Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (4G LTE) 6GB RAM / 128GB $639.20 Shipped @ Mi Official Store eBay

310

Go to Deal

Cashback

nivurek on 27/05/2019 - 13:53 ebay.com.au (832 clicks)
Last edited 29/05/2019 - 01:05 by 2 other users

PSMART20

[EDIT]: Seems the eBay store was linked on the 'official' Mi Australian store website and Xiaomi are selling through a certified distributor called 'Panmi' which is based in Chippendale, Sydney.

According to Techradar, there is an 'official' Xiaomi store on eBay. The store that is selling this item does not have much feedback, but it managed to get on the front page with the 20% sale so although there is some skepticism, I'm assuming it's trustworthy and is the mentioned store in the article.

Not sure if this model is the Global version but the store description says 'Australian Standards certified products with local warranty support'.

If it is really an official store that has local stock and is selling global model, then this is the cheapest I've seen for the Mi Mix 3.

Features:
● Display: 6.39 inch, 1080 x 2340 FHD+ Pixel Screen
● CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Octa-core 2.8GHz
● MIUI10 ( Android 9 ), Bluetooth:5.0, GPS, A-GPS, Glonass, Beidou
● Camera: 24.0MP + 2.0MP rear camera + dual 12.0MP front camera
● Networks
FDD-LTE B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 /B13 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25 / B26 / B28 / B29 / B30 / B66
TDD-LTE B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 (2496MHz - 2690MHz)

Original 20% off Mi Official Store @ eBay Deal

Related Stores

eBay Australia

Marketplace

Xiaomi Australia

• 

  send2riven on 27/05/2019 - 14:10

  +4

  https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Xiaomi-Mi-9-Dual-Sim-6GB-RAM-128…
  I will pay $60 more for the Mi 9. SD845->SD855

  • 

    13 on 27/05/2019 - 14:14

    Yes i looked at that to, is 703 a good deal on this

    • 

      yaditya on 27/05/2019 - 18:09

      Geekbuying is selling for around $660

• 

  ozizoy on 27/05/2019 - 14:20

  B28?

  • 

    nivurek on 27/05/2019 - 14:24

    Has B28 based on the 'official website' specifications.

  • 

    willyroo on 28/05/2019 - 09:01

    And it has VoLTE (Voice over LTE). Not much point having 4G as B3 (1,800MHz) or B28 (700MHz) in the land of Oz if you can only use it for data.

• 

  [Deactivated] on 27/05/2019 - 14:25

  Is it likely that this phone would be ban like Huawei?

  • 

    lovbargain on 27/05/2019 - 14:30

    -5

    unlikely, because Mi is not capable

    • 

      lovbargain on 27/05/2019 - 16:45

      -2

      why I was negged?

  • 

    scud70 on 27/05/2019 - 15:02

    ha! thats exactly what I've been thinking … not sure why Huwaei is copping all the flack and not these other Chinese brands .. id assume same trade embargo applies to them

    • 

      pzhon on 27/05/2019 - 15:20

      +11

      Huawei was fine until they touched the biggest cake - 5G. This project helps America making billions of dollar.

      • 

        scud70 on 27/05/2019 - 15:46

        +4

        yeh i get that bit and the political stuff but you'd have to be naive as heck to think govt owned company from china wouldn't use it as a spying platform (or at least the possibility of it)…how likely would it be for China to allow a US govt owned company to roll out telecom infra in their country .. lol
        So i get both sides of the "argument" but consumers cop all the crap with lack of support, less competition etc … still thinking about it logically you'd have to say this will affect all Chinese phone manufacturers the same …

        • 

          Jamesx on 27/05/2019 - 16:06

          +1

          @scud70: even iPhones are made in China, so ban iPhones too?
          In theory, Chinese Gov can secretly seed these phones because what people said about it.

          • 

            scud70 on 27/05/2019 - 16:10

            +2

            @Jamesx: i guess beats me on the thinking behind it… but i was referring to infrastructure based on those technologies not individual phones… we already get spied on no matter what we do as individuals these days just depends who your ok with from that front ..

        • 

          wch0852 on 28/05/2019 - 22:25

          @scud70: Huawei is private company with Communist party member in it. According to Chinese legislation, any private company that has more than 3 communist party member must have a committee in it. Purpose is to provide code of conduct and guidelines to prevent corruption and bribery. None of these major tech companies in China are state owned. Not blaming people for getting the concept wrong, there isn’t much resources online for people to understand. Besides most people won’t bother.

      • 

        CookieJacker31 on 27/05/2019 - 16:27

        Trump is know for tactics like taking what you want from him off the table and putting what is yours and don't want to be on the table on the table. China doesn't want Huawei on the table, so Trump just put it there, if China wants it off Trump will want something. Next move is up to China in this game of one upmanship.

        I don't think the other Chinese phone makers are seen as the same level of threat because they aren't also building the networks.

      • 

        garage sale on 28/05/2019 - 06:14

        +1

        america doesn’t make much in the way of 5G, they are way behind. the 5G bans are about giving US companies a chance to catch up. and of course the cost if you don’t assemble in china ….

    • 

      onlinepred on 27/05/2019 - 15:36

      It's all political, not logical.

      • 

        xoom on 27/05/2019 - 18:16

        Its all about the money.

        FTFY.

    • 

      garage sale on 28/05/2019 - 06:07

      xiaomi is a small brand globally compared to sales from zte and huawei, zte got a ban, now huawei, it does give non chinese companies a business advantage …zte are still trying to recover and they used to be a top seller in the US.

• 

  stuhasic on 27/05/2019 - 15:14

  +2

  I have had the 4GB/64GB Mi Max 3 since December. It is a truly awesome phone that I got from Gearbest for $370.

  • 

    loropy9 on 27/05/2019 - 15:29

    -1

    So they have Mi Max 3 and Mi Mix 3? That's just ridiculously confusing and somewhat misleading nomenclature by Xiaomi.

    • 

      Caped Baldy on 27/05/2019 - 15:31

      +2

      They target different users and they look quite different.

      Don't get me started on Samsung's naming…

    • 

      nikoris on 27/05/2019 - 20:16

      +2

      Because Xs and Xr are better. Or A30,A70, S10,S10e,S10+.
      Or pixel 3, 3xl, 3a, 3a xl

      • 

        loropy9 on 29/05/2019 - 19:23

        That’s so true.

  • 

    onlinepred on 27/05/2019 - 16:29

    Different phones though, one is budget and the other is premium.

• 

  shortcircuit on 27/05/2019 - 17:36

  i really want to buy this phone, but will it have the same faith like Huawei

  • 

    nikoris on 27/05/2019 - 20:16

    +1

    huawei will be unbanned.

• 

  jackau on 27/05/2019 - 18:16

  +1

  Yes this phone has band 28, it is perhaps the most bandwidth complete device release by Xiaomi in 2018. It work on all three networks with 4G but I am in SYD, that doesnt say hellstra band 28 is at my area..
  It is my primary drive right now, excellent device all around except that battery wont last two days in my usage (previous mi 5S plus manage two days!), enough for one day however.

  the device is heavy and the slider render the protection of the lower chin at risk, I manage to buy a chin that sticks on it so it has protection but looks out of place once slide out.
  the shine point is the screen, no notch what so ever. the size is thin and great at hand. Since I dont often use selfies i barely use the slider, I manage to customise the slider sound to light sabre / star trek communicator etc at will with easy file transfer renaming.

  highly recommended but I would rather trade off the slider for better battery like the up coming redmi K20.

• 

  Blugok on 27/05/2019 - 18:31

  U reckon its TRS eligible?

• 

  avitas on 28/05/2019 - 21:07

  +1

  Xiao(mi mi mi)x 3