Canon 6D Body $1985, 70-200 IS $2399, 600D $425 + More - $19 Shipping or Pickup Bris

70

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

Store RepCameraPro on 09/02/2013 - 17:17 camerapro.com.au (785 clicks)

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Super special prices on a range of Canon lenses and DSLR's.
Below are strictly while stocks last and for limited time.
All items are 100% Australian stock with 12 months Canon Australia Warranty.

Canon 70-200 IS II $2399: http://bit.ly/UNiTXS
16-35 II $1565: http://bit.ly/UNj9WE
17-40 $799: http://bit.ly/WA861I
10-22 $849: http://bit.ly/WK24Kh
100-400 $1689: http://bit.ly/WA861I

600D Body $425: http://bit.ly/Z11Bre
6D body $1985: http://bit.ly/YgSAnU
6D + 24-105 $2895: http://bit.ly/XYXebh

Please feel free to get in touch with us by phone on 07 3333 2900, email on [email protected], or via our facebook page: facebook.com/CameraProPtyLtd
The CameraPro team

Related Stores

CameraPro

• 

  kulprit on 09/02/2013 - 18:11

  Anything on the Nikon front. Just looking to progress past my kit lens, onto a prime, prob either the 35 or 50. Would like something with af though (d5100 so no in body)

• 

  parker1 on 09/02/2013 - 18:14

  Anyone reckon the 6D + 24-105 would be a good travel kit? Or should I go for another lens? Any recommendations?

  • 

    Bunnycat on 09/02/2013 - 18:57

    I reckon this would be the perfect travel lens for this body. Check out this thread for some interesting discussion and sample pics. I'm hanging out to get my hands on this combo…
    http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1252637…

    • 

      zealmax on 09/02/2013 - 20:05

      I have the 24-70 F2.8 Nikkor version. It is roughly the same size as the Canon 24-70. I don't consider it a travel lens. It is too heavy and limited focal range limits it from being a good travel lens.

      • 

        Jackolow on 09/02/2013 - 21:13

        24-105 is significantly lighter and it doesn't have the weight issue of the 24-70. Pretty comfortable for a travel lens unless you want a wider lens (17-40?)

      • 

        parker1 on 10/02/2013 - 00:10

        Significantly lighter sounds good. But l also want a wider lens too.. Ah the dilemma!

        Thanks for all your help nonetheless! :)

    • 

      abacus on 10/02/2013 - 01:29

      The 24-105 f4 is a quality L lens, second in quality behind the 24-70 2.8. For travelling I would go with a cheaper and bigger zoom unless you are a perfectionist. NOTE: I don't think EF-S lenses (like the 18-200) are compatible with the 6D. Most reviews say the 6D is better than the 5D Mk 2. See bob atkins, dpreview etc.

  • 

    Paul Atreides on 10/02/2013 - 07:12

    Yes, that would be a good travel combo. I'm personally using the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC lens as my travel lens, and would recommend it (inbox me if you want further deets). It'll set you back about 1.1k AUS stock in addition to the 6D.
    As mentioned, I do at times wish that the tamron 24-70 had a longer reach, but I've learnt to live with it. I should also mention that I also bring my Sigma 50mm f/1.4 lens with me whilst I travel.

    I've got a friend who uses about 3 primes as his travel lenses (24L,50L,85L), so some people are just different.

• 

  Succulent Synth on 10/02/2013 - 09:14

  I travel with the 24-70 f/2.8 L and the 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L

  Both are heavy lenses but I feel they give me good coverage for anything from landscapes to portraits and wildlife. I wouldn't mind adding the 85mm f/1.2 prime as my next lens.

• 

  31mop on 10/02/2013 - 09:53

  Any decent prices on 4/3 cameras?

• 

  cdchi1 on 10/02/2013 - 17:28

  Some good prices, but the 10-22mm price is average. You can get non-grey 10-22 cheaper elsewhere ($820 cheapest I've seen). Though I just bought the Tokina 11-16mm elsewhere though so don't need it.