• out of stock

Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5070 Ti WINDFORCE 16GB Video Card $1509 + Delivery ($0 C&C SYD) @ Mwave (Sold Out) & JW Computers

400
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5070 Ti WINDFORCE 16GB Video Card $1509 + Delivery ($0 C&C SYD) @ Mwave (Sold Out) & JW ComputersAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
tc423 on 02/04/2025 - 08:52 mwave.com.au (1484 clicks)
Last edited 02/04/2025 - 11:42 by 2 other users
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

RTX 5070 Ti RRP "Deal" - $1509. Surcharges: 0% bank transfer, BPAY, Afterpay, 1% for credit/debit card & Zip.

Bought 9070XT already and love it.

Maybe for those who want DLSS4.

Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5070 Ti WINDFORCE SFF 16GB Video Card
- Memory Size: 16GB
- Memory Type: GDDR7
- Memory Bus: 256 bit
- CUDA Cores: 8960
- Boost Clock: 2452 MHz
- Memory Speed: 28 Gbps
- Interface: PCI-E 5.0
- Power Connectors: 16 pin*1
- I/O: DisplayPort 2.1b x3, HDMI 2.1b x1
- Recommended PSU: 750W
- Manufacturer Warranty: 3 Years Warranty

Also available

  • JW.com.au
    Surcharges: 0% direct deposit, 0.8% card, 1% PayPal, 2.2% Zip & Latitude.
Computing Computer Component Gigabyte Nvidia Video Card

Related Stores

Mwave Australia
Mwave Australia
JW Computers Online
JW Computers Online

Comments

  • bAps on 02/04/2025 - 09:04
    +7

    Just ordered an MSRP 9070XT the other day, otherwise I'd definitely be ordering one of these

    • onlinepred on 02/04/2025 - 09:40

      Where from?

      • bAps on 02/04/2025 - 09:43

        one of the XFX cards from scorptec that was posted on OZB

        • educalifa on 02/04/2025 - 13:53

          That's what I got as well! No regrets… been awesome so far!

    • Watanabe1995 on 02/04/2025 - 10:36

      Still a good choice :)

    • Ilikecars on 02/04/2025 - 16:06
      +3

      The 5070Ti isn't worth $370 extra though is it?

      Seems like a lot to pay for DLSS4 and marginal improvements.

      • frugalpetey on 02/04/2025 - 20:26

        Depends how much you value ray tracing / path tracing performance on top of DLSS4.

        In heavy RT games I'd say the price difference is justified, and if you even want to remotely dabble in PT then the 5070 Ti is the only choice by default since the 9070 XT just tanks under any PT load and is basically unplayable.

        For pure raster performance I would agree, 9070 XT is the better value. But for the points mentioned above, I do feel the 5070 Ti justifies the higher price.

        • Dealf Hunter on 02/04/2025 - 22:23

          I tried PT in Cyberpunk yesterday for the first time with my 5070 Ti and it's definitely an impressive feature to use if you have the option - pretty much makes ray tracing seem like a downgrade. Although you do of course need to use DLSS and frame gen to make it playable.

  • MrZ on 02/04/2025 - 09:07
    +39

    MSRP is an American term. It's called RRP in Australia.

    • itsmoe on 02/04/2025 - 09:11
      +13

      You tell him bro, but reply to his comment, it's probably better.

      • astevens on 02/04/2025 - 09:18
        +1

        I mean, the term "MSRP" is literally in the first line of the deal, so it's applicable here on its own.

    • tc423 on 02/04/2025 - 09:42
      +1

      good to know!

      • PapaWill on 02/04/2025 - 23:21

        The Imperial System are mostly English words as well - do we use that?

  • drearyFalcon3 on 02/04/2025 - 09:09

    should i pull the trigger?? it is gonna mainly be used for ML and LLM locally….

    • MrZ on 02/04/2025 - 09:10
      +11

      Yes let's all buy a US$749 card for $1500 lol

      • itsmoe on 02/04/2025 - 09:11
        +8

        $300 AUD over RRP. Geez man.

        • kungfuman on 02/04/2025 - 09:14
          +13

          you do realized its 1192 AUD and if you add gst and import tax and fee on top of that it comes to around the 1400 mark so its not that much more

          • dealhunter52 on 02/04/2025 - 15:07
            +7

            @kungfuman: You do realise that these cards are not in made in USA.

            US$ 749 price is excluding sales tax but including import tax and fee. US customers also have to pay import tax and fee.

            $1192 + 10% GST = $1311. Rest is all Australia tax or corporate greed.

            • entropysbane on 02/04/2025 - 17:20

              @dealhunter52: Probably a double digit percentage buffer for exchange rate risk. Although difficult to see how the AUD could fall further.

      • Zythyx on 02/04/2025 - 09:12
        +3

        Guess you're new to the Australia tax? This is pretty normal for new products.

        I'm happy to wait until it drops a couple of hundred

        • kungfuman on 02/04/2025 - 09:32
          +5

          people seems to not realize either that 749 is NOT INCLUDING TAX!!! no US price has TAX ON IT.!!

            • kungfuman on 02/04/2025 - 10:14
              +2

              @MrZ: That means absolutely nothing anything that comes into this country will get GST added to it doesnt’ matter what the U.S. does

              • MrZ on 02/04/2025 - 10:37
                -5

                @kungfuman: You're saying that the US price doesn't include sales tax. My point is that not everyone in the US pays this tax.

                • kungfuman on 02/04/2025 - 10:48
                  +2

                  @MrZ: and I am saying it doesnt' matter because the point is no matter what the U.S. does you still get hit with GST. when it enters Australia. no way to avoid it. So you will never ever ever get it for 750 USD in Australia ever.

                  • MrZ on 02/04/2025 - 13:51

                    @kungfuman: Ok, I thought you meant that the 749 doesn't include US sales tax in the US. You should have been clearer and said GST in your original comment.

      • plmko on 02/04/2025 - 09:44
        +1

        You're comparing unobtanium MSRP to market realities. The US sells these for $950 USD which will be the new price with tariffs in place. These will never be $750 USD again until they are on clearance sales.

    • bAps on 02/04/2025 - 09:15
      +5

      If you need one now, this is as good as youre going to get for the foreseeable future.

      • drearyFalcon3 on 02/04/2025 - 09:22

        well, I have a laptop that's running 3080 16GB it.

        i am just undecided if I should get my desktop the 5070 TI or just keep using the laptop (run the LLM as remote services).

        I usually use the desktop pc for all my work.

    • Brobert on 02/04/2025 - 09:15
      +6

      16GB is a little on the small side for inference tasks, you'd be better off with a couple of older, cheaper cards with more total VRAM.
      Support for the 5000 series is also still a little patchy.

      • Commodore64 on 02/04/2025 - 09:41
        +8

        A used 3090 is probably still better. 24gb memory and more bandwidth

      • Dubzy on 02/04/2025 - 10:33
        +5

        You just gotta find em first!

        • DevilsInDetails on 02/04/2025 - 12:26
          +3

          Indiana Jones and the Lost Graphic Cards!

    • stephendt on 02/04/2025 - 12:23

      No there are better options available than this imo.

    • Thiefsie on 02/04/2025 - 14:18
      -1

      No. want more Ram for that. Go AMD

  • kungfuman on 02/04/2025 - 09:12

    much cheaper than what I paid on release day :D for my MSI 5070 TI trio OC I paid 1800 bucks!!

    • Jazza2400 on 02/04/2025 - 16:15
      +2

      I got this model for $1619 release day at umart. Glad to see price is coming down but happy to have had the card as enjoyed the shit out of it

  • FuRyZ on 02/04/2025 - 09:26
    +5

    Honestly unless you absolutely need DLSS4, just get a used 40 series card. I picked up a 4070ti for $800 on FB marketplace.

    Value for money is terrible on the 50 series right now. Others are opting for a 9070xt, which is certainly better value for money but also comes with all the usual Radeon driver bugs. A used 40 series in my opinion, is far better than either of those other options.

    • reactor-au on 02/04/2025 - 09:40
      +3

      DLSS 4.0 is available on RTX 40, just that frame gen is limited to 2x.

      • FuRyZ on 02/04/2025 - 10:03

        Fair point, its only the new multi-frame gen feature you are losing out on if you used DLSS4 on an older GPU.

      • Grish on 02/04/2025 - 11:57
        +4

        Yep, this comment along with "all the usual Radeon driver bugs" is enough info for me to gauge this guys knowledge vs marketed-mind haha.

    • bAps on 02/04/2025 - 09:44
      +20

      AMD drivers have been great for years now. We're not in 2018 anymore.

      • FuRyZ on 02/04/2025 - 10:13

        Firstly I am no Nvidia or AMD fanboy. I have owned both. Literally just built an all AMD system for a friend as it was hands down the best value for money if you want brand new parts. You would be stupid to buy brand new Nvidia today.

        I still stand by my statement that AMD drivers continue to lack the same polish that Nvidia drivers have. They may have improved but bugs continue to be an issue. Can't remember the last time I had to DDU an Nvidia system I built, still have to do it from time to time on friend's AMD systems. Though I am happy to agree that AMD systems I have built are less problematic than they used to be.

        • Lazer84 on 02/04/2025 - 10:27
          +16

          nvidia have had their share of driver issues in the past and currently have black screen issues people are complaining about.

          nvidia brand is just teflon/leather jacket coated :)

        • integriti on 02/04/2025 - 10:53
          +7

          You're not wrong, but ironic given recent news where the 572 drivers are absolute dogshit and haven't gotten any better despite months of hotfixes. Outlier or a sign of things to come from the green team?

          Meanwhile, I've just upgraded both my PCs to the 9070 XT for my first ever AMD cards. Haven't had any driver issues with any games so far, and Adrenalin has been awesome, especially it's per-game performance tuning capabilities. Automatically reducing power limit by 30% for old games and increasing by 10% for demanding ones has been a game changer.

      • p1 ama on 02/04/2025 - 10:55
        -3

        I think you're right that AMD drivers are fine (and they have generally always been fine). However, a lot of the strife that AMD finds itself in has to do with them always being on the back foot, playing catch-up to Nvidia, and releasing products that are half-baked and don't work properly on day one. It only takes one or two examples of this happening for people to have a sour taste.

        I remember picking up the R9 290X back in the day, and it was just a hot, loud, buggy mess on release. Whilst it eventually became a decent product, it was terrible for the first few months. Similarly for the R9 Fury X, Vega 64, and 5700 XT. They were all decent GPUs, but rushed to market because Nvidia had released something.

        Ultimately the numbers do not look good for AMD (see: https://pcviewed.com/nvidia-vs-amd-discrete-gpu-market-share…), from having 45% of the market just 15 years ago, they've now fallen to having just 10% of the market. Whatever the reason is, I don't think that 90% of buyers are crazy - there's very obviously something deeply wrong in the Radeon division at AMD. It may well be that their actual products are fine, but their product strategy, marketing, communications, release cycle, R&D…etc. or something is not working.

        The good news is that the PC market has always been very responsive to innovation and great products. They already have the model with their Ryzen CPUs - going all the way from even worse market share to dominating all of the top-10 CPU sales spots on Amazon. I'm not an AMD "hater", I've exclusively used AMD CPUs since the Ryzen 7 1700X, and have spent thousands of my own money on Radeon GPUs over the past two decades, but it's clear they have an issue.

    • hybir on 02/04/2025 - 09:44
      +17

      Having had a RX6800 and now a 9070XT, what usual Radeon driver bugs?

      All I can hear lately is talk of buggy NVIDIA drivers for the 40 series.

      • gentlekoala5906 on 02/04/2025 - 10:03
        +1

        How has the RX6800 to 9070XT upgrade been? I am still running an RX6800 for 1440p and it's been unreal, the 9070XT is tempting though.

        • hybir on 02/04/2025 - 11:59
          +1

          There's no denying the 9070XT is a fantastic card, I went from 4k at 70 fps to 110fps in Cyberpunk and RDR2.

          However, as someone who only plays singleplayer games, $1200 for this upgrade just feels like an okay value deal. The RX6800 is still a great card and I think would've been equally as happy using Lossless scaling to generate the extra frames and save the money now that I've tried it out.

          • gentlekoala5906 on 02/04/2025 - 17:38

            @hybir: Thank you mate, I think I'll stick with the RX6800 for another generation

      • MasterScythe on 02/04/2025 - 12:46

        The one that I hit, that the rep confirmed existed, but had no plans to fix, was when you had 5 or more monitors connected, with a unique refresh rate for each.
        The drivers would reset any time it hit 100% utilisation.
        I was able to workaround this by unplugging the VR goggles (disabled 2 displays) and enabling my other monitors (and vice versa).

        But having to disable 2 of my monitors to enable VR reliably got in the way of workflow, so NVIDIA was the answer there.
        Niche as heck, I agree before you say it, but it's one example I could repeat reliably.

        Once this is fixed, I'll be back to AMD as soon as is humanly possible.

    • Timboj on 02/04/2025 - 10:10
      +10

      "…all the usual Radeon driver bugs." What?

      • gentlekoala5906 on 02/04/2025 - 10:45
        +3

        I've had an RX6800 since December 2020 and I'm yet to hit a driver issue

        • Timboj on 02/04/2025 - 17:10
          +2

          Just sold mine for a 9070 XT. They're both great cards.

          I'll say I've probably owned a dozen cards in my life, both nvidia and AMD. They've ALL had driver issues at some point, but none that I'd consider major and neither has stuck out as worse than the other.

          Nvidia is just a protected brand.

      • Mums Poop Sock on 02/04/2025 - 11:26
        +7

        A 10 year old meme

      • CrazyTachikoma on 02/04/2025 - 11:39
        +3

        the bullshit nvidia fanboys still claim

        I build computers for me and family for 2 decades now, Radeon drivers were bad before AMD bought them, about 20 years ago…

        In the past few years I had

        geforce 1060
        geforce 1070
        rx 5700 xt
        rx 6800
        rx 6600
        rx 6600 xt
        rtx 3080
        and now own a 7900 xt

        out of these, only the 3080 got hdmi 2.1 driver issues with my TV (htpc) so I had to replace it after a few months

        everything else was perfect

    • DennisNedry1991 on 02/04/2025 - 11:57
      +1

      $800? Damn that's a good deal. I'm seeing them on FB Marketplace for well over $1k. Mostly around the $1,400 mark.

    • tmr3 on 02/04/2025 - 13:17
      +1

      Can we please dispel with the notion that either of AMD or NVIDIA has more or less driver bugs than the other? They've both had their fair share of issues on and off over the years, because as it turns out, GPUs are kind of a complex thing.

      They often come in waves as new products or architectures launch. NVIDIA is currently having a really rough time of it with their 572 branch and it's not just affecting 50 series cards, but 40 series too. Fairly widely reported by users and tech press.

      Equally, you can find reports of users online having issues with their new 9070 and 9070 XTs, but less widely reported across the interwebs.

      • burns13 on 02/04/2025 - 15:35

        Nvidia App barely works

    • jasswolf on 02/04/2025 - 14:13

      Honestly unless you want to try some RTX demos, just get a used 10 series card. I picked up a GTX 1070 Ti for $500 on eBay.

      Value for money is terrible on the 20 series right now. Others are opting for a RX Vega 56, which is certainly better value for money but also comes with all the usual Radeon driver bugs. A used 10 series in my opinion, is far better than either of those options.

      • tmr3 on 02/04/2025 - 15:49
        +1

        I'm sorry, what year is it? Surely you're trolling but I'll bite anyway.

        A GTX 1070 Ti for $500… when 3070s are selling for that or less?

        1070 Ti's are like $150.

        For less than $500 you could get a brand new RTX 4060 or RX 7600 which are something like 40-50% faster than a 1070 Ti in addition to all the modern features.

        • jasswolf on 02/04/2025 - 16:02
          -1

          Please compare back with the parent comment.

          This is what people were saying in 2018, the last time there was a big architectural change on the same silicon process.

          Aussie RRP is still bonkers, and I was hoping to see the 5080 be closer to $849 USD than $999, but NVIDIA staffing costs have more than doubled since 2018 and we've barely scratched the surface of what Blackwell can do compared to Lovelace.

          • tmr3 on 02/04/2025 - 16:12
            +1

            @jasswolf: Fair, fair. I've been responding to some other comments so the exact context was lost on me.

            I personally don't think Blackwell is going to pull off any wonders over the next few years compared to Lovelace. This isn't really a Turing situation where die sizes have gone up massively as part of introducing a whole new set of architectural features (except for the 5090).

    • Pacify on 02/04/2025 - 14:49

      AMD driver bugs haven't really been a thing for a long time

  • nove777 on 02/04/2025 - 09:39
    +6

    these prices are insane.. Nvidia cash grab

    • wetsandwich on 02/04/2025 - 10:01
      +2

      People will pay that for as many as they can make, so there is no reason at all for them not to charge the absolute maximum possible, unfortunately.

    • jjcf on 02/04/2025 - 10:46
      -2

      I can’t believe a listed company would seek to price products as a factor of customer demand. Someone call Tracey Grimshaw.

  • plmko on 02/04/2025 - 09:50
    +4

    I paid $1500 for a 3070ti during peak covid and sold it for $1700 and people still thought that was a deal.

    Funny how quick sentiment flips despite getting more GPU for your money.

    I now have a 4060ti for $250 rather wait out this whole bloated market, Nvidia AI bubble will pop eventually. And PC gaming kind of sucks in the last years, I can't say it's worth investing so much into it.

    • wetsandwich on 02/04/2025 - 10:02

      I have a 1080ti still going strong, no way would I spend more than my whole PC is probably worth just for a graphics card when that baby can still run anything!

    • freefall101 on 02/04/2025 - 10:11

      During covid I just kept flipping GPUs and waiting for deals on better ones. Bought a cheap refurb Acer system with a 2060 and sold the 1060 I had. Got a 3060ti at RRP and sold my 2060 for $50 less. Sold my 3060ti for $900 and picked up a 3080 for $1k in 2021.

      Really on the fence about moving on from the 3080 to a 9070 XT or 5070 TI though, I should have traded up to a 4070 ti when the price difference was smaller. Being a grand out of pocket on a GPU doesn't make any sense.

    • MrZ on 02/04/2025 - 13:50
      +1

      Where'd you get a 4060ti for $250??

  • botchie on 02/04/2025 - 10:02

    this is about equal to 4080 super in performance, less the new frame gen tech

    • HD9990 on 02/04/2025 - 10:08
      +1

      humm. and about 4080 super price as well..

      • botchie on 02/04/2025 - 11:19
        +1

        yeah price per frame about the same

    • jasswolf on 02/04/2025 - 14:29
      +1

      It's not well tuned, so there's about 12% more performance to be had at 300W (typically it's 280W at stock despite 300 W TDP). At that point it's about 8% faster, or about 85% of the performance of a 4090 at about 70% of the power consumption.

      • ewok666 on 02/04/2025 - 15:40
        +1

        You can flash this with the gaming OC bios and get to 350W. The 5000 series cards overclock much better than the 4000 series, the ones I had anyway.

        • jasswolf on 02/04/2025 - 16:11
          +1

          True enough, but you're only getting maybe another 1-2%, so the curve flattens right out.

          • ewok666 on 02/04/2025 - 16:59

            @jasswolf: My card goes from 135fps to 155fps in Outlaws compared to the original Windforce OC clocks and power. It runs around 3200MHz and draws about 320W. None of the 4000 series cards I had overclocked anywhere near that well. Sure, not all games benefit equally but it's still pretty good.

            • jasswolf on 02/04/2025 - 17:59

              @ewok666: Yeah I meant optimal overclock at 320W power limit vs 350W, both are a huge uplift from stock.

              Suddenly the 5070 Ti performs like a 5080, and the 5080 goes within touching distance of a 5090, and presumably will move past it when neural rendering ramps, all for 20 extra watts each.

              • ewok666 on 02/04/2025 - 18:22

                @jasswolf: lol. The 5080 gets near a 4090. it will never get close to the 5090. The 5090 is literally twice of everything except clock speeds, of course. Still $1500 is a (profanity) good price these days. I paid $1700 just a couple of weeks back and don't regret the purchase. That said, I'll get a 5090 when they get back close to MSRP or RRp or whatever ;-)

                • jasswolf on 02/04/2025 - 19:29

                  @ewok666: Sorry, yes, I obviously meant a 4090, and that's reflected in the power consumption comparison.

  • pacificstorm on 02/04/2025 - 10:10

    Minimum recommended CPU requirements (AMD/Intel) for this beast?

      • Kevin Bacon on 02/04/2025 - 10:34

        He said CPU not PSU lol

      • zealmax on 02/04/2025 - 10:34
        +2

        1000W CPU?

    • Dubzy on 02/04/2025 - 10:37
      +3

      X3D is unmatched, if you're AM4 > 5800X3D, AM5 > 9/7800X3D

    • stevelo on 02/04/2025 - 13:49

      I will say minimum 5700x3d (already on AM4), 7600/9600 x or none x. Recommend 7800x3d/9800x3d if you want to max 5070ti gaming performance, or without CPU bottleneck.

      • pacificstorm on 02/04/2025 - 15:10

        Currently using Ryzen 5 5600x with MSI Carbon Gaming Pro B450. Be feasible or not to keep this setup and just replace my aging 1660 ti gpu with? Thanks.

        • stevelo on 02/04/2025 - 19:21

          This is 5600x and 4070 ti super
          https://youtu.be/Ihlsqjl4LbU?si=mvb79J7Z7-7t8Er0

          5070 ti is around 15% faster than 4070 ti super, general you want a faster CPU for faster GPU, so your GPU won't be bottlenecked by your CPU most of the time. Depend the resolution, graphic setting, RT ect. 5600x is fine, but you need to expect your GPU isn't running at max performance due to a slower CPU (5600x). If you still can find 5700x3d in cheap (I got one few months ago for around $220), get it. But i heard 5700x3d stock has dried up.

  • Evanlet on 02/04/2025 - 10:29
    +2

    OOS

    • tc423 on 02/04/2025 - 10:48

      JW still has a few stock

  • greatsaiyanman86 on 02/04/2025 - 11:01
    +7

    I got the 9070 XT and am absolutely loving it..
    The Adrenaline software is decades ahead of Nvidia Experience too.

  • Bid Sniper on 02/04/2025 - 11:06
    +1

    9070 XT or previous gen Nvidia. These Nvidia cards are poor value.

    • botchie on 02/04/2025 - 11:19
      +3

      previous gen if you can get it for the price we had in Nov - Dec 24

      • Bid Sniper on 02/04/2025 - 12:00

        I should of said previous gen AMD cards. Have a 7900xt and still really happy with it, got it for $1300 when they came out with Last of Us remastered.

        Nvidia pissed me off with 3000 series, got it a 3070 for $1100 but figured covid tax so ok but Nvidia just ran with it. Gamers should look at elsewhere.

        • botchie on 02/04/2025 - 12:36

          i guess yes in retrospect there's no need to upgrade even from 30xx cards , new games haven't been that demanding and unless you game at 4k you can tweek few settings, same goes for AMD
          only thing to note is that new DLSS4 and FSR4 look real good - nice and sharp but that shouldnt be a cause to dump $1300 + - into a game I dont think

          • Bid Sniper on 02/04/2025 - 13:01

            @botchie: For me going from 3070 to 7900xt (similar to 9070xt performance) is 4K@60hz to 4K@120hz (without RT). Which is worth the upgrade personally.

            I found FSR3 better than DLSS3 but still not as good as raw raster. Agreed if you have a last gen card its still relevant, disable RT and will run fine.

    • Huntakillaz on 02/04/2025 - 12:26

      9070XT's biggest win is the 1% & 0.1% lows are stable af! almost every review I've seen of it those 1% lows slap the shit out of any other card near its tier or lower

  • Arnor on 02/04/2025 - 11:11
    +4

    FU nvidia for keeping VRAM low on the 5000 series!
    5090 should have 48GB
    5080 32GB!!
    5070 24GB

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join