Woolworths No Longer Bothering to Stop Shoplifters

I am really starting to wonder whether those of us looking out for genuine discounts, but still paying for our groceries, are actually the mugs given what I have discovered about Woolworths' apparent attitude to 'five finger discounts' for anyone that wants one.

Tuesday early evening I was grabbing a few groceries at WW Hurstville when I spotted a shoplifter shoving various items down their pants and up their shirt. Having worked in retail previously and nabbed a few shoplifters stealing from my previous employer, I followed them around for long enough to get a video of them doing it on my phone and while trying to notify a staff member. The shelf packer advised me to report it to the service desk, which I did.

The only person at the service desk was serving customers so I excused myself and asked if they could please call a loss control officer as I had witnessed a possible shoplifter (at that point, the person hadn't left the store, so perhaps they just preferred to carry high value items to the checkout in their underwear).

It was the store attendant's response that really shocked me. He told me that there are no loss control staff in the store and not to worry about it and that there was no-one interested in preventing theft from the store. This really annoyed me because the cost of theft just gets passed on in higher prices for the rest of us, honest customers, so I asked to speak to the store manager.

The store manager empathised with my concern about higher prices, but told me that loss control officers only visit the store a few times a year because 'head office' didn't want to have to pay extra wages. He agreed that shoplifting is rife in the store and that he sees people shoplifting most days. However, apparently staff are discouraged from approaching shoplifters in case they are threatened or injured. Also, most of the video cameras and other obvious anti-theft devices are primarily about creating an impression of security and discouraging honest customers from doing the wrong thing rather than stopping those that are claiming 100% discounts on everything that they buy.

It really annoys me that rather than addressing a social problem (theft), a large company like Woolworths is condoning and effectively encouraging it just because it has the market power to raise its prices to the rest of us.

What do others think? Is it reasonable for me to be disappointed in WW? Should large companies like WW have a role to play in supporting a safe and honest society? Or is it reasonable for them to encourage shoplifting because it hurts the small retailers more and discourages competition, thus allowing the big retailers to make more profits over the longer term.

My other thought is if Woolies openly acknowledges that it doesn't care about theft, why are we all bothering to pay?

Related Stores

Woolworths
Woolworths

Comments

    • Just like that kid who came back and killed all those bullies he had in school?

  • +3

    If you think the store staff are bad, wait till you see what the police do to a small time shoplifter. Absolutely nothing. Imagine the amount of time, paperwork, energy it would take to prosecute someone over a $50 theft. If the matter ever makes it to court, the magistrate will just hand down a small fine and no conviction recorded … most cops just don't bother.

    It's even better if you're under 16 … I'm surprised there isn't more Oliver Twist-style shoplifting gangs around.

    • +1

      The point of the law is to act like a deterrent so you're liability for your actions. Once you have a breakdown of liability of your citizens without any repercussions of their actions (even minor) you get a break down of society.

      Granted, the multi-national business like Woolworths all-ready probably have security camera's in every aisle. The video camera feed may some-day be processed by some analytics company to provide face recognition and suspect identification. So you don't know that chocolate bar right now may cost you later on in your life (depending if they decided to follow it up to the full extent of the law. Though most people won't want a criminal charge as theft recorded against their persons.

      • Woolworths all-ready probably have security camera's in every aisle.

        lol

        Operational shrink outweighs theft many times over. Better off fighting operational than piss-farting around with enforcement, when deterrent is 'good enough'.

  • +1

    Things aren't so simple as they maybe used to be, shoplifters have an advantage these days. If you were to come up to an employee and tell them someone was stealing they couldn't take your word for it, they need to observe the act as well ensure they didn't discard the item before they exit the register. Even then, only the store manager is allowed to stop or apprehend the shoplifter as things may turn violent. Shoplifters have pulled knives on employees in the past just for questioning them.

    Most shoplifting occurs at self serve which isn't technically stealing unless they exit the register. Employees will only point out to customers where they didn't scan an item to prevent the loss (usually "woops it didn't scan" or "woops i pressed the wrong item"), the alternative is to allow them to exit the register and later pull them up on camera which usually costs more in time.

    You'll find steps are only taken when the loss is large enough to warrant the resources in prosecuting them or they are a repeat offender.

    • +1

      I've heard from someone working at Coles head office that the only person that can detain and search a suspected offenders bag is the store manager and that's only if they've personally witnessed the shoplifting happening.

  • +11

    I have previously worked at Coles and shop lifting contributes only a mear 2% to the total loss of the store. The biggest loss is markdowns and products that have reached their expiry/best before date.
    I have seen quite a few people stealing from the store valuable items but basically all you can say to them is "can i help you"…
    You are not allowed to put a hand on them as we were told that it is a criminal offence (yet stealing isn't)
    I remember a case where this guy left the shop with a full trolly of goods, 2 security guards went after him and at the car park he pulled a gun out on them.
    The store will only consider going after someone who has emptied the shelves a hefty amount of $$$ in which case the police would get activated after providing them with security camera surveillance videos. Talking about the police and their duties….
    I personally think that getting away with crime encourages others to do same and as long as they don't get caught it is fine. Unfortunately

    • +15

      I have seen quite a few people stealing from the store valuable items but basically all you can say to them is "can i help you"…

      Thief: "Sure, grab the other side of that TV for me."

      • That's good! But Coles don't sell TVs…..

        • +2

          @Baysew: Ok, well of the many Coles store I've visited, none have TVs for sale……maybe it's a Eastern side things where they have more stuff and opportunities…..over the Western side….

        • +1

          @Zachary: …the shops were closed due to restrictive and out of date trading laws.

        • @Baysew: Oh so they used to sell TVs, now they don't anymore?

        • +8

          Someone nicked them all.

  • +1

    If enough people do something wrong it becomes something normal. Nowadays, one can be convicted of shoplifting many times before seeing the inside of a prison cell. My wife saw someone outside Woolworths Greenhills NSW place several slabs of Coca-Cola into his trolley and simply push it towards the escalator.

  • +2

    It comes down to two things:

    1) Money. If it were more cost effective for WW to have loss officers, they would.

    2) People just wanting to do their job and go home to their families. Not many people want a confrontation.

    …I used to work at a liquor store and busted a few shoplifters… My manager was appreciative, but it was discouraged by head office who didn't want us getting hurt. IE. a lawsuit.

  • -3

    What you've said is so unbelievably stupid that I doubt you've stopped to think twice about it. You're trying to make an economic argument with basically no foundation in microeconomics at all.

    Let's think through the situation for a second. Your argument is that Woolworths don't care about shoplifters because they can just "pass on the costs" to consumers. That statement is economically invalid because higher prices will decrease demand.

    Even if Woolworths were a monopoly, they would engage in profit maximising behaviour, which means that they would always choose to minimise their costs. If it were cheaper to hire a loss prevention officer, they would do that and pass on the lower costs. If this, like you say, would actually decrease prices then it would not only benefit consumers (as consumers will end up paying less), but it will also benefit Woolworths as they will make a greater number of sales due to the increased demand from lower prices.

    Also, your moral argument seems to break down as well. It's not Woolworth's prerogative to encourage an "honest" society, but rather, that's the job of law enforcement.

    • I don't know where to begin with this.

      "Your argument is that Woolworths don't care about shoplifters because they can just "pass on the costs" to consumers. That statement is economically invalid because higher prices will decrease demand."

      I think other posters have stated quite well why Woolworths would be willing to put up with losing a few hundred dollars per day of product, because it's cheaper than hiring just one security guard. Woolworths can afford LOWER prices if they lose less product per day than hiring a security guard, and that's assuming the security guard is 100% effective at doing their job.

      Woolworths benefits from an honest society, as we all do. A lawless society where people simply don't want to pay a retailer for stocked products is not in any business's interests. I don't think anyone wants to live in a country where the general feeling is 'it's only a crime if you get caught'.

      • +3

        Woolworths can afford LOWER prices if they lose less product per day than hiring a security guard, and that's assuming the security guard is 100% effective at doing their job.

        Incorrect. Let's say it costs $400 to hire a security guard per day.

        If they hire a security guard for $400 per day to stop losses of $350 per day, consumers will end up paying $50 more (as a whole) and the demand for goods will be lower, which is bad for Woolworths as well.

        If indeed the losses are above $400, say $450, then by hiring a security guard, Woolworths saves $50. If this saving is passed onto consumers, then demand increases (which is good for Woolworths), even if this saving is not passed onto consumers, then Woolworths also wins (as it saves $50). How much it passes onto consumers can be calculated empirically through a basic profit maximization optimization problem.

        I've demonstrated that in all cases, it is in Woolworths' interests to minimize their costs. Think about it for a second before you comment. Don't worry about prices, as prices are a function of consumer demand. Think about costs. As a business, Woolworths will wish to minimize their costs, thus, they will always choose the option which leads to minimum costs.

        Woolworths benefits from an honest society, as we all do. A lawless society where people simply don't want to pay a retailer for stocked products is not in any business's interests. I don't think anyone wants to live in a country where the general feeling is 'it's only a crime if you get caught'.

        This moral argument is irrelevant to the economic argument.

    • -1

      "What you've said is so unbelievably stupid that I doubt you've stopped to think twice about it." Mmm, mirrored here I feel.

      "Comprehension atrocity in column one, comprehension atrocity in column one".

      Negged

  • +3

    Depends. I've worked a bunch of retail jobs and wastage is usually trivial vs the cost of hiring loss prevention and/or potentially accusing a customer of shoplifting. At H&M, 99% of sales advisors were too busy to notice, and generally won't be confrontational, though we did enforce the item limits in fitting rooms. Security was also only positioned at store entrances, and uniformed (easy to avoid). Compare this to Uniqlo, which has plainclothes, and very active, and professional loss prevention staff. I started more than a few shifts overhearing some guilty kid crying because the loss prevention office was adjacent to the break room. Depends on company.

  • Would you risk getting punched in the face for a crappy casual wage?

    • +1

      And if u did risk getting punched in the face, u would be told off my management coz ur risk getting hurt on the job and that will increase their workers comp.

    • -2

      Would you risk getting punched in the face for pulling up some big guy for disrespecting your wife/girlfriend? Much easier to ignore it. But your girl will get a firm idea of how much she means to you.

      • Lol - I bet you rescue all the damsels Nobel one! I'm sure she'll think the same thing when your fronting ends up with you getting smashed. Leaving her at your hospital bedside wishing 'why didn't he just walk away'

        But women don't think like that huh

  • +3

    I have a friend who worked as security in one of those shops, he told me he is NOT supposed to do anything, like in his job description it tells him not to. He can tell people off, call the police and alert other staff but thats it, his job is to deter thieves by being in the area, not by chasing people down (Remember most security are not police officers, they have the same amount of power as any shopper going through, besides being backed by the company)

    I have seen blatant theft by a person before though (in woolworths) security just stopped him and said hay mate give us our items back. The guy did and hurried away, no police was called and nothing bad happened.

    I don't even know what they can do? They're not police, and staff definitely isn't going to physically stop people (considering how dangerous most of these people are), by the time police arrives the thief will be long gone. Even if the police does catch him, then woolworths have to probably provide statements, evidence etc etc for like some fruit and vegetables (normally the stuff has to be small to hide in their jacket).

    My assumptions is the time and money spent to catch someone who stole some groceries are probably higher then it being worth doing, especially so considering woolworths buys products at a muchh lower price then we pay, (with the added bonus that we pay for thieves misdeeds). I'm guessing thievery is also part of their logistics and price model, and unless it becomes a big enough nuisance that its worth the cost stopping, I highly doubt they'll do much more then they're already doing.

    • +1

      considering how dangerous most of these people are

      Yeah, poor people are pretty dangerous.

  • +16

    This should be posted as a deal. 100% off at Woolworths, excludes gift cards.

  • +2

    well their profits are being stolen from aldi

  • +1

    I wouldn't worry to much, it was probably this Woolworths Police and Onerous Trolley Fines

  • +7

    Isn't this the Aussie culture now ? The cops wont pursue an offender. The stores wont catch shoplifters. The cricket team doesn't want to win. Etc.
    Just yesterday I witnessed someone very smelly walk in, grab a packet of baby nappies and walk out - I think a few sections of the society think of a store as a walk in- pick what you want- walk out kinda place. I loved that attitude and confidence

  • +3

    Having worked in retail previously

    Are you sure you worked in retail before? The loss control officer doesn't hang around at stores. It would be insane to expect them to be at each store at every hour.

  • -1

    Last year I was shopping at Coles Leopold very early in the morning when two persons walked out of the
    store with numerous items in their hands. I approached the service counter and was advised not to give chace
    to the offenders. Also this employee told me that Coles staff are advised not to stop shoplifters.
    I even gave this employee their car registration number but stated not interested,even mentioned why don't
    you contact Police no reply. No wonder we are paying high prices for our goods.
    SHAME COLES SHAME.

    • +1

      So much blame on the retailer when it's obvious it's the society we live in that has created this.

      You think Coles or Woolworths don't care? Ur not thinking straight.

      The truth is, as mentioned, it's too much risk to chase. Plus the police don't care.

    • +5

      That was LAST year.

      Coles are taking a different approach this year.

      Customer 'manhandled' by staff at Perth Coles 'for coming in after closing time'

      That was just trying to shop after 5.00PM, imagine the treatment shoplifters might get.

      (Side note - supermarkets close at 5.00pm in WA?)

      • +4

        Therein lies the agency problem.

        Shoplifter: *Meh, it doesn't affect me.*

        Customer after closing time: *They're not going to make me finish late, tackle them!*

      • 9pm now, but 5ish on weekends :(

      • (Side note - supermarkets close at 5.00pm in WA?)

        5pm on weekends.
        9pm on weekdays.

    • -2

      I approached the service counter and was advised not to give chace

      I'd be more worried about your spelling and grammar lol

    • Why didn't you ring the police to report the crime instead of telling someone else to do it?

  • +2

    So what happens when customers rob other customers in store since their is no security or accountability from staff?…

    Probably worth paying a salary to make customers feel "safer" in store.

    • +2

      Yes of course, Coles not prosecuting minor larceny offenses will obviously leading to serious assaults with intent to rob. Obviously!

    • +2

      I think this is part of the reason that I reacted the way I did. My wife shops here with my young daughtrs regularly. Knowing that the store does nothing to discourage thieves, surely it's only a matter of time before some druggie decides to rob a customer for the cash instead of stealing stuff to resell to feed their habit? When that happens, it's nice to know that the store staff will be more interested in making sure the thief doesn't trip over on the way out than protecting our coming to the aid of their customers.

      • I think that you'll find that once people are threatened it will be treated completely differently.

  • I used to work for Officeworks more than 15 years ago and even then we were cautioned against waylaying shoplifters, so this isn't new. Not sure where OP worked in retail but must've been a small store with a very different approach.

    Most people don't steal. Some people do. Be comfortable with whichever side of the line you decide to be on

  • +4

    Post the video, maybe one of us will know the offender!

  • +1

    I've worked in retail in the past for long stints (both corporate stores and laid back locally owned stores) - always told not to approach shop lifters, for your own safety.

    In the smaller stores, all we were told to do was document what item(s) were taken (if known), and write them off in the PoS as 'theft', and if we have time, check the camera DVR.

    Larger stores (one being Woolies), literally no action taken whatsoever. You're there to serve the paying customers and that's it.

  • +4

    thanks for posting this. you have now inspired me to shoplift at woolies stores ;)

    • lol

    • +2

      At least stealing by an ozbargainer costs the store less than if it was someone that would have paid full price.

    • +1

      Steal from woolworths, give half to charity. That way you keep things squared with the man upstairs.

      • +1

        Is it even stealing if a thief was to notify a staff member that they intend to remove the goods from the store without paying and ww don't object?
        I'm not sure that giving half to charity is how it works.

        • Of course it is! The staff don't own the goods, they can't give permission one way or the other.

          Giving half to charity means you can't be labeled a complete scumbag who only steals for selfish reasons. No, you're a modern day robin hood :)

  • +5

    The staff monitoring self checkout thought i was shoplifting once and proceeded to stop me and check all my groceries and my receipt. Was not impressed and wasted 15 minutes for them to inspect all my items which were all fine. Got back to my carpark and BOOM a fine for being parked for 5 minutes too long.

    Pissed off, they did nothing to help me afterwards..

    • +1

      super burn! similar thing happened at a kmart some years ago with some xmas cards in the sis-inlaws handbag, found the reciept in another bag in the car but wow, they had not prrof it was stolen! just identical to something they sold (not the same thing at all) ~ upshot was almost getting towed because the time had expired and it was not a clearway! Kmart never said sorry or offered to repay for loss of time ect…

      SO yes, you can help me, you carry one side and ill get the other!

    • That's why you laugh in their face and leave the store. Why would you wait around professing your innocence?

  • +1

    I see here some people always worry about shoplifting from Woolworths or Coles. Just relax. A couple of tuna cans won't do a lot of harm to one of the most profitable companies in one of the wealthist countries in the world. It's not like 70 percent of the customers steal on a daily basis.

    • yep, we get welfare; makes this look like chump change as the foreigners all want to do the crappy jobs for us now

    • +2

      A couple of tuna cans won't do a lot of harm to one of the most profitable companies in one of the wealthist countries in the world

      Did you make sure it was Sirena tuna? I only steal the best.

  • +6

    You wouldn't download a Woolworths!

  • +2

    This theft is already built into the prices we pay. Just too expensive to police.
    Wages in Australia are just brutal if you're running a business.

  • +1

    It's really sad, the thief is everywhere. My business is online based, and the customer just buy, use and return it. Also, they claimed that there is a missing item in the package and ask for a refund, it is annoying when many people out there think that is ok to do that.

    I can't do anything and just take it as a risk because if I don't refund the money or accept a return, that customer will go to our Facebook or Instagram and saying that this is bad customer service, stay away, scam, selling fake product company blab blah…

  • +2

    This happened to a manger at my local Coles in South Melbourne. He's a great guy to talk to always friendly and should be scanning barcodes while having a chat, not going to hospital.

    http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/supermarket-worker…

  • +2

    I live near a complex with both an Aldi and a Woolworths inside, and there is a lot of theft at the woolies. I have noticed that theft goes completely unchallenged there, probably for the reasons mentioned above, but I think there also might be a contradiction associated with woolworths' interests; obviously eliminating crime is good for business, but then any media attention focused on dangerous robbers being chased about their stores would be unfavorable. For contrast, I once witnessed this guy sprint right out of the Aldi with what looked like 2 boxes of some sort of electronics under both arms, and the Aldi staff member actually tried to chase him down all the way to the end of the street! Perhaps owing to different policies and store layout, I would guess that shoplifting at Aldi happens less.

    • +1

      A month ago at a bunnings in SE melbourne, a guy was caught stealing $20 worth of merchandise. Security pinned him to the ground. He couldn't breathe, started coughing up blood, and now he's dead. Some publicity is just not worth the cost

      • +13

        Sounds like lowest prices was just the beginning for that guy

        • -2

          ha ha! oh, that warms the cockles of my heart. You should send that to the family (god knows his wife and kids could use some cheering up)

        • +3

          @outlander:

          He was a thief… entirely his own fault. His wife and kids are probably scum too.

  • -1

    I don't shop at woollies much. One reason, apart from Coles being closer is that woollies treats every customer as a criminal, IMHO.
    Barriers on the entry that stop you leaving. Barriers at every closed checkout to stop you leaving that way too. Sometimes I decide I just don't need to pay their higher prices, or they don't have any BBQ chooks at 7pm, and would rather just walk over to Aldi. Knowing it's not easy to walk out through the express lane or self-serv lane, sometimes I just don't bother to enter.

    • Funny, in a thread where everyone is discussing how woolies don't treat thieves like thieves, here u are saying the exact opposite! Saying they treat everyone like thieves, lol.

      Just goes to show everyone has a different opinion and u can't please them all.

  • +1

    Although I haven't worked in the field, I did study security and risk management over 10 years ago, so here are a few things I remember. Unless the person making an arrest is certain the offender has committed the offense, you are liable for an unlawful arrest. You can get sued and also your employer. Crims know the inns and outs, and can play you. For example, you saw someone place an item they took off the shelf (again you CLEARLY saw them take it off the shelf, and you KNOW it belongs to your store) and stuff it in their pocket. You follow the person PAST the door (ideally OFF/PAST your property) so you can stop/arrest them. Too bad for you, because they already secretly dropped the item as they turned a corner inside the store, and with a big grin they await you to stupidly stop/arrest them. Boom, your fkd. Payday bitch.

    And forget about acting on a tipoff, including security who saw everything unfold from the cctv room. Unless you can get the perpetrator to admit to the crime, you would never risk making an arrest, because YOU never saw the offense occur, you would be crazy to risk everything on someone else's word.

    And if you do everything correctly, make an arrest, have the offender and item, and they admit to everything, then hope the a camera recorded at least some of it. Story's change when police arrive, then it's your word against theirs.

    And, i'm probably stating the obvious, but we should know bag checks are entirely voluntary. There is no need to show staff who ask to see in your bag. Of course they can then bar you from ever entering the store in the future. Also somebody may have sensitive items they wouldn't want to show, like maybe a DILDO, so you need to consider that not everyone who refuses a bag check is doing the wrong thing.

    As I remember the words of our instructor; "NEVER ASSUME ANYTHING".

    • +1

      I don't always take my Dildo shopping but when I do I try not to steal.

      • +4

        I wouldn't worry about that. In the event of a dildo, it's company policy to always refer to it with the indefinite article "a" dildo, never.. your dildo.

        • +1

          Now that is what I call considerate.

      • +1

        Now that is what I call considerate. (I misplaced my earlier attempt).

    • they are saying it is the condition of entry as if we signed something. they force you to show your bag with the way they speak with you and their body language.

      • +1

        Yeah, although usually the signs are carefully worded like "It is a condition of entry that staff may ask to see inside your bag". Business that use words like "It is a condition of entry that you must show contents of bag if asked", are asking for trouble.

    • +1

      Because stealing is normal and deeming it anti-social suggests we are pitifully judgmental and need extra hobbies.

    • +1

      So if you owned a store, and someone made you aware that another person was stealing, you'd tell them to mind their own business? LOL

  • +1

    You should've just vigilante'd the guy like the lunatic from the movie super

  • +1

    Ive heard stories of people loading up a full trolley and just walking straight out as they aren't allowed to question them! Karma…

  • +2

    Not worth it stopping thief's and risking your own safety for a small amount of goods being stolen.

    Work at a bottle shop and didn't stop a theft but abused the person in question with a few choice words as they left the store.

    He rocked up 2 hours later with a few mates in a car as I was closing solo but luckily nothing escalated. Absolute scum. Australia needs tougher laws so these pieces of shit actually learn a lesson.

    • +2

      I agree, but what point is tougher laws of noone is going to enforce them?
      It's not the police's job to patrol stores identifying potential shop lifters for crimes that the victim isn't even interested in documenting, let alone reporting.

      • +2

        There are repeat offenders which are easily identifiable. Yet the police hardly bother unless its repeat cases or related to a car theft etc as the offender will usually just get a slap on the wrist for a first time offence.

        Relating back to my previous example. Noted down the car number plate and made a police report yet nothing was done.

    • +1

      Did you get the rego number and report it.

  • +1

    Yep I worked in retail and we could do nothing, if someone filled their trolley with shopping walked through the checkout without paying we couldn't do a thing other than getting their number plate for their car, we were not allowed to touch or stop them, only time they were stopped was because of a centre security guard or loss prevention was in store (which was like once yr)

  • They don't have a problem of underproduction, they have a problem of underconsumption ( oversupply) a lot of stock is just wasted. Moreover they also buy from their sister firm who also has their gross profit margin in the chain. Cost of items is lesser than the risk involved in chasing and fighting a thief.

  • +3

    Anyone rubbing their hands together and thinking they can now go to their local supermarket and take what they want is a freakin' idiot. Have fun finding new employment with a criminal record.

    • +3

      How are you going to get a criminal record if no one is interested in catching a theif?

      • +1

        They will still occasionally hire people to go after thieves and if you're brazen about it you'll push them into pursuing you.

  • +2

    I saw someone munching on a protein bar while doing his shopping at my local woolies this morning. He was wearing a pair of fila shorts and a bonds singlet. I wonder if he had paid for that protein bar? I wonder if he was an ozbargainer? I wonder if I am jumping to conclusions? I probably am.

    • +3

      Wouldn't an OzBargainer be wearing a $1 Slazenger T-shirt?

    • +1

      Singlet and shorts, was he hot?

      • Let's just say I thought it was Scrooge McDuck…

    • I thought with the price of protein bars they be in locked glass cabinets.

  • So all the price hike more than doubled in the past 10 years is due to theft price cover up…Sigh why must us normal consumer bear it as it should be a problem the corporate have to dealt with.

    THey should have the one way exit like Audi. At least the Germans have a solution to prevent it or the Muslim way "PLEASE LEAVE THE HAND That YOU STOLE THE PRODUCT BEHIND"

    Chop

    • +2

      I think you mean Aldi….with Audi it'd be grand theft auto ;-)

  • +2

    Here's a recent experience of mine.

    In a shopping center that had both Coles and Woolies, I did a large shop at Woolies - 2 troleys - but had to go to Coles for chicken schnitzel as my family won't touch the Woolies branded stuff. I asked if I could leave my troleys at the front counter but the staff said they weren't permitted to mind people's belongings but that I would be okay because I had a receipt. I was maybe 3 minutes grabbing the schnitzel and then lined up and went through the checkout.

    It just so happened that a box of 12 x 1.25L bottles hadn't been scanned by the checkout girl at Woolies so it looked like I had tried to shoplift them from Coles when the guy at the checkout ran through my whole receipt. Luckily he was sensible and realized that the odds of me managing to bury a large box at the bottom of one of my trollies (under a pile of stuff) in 3 minutes was next to nil. So in the end they just let me go.

    To add insult to injury I had to go back to Woolies to pay for my coke. (No one chased me up on this. I could have walked out).

    So if you think no one ever checks, you're deluding yourself. Yes in many cases the stores decide not to pursue it. Yes there are bad policies and lazy or uncaring staff. But it doesn't mean they never look at shoplifting.

    If you don't believe me take a look at the NSW crime stats here:
    http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Documents/RCS-Annual/Report-Rec…

    Page 18
    Police reports citing "Steal from a retail store":
    Jan 2014 - Dec 2014 Number of offences: 20,585
    Jan 2015 - Dec 2015 Number of offences: 21,956

    I don't know how many are caught. It might only be 5% - but if so it means if you're dopey enough to do it regularly you'll be caught in after something like 20 incidents. Would your employer be okay with you having a criminal record?

Login or Join to leave a comment