Aren't we obsessed with SUVs?

A few recent comments on OzB got me thinking about what we see on our roads lately.. Even the narrow or single lane roads are usually full of giant SUVs and a handful of hatchbacks and sedans 'hidden' amidst them. This is fast becoming more common as car companies want us to buy bigger, more expensive cars. I am not sure if anyone else feels this but in my eyes, SUVs are inherently uglier (as f***!) than sedans and hatchbacks.. too bulky and heavy for my personal liking, especially considering our roads (case of the American roads could be arguably different). No matter which brand and how expensive really, they just don't look as attractive.

Also, I never understood why small families in our country (even in major cities) opt for less cost-effective, uglier and more expensive SUVs vs much nicer looking, cheaper and more cost-effective sedans or hatchbacks. Parking lots in Australia aren't even made for SUVs at the most places - sedans barely fit there. Not that everyone goes to camping every other weekend or all SUV owners need to fit in prams either. For a couple with no kids or a family with one kid, sedans (if not hatch) are perfect and so much better looking, ay! I was in Europe in last holidays and I didn't notice that many SUVs there. Beautiful hatchbacks and sedans on the roads was quite refreshing, honestly.. compared to our increasingly congested roads where all you see around you is giant SUVs driving past, all looking quite similar. Btw, I have owned SUV in the past for extended family needs and now own a hatch which I love driving around. If I don't have more space requirement, I would prefer hatch any day even for daily commuting or even reasonably long distance driving; so much easier to deal with driving and parking in our busy urban areas.

What do you all think?

Comments

      • +3

        Can't speak to any of the other examples you have given, but I have driven a friend's modern RAV4 a few times. Absurdly unstable and dangerous if you need to make a fast maneouver to dodge something on the road (animal, pothole, open car door etc). I can literally feel the outside wheels lose traction as the center of gravity shifts.

  • +1

    'Over-obsessed' seems like a tautology

    • +1

      Yup.. didn't realise it earlier. Removed it now. Cheers.

    • stylistic, may be used to emphasise the obsession (?)

  • +29

    What do you all think?

    I think people should buy the car they want and care less about what cars others buy?

    for my personal liking,

    so dont buy one :)
    In my car history I've had small hatchback, sports 2 door coupe, motorcycle, station wagon, and large suv. All suit different use cases, lifestyles and periods in peoples lives.
    Most people aren't wealthy enough or have the garage space for a car for all use cases, so have to buy the car that best suits covering their range of use cases.
    I know, despite regularly missing the fun aspect of a 2 dour sports coupe or motorcycle, neither would be suitable as primary family vehicle at my current stage in life.

    Parking lots in Australia aren't even made for SUVs at the most places

    Havent had that problem, but I do now how to park a car ;)

    • +4

      I think people should buy the car they want and care less about what cars others buy?

      +1

      • +13

        Sorry, should also have added 'and not start threads complaining about other people's vehicle choices' :)

        • +1

          Gee imagine having such a boring life that you get bent out of shape by what someone else decides to buy

    • +1

      Havent had that problem, but I do now how to park a car ;)

      I manage to park a ssangyong musso (short wheel base) without it sticking out, ever. It isn't remotely difficult I don't understand why people go on about these cars "not fitting in parking spaces", or being too wide for lanes when they should be more concerned with people who don't know how to drive/park in reality.

      Parking though is more an issue for the dual cab utes with longer trays and the larger end of the SUV scale….even then, they're barely protruding if you know how to park….

      • I don't know where you live but in the ACT many, many car parks are only just wider than my Kia Sorento. Even if eveyone parks exactly in the middle of their space (spoiler - they don't), it's not possible to get in and out on both sides of the car. In theory it's supposed to fit more cars in and discourage people from owning large cars. In practice people park across two spots, and far fewer cars than the number of spots can actually park.

        • I'm in Melbourne and haven't had that problem, but yeah I guess YMMV depending on the area.

        • +1

          I thought it was just me at first when I was first trying to park around Canberra, I feel for you so bad.
          It's the same with all of the parallel car parks around there as well especially when it came to the length of them, trying to fit anything longer than a small hatchback was a real mission and it also came down to luck with what was in the parks either side too.

  • +4

    i have a Subaru xv. i hate paying the suv surcharge at car washes when it's really just a hatchback that's 4cm taller

    • -1

      I feel you, mate.

      • but it's totally justified for the Big 4wd we also have

      • -1

        Do you really?? Because back in the 90's hand carwashes didn't really exist..people used to do it on their driveways on a Sunday….but WhY Do We NeEd ThOsE NoW?!?!?!

  • +9

    SUV good for prams , just throw it in the back even without having to fold.

    Impact/Inertia/Crumple/Survivability of getting rear ended on SUV vs mini lightweight hatchback, with passenger / baby onboard back seat.

    Being taller, you also could see more of what traffic conditions lies ahead for better / more reaction time.

    I don't drive SUV. So calm down.

    • Fair enough, mate. I am calm with all cars. Just hearing what people think!

  • +16

    I want a station wagon for carrying my shit around in, but I'm too tall to be stooping down into sedan based station wagons/hatchbacks just to get in.

    SUVs are popular mostly for this reason. People have kids and junk they want to carry around and don't feel like getting down into a car just to drive it.

    My SUV is almost exactly the same in dimensions as my wife's corolla, just about 5cm higher up to get in and out of… So it's like a slighter higher riding hatchback.

    Now, if you are talking about things like Dodge Rams, Chev Silverados, Nissan Patrols, LandCruiser 200/300 series just to drop kids at school…

    • +2

      Now, if you are talking about things like Dodge Rams, Chev Silverados, Nissan Patrols, LandCruiser 200/300 series just to drop kids at school…

      Yeah.. that's insane but very commonly seen.

      • +1

        Very commonly seen? Hardly ever around my area (Sydney south-eastern suburb). According to Canstar, the top selling SUV in Australia recently are:

        • Tesla Model Y
        • Toyota RAV4
        • MG ZS

        These are all similar in length x width comparing to Corolla-sedan.

        • +1

          Sorry, I meant that it's common to see people dropping kids at school in big sized SUVs, may not be exactly those models.

        • +6

          Hardly ever around my area…

          70 to 80% of the mum-taxis that inhabit my local school’s parking area would be SUV’s in the large segment, Pajero, Prado, Everest, LandCruiser, Patrol, Range Rover, Audi Q7, and any model of the twin cab variety.

          Of that section, about 20% of them would be extra large SUV, think Ram, Silverado. It wouldn’t be weird at afternoon pick up to drive past 8 or 9 Dodge Rams or Silverados.

          I work and volunteer at a few schools around Newcastle and up the valley and I can assure you, this ratio is pretty consistent everywhere I go. School pick up is a war zone of mums in their massive penis envy large SUV’s everywhere I go. And most of these urban assault vehicles are picking up 1 or maybe 2 children on average.

          • @pegaxs: Probably the family car, whilst dad has the tradie work Ute supplied by his employer.

    • +15

      stooping down into sedan based station wagons/hatchbacks just to get in. SUVs are popular mostly for this reason.

      A truly godsend for old folks with arthritis / joints / movement problem to get in and out everytime.

      • +3

        +1 for this.

    • +2

      yeah putting kids in car seats is difficult with sedans especially when tall- and you have to watch your parents dont fall getting out

    • +1

      stooping down into sedan based station wagons/hatchbacks just to get in.

      SUVs are popular mostly for this reason

      This is the ugly truth.

      SUV sales trend line exactly follows the rise of obesity:

      https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/its-because-youre-fat/

      It's much harder to stay slim after 40, and us saggy old dogs are more likely to own property (my house only cost 250k, because it was bought in 2005) so we're also the only demographic that can actually afford new cars.

  • +3

    Meh, buy whatever you want to be in. If it doesn't fit in the car park, so be it.

    My 2.2L Diesel Santa Fe is much more fuel efficient than the BMW 130i hatchback I had 10 years ago.

    Also, you cast all and any that aren't hatch or sedan like as ugly which means you're trying to hide subjective bias behind an objective argument and will never be swayed no matter what anyone says.

    • +3

      My 2.2L Diesel Santa Fe is much more fuel efficient than the BMW 130i hatchback I had 10 years ago.

      Comparing apples to oranges. A decent modern day hatchback is far more efficient than a diesel Santa Fe.

      • +1

        Agree, 100%.

      • +2

        2023 i30 hatch 7.4 l/100 combined
        2023 Santa fe diesel 6.1 l/100 combined

        Seems crazy but that's according to Hyundai themselves

        • Well you’re comparing to a base model i30 with a 10+ year old engine. The 2.0 petrol they use sucks. Compare like for like with a diesel i30 or another brand with an actual modern engine.

        • Isn't diesel more expensive than petrol?

          • @Leadfoot6: Diesel is currently 10¢ cheaper at the place I drove past today.

            • +1

              @mapax: I posed a rhetorical question.

              The following(from October 2022) will answer it:

              "The great diesel mystery: why is it more than 40 cents a litre dearer than petrol?

              You never had to worry much about the difference in price between petrol and diesel. They tracked together. But over the past 15 years, diesel has averaged five cents a litre more than petrol, ranging from two to 13 cents.

              But now they have parted ways as the global market for energy has blown up. Diesel now costs 44 cents a litre more than petrol. Those driving petrol cars are enjoying a slight respite from high prices, and those driving diesel utes are in a world of pain.

              How on earth has this happened? It is not about greedy local retailers, I’m afraid. The global price of diesel has shot up, as this chart shows.

              Crikey
              Sign up to keep reading.
              Get access to Crikey investigations for less. Get 50% off a year of Crikey for a limited time.

              https://www.crikey.com.au/2022/10/20/diesel-petrol-prices-mi…

              According to "FuelCheck" in my postcode area of 2527 Albion Park Rail NSW Diesel is about 17cents per litre more expensive than petrol.

              I was not cognizant of the difference being as big as 40 cents(as per the article), but I knew it was significantly more.

    • Sorry, I don't hate SUVs and I believe cars are for utility more than looks anyway so it doesn't matter. You are right - it's a very subjective matter and everyone can have a different view, which is what is being shared here. We aren't looking to find a conclusion of any sort.

  • +7

    What is with parking spaces getting narrower & narrower? We stopped by a small shopping village cafĂŠ last w/e & the parking spaces were so narrow that we could barely exit the car even though our hatch was centred within the parking spot as were the non-SUV vehicles on either side of us.

    • +3

      Totally.. Parking spaces at the most places (even newly built) aren't meant for SUVs. They barely fit in and there's no way you can open the doors and get in without doors touching the cars in the adjacent bays if they are SUVs too. Who on the earth approves this size of bays these days?

      • +1

        This one is decades old yet the parking spots cannot properly accommodate non-SUVs without risking a ding.

    • +2

      Not saying it was the council that I sometimes contract to, but some are “allegedly” making parking spots smaller to encourage people to use more environmentally friendly transport options when going to the shops and so that they can also boast about make an extra disability parking spot.
      The stupidity of shrinking regular parking to install one or two extra disability spots is that they have also recently made it harder to get disability parking permits for partially disabled people, which means they now have to use the regular parking, which is now smaller and harder to use.

      • +1

        We aren't far from the day when even people with disability will struggle to find parking anywhere, let alone other people. It's already happening because of developers' and councils' greed and poor planning. It's unfortunate.

        • +1

          It's odd that they cannot have adequate disability parking spots when there is a community need. I've seen shopping centres reallocate multiple 'prime' parking spaces for 'Click & Collect' customers only (including one where a disabled parking bay was moved further away) virtually overnight. Similarly, another one reallocated an entire row nearest the entrance/exit when a child care centre took up a tenancy for specified morning/afternoon pick-up & drop-off times. So, it's not that difficult.

      • +2

        Now, that is just too dumb. Honestly, certain decision making powers needs to be revoked from some folks!

        I have no issue with councils encouraging public transport in areas where it is readily available however this is a very small shopping village & services an area that is not on a train line so public transport would be limited to bus only. It's a shame too as you would think the local council would encourage people to go there, especially as it is out of the way, but when even the trolley collector recommended that we park on the street then you know the locals probably also avoid it & go to the nearest Westfield.

    • Strangely they repainted the carpark at the shops recently and spaces aren't equally sized and are random. Some spots easy fit for an SUV some won't even fit a cerato.

    • +1

      One of the many things Costco gets right.

      • Wide parking bays?

        • +1

          Yep

          • @GandalfTheCheap: Well, if you have to haul a tonne of goods home each time you shop then Costco know you will be driving a large vehicle in which to transport it.

  • +2

    I also think they don't look as good as a sedan. Recently had to get a new car because old one was losing power when driving / engine light came on and we opted for 7 seater SUV. Was more practical to drive one car with kids and grandparents since that's the stage we are in. It'll be good for driving the kids and their friends to and from activities too but as soon as appropriate, I'll be switching back to a small - mid size sedan.

  • +2

    Recently bought a RAV. Came from a Suzuki Swift.

    I dont consider SUVs suitable family cars. Excuses about prams, sports equipment and space are generally concocted by people who don't want to admit driving high and having a larger cage around them is important to their driving habits.

    My reasons for getting a RAV (Hybrid) -

    About the same fuel cost as the Suzi
    Less back aches from being kicked by 6ft teenager
    Less complaint from 6ft husband whose head touched top of Suzi
    Facilitates my antique and road side scavaging habits

    Having driven a Landcruiser (93 model) and Hilux (98) I can safely say modern SUVs are lazy arse driving and do not resemble any type of genuine off roading vehicles. I happily take my RAV to the farm but I wouldn't bother with it for grunt work.

    What I would like to see is a SUV/4x4 drivers licence class. Sure that'd peeve a few Toorak/Burnside/North Shore mums off.

    • +4

      Never owned an SUV before kids, only owned Corollas. So I didn't know what it was like to "drive high". After kids, there's no way a Corolla had enough space for the odd road trip and would be a struggle just having a pram, 2 kids, and a week's worth of groceries. You're only projecting your own habits onto everyone else.

      • 🤦‍♀️👍

      • +1

        After kids, there's no way a Corolla had enough space for the odd road trip and would be a struggle just having a pram, 2 kids, and a week's worth of groceries. You're only projecting your own habits onto everyone else.

        Did your parents own an SUV when you were growing up? I'm sure did road trips, had prams in the back, and took you along places just fine.

        • +1

          Nah no suv. Van. Family of 6.

        • +1

          My great great grand parents had a horse and cart. Heaps more space and luxurious inside.

          Everything was fine then too but it turns out the automobile was better and now the SUV is better for some things too.

          But does everyone benefit from an SUV probably not.

          I would prefer an excellent station wagon but there's not many around now. The closest alternative is an SUV which is essentially a semi jacked station wagon.

        • No, they couldn't get what they needed because they couldn't afford the Landcruiser or a Patrol at the time, they were also the only options for a SUV type vehicle at that time. So instead, they were stuck with trying to tow trailers to carry the extra load instead of it all just fitting inside the car, sounds real economical and safer doesn't it, not.
          What a stupid point you tried make with that, the times have changed since then and so have the vehicles too.

          • +1

            @ConsumerAffairs:

            What a stupid point you tried make with that, the times have changed since then and so have the vehicles too.

            You're missing the point - what exactly has changed over the last 30 years that requires cars multiple times larger?

            I don't have an opinion on SUVs, obviously people can drive what they want. However, I think this narrative that the vast majority of the population "need" SUVs is obviously ridiculous and just leads people to buy cars that are heavier, larger, and more dangerous than we need.

            I'm not advocating for taking away your car, so no need to get touchy. Just advocating for people to use some critical thinking when making their vehicle purchase decisions.

    • +5

      Excuses about prams, sports equipment and space are generally concocted by people

      Just because these don't apply to you doesn't mean they're not applicable to others

    • +2

      Excuses about prams, sports equipment and space are generally concocted

      As someone who owns an SUV and a Corolla, all I can say is, you are wrong. My SUV fits way more shit in it than my wife’s Corolla.

      If we need to go anywhere and need any space for anything, the Corolla gets left at home. It has so little space in it that it’s shit to even go do the weekly shopping.

      If we take our child and the 2 neighbour’s kids to school, that’s it for the Corolla. No more room for bags. I could fit 4 kids in my car and all their bags and probably fit in half a weeks shopping as well.

      I would rather have the space and need is occasionally, then to not have it and need it.

      So, why do you own a RAV4 that makes it legitimate for you, but a “concocted requirement” for a family?

    • Would you really want a Cx-3 which isn’t much bigger than a Mazda 2 to have it’s own license class?

  • +3

    What I would like to see is a SUV/4x4 drivers licence class. Sure that'd peeve a few Toorak/Burnside/North Shore mums off.

    Oh yeah.. this is gold.

    • I'd agree, but firstly make anyone towing a caravan over the avg weight of a sml loaded trailer, get a truck license equivalent. Imagine the gross weight of a fully loaded 4wd wagon and a fully loaded 40+ ft condo-van, barrelling down the backroads.
      Madness

      • Imagine the gross weight of a fully loaded 4wd wagon and a fully loaded 40+ ft condo-van, barrelling down the backroads.

        Think you should check out the allowable GCM on the said 4WD wagons.

        I agree a licence upgrade should be compulsory.

  • +14

    Look in the carpark of your local shopping centre and count the number of SUVs versus sedans and hatches. It's close to 50%.

    Car makers are very keen on everyone buying an SUV. They have higher profit margins compared to a smaller car. You're only going to buy one vehicle, so why not push you towards the larger and more profitable one? Wagons have virtually disappeared from our roads. It's a hatchback, sedan, or SUV now.

    There is a feedback element in people purchasing SUVs leads to more SUVs being purchased. I have always driven hatchbacks, but increasingly I find pulling out of parking spots to be a game of chance. With an SUV beside me, it's impossible for me to see oncoming traffic. The rear camera doesn't have a 180 degree view. So I pull out slowly and hope for the best. So far so good. This leads to more people buying SUVs because they have trouble seeing in carparks.

    The more large SUVs there are on our roads the greater the pressure to buy one to feel safe. I see this at my female dominated workplace. When one of the staff has a child, takes time off and then comes back, she almost always comes back in a large SUV. Some of this is due to the practicality of having a nice large vehicle, but carrying one child doesn't require a brand new car. The major factor is safety: everyone around me has an SUV and is going to injure my child in a crash, so I need an SUV to protect my child.

    Not saying anything about this is inherently good or bad, it's just the way it is.

    • +3

      I was out earlier today and I do agree that it is at least 40% of cars that I saw on the roads and in car parks were SUVs. Funnily enough most of the ones that were on the road only had one occupant, but there were a few with two occupants in them (in the driver and passenger seats). I only saw one with a lady driving with two small kids in the back, husband nowhere to be found.

      I agree that it's going to get to the point where one will have to either buy and SUV or put up with poor visibility in car parks and not being able to see when pulling out of a side street (if an SUV is turning the other way) and being at higher chance of injury/death if you get into an accident with an SUV" etc. It really is the way it is.

      • +2

        Checked all of the second row seats for rear facing child seats?

        • I think I only saw one with a child seat in the back but it was front facing. Didn't see any rear facing child seats in the sample I saw this afternoon.

          • +2

            @Ghost47: Just so you know, before that child seat was front facing, it was rear facing.

            Maybe the owner of said vehicle bought it to fit the rear facing child seat. Many hatchbacks don’t fit rear facing child seats.

      • +1

        Good to see you're another one that has no idea how a family operates, you think just because you don't see every single seat in the vehicle occupied that it means it's never occupied? BTW, what's it got to do with not seeing 'the husband' got to do with anything?
        It's far more economical and fiscal to own a single vehicle that can do everything you need it to do for most of the time than to own multiple vehicles that have a singular purposes.
        Are you going to own and run a motorbike to cart yourself around because it only has one seat? I'd highly doubt it.

  • +2

    Being a large tall frame with long legs plus being a senior my existing 6yo compact Kia SUV is perfect, the wife's old Ford Fiesta is a disaster for me and I have to "Fall" into it and unfold myself to get out, just not nice!.

    I agree, the excessive number of huge SUV's are at times a pain when stuck between other vehicles. Just try as I do to go to the outer parts of parking areas to avoid the problems of space - the bonus, some limited exercise and no dings in the bodywork!. Cheers to All

  • +1

    I also have no great love for SUVs and agree with most of your points. I also think people should just buy whatever it is they like.

    The only thing I disagree with is the it being something the car companies are foisting upon us. Yes, it appears they're more profitable, but if there wasn't demand, they wouldn't keep selling them. I personally believe that the reason manufacturers have more SUV's in their lines and reducing or even eliminating sedans is because of market forces. In my mind, it's the consumer causing the shift.

    • I agree to an extent but companies are known to retire their cheaper brands/ products (even though they are often even better), when their high-margin, higher-price products start doing well so eventually people don't have much choice. Apple is an example. Almost every new version that come up is with is dearer even when phones should get cheaper with evolving technology. $1500 for a phone.. really? It's not just Apple though.

  • too bulky and heavy for my personal liking

    Lucky you aren't forced to buy one then.

    I personally really like wagons, but they seem to have gone out of fashion for the most part.

    • Yes, I have been lucky to be able to drive a hatch these days. I like size of the wagons too, such as i30.

      • +1

        lucky to be able to drive a hatch these days. I

        Tbh I miss driving a little hatch, easy to park amazing on fuel etc. If registration / insurance wasn't so expensive I'd probably have 2 cars instead of a dual cab ute, but it actually just doesn't make financial sense to pay rego / insurance on 2 vehicles to save some fuel consumption and have a little convenience.

        For me that's the main reason I'm driving something that is 95% of the time much larger than I need it to be for my commute to / from work and university.

        Would be nice if we could get rego based on kms travelled or something like that instead.

  • +2

    There’s lots of reasons. Somewhere along the way ‘we’ decided that SUV>wagon so now it’s almost impossible to buy a wagon. If you want better boot space then you also likely want an SUV.

    Also a while back, at the start of the SUV boom car advertising standards changed and they stopped advertising speedy driving and so in order to make cars exciting they now all have to go off road.

    Then there’s the whole SUV definition that covers a Mazda cx3 (slightly tall hatchback) up to a landcruiser (full off road wagon). IMO neither of these are SUVs. The former is not really off road capable and the latter is still a 4wd. Sure, there are plenty that fit the 4wd shape and style without rock hopping 4wd capability (imo a true SUV) but so many are just tall hatchbacks with bigger wheels.

    When we had kids I found putting kids into a car seat in a wagon or sedan meant a lot of back loading for me. It was either reach in with the kid in fully stretched arms and head outside the door or head in and no room for arms. When you are tall it’s easier to put your kids in a higher vehicle. Our 2003 Forester was not tall enough.

  • +3

    I have a rav4 , mrs has a camry, both have very similar fuel consumption and parking footprint.

    Rav4 is a lot more useful tho.

    Life is too short to be angry at the cars people everyone has their reasons.

    • +1

      No one is angry, mate.. No one cares even if everyone drives a truck or a van. Just exchanging thoughts here.

  • +2

    Less well endowed gentlemen prefer utes.

    • +2

      And you know this how?

    • +1

      Less well endowed gentlemen prefer utes.

      My doctor told me I must sit on the loo to wee 'cause I'm not allowed to lift anything heavy. I've also had two 4WD utes.

      • Boss lady tradie?

        ;)

    • So, how's the single life treating you?

  • +2

    I agree, I don't really like SUV's but I've never driven one so I cant be overly critical.

    I dont like them because they all look the same and now there is virtually no interesting cars on the road anymore. There is a carpark outside my work and every single car in that carpark is a mid sized SUV except for a little Suzuki Swift.

    I am a holdout I will never ever buy one. There's something a little depressing about them.

    • 100% my thoughts.

  • +5

    ive always wondered this too. living life in excess then complain about cost of living
    whinging entitled *****

    • +2

      Yup.. cost angle is something no one thinks about when buying an SUV. Even I didn't when I owned one, I confess.

    • +2

      ve always wondered this too. living life in excess then complain about cost of living
      whinging entitled *****

      Same as smoking, booze, buying crap you don't want or need but hey its 50% off, eating out 6 or 8 times a month, changing phones every time an updated model comes out, Kentucky, Maccas, etc. Wonder how much some here spend on games? Yep.living life in excess then complain about cost of livingwhinging entitled* *******

  • -1

    tl;dr plz

  • +3

    I don't like the way SUVs handle.
    I like sedans.

    My wife likes the road position of an SUV as she feels safer but she is short.

    I'm not exceptionally tall either.

    Too many ford rangers and hiluxes people who aren't tradies because of poor tax incentives.

    Many people buy bigger cars and houses than they need because the bank will give them bigger loans than they can afford if they have a few adverse circumstances.

  • +4

    Get rid of the UTE in particular RAM. Those monster truck is pure ugly.

  • +2
    1. If you have trouble parking a "big" SUV that says more about yourself than it does the car. They aren't that big lets be honest.
    2. When I drive my SUV on long trips I feel much less fatigued than when I drive a hatchback for example. Higher driving position ftw
    3. Good sized boot and at a really good accessible height

    To name a few, I could go on.

  • My choice in buying an SUV was due to accessibility. It is much more convenient and less painful for me to "slide" into my seat than crouch into my seat. I'm not very tall, so a higher driving position is also very nice.

  • -1

    Lots of SUVs are very good driving cars these days. Convenient to get in and out, dont have to play tetris on grocery runs, you get to sit higher in traffic and see further ahead. Cant complain.

  • +7

    Woman at work bought an SUV when she had a kid and did the whole, “I need the space,” excuse. I pointed out her previous hatchback actually had more boot space and there was way more leg room for the backseat passengers. Then she said, “I just wanted to be higher up than the other cars on the road. I guess if you’ve got the extra $15,000 to pay for being higher up…

    • Was it a Kona? I'm surprised at how little legroom and boot space that car has.

Login or Join to leave a comment