$12 Chicken Hunger Tamers (Delivery / Service Fees Apply) @ Participating Hungry Jack's Stores via DoorDash

411
$12 Chicken Hunger Tamers (Delivery / Service Fees Apply) @ Participating Hungry Jack's Stores via DoorDashAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
theguyrules on 31/08/2024 - 12:16 doordash.com (759 clicks)
Last edited 31/08/2024 - 15:07
12CTAMER
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Works on large meals.
I paid $13.70 delivered including fees for a Large Bourbon St Jack's Fried Chicken Hunger Tamers. That is using DashPass for free delivery, so YMMV.

Tackle hunger with this epic deal!

Today only, get any chicken Hunger Tamers meal for just $12 on DoorDash! 🤯

Simply add any chicken Hunger Tamers meal to cart and apply code 12CTAMER at checkout.

Be quick! Available today only. ⏱

Referral Links

Referral: random (733)

Referee gets $5-15 off first 1 or 2 orders over $15/$20. Referrer gets $5-$45 credit once referee places an order over $20.

Check the web page heading before joining as there are multiple sign up offers.

DRIVERS/DASHERS ONLY: random (25)

$400 Bonus for referrer and referee if referee does a certain amount of deliveries.

Dining & Takeaway Burger Chicken Nuggets Fast Food Food Delivery French Fries Soft Drink

Related Stores

DoorDash
DoorDash
Marketplace
Hungry Jack's
Hungry Jack's

Comments

  • theguyrules on 31/08/2024 - 12:50
    +2

    Got 6 bonus nuggets in our order, and got a free whopper from the uno thing.
    Nice!

    • FXx on 31/08/2024 - 13:05
      -6

      Why support NATO in this instance when they went back on their promise to not push further East into Europe and influence nations such as the Ukraine?

      • Gervais fanboy on 31/08/2024 - 13:32
        +7

        Exactly

        I went into the rabbit hole trying to educate myself on this and I ended up being an admirer of Gorbachev and a big time critic of Ronald Reagan, who could have thought lol.

        which infers they support Russia in the war

        Yet Burger King has its HQ in the US, who are the biggest war mongers since the beginning of time.

      • Butt Scratcher on 31/08/2024 - 13:38

        They didn't even bring up NATO.

        You can be against the Ukrainian war without being part of, or pro NATO. Just as many countries/people are

    • megaalc on 31/08/2024 - 13:10
      +3

      Propaganda detected

      • kungfuman on 31/08/2024 - 14:12

        no mainstream media or the US. government officials are here though.

    • BROKENKEYBOARD on 31/08/2024 - 13:30
      +1

      Wouldn't food companies leaving Russia actually be a net positive for Russia? Less money would leave the country (assuming some profits had to go to Burger King USA) and less junk food options is a good thing.

    • pharcyde on 31/08/2024 - 13:34
      +1

      0 bargains posted always talk the most ish.

    • kungfuman on 31/08/2024 - 13:45

      Russia should get support because the corruption and criminals in Urkrane need to be brought to justice. Better known as the ukranen government. I would gladly support Russia if they finally take down the Ukrainian government.

      • Gervais fanboy on 31/08/2024 - 13:51

        Ukraine’s corruption is Ukraine’s business, that doesn’t justify Russia’s incursion but NATO expanding further east despite America’s past promises that it wouldn’t is the only valid justification for Russia.

        • kungfuman on 31/08/2024 - 14:08
          -2

          the genocide conducted by the ukranian govement in the donbas region has been allow to go on for too long russia didn't attack after 8 years of puting up with it, before the ukrainian govement decided to slaughter russian civilians in mass in the donbass region, russia wasn't interested in war, the ukranian govement started it the US and UK backed it and then it became a proxie war for the US, uk and Nato. Understand this Ukranian is losing and will not win no matter how much BS the media will have you believe.

          • BROKENKEYBOARD on 31/08/2024 - 14:13
            +2

            @kungfuman: Do you think it's a giant coincidence that the only countries that seem to be backing up Russia are North Korea and Belarus?

            • kungfuman on 31/08/2024 - 14:19
              +1

              @BROKENKEYBOARD: Russia is being backed by China, North Korea has nothing they can barely take care of their own country they couldn't even back a high school football team.

              the other countries that are on Russia side are Brazil India, UAE and south Africa they even formed their own version of NATO called BRICS.

            • Aureus on 31/08/2024 - 14:20

              @BROKENKEYBOARD: Don't forget Syria!

          • Gervais fanboy on 31/08/2024 - 14:19

            @kungfuman:

            the genocide conducted by the ukranian govement in the donbas region

            Sad but that’s all still Ukrainian business in Ukrainian territory. Russia isn’t the World’s police, they have got plenty of civil rights issues happening within their own territory. Lookup Chechnya.

            ukrainian govement decided to slaughter russian civilians in mass in the donbass region,

            Simple solution - ask those Russians to return to their motherland and they’ll be fine.

            russia wasn't interested in war, the ukranian govement started it the US and UK backed it and then it became a proxie war for the US, uk and Nato.

            Now you are making a seperate point. A point that I don’t disagree with.

            • kungfuman on 31/08/2024 - 14:26
              +1

              @Gervais fanboy: its Russian Territory now, the entire donbase is part of Russia. and they did it with out firing a single shot, every country in that region all voted to be part of Russia .
              It was very clear that the donbas region didn't want to be part of Ukraine.
              America isn't the world police but they believe they have the right to start wars in every part of the world. There is so much behind the war that the media doesn't seem to be talking about. The more you dig the more you realize how much BS we are being fed.

              • Gervais fanboy on 31/08/2024 - 15:15

                @kungfuman:

                its Russian Territory now, the entire donbase is part of Russia.

                Most of it, not all. Atleast that’s what Google tells me.

                America isn't the world police but they believe they have the right to start wars in every part of the world

                You hurt the integrity of your own argument by bringing that up. You have already seen me criticise the US for that.
                Regardless, just coz US is doing it, doesn’t mean Russia has to follow suit.

        • Aureus on 31/08/2024 - 14:15
          +2

          NATO promised Russia it would not expand after the Cold War

          Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949. This has never changed. No treaty signed by NATO Allies and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. Decisions on NATO membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. Russia does not have a veto.

          The idea of NATO enlargement beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed until 1991. Mikhail Gorbachev said in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up either."

          Individual Allies cannot make agreements on NATO’s behalf. President Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer to commit that no former Soviet Republics would join NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so… NATO operates by consensus," he said.

          The wording “NATO expansion” is already part of the myth. NATO did not hunt for new members or want to “expand eastward.” NATO respects every nation’s right to choose its own path. NATO membership is a decision for NATO Allies and those countries who wish to join alone.

          https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/115204.htm

          • FXx on 31/08/2024 - 14:33

            @Aureus: Taken from the NATO website too, who would have thought? Hilarious.

            I wonder if they also believe their decision making in Ukraine is completely innocent and legitimate too?

            • Aureus on 31/08/2024 - 14:36
              -1

              @FXx: Okay. Provide a non-NATO source then. Good luck. 🙄

          • Gervais fanboy on 31/08/2024 - 15:10

            @Aureus: NATO not expanding further East was the condition upon which the Soviets allowed the unification of East and West Germany.
            I can share sources to prove my claim but I don’t wanna get into this long winded argument with you.., so you can have the last say on this.
            Regardless, America backed NATO lurking on Russian borders is a straight up instigation and means for war, just another excuse for the US to justify its crazy military spendings and feeding that military industrial complex beast.
            Also, Ukraine joining NATO is not that much different from Russia setting up its Nukes in Cuba and we all know the outcries that came from it. Also, lookup ‘Operation Northwood’, it’s a declassified US government file.

      • Aureus on 31/08/2024 - 14:06

        Clueless take.

      • FXx on 31/08/2024 - 14:23

        NATO put Zelenskyy there for their own benefit, so yeah, that'll happen…

        • kungfuman on 31/08/2024 - 14:29
          +1

          i think more and more people are figuring out and are against wasting millions of dollars of tax payer money on Ukraine.

          • FXx on 31/08/2024 - 14:38
            -1

            @kungfuman: Imagine if they polled western nations before sending our money over there into their laundering war exercise? You'd be surprised how many wouldn't support it, western governments know this.

    • alz on 31/08/2024 - 15:14

      Who cares
      Stick to your boring tite arse life here on ozb
      Leave politics to the big guns, Putin going all out on the imperial west.

  • cvathapa on 31/08/2024 - 13:21
    +1

    How'd u get it for 13.70 delivered? Mine shows 14.56 altogether.

    • Undercut 2241 on 31/08/2024 - 13:48
      +2

      Mine shows $18.30

      $12 meal + $3 delivery fee + $3.30 service fee

      how did you get it for $14.56?

    • theguyrules on 31/08/2024 - 14:30

      It would depend on how far away the store is, as to how much the fees are.

  • Butt Scratcher on 31/08/2024 - 13:33
    +1

    Why is it so difficult to find the pickup selection?

    Is it not offered or something

    • Undercut 2241 on 31/08/2024 - 13:43

      I'm struggling to find it as well. Seems like the pickup option at the hungry jacks store page is greyed out?

    • rezgad on 31/08/2024 - 14:05
      +1

      pretty sure pickup is not an option for the bigger fast-food chains. Delivery is the only option which when combined with the other fees, doesn't make this much of a deal.

  • knight321 on 31/08/2024 - 13:48

    I just got my meal delivered but no uno stickers on either the drinks or the chips!!

  • NuttyGoodness on 31/08/2024 - 13:50
    -2

    Is this the price with doordash premium? I cannot get that price at all. About $24 is what mine comes to

    • theguyrules on 31/08/2024 - 14:30

      Yes.
      I got a years free Dashpass from signing up to an Amazon.ca Prime account.

      Either way, it's not a valid neg as I didn't say free delivery.

      • NuttyGoodness on 31/08/2024 - 14:55

        You said the price delivered and including fees was $13.70 without mentioning a premium service. So yeah, neg.

        • theguyrules on 31/08/2024 - 15:06

          That was how much I paid. I didn't put that price in the title because it isn't the same price for everyone. Even the service fees vary.
          I'll update the description to make that clearer.

  • DrDogRespect on 31/08/2024 - 13:50

    pickup disabled at my local hj's, shame

  • RocketToSpace on 31/08/2024 - 14:13

    You can't even get warm food from Hungry Jacks… I swear these guys don't even find a driver until your order has been sitting in a bag for more than 10 minutes.

    The last few times I've had an order delivered from Hungry Jacks the food has been delivered cold and this Hungry Jacks is only about 2 miles from my address… Other places between 2-3 miles get delivered hot to me. I think Hungry Jacks just doesn't like their own customers.

    I wouldn't even use this deal to be honest.

    • spaceinvader2054 on 31/08/2024 - 14:19
      +1

      I have the same experience. Gave this one a gamble, driver had 2 other stops, after an hour it gets to me and the drink is spilled throughout the bag. Food is stone cold anyway. Driver cancels and I get on with my day. Thanks for listening to my Ted talk.

  • Nand0sx on 31/08/2024 - 14:36

    $8.40 in fees and delivery for me…

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join