

      Normal part of what you pay for a streaming service not a deal

      • GandalfTheCheap on 01/09/2022 - 13:16
        +6

        Or you could just exclude deals with the SUBS tag, as is pointed out in the description of literally every single one of these deals.

        • thesainter on 01/09/2022 - 13:20
          -6

          Not a (profanity) deal in any sense and this will gain momentum as people get more sick of these useless posts…. Simple

          Remove the comment to downvote and these posts would show a real reflection of how the community feels on this issue

          • Domingo on 01/09/2022 - 13:34
            +3

            @thesainter: Wasn't the poll in the forums and not the front page, so all the people who don't read the forums wouldn't have seen it to vote on it, and therefore it is not necessarily an accurate representation either (if the comment to downvote requirement is considered to make the vote count an inaccurate represetation)?

            • thesainter on 01/09/2022 - 14:03
              +1

              @Domingo: I don’t read the forums either…

              Like I said this will pick up momentum, don’t see the latest Bridgeton being posted just skews to certain fanboy content

              Also negative vote limits skew the results

              • themadman on 01/09/2022 - 14:38
                +1

                @thesainter: Talking about "skewed to fanboys" is like saying deals are "skewed to tech"? Who cares? If it skews one way that's because more people are apparently into it right? Just block the category if you hate it that much and move on. What harm is there in allowing subscription content updates?

                • thesainter on 01/09/2022 - 14:41
                  +3

                  @themadman: Because ozb is not a feed for curated upcoming streaming releases

                  Especially content that anyone with an interest in knows about, a year or more in advance

              • GrueHunter on 01/09/2022 - 20:42

                @thesainter: "everybody is wrong except me you'll see"

                • thesainter on 01/09/2022 - 22:34
                  +2

                  @GrueHunter: the 1st 'not a bargain' post has 85 + 16 (downvotes) =101 votes, not a small amount is it champ

                  • GrueHunter on 02/09/2022 - 19:01
                    -1

                    @thesainter: Looks like 7:1 ratio of positive votes for this one, "champ"

                    • thesainter on 02/09/2022 - 20:23
                      +1

                      @GrueHunter: You missed the part where we discussed a down vote needs comment and is not a true representation, especially when bitter sad little people like you hate vote…you have 25 comments in this post, as the kids say go touch some grass

                      You could have watched the entire episode in the amount of time you spend shit posting in this thread

  • 7ekn00 on 01/09/2022 - 12:19
    +5

    If only they stuck to Tolkiens work, should be fine for those that haven't read the books ;)

    • Blitzfx on 01/09/2022 - 12:25
      +1

      I think it's pretty interesting spin on the lore that they gave some characters time traveling abilities, since a few of them appear in eras they are not supposed to be in

    • blackfrancis75 on 01/09/2022 - 12:40
      -5

      Tolkien did a hell of a lot more than The Hobbit and LOTR.
      Unfortunately, none of it is good.

    • TheContact on 01/09/2022 - 12:44

      I don't think they were actually allowed to.

    • Muten-Roshi on 02/09/2022 - 22:32

      They fired the lore expert so they could hire an intimacy coordinator. :P

  • bargainatoraah on 01/09/2022 - 12:22
    +4

    Reviews are poorly

    • muwu on 01/09/2022 - 13:27
      +1

      Poorly what?

    • bobmonkey17 on 01/09/2022 - 13:56
      +6

      83% on Rotten Tomatoes from 124 critics, doesn't seem "poorly".

      • martygeeoz on 01/09/2022 - 14:48
        +12

        You mean paid shills, not critics. 83% from critics is a bit of a red flag these days.

        • Tinqer on 01/09/2022 - 19:23
          +3

          Geez the haters are wild on this. "The reviews are bad" "No they're mostly good" "Well they're not real reviews"
          The Tolkien fanbase not looking very attractive to me. So much desire to burn anything they feel crosses whatever lines they've erected.

          • martygeeoz on 02/09/2022 - 13:20
            +5

            @Tinqer: As a Tolkien fan I don't care if I'm attractive to you or not 😂 You want to watch it, watch it. Just saying that the critics have stopped being a reliable gauge of the quality of a show a long time ago, as they invariably insist on letting their own biases and conflicts of interests dictate the reviews of the shows that they like AND hate. The Terminal List is the best recent example of the latter. Critics hate it, fans love it.

          • Muten-Roshi on 02/09/2022 - 14:03

            @Tinqer: https://youtu.be/qhZJMoN3pUw

            Thoughts?

      • Ham Dragon on 01/09/2022 - 14:52
        +11

        Believing "critics" on RT 😂😂😂

        • bobmonkey17 on 01/09/2022 - 16:27
          +6

          Someone who’s seen the show vs. some rando with a comment on ozbargain, hmmm…

          • GrueHunter on 01/09/2022 - 20:43
            -1

            @bobmonkey17: I wonder if there's a script that'll just let me replace most comments with "something something MSM!" I wouldn't be missing much of the detail.

      • morediscount on 01/09/2022 - 15:07
        +5

        amazon even paid influencers to give good ratings for it

        • sane on 03/09/2022 - 14:51

          Got to say that when you look into the RT audience scores, most of them, 1 or 5 stars, are from people who have never rated a thing before.

          Having watched it, I'd say it would be impossible to give it a true 5 star rating, even if you were generally positive about the idea. In particular the story is slow and the acting ropey - so even if you weren't a Tolkien purist you'd have to mark it down. If you ARE a Tolkien purist however, 1 star is perfectly believable - Tolkien in name only.

          Upshot, yep, I'd say someone has been paying for review spamming.

      • EightImmortals on 01/09/2022 - 16:04
        +3

        What is the audience score?

        • GrueHunter on 01/09/2022 - 20:44
          +1

          The audience…that hasn't seen it yet?

          👏
          👏

          👏

        • morediscount on 05/09/2022 - 10:47
          +2

          event if you see Google reviews there are so many fake 5 stars calling it amazing and better than GOT after watching 2 episodes .. Amazon spending a lot on paid reviews

      • Muten-Roshi on 02/09/2022 - 14:04
        +2

        Rotten Tomatoes is indirectly owned by Disney

        • GrueHunter on 02/09/2022 - 19:03
          -3

          HOW DERP DOES TEH CONSPURICY GO

          let's ask jordan petersen

          sorry, drug addict jordan petersen

          I mean DOCTOR jordan pertesen

          damn autocorrect

  • FireRunner on 01/09/2022 - 12:26
    +10

    LOTR haters can stay away from this post please :)

    Im not a hater, in fact a huge fan of both the novel and movies. What’s shown do far doesn’t give me much confidence that this series will live up to the expectations. It’s visually impressive but will deliver in where it counts?
    So far it looks like all flash and no substance but we’ll have to see

  • Miso on 01/09/2022 - 12:26
    +7

    "LOTR haters can stay away from this post please :)"

    My understanding is that the Tolkien nerds are up in a froth about this.

    So us LOTR haters are actually the winners. We get a fancy high budget tv show. And get to watch nerds tear themselves apart over perceived canon violations.

    It's gonna be great.

    • FireRunner on 01/09/2022 - 12:33
      +6

      Exactly what I’m thinking. It’s the LOTR fans that take issue with it rather than the haters.

      We get a fancy high budget tv show.

      Honestly if they want to rewrite large parts of Tolkien’s works then maybe it should have been an original work that is inspired by Tolkien rather than directly linking it. Of course they wouldn’t do that because they want the IP which carries all the weight from the books and movies

      • blackfrancis75 on 01/09/2022 - 12:51
        +2

        | an original work that is inspired by Tolkien

        this is who they're competing against ;)

        • Big Sexy Unit on 01/09/2022 - 13:38
          -1

          Enter every high fantasy series

        • Muten-Roshi on 02/09/2022 - 23:50
          +3

          I loved the part where Galadriel shouted “avengers assemble” and Avada Kedavra-ed the patriarchy straight to Westeros. Totally one of the scenes ever made, couldn’t stop crying

      • GrueHunter on 01/09/2022 - 20:46
        -4

        It's not LOTR fans.

        It's white boy snowflakes who say they're LOTR fans.

        See also Star Wars, Marvel, DC, Doctor Who…

        • FireRunner on 01/09/2022 - 21:07
          +4

          Caring about consistency with characters, lore and style of the established IP doesn’t make you a “snowflake”. It’s not fair to the fans to piggyback of the success of a beloved franchise by contradicting or damaging previous works.

        • bargainerpro on 01/09/2022 - 21:09
          +1

          Why are you racist against white people? That's not cool, mate.

          • GrueHunter on 02/09/2022 - 19:05
            -1

            @bargainerpro: Stop me

            Also, not your mate, pal

            • bargainerpro on 03/09/2022 - 17:25
              +1

              @GrueHunter: Are you also racist towards other people or just towards white people?

              Why this hatred towards people with this specific skin colour?

        • morediscount on 05/09/2022 - 10:48
          +2

          not true … I'm not white and I hate it

    • Muten-Roshi on 01/09/2022 - 12:39
      +8

      Well it's not exactly about perceived canon violations. It's about how it's a quick cashgrab, with Amazon just wanting the IP name to get people. They don't care about the product, just the marketing.
      It's how the cast, screenwriters and producers are blatantly trying to turn the series into something its not. It's not a GoT equivalent, it is a lot more wholesome than constant sex and gory violence, and gender politics. LotR was about self-sacrifice and heroism, not hedonism.

      They even admitted they wanted a 'blank canvas' for the story in one of their interviews. Like, whats the point of signing up for LotR if you want to create your own world and story?

      You can have all the SFX and high budget you want. It does nothing if the writing and plot is simplistic and boring.

  • b2dz on 01/09/2022 - 12:27
    +1

    Does anyone know what subtitles this will have at launch? I'm hopeful it's like most other Amazon content and have a huge range. Honestly that's one of the best things about Amazon Prime.

    • MS Paint on 01/09/2022 - 12:30
      +1

      English and Kawishana at launch.

    • Tleyx on 01/09/2022 - 12:31
      +3

      As long as subtitles are in Elvish for us purists

      • FireRunner on 01/09/2022 - 12:38
        +5

        You’re not a true fan unless you use Entish subtitles

        • entropysbane on 01/09/2022 - 12:50
          +5

          Turns any one hour episode into a fortnight’s viewing.

      • garage sale on 02/09/2022 - 03:53
        +1

        was hoping for klingon subtitles so as to be more inclusive.

  • Kaines on 01/09/2022 - 12:30
    +11

    Looking forward to it. Not a deal

  • cheepo on 01/09/2022 - 12:32

    Episodes would be accessible here by Friday afternoon right!

  • the cringe on 01/09/2022 - 12:40
    +6

    We wuz elves n shiet

  • Budju on 01/09/2022 - 12:41
    +20

    I hear woolworths is selling pasta tomorrow at full price. Be ready people

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join