Philips BDM4350UC 43" UHD (3840x2160) IPS Monitor $839.20 Delivered @ Futu Online eBay

Related Stores

eBay Australia

Marketplace

Shopping Express

• 

  Tacooo on 21/02/2017 - 16:32

  I always considered monitors to be 30" or less and TV 32" or more.

  43" seems like a TV.

  • 

    bargaino on 21/02/2017 - 17:07

    It has DisplayPort input, so I'll call it a monitor.

    • 

      Diji1 on 21/02/2017 - 18:57

      +1

      • 5ms or whatever refresh rather than 20 to whatever.
  • 

    camh on 21/02/2017 - 19:32

    +2

    A TV has a tuner. A monitor does not.

• 

  Yongaz on 21/02/2017 - 16:35

  Good price. I paid exactly this a couple of weeks ago… it's FANTASTIC, but it's so FRIKKIN HUGE lol. You better have a long desk or it ruins the experience altogether. I had to buy a keyboard extender tray so I could sit further back, but otherwise I have no regret whatsoever. And oh I don't think it's great for FPS gaming because it's so huge and your eyes simply can't keep up….

• 

  stratbargain on 21/02/2017 - 16:36

  +2

  Apparently burn in can be an issue with this mornitor so make sure to read reviews:

  https://www.amazon.com/Philips-BDM4350UC-43-Inch-IPS-LED-Mon…

  • 

    OnTheMark on 21/02/2017 - 21:07

    I've had mine for like 6 months and no signs of screen burn in on mine.

    Mine does give a warning about burn in when turning it on - I'm thinking that the first release of this monitor did have burn in issues which they've subsequently fixed and added in a warning to be sure…

    • 

      SAVE FERRIS on 22/02/2017 - 12:31

      myself and a colleague bought one each. his is fine. mine suffered severe burn-in from the get-go. apparently it's just poor quality control from factory as a few forum searches has shown similar people having issues.

      the burn in from my was so severe that it just happened as soon as it turned on - not after extended use. i used a few burn-in websites that switched from b&w squares to pure white, and after having the b&w squares on for less than a minute, i switched to white and could still clearly see them.

      i took it back to MSY (where i purchased it from) and showed them the same tests and they refunded me immediately.

      YMMV - just check for burn-in immediately after purchasing.

  • 

    expatOz on 27/02/2017 - 09:43

    +1

    I just got this morning. I can confirm about image retention, but i've usrd it for like 30mins and its not too bad atm. Will connect it to my macbook and report back.

• 

  [Deactivated] on 21/02/2017 - 17:37

  -5

  Isnt 4k too low res for 43"? Like 1080p on a 27"?

  • 

    [Deactivated] on 21/02/2017 - 17:45

    -1

    Show me a higher res monitor than 4k @ 43"

    • 

      [Deactivated] on 21/02/2017 - 18:01

      -2

      What does that have to do with my question?

    • 

      robbo600 on 21/02/2017 - 18:26

      Here you are…

      http://www1.ap.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx…

      • 

        csingh on 21/02/2017 - 18:34

        @bti_jet

        BURN!!!

      • 

        [Deactivated] on 21/02/2017 - 19:29

        -1

        @csingh:

        Ohhh I felt it…. Boo whoo

        FYI I think only the 27" comes in 5k

        How about burning your head lol

      • 

        [Deactivated] on 21/02/2017 - 19:31

        -1

        Show me 43" that has 5k res.

      • 

        [Deactivated] on 21/02/2017 - 21:26

        @bti_jet: The fact that a smaller size monitor has a higher resolution just makes this look even worse.

      • 

        [Deactivated] on 21/02/2017 - 23:55

        @Orpheus:

        Yawn….

  • 

    Diji1 on 21/02/2017 - 18:57

    No. Apparently people usually don't have to change Windows text sizes.

  • 

    camh on 21/02/2017 - 19:38

    Nope. It's about 100dpi, which is pretty much what monitors have been for a long time until the recent high-dpi "retina" displays. My 30" is 2560x1600 which is also about 100dpi. My monitor before that was 24" 1920x1200 - again about 100dpi.

    Actually, at 43", it's a bit less than 100dpi - I previously worked it out on a 4k 40" monitor - but close enough.

    • 

      TheContact on 22/02/2017 - 07:54

      It's actually just over 102 ppi. 40" would be just over 110ppi. For less gigantic comparisons, the 40" would be basically equivalent to a 27" QHD 2560*1440 panel, slightly more sharp actually, but close enough. And the 43" is fairly obviously the same as a 22"(they all seem to actually be 21.5") full HD 1920x1080.

      Been eyeing these large 4K monitors for a while, but seems it's just not the time yet, with cards barely able to drive games at 4k and the whole HDR thing now.

      • 

        ozbjunkie on 22/02/2017 - 15:22

        Agreed, not the time yet.

        But I still browse the deals fantasising about what will come.

        4k and 144hz with GPUs that can drive them (and a port which can much that much info)

        Ahhh… Back to reality.

  • 

    OnTheMark on 21/02/2017 - 20:45

    No - it's equivalent to 4x 21.5" full HD monitors joined together with no bezels!

    I've got one sitting on my desk with a Dell U2412M (24" 1920x1200) monitor on either side - the text on the Dells is slightly larger, but not by much - no font scaling on any of the monitors.

    Tempting to get a 2nd 43" monster to replace the 2x 24" monitors!

  • 

    [Deactivated] on 22/02/2017 - 00:25

    -1

    6 people just bought this monitor and dont want buyers remorse 😂

• 

  a22andrew on 21/02/2017 - 21:24

  why is this one so good for BDSM?

• 

  expatOz on 23/02/2017 - 05:38

  I was about to press the buy button at MSY and thought of checking OzBargain :)

  Bought one for PS4 gaming and Productivity. Not the best monitor, but great overall and at an excellent price.