Bought a 2000 Deisel Mitsubishi Delica in late Dec for a premium price ($16k) with the seller claiming it was mechanically immaculate which seemed to check out in every regard… However, three months later it's at a Delica specialist getting a cracked cylinder head fixed which is going to cost approximately $3-$4k.
Two insections prior didn't detect any issues with he head (difficult/impossible to detect for anyone other than a specialist in this case), however turns out this Delica specialist had already diagnosed tis delica with a cracked cylinder head just WEEKS before I bought it. Meaning the seller knew about it didnt disclose the issue.
I have been communicating with the seller via text after the head issues started a few weeks after owning it, but he specifically advised against me taking it to the specialist as they charge too much etc. The seller claimed there were no known major issues at purchase, even when asked specifically about the head (as they're known to go around the 200k mark). I have this all on text messages, so I do have some written proof of this.
The seller also seems to be well known in Delica circles on the forums and FB pages an appears to do then up and sell them occasionally. He appears to have an automotive company and has custom swing arms fabricated for Delicas. He doesn't know I currently know he lied.
Unlikely, but if I have this evidence from the garage in writing, is there some way I can claim the $4k for repairs back from the seller? VCAT perhaps?
The seller was dishonest with you. However, you bought a used car. I don't think he's required to tell you all he knows about the car's faults even if you ask specific questions.