HPdeskjet » user profile

I personally would take one of the techfast 5600 + 4060 deals at $748, considering that one is literally 20-30% faster than this one.…

None of the bottleneck calculators out there are even remotely accurate.…

12900ks = i7-13700k FYI, not comparable to i9-13900/14900k 14900k has double the ecores (8+8 vs 8+16) and is like 50% faster @ same power…

See below post. The 5700g is ~24% slower across the board vs a 5600 (134fps vs 166fps avg @ 1080p), with the exception of a few games that…

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-5600g-review/4 From most reputable sites the difference between 5600 and 5700g is 20-30%…

16mb yes, still terrible for zen3. Even 32mb bottlenecks hard, just see the dramatic difference between 5800x and 5800x3d. It's pretty…

the 5700g is about 30% slower than a 5700x/5600 for gaming loads, the gpu does not matter here when testing cpu bottleneck. it has half the…

A 5700g is much slower than a 5600 or 5700x for gaming loads due to the lack of cache, and you can find plenty of Ozbargain posts with…

degrade is a non issue provided you get a motherboard that dosen't overshoot and randomly feed it 1.58v when the CPU only asks for 1.48v.…

5700g = 3700x/3600 tier due to lack of l3 cache nowhere close to 5600/5700x will bottleneck the 4060 (can't believe im saying this) esp at…

https://abx.digitalfeed.net/ I own U12t / Monarch3 and these, nothing wrong with Spotify. Do the test yourself if you want to see if you…

Motherboard draw is negligable. For low idle draw just avoid AMD from Zen3/Zen4 onwards due to the 15-25w IO die, way higher idle than…

@ 2khz+ you get better motion clarity than 1khz, as the mouse movements are less jumpy when swiping fast (e.g you can spot targets more…

For the battery reduction yes, the tablet size makes up for some of it (it's still reduced, but not all the way down to like 5-6hour SoT…

60 in casual looks a lot less smooth than 144hz, even on the desktop scrolling stuff it looks stuttery.

24in is too big for 1080p, it looks very blurry at 72ppi.

Do not buy this node, Sd8g1 is Samsung (think exynos) and not TSMC so you get overheat + throttling issues and significantly reduced…

except the legion most of those are ewaste tier chassis quality, the g14 gets pretty close to the blade 14 and macbook pro.

TTC golds are the best mice switch I have tried to date. Zaopin QC and build are quite good as well, would take over viper mini etc.

decent 3395-based mouse vs actual e-waste... not comparable.

24" 1440p finally some good ppi

https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/16x0s70/nokia_beacon_1_constant_headache/

FYI it's also a lot slower, you go from ~20ms aptx LL to 60-80ms aptx adaptive in LL mode. I'd prefer the older kb8p/kb9p dongles anyday.

I've passed double blind ABX testing with 100% success rate between 240hz and 360hz. It's super noticable, especially if you've played comp…

a lot less sharp and smooth, I went aw3423dwf -> lg27 -> aw3225qf.

z790i lightning hitting aus when I want to run 8800mhz ram... edge only goes to 8200-8400 atm

This has the exact same pixel density as 24" 1080p, image will not be any shaper. The bigger panel will be nice though.

If you think 32" 1080p isn't blurry I don't know what to say. There's two possibilities - either your monitor is TV distance away, or you…

The entire G5 line is basically e-waste. Even the 240hz G5 is terrible. The panel is super smeary in motion, even when scrolling documents…

32" 1440p is the same PPI as a 24" 1080p monitor, so pretty blurry. Would elect for the 27" 1440p options, and only 4k at 32".