This was posted 12 years 11 months 16 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Kardashian Kollection Leopard Tote Bag $54.95 Ea (Reg $99.95) Harris Scarfe ON-LINE

31
Kardashian Kollection Leopard Tote Bag $54.95 Ea (Reg $99.95) Harris Scarfe ON-LINE
Go to Deal
Cashback
Ltaneh on 07/12/2011 - 12:34 harrisscarfe.com.au (282 clicks)

FREE P&H

  • Exclusive deal of the week offers only available to hs friends newsletter subscribers & hs card customers. (easy to create a new account at checkout).

One Day Only - Offer expires 11:59pm tonight, don't miss out.
Only 50 bags available online only*.

Kardashian Kollection Leopard Tote Black

Decorative Leopard print and zip detail.

Fully lined with KK print lining.

Stitch detail lower panel.

Includes additional strap to use as a tote or sling bag.

2x Internal zip pockets

2x Mobile phone pockets

Reg. $99.95, now $54.95ea exclusively online.

  • Offer only available for purchase online. Strictly limited stock, no backorders.

^Delivery available only in locations covered by Australia Post.
Our delivery policy can be found here.

Discount off regular prices, no further discounts apply. Offer not available for layby. Excludes payment via giftcard and staff discount.

Harris Scarfe reserves the right to amend or withdraw the deal of the week offer at any time without notice.

Health & Beauty Kardashian Kollection Tote Bag

Related Stores

Harris Scarfe
Harris Scarfe

closed Comments

  • colblair on 07/12/2011 - 12:42
    +12

    Porn stars are getting into bag making now?

  • tsunamisurfer on 07/12/2011 - 13:06
    +11

    Warning….only guaranteed to last 72 days.

    • colblair on 07/12/2011 - 13:56
      +6

      curious as to why my comment was marked inappropriate. All I did was express my incredulity at how someone who became famous in the way that she did is now releasing her own branded bags.

      So I will just neg the deal based on the fact you can get the same quality bag which provides all the benefits of this bag for a cheaper price elsewhere with the added benefit of not being associated with this brand.

      • neil on 07/12/2011 - 14:29
        +4

        I see the confusion. Your comment "Porn stars are getting into bag making now?" was misconstrued as being a comment against the OP as the OP's name had a xxx at the end of it. You are actually meaning that Kim Kardashian's reason for being famous was because of her sex tape that she profited on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Kardashian

        I've republished the comment.

        • colblair on 08/12/2011 - 10:13

          cheers :)

  • rack on 07/12/2011 - 13:13
    +3

    I have seen the same bag at strandbag for $49. Thes don't even retail at RRP. BTW RRP's are meant to fool people.

  • jnav on 07/12/2011 - 13:25
    +2

    2x Mobile phone pockets… Detachable bum bag?

    • tsunamisurfer on 07/12/2011 - 13:29
      +2

      One for your husband.

      One for Ray J.

      • Tal_Shiar on 07/12/2011 - 13:36
        +2

        What husband?

  • jmi on 07/12/2011 - 13:50
    +4

    And I thot all the Kardassians were wiped out in the Dominion War…. silly me.

    • cmdwedge on 07/12/2011 - 14:48
      +2

      I mean this question with all sincerity. Do you actually believe that 'thot' is a real word? Or is it just easier to type?

      • jmi on 07/12/2011 - 15:25

        Easier2type. :)

      • retiredfeline on 07/12/2011 - 20:22

        He Bliefs it. :)

  • ccrap on 07/12/2011 - 16:06

    Good thing they dropped Kim's name from the label, or else it would be Kim Kardashian Kollection (KKK)… Also, one of the fugliest totes I have seen :( Waiting for a good Kim product just so I can comment: What a banging good deal.

    • LordSydney on 07/12/2011 - 20:18

      Wouldn't be the only controversial thing about the label.. the logo is basically a masonic compass disguised in a back-to-front K..

  • lisss on 07/12/2011 - 16:32

    Ew. If people want to pay for that brandname and be associated with it, I feel for them. The inflated RRP and sale price are definitely not due to the bag's aesthetics or quality…

    • tsunamisurfer on 07/12/2011 - 17:32
      +2

      I can really see a bag snatcher coming back, putting it back in one's hands and feeling sorry for the owner.

      • retiredfeline on 07/12/2011 - 20:24

        On the other hand the owner might be secretly relieved to have it off her hands and deny ownership of it. But not before asking for the contents back. :)

  • skinny on 07/12/2011 - 17:34
    +1

    Is it a real Kardassians bag or the decoy body double?

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join