Sicko - A Film by Michael Moore (2007) - Free Streaming with No Ads @ YouTube

2010

With the recent with the alleged shooting death of that Healthcare CEO in the USA by Luigi Mangione, Film maker Michael Moore has decided to release his 2007 Oscar-nominated film SICKO.

Sicko is a 2007 American political documentary film by filmmaker Michael Moore. Investigating health care in the United States, the film focuses on the country's health insurance and the pharmaceutical industry. Moore compares the for-profit non-universal U.S. system with the non-profit universal health care systems of Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Cuba.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicko

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386032/

Related Stores

Michael Moore
Michael Moore
YouTube
YouTube

Comments

  • +3

    Cool seeing all the free movies being added to YouTube

  • +31

    I think we can all agree that it was an actual shooting death

    • +25

      no he had a covid jab, so it must be part of Bill Gates depopulation agenda 😋

      • +6

        God I hope people aren’t downvoting you because they think you are being serious.

        • +8

          no that's the upvotes!

          • +10

            @M00Cow: Now I'm confused as to whether I should upvote or downvote the comment. When did this all get so complicated?!?!?!

            • @AngusD: I've chosen to simply abstain

              • +2

                @beltdrive: Be careful abstaining. You might find yourself cancelled for failing to speak up against the side that's literally as bad as Hitler.

        • -1

          Cooker down votes, I'm looking forward to some with this comment.

      • Does he have shares in C/iA? Their mission statement: "We’ll know our dis-information program is complete when everything the American public believes is false" W Casey, ex dir

      • Dan Andrews did it!

    • I assumed the “alleged” is referring to Mangione‘s involvement, who is almost certainly guilty, but hasn’t been convicted yet

      • +2

        The guy was suffering severe back pain, high on painkillers and out of his mind! Definitely mentally impaired.

        /s (sort of)

        • +3

          Have you ever had chronic pain?

          • +1

            @Caped Baldy:

            Have you ever had chronic pain?

            Yes, the American insurance industry is indeed chronic pain.

      • -1

        Almost certainly *innocent.

      • WHAT MURDAAAAAA

    • +6

      could have been a pre-existing condition.

    • Must've deserved it.

  • +12

    His current comments about the murder (by the industry) are great

  • +4

    Push a man over the edge and they will do unimaginable things.

    • +14

      They have consistently reject a Universal Health System. In America it doesn’t take much to push someone over the edge.

      • +22

        Push people over the edge, and make sure guns are widely available. What could go wrong?

        • +1

          He used a 3D-ghost hybrid gun, not a "widely available" one.

      • +13

        That's an overly simple take. The vested interests corrupting policy makers and news cycles have a massive role in preventing any decent health care system. And even if a majority of voters in the dumb non-compulsary voting system vote against it (ie for republicans), it still discriminates against those who need but can't afford basic health care.

        • +5

          When it's a private industry, the system is based on profit.

        • +7

          Don’t disagree but if people keep voting Republican they shouldn’t be surprised when the same crappy system continues. The LNP would love to ditch Medicare over here but even they know this would be political suicide. People should do some Googling as to why we have Medibank private.

          • +4

            @try2bhelpful: The Democrats have been in power for 12 our the last 16 years

            • +3

              @sallan75:

              The Democrats have been in power for 12 our the last 16 years

              Suggest you learn what the filibuster is, then google what led to Obamacare (rather than his preferred single payer system), champ.

            • +1

              @sallan75: "In power" tells us you have no actual idea how the system (such as it is) works in ANY way

              • @mickeyjuiceman: Lets all cry about American politics

                • +1

                  @sallan75: I'm not crying, I'm saying you have less than no idea what you're talking about and as such probably shouldn't comment until you've educated yourself a bit.

                  • @mickeyjuiceman: LOL, you are crying. Poor boo hoo baby. Oh mah,look at mah edukation…

            • +6

              @sallan75: They can’t get anything past the GOP who just stop any attempt to fix this. The same with any meaningful gun control. If you don’t own both houses then you get nothing.

              • +2

                @try2bhelpful:

                They can’t get anything past the GOP who just stop any attempt to fix this.

                Lol is this the cartoon version of politics you learned from watching CNN?

                Obama had both houses in 2010 when ACA was passed. But feel free to tell us how it was the fault of the GOP bogeyman…

                If you don’t own both houses then you get nothing.

                He had both houses and gave America a shit sandwich…

                • -2

                  @1st-Amendment:

                  Obama had both houses in 2010 when ACA was passed. But feel free to tell us how it was the fault of the GOP bogeyman…

                  Google filibuster before you embarrass yourself next time.

                  • @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                    Google filibuster

                    Done. Now tell me how you think that works when you have both houses and ACA got passed by them both… I'll wait…

                    • @1st-Amendment: Way to show you are able to google something and not absorb a single thing about its meaning. They were filibustered by the GOP. For someone with such a pathetically USA-obsessed username, you sure don't know a lot about how the country actually works.

                      • +1

                        @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                        Way to show you are able to google something and not absorb a single thing about its meaning.

                        You literally said "If you don’t own both houses then you get nothing." The Democrats had both house and got their ACA passed. I'm waiting for you to explain how you think a filibuster affected this outcome? A filibuster is only an attempt to delay an outcome, it doesn't change it. And ACA got passed so any attempted filibuster obviously failed.

                        They were filibustered by the GOP.

                        Yes you said that already, now try and explain how you think this affected the outcome.

                        you sure don't know a lot about how the country actually works

                        Well just repeating the word filibuster over and over as if it's a new word you just learned is not how things work. I know that much.

                        • @1st-Amendment: OK, champ.

                          • Democrats had 59 votes after Ted Kennedy died, and GOP won his seat.
                          • Conservatives filibustered Ovama's healthcare solution.
                          • The vote needed to break the filibuster was gained from a conservative independent, who rejected the solution, instead demanding the ACA, being an insurance based bill, rather than a universal care one.
                          • +1

                            @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                            Democrats had 59 votes after Ted Kennedy died, and GOP won his seat.

                            So Democracy in action then?

                            Conservatives filibustered

                            There you go using that word again. I think maybe you should google that word because it doesn't seem to mean what you think it means.
                            A filibuster is a delaying technique, the Bill still passed hence why it is now an Act. But let Google explain this to you:

                            'The Affordable Care Act (ACA) faced significant opposition, but it wasn't subjected to a traditional filibuster. Instead, the Senate used a process called budget reconciliation to pass the final version of the bill, which cannot be filibustered'

                            That sound you just heard was your lame argument being burned to the ground…

                            a conservative independent,

                            A simple google would tell you that there were only two independents at that time, Bernie Sanders, the most left wing senator in US politics or Joe Lieberman who was the former Democrat VP nominee. Which one of those is your 'conservative' bogeyman?

                            This is comedy hour…

                            being an insurance based bill, rather than a universal care one.

                            So Democrats wrote the bill and unanimously passed the bill, 100% Democrats,but in clown world this is the Republican's fault?
                            GOP bad, orange man bad etc… time to get out of the echo chamber…

                            • -1

                              @1st-Amendment: You're either incredibly stupid, or being deliberately obtuse.

                              The ACA was not the bill Obama wanted passed. It got through without filibuster because it was acceptable to the 60th vote.

                              • +1

                                @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                                The ACA was not the bill Obama wanted passed

                                Cool story, welcome to Democratic process. It's still his shit sandwich. Own it.

                                It got through without filibuster

                                So you went from 'They were filibustered by the GOP' to 'It got through without filibuster' and claiming I'm the stupid one? This is comedy…

                                it was acceptable to the 60th vote.

                                So who was that exactly? Bernie Sanders or Joe Lieberman? Which one of those two men is your Conservative bogeyman?

                                Here's the list of the 60 yea voters, 58 Democrats, 2 independents, ZERO Republicans. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1…

                                Please specify exactly which one of these Senators you think is the GOP stooge responsible for ruining Obama's Utopia here:

                                • @1st-Amendment: I already said it was an independent conservative who demanded private health insurance centred bill. And, of course, it was Repunlicans who all voted against both the insurance and universal healthcare bills.

                                  You really are lacking in intelligence and character to somehow blame the situation on Obama. Then again, that would be why you choose to be a GOP supporter (the party of the rich and the stupid).

                                  • @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                                    I already said it was an independent conservative

                                    So which one out of Bernie Sanders or Joe Lieberman do you think qualifies as Conservative?

                                    I'm up for a laugh, I can only assume that since Bernie is the most left wing politician in America, it has to be Joe Lieberman. Al Gore's former VP running mate is secretly a closet Conservative who schemed to derail Obama's universal healthcare plans? This is the magic fairy dust that you have to tell yourself to avoid the reality that ACA is a shit sandwich foisted on the American public by Obama?

                                    You really are lacking in intelligence

                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

                                    • @1st-Amendment: Lieberman was against a public option. He was a conservative who was entirely against public healthcare. Also a waste of space who supported Bush during the Iraq invasion.

                                      • +1

                                        @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                                        Lieberman was against a public option. He was a conservative

                                        Lol This is what you're sticking with?

                                        Joe Lieberman, Al Gore's VP nominee for the Democrat party presidential campaign is a really closet conservative GOP stooge… The comedy show rolls on…

                                        Also a waste of space who supported Bush during the Iraq invasion.

                                        Well you're right there. Democrats are mostly a waste of space. Just like Gore, Hillary, Biden, and every other major Democrat leader at the time that also voted for war. For bonus points do you know which US president was the first to not start any new wars in many decades? Can you see the pattern now?

        • +6

          The "ideal" customer for a for-profit healthcare system is one that is alive, but in constant pain and on a regular supply of medication and has many operations that help their symptoms, but should never cure them

          • @murdercluck: Sounds like those solutions for HIV/AIDS and obesity. I guess, same will be with cancers.

        • +1

          The vested interests corrupting policy makers

          America has the best government that money can buy! /S

          Read it a second time if you don't get the joke.

          And then cry, because sadly our government is going the same way.

          In a million years, when aliens finally visit earth, they'll have archaeologists trying to find out what wiped out the human race. Was it war? Disease? Famine? And then they'll discover the true cause - lobbyists.

      • The edge was gold plated, judging by the Ivy league education and wealthy family he was exposed to.

    • +3

      Push a man over the edge and they will do unimaginable things.

      This sounds like it could be the one line pitch for a present day Liam Neeson film

    • +4

      I've had "chronic" pain for two weeks, can't imagine what it's like for years. I was going a bit mental.

      • +1

        Not sure two weeks counts for textbook chronic pain, more akin to acute pain, and yes you do go mental after being in pain for years.
        Hope you are feeling better now though.

        • +2

          That's why I used quotation marks… I was worried it was permenant even though the injury was minor. I was just used to the pain going away a lot quicker.

    • +5

      " I need mah freedoms and guns to fight corruption "

      Individual uses their gun

      Surprised Pikachu face

      • +1

        mmm chef's kiss.

        I guess that's why the right and left have come together.

      • Must include thems freedom units.

    • no need to act like savage Muricans in Australia, have some class

      • Nah, yeah, ya (profanity). Too right.

  • +29

    What’s the old saying, One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter…

    • +9

      and when they take over Syria they're neither & both!

      • +2

        They become 'rebels' or 'moderates'

        • -2

          Compared to Assad they probably are.

    • +46

      It's America, they have rebuttals and debunks for moon landing, COVID science and round earth

      • +21

        going to a socialist country to look at their socialist medicine is one of the more intelligent parts of this doco.

        • +21

          No, all socialist things must automatically be dismissed as bad without any investigation. We have the best things - they told us so.

          • +15

            @BlueJay87: Is Cuba's communism authoritarianism brutal? I believe so.

            But not as brutal as "No I will not honor our agreement, I already have your money, go and fkn die" or "We dislike your country's politics so much we will strongarm the entire world to ensure your population starves."

          • +3

            @BlueJay87: When your country has been sanctioned for literally everything under the sun, what do you do?
            Going into the country that sanctioned your livelihood is the only way.

            • +1

              @TightAl: Are you suggesting the sanctions happened before the brutality?

              • +1

                @heal: So why the embargos and sanctions still in place now? :)

                • @TightAl:

                  So why the embargos and sanctions still in place now? :)

                  Respond honestly to my question and find the answer to yours, you will. :)

          • +1

            @BlueJay87: Compared to a capitalist country where kids can't go to school safely?

      • Sums up the American system then

      • +5

        If someone goes to Cuba to make a documentary about cigars, is that a trash documentary?

          • +3

            @BlueJay87: Saying that their health system is automatically bad because they have a brutalist regime is like saying their cigars are bad for the same reason though. A country is made up of many parts, they don't all have to be bad or good.

            • @noisymime: Its literally a crime to criticize the goverment in Cuba. Going over there with a camera is not going to get you an honest appraisal of the system. Moore was there on a propoganda trip to whitewash the brutal Cuban system. Functionally equivalent to Tucker's trips to Russia. He's not a serious journalist.

              • @BlueJay87: Criticising the next US president won't do you a lot of good either

                • +1

                  @Big L:

                  Criticising the next US president won't do you a lot of good either

                  Worked ok for Joe Biden and Donald Trump. In fact most of the media and entertainment industries have very profitable careers doing exactly that
                  Do you read what you write before you hit send? Because this is the opposite of what we see with out own eyes every day.

              • +2

                @BlueJay87: He wasn't there to talk about Cuba's cred as a democracy, he was there to show that a literal communist dictatorship provided better healthcare to its citizens than the US did. It's inherently saying Cuba is a shit place to live by using it as such a point of comparison.

                • +1

                  @JohnHowardsEyebrows:

                  he was there to show that a literal communist dictatorship provided better healthcare to its citizens than the US did

                  And lied while doing it. But hey it's in a movie and aligns with my existing beliefs then it must be true right?

            • -2

              @noisymime:

              they don't all have to be bad or good.

              But in Cuba they are all bad. I've been there and seen it for myself. It was like going in a time machine to the 1950's with the worst of everything.
              If you are relying on Michael Moore films for your reality then you need help.

              • @1st-Amendment: Are you American?

                • @Big L: Of course he is.If not they would have declared so,on many occasions asked.He's emabarrased. I wuld be too as a Trump tragic.They look away from criminality,sex assault,corruption,bastardisation of justice and law,lies,Mafia behaviour etc and say it's all fair dinkum democracy , according to them LOL>
                  America is getting what it deserves and right now the Trump Musk honeymoon is looking like divorce as they argue over who gets to be on top.(Apparently both paranoid the other will knock the other ones rug off their ugly pumpkin)

                  https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/at-work/you-dont-get-it…

              • @1st-Amendment: But the GOP in America wants to take everyone back to the 1950s. They must be aspiring to become Cuba.

Login or Join to leave a comment