Are Corporate IT Departments Going Too Far With Content Filtering/Blocking?

I am currently dealing with a big insurance company that has a painfully annoying corporate IT block on viewing content. I am trying to provide photos and videos for an insurance claim because their assessor/builder did a "remote inspection" via video/phone call but didn't do a very good job, so photos have been requested from me. I don't mind doing that. But trying to get the content to them has become painful!

I have tried Dropbox, Google Drive, and even my own domain site to get them photos and videos. We are talking 350MB of files; these are not something you can easily send via email.

I know that early on, when email scams were new, Dropbox and Google Drive were blocked to stop scammers from providing links to fake invoices, but surely people are a little more educated now, and there are approvals/processes in place to try to avoid money scams.

What have you found to work as an alternative when having this issue? I thought that on my own domain would've worked, but it didn't.

Comments

  • +12

    Are Corporate IT Departments Going Too Far?

    Is India and the Philippines considered 'Too Far' ?

  • +7

    Bikies to deliver the files on USB stick.

    • USB drives are disabled in my office.

      • +3

        Get bikies to enable

        • Is there anything the bikies can't fix?!

          • +1

            @stuffandthat: They can't stop Harley's from leaking oil
            .

    • -2

      You're so modern using, "bikies" as satire. It seems to me like it was only yesterday that the go-to word was "nazis" (chortle, chortle) and how naughty I felt saying that word. My how time flies when it comes to humour.

  • +8

    I'll riot if my company ever blocks Ozbargain

    • +4

      If it's your company then I'm sure it will never happen. Just fire the IT guy that blocks it if it does occur. Too easy.

      • Don't forget to get him to unblock it before you fire him.

  • +7

    Corporate IT usually want to limit access to file-sharing services like Dropbox / Google Drive because it can be used to share confidential material or files without any oversight.

    If you use the Corporate business standard, like OneDrive, access can be managed, audited and revoked.

    • Corporate IT usually want to limit access to file-sharing services like Dropbox / Google Drive because it can be used to share confidential material or files without any oversight.

      Sure, that is fair enough but it should be allowed to at least view inbound items. It would be hard to police what is inbound vs outbound for Dropbox, but I am sure a security policey is available.

    • Agree - OneDrive the go here

    • +1

      Corporate business standard, like OneDrive

      Anyone else notice how Gen Z have a preference to Google and Apple software over Microsoft? They're comfortable using Drive or iCloud but clueless with OneDrive. Same with Docs/Slides/Sheets or Pages/Keynote/Numbers instead of Word/PowerPoint/Excel. I'm not judging, just find it amusing.

      • +1

        Anyone else notice how Gen Z have a preference to Google and Apple software over Microsoft?

        I haven't noticed this but I don't work with a lot of Gen Z's.

        I'd imagine they're comfortable with what they know: Google Drive from using Android, or iCloud from using Apple.

      • 95 here, so i guess id be Gen Y/Z, but honestly Microsofts software is attrocious, and they keep changing the UI on everything so frequently.
        i feel like older generation's probably stick to it because theyre used to it, and i dont blame em.
        ive recently started working for a large organisation after a decade in Startups, what purposely avoid using microsoft.
        In my opinion it honestly seems like its just these bigger older organisations are stuck using microsoft as they probably cant easily move their systems to another provider.

        Also microsoft seem to just enjoy changing the UI Every few months for no reason other than to justify their subscription model. Ive used Azure for the first time coming from Git/Atlassian changed their UI probably three times over 5 years.
        Since starting at this place Microsoft has changed:
        - Teams twice,
        - Azure twice
        - TFS 3 times.

        Compare this to how many changes their competitors suites have had and id literally jump ship immediately.
        And with how they keep changing Control Panel to use more and more of the windows 8+ 'Settings' dumpster fire app, theyre about 1 more change away from me abandoning them entirely.

        • +1

          Microsoft often changes things so that we Boomers get at least some regular mental exercises.
          The price for this little but important extra is built into the 'subscription model'.

        • 95 here, so i guess id be Gen Y/Z,

          Nope, that would make you Gen Silent.

          And congrats on being OzB's oldest member - hold on for another 5 years, and you'll get a personal letter from Scotty.

  • If they said email only, you could always try sending multiple reply emails, with each reply containing an attached photo, You could also try compressing the photos. Alternatively retake the photos with a lower resolution setting.

    Maybe ask them to clarify if there is another acceptable method to upload the photos. If none of these suggestions work, ask them to escalate it to someone who can override the policy.

    • I ended up sending 1 email per photo which is okay. Videos I have tried a YouTube upload.

      ask them to escalate it to someone who can override the policy

      That would probably involve IT and that could take days to get a ticket done.

  • +1

    Isn't this THEIR problem?

    Surely they would have a solution of some sort, even if they share a One Drive folder to you and give you 'Write' permission to it.

    • You would've thought so, but nothing was suggested and I tried multiple methods besides One Drive which probably would've worked. If what I have done (which is multiple emails with 1 attachment) works, then it should be okay.

      • +5

        Sounds a little like malicious compliance….I fully support that.

        • I don't necessarily disagree, but it makes it very hard when email is limited and they don't provide a solution to share the requested information with them.

  • +1

    At work we used WeTransfer for large files that gets blocked by email size quotas. Not sure if your insurance company allows it though since they don't even allow files uploaded to your own domain, because it is technically another website that requires the insurance person to download from.

    https://wetransfer.com/

    • I'll give it a go. I would've thought that Dropbox / Google Drive would've been more secure/reputable. But, I will try and see if I have any luck.

      • Just host a torrent and send them the magnet address.

        Or find out the emai size limit and 7zip the lot into a split archive and send each bit separately.

    • Sadly, WeTransfer didn't work. I got a call from them and they said it hasn't worked.

  • Have you considered reducing the image file size?

    • +1

      Yes.

      • And? Did you?

  • +3

    Why would your insurer want to make it easier for you to make a claim? Claims cost them money.

    • Honestly,. There needs to be a law, that if a company asks you to provde something, they need to be responsible for providing the easiest solution possible. The Enshittening of Previously perfectly fine services is ridiculous

    • Ex-insurance here:

      Claim disputes cost them more. If the client makes it to external arbitration then they've probably won, and the insurer pays for the proceedings either way.

      Insurance is run off actuary. We did stack the deck but not in the claims procedure itself. The place you stack is in the policy wording. Insurers are underwritten, your payout isn't our money, but the cost of our doing business is 100% on us. Claimants don't go away when they meet resistance, they just get stroppy. A processed claim is our goal, not a paid or denied one, because our money is made at the point of actuary. Everything after that is operational expenses (which are factored into the actuarial calculations in the first place).

  • -8

    Corporate IT Departments Content Filtering/Blocking

    Aka USB usage blocking.

    If you have laptop with hotspot, try Airdroid.

    • +6

      Did not even bother reading description, impressive

      • Oh crap

  • -2

    The nature of experts, amongst other things, is that they value whatever they are experts in higher than the rest of the community does. And they see it as the solution to every problem. So teachers want more money spent on education and see it as solving sall of society's problems. And lawyers and politicians see laws as the answer to everything. And police see more policing as the solution to everything. And of course a lot of those would be nice, but we can't spend more on everything. We only have as much to spend as we earn. So we need to spend it on the best solutions.

    The narrower people's view of the world the more important and valuable they see it to be.

    So its not really surprising that corporate IT security people, whose view of the world and careers are built around that tiny area of IT, see it as a lot more important than everyone else thinks it is. And then tell management, who really don't know much about anything but managing, so they leave the decisions to the experts. And the experts weigh everything down with more and more security. To the point where it gets in the way of other people who are experts in something else doing their job.

    Its the consequence in all sorts of areas of a society where the amount of knowledge is expanding, so people and jobs are becoming narrower and narrower in what they know. So we are doing what most people would consider too much in too many areas, except their own of course.

    You saw this sort of silliness you get from experts with the Voice referendum. A bunch of people who were constitutional lawyers were convinced that a constitutional amendment was the solution to Aboriginal disadvantage. And being experts, they convinced a lot of other people who spend their lives doing whatever experts say. Fortunately 60% of the population, the 60% that has a wider perspective of the world, saw that it a a silly way to try to solve that particular problem.

    I realise this will upset a lot of people who are experts. We should list to them as to what could be done. But when it comes to what is done, that needs to be left to people with a wider balanced view of the big picture.

    • Centerlink much lately?

    • +4

      I realise this will upset a lot of people who are experts. We should list to them as to what could be done. But when it comes to what is done, that needs to be left to people with a wider balanced view of the big picture.

      Sorry, but this is a crock of crap.

      I mean, I'm sure everything will be fine if "people with a wider balanced view" were performing surgeries, designing bridges, and writing complex software instead of those who literally have had to acquire a degree, pass exams, obtain industry certification, receive on-the-job training, and built up knowledge and experience over many years in their specific fields.

      FWIW, your idea that experts see their area of expertise as "the solution to every problem" could not be more wrong. One of the critical requirements to become an "expert" is to know when and how your expertise should be applied and how it dovetails in with other people's expertise.

      Most of the "experts" I've come across are knowledgeable and humble and are fantastic to work with. The most annoying types are those who know nothing but think they are entitled to an opinion on things they have no understanding of because they're a "regular person".

      • +2

        Expert reply.
        Of course, my ignorant but well balanced reply here with a wider view of the big picture is the correct one.

  • +2

    They're not going far enough imo

  • reduce resolution and image quality, you can get peanuts size. it would be ok as they only need to see it, no need for fine details.
    use IRFANView and play with parameters : https://www.irfanview.com/64bit.htm

    • +1

      Powertoys is also good for resizing en masse.

      • ah, never tried that :D used to IrfanView from Win9x days :D

  • Print them out at Officeworks and snail mail them.

    • Its a 1.5 hour round trip to Officeworks. They are already dragging their feet and the builder is the one who stuffed up. I am just correcting the builders mistake which I find very frustrating.

  • -1

    Can tell that you don't work in IT. People do still fall for scams.

    Having said that, you could ask them to provide you with cloud storage from their own system (Microsoft 365/Sharepoint/Teams/G Drive). Do they use Zoom/ Teams? Create a call with them and send the files in the chat during the call.

    • -1

      Can tell that you don't work in IT

      False. I do. I am just not a control freak like some big corporates. I educate staff on identifying scams/concerns, etc.

      Having said that, you could ask them to provide you with cloud storage from their own system (Microsoft 365/Sharepoint/Teams/G Drive). Do they use Zoom/ Teams? Create a call with them and send the files in the chat during the call.

      Tried Google Drive and it didn't work. I have no idea about Zoom/Teams. It looks like WeTransfer has worked, but I haven't received a response.

  • I dont understand why you can just reduce the file size. You are trying to send a 350mb file. Make it smaller. If the smaller ones arent good enough, try something else. But why are you ignoring the very simple most obvious solution for the more complex ones that you already know arent working?

    • You are trying to send a 350mb file

      No, it is 350MB in total which includes two videos.

      But why are you ignoring the very simple most obvious solution for the more complex ones that you already know arent working?

      And what would the most simple solution be? Reducing, yeah, I have done that.

  • +1

    Mining companies are bad.
    One Minesite I was at. Enabled Restricted mode on YouTube. Most of the channels I normally watch were gone. Had to use VPN. It's over the top.

  • +2

    Upload the videos to YouTube with a private link. Could even include the photos in a slideshow form.

    Though I agree that it's shocking that you need to jump through the hoops for their lack of a suitable business process.

  • Why are you making it your problem? You've tried.
    Tell them to send someone out to take photos / videos if they need them.

    • Tell them to send someone out to take photos / videos if they need them.

      They have FINALLY agreed to do that today because even the insurance guy is sick of the back and forth.

Login or Join to leave a comment