This was posted 3 years 11 months 15 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Free Screening of Sacred Cow: The Case for (Better) Meat Documentary

551

I've been following this project closely for almost a year now since reading the book and backing it on IndieGogo for $25USD. I think it's going to be great and it looks like it's going to be free from November 22nd-30th (US time).

ABOUT THE FILM

The Case for Better Meat

At our grocery stores and dinner tables, even the most thoughtful consumers are overwhelmed by the number of considerations to weigh when choosing what to eat—especially when it comes to meat. Guided by the noble principle of least harm, many responsible citizens resolve the ethical, environmental and nutritional conundrum by quitting meat entirely. But can a healthy, resilient and conscientious food system exist without animals?

Sacred Cow probes the fundamental moral, environmental and nutritional quandaries we face in raising and eating animals. In this project, we focus our lens on the largest and perhaps most maligned of farmed animals, the cow.

COMMON ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT MEAT…

  • Red meat causes cancer, obesity and heart disease.
  • We’re eating too much meat.
  • Humans don’t need to consume animal products to be healthy.
  • Raising livestock is bad for the environment.
  • It’s unethical to eat animals.
  • If we can produce meat in labs, then why should we eat animals?

The connection between nutrition and ecosystem health is starting to make some headway into mainstream media. Everyone is trying to figure out how to feed the world in the most sustainable and healthy way. However, we've allowed corporate interest, big food, flawed science, click-bait media and naïve celebrities to steer us away from what a truly nutrient-dense, ethical and sustainable, and regenerative food system really is. The mantra that “all meat is bad” influences how we're training dietitians, shaping our dietary guidelines, designing school lunch policies, and funding for nutrition-related research.

As we’ve become more globalized, the entire world is now pushing towards the "heart healthy" (and highly processed) Western diet. In the process, we're destroying entire ecosystems and human health through industrial, ultra-processed food.

Sacred Cow comes at a critical point in the nutrition and sustainability story. A meat tax is a very real possibility. Well intended yet highly misguided, The EAT Lancet Global Dietary Guidelines are calling for less than 1/2 an ounce of red meat per day, for human and planetary health.

Meat is being vilified as causing cancer, heart disease and diabetes, yet there are no solid studies to back this up. Meanwhile, Silicon Valley has invested millions in highly processed meat alternatives, with the assumption that engineering our proteins in factories will be a better alternative to something nature has already figured out: grazing animals, restoring land while converting cellulose into protein.

THE SOLUTION IS REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE.

The truth is, well-managed cattle are the unlikely heroes of this story. We can increase biodiversity, improve soil health, increase the water holding capacity of the land and raise high quality, nutrient-dense protein, while preserving family farming communities. Removing these animals from our food system could cause more harm than good.

Related Stores

sacredcow.info
sacredcow.info

closed Comments

      • +1

        Which is exactly why we shouldn't have 7 billion people. The earth can't support that.

        • Its time for humanity to go interplantary

          • +3

            @Lunatic: Err, you think we should inflict this level of incompetence on more planets? Yeah, I can't see that going wrong…

          • @Lunatic: No, it's time for humanity to not breed at an exponential rate.

        • I agree, but while 7bil+ people cutting down on their meat consumption won't save the environment alone, at least it won't destroy it. You can't say that eating meat will save the world, no matter how organic, free-range, land rotated, etc it is. The exception might be lab grown meat.

          • +1

            @[Deactivated]: I know it won't. Having less people will though.

            • @brendanm: Yes, but that's a moot point because we're not going to cull people nor do we have enough time for them to die naturally after the implementation of population control. We need to change our behaviour.

              • +1

                @[Deactivated]: Yeah, we can change it by making shitloads of trinkets for people to buy en masse, and constantly updating every single thing. That's excellent for the environment. We can also continue to burn coal rather than using nuclear power, also excellent. Chopping down forest at a rate of knots is also tops. So many great things, so little time.

                • @brendanm: I agree with all of what you said, but it's all whataboutism.

                  Moreover, the leading cause of one of your three points (deforestation) is primarily caused by meat consumption.

  • 95% of the longest living animals on earth are omnivore. Sad that the ones that have a vegan diet die pretty early.

    • +2

      Vegans supposedly live longer.

    • Yeah, elephants are herbivores and die after only 6 months.

      • Way to make your point with science, if not percentages and mathematics…

  • Conspicuous by his absence from this thread is one certain loudmouth. Thus proving he's only on Ozbargain to troll/argue for his own amusement, only pulling his head back in just far enough so he can do it to a new person tomorrow. He should be permanently banned.

    • Sorry mate who are you referring to? I'm not really sure what you're talking about..

    • Which one are you talking about?

  • +1

    Thanks OP, something everyone should be educating themselves on.

  • I read it as, 'The Killing of a Sacred Deer'

  • When I grow up, I'm going to Bovine University!

  • -3

    Just FYI, processed and red meat cause cancer - source World Health Organisation.

    Link: https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr240_E.pdf

    But lets look at alternate facts:
    1) F@*& science man!
    2) But they taste too good. Cancer is totally worth it.
    3) You must be a preachy Vegan to be talking about evidence and a serious public health issue.
    4) I'm a carnivor so I must eat meat if it kills me
    5) Meat grown in culture (from an animal) is somehow different in a non-cancer-causing way so yeah!

    • +1

      lol.. watch this in regards to the cancer claims: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up__RB_rgRM

      • lol, no thanks I prefer real experts to fake ones. Thats why I linked the WHO article. Its a consensus of experts across multiple countries and is based on scientific evidence.

        • Okay well if you'd care to watch the video he explains the statistics and the 'evidence' used to make those claims, which you clearly don't understand (or don't want to because it might conflict with your preconceived opinion).

    • +1

      Can you clearly demonstrate each IRAC panel member had no biases, given a good portion of them are self claimed vegans?
      7

    • +1

      Everything causes cancer according to the who. Do people actually believe anything they say?

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6r6LV02QscU

    I love cow. But I prefer baby cow. So young and supple…

    Veal the power!

  • +2

    The ingredients list for beyond meat is quite concerning, check out the label sometime.

  • Anybody got the link to the free movie screening yet ?

Login or Join to leave a comment