Seems like a good price for a well reviewed phone.
New OnePlus 9 Pro Dual SIM 5G 8GB RAM 128GB Morning Mist (FREE INSURANCE + 1 YEAR AUSTRALIAN WARRANTY)
OnePlus 9 Pro Dual SIM Android 5G, 8GB / 128G $913.95 Shipped (HK) @ Becextech
91
Farmos on 01/01/2022 - 16:41 becextech.com.au (587 clicks)
Last edited 01/01/2022 - 16:47 by 1 other user
Last edited 01/01/2022 - 16:47 by 1 other user
Related Stores
closed Comments
I got the black variant from Aliexpress when it came out, $1400 AUD, which is close to the RRP US price. So I would gamble probably $100~200 less for the non-pro variant, and $100~200 more for the pro variant.
Oneplus 9 series was be announced late Jan, early Feb? But purchasable mid to late March.
is Oneplus 10 released in AU?
They havent released a phone here since oneplus 5 I think.
all right.
I thought OnePlus is popular in global.Then I have to try 3rd seller,,,
Maybe, a good phone, but, it's not a very reputable seller here…
i would not trust becextech with a 900 dollar purchaes regardless of how good the price is. if you need any aftersale support you are basically stuffed
True!
Absolutely true!
Thanks for the link.. what that person had to go through is my worst nightmare. Good to know, will not be using this store.
And no VoLTE or VoWiFi on Telstra…
Don't buy from this dodgey ass seller not even for 1 or 2 Dollaroos
I am still curious what the merger b/w Oppo and Oneplus would bring with their unified OS. But I would strongly recommend whoever is considering buying this or any Oneplus device to have a read or look around some of the recent experiences with the current flagship.
In my opinion, the Oxygen 12 update (which is available for OP9 devices now) is just a reskin of the ColorOS from Oppo, so the quick and customisable OS isn't there anymore.
And this upgrade is more of a downgrade in many instances, it introduced so many bugs, laggy animation, reception issues and my Alexa app no longer boots D:
I switched to Samsung when my OP6 died and their OS is no where near as good as OxygenOS was. Shame that it's now ruined with the merger.
I moved from Samsung Galaxy S4 —> OP2 —> OP5T —> OP9P but am thinking about jumping back to Samsung after this.
With their trade-up programs, it IS better value than what you are getting with OnePlus.
AND their ecosystem is much more integrated. Bought a OnePlus watch with this phone too, o boy what a waste of money XD.
(I would consider Xiaomi too but their OS sounds eff'd)There's just so many of the small things that OnePlus did better than Samsung. After a pixel experience theme (or Nova Launcher) it's not as bad as it was. Unfortunately not all the Samsung bloat could be removed via ADB.
Thinking something like Pixel might be a better investment. I'd use Xiaomi but only for their tablets. Otherwise it feels too iOS like.
@Clear: There are bloats in OnePlus too, which can only be disabled unless adb or root access.
Pixel is excellent with software, but the hardware to me isn't worth the price.
Warranty?
Seems like an average camera from the specs. You'd be better off with an S21+ or Ultra with Aus warranty for this price.
“New OnePlus 9 Pro Dual SIM 5G 8GB RAM 128GB Morning Mist” - Mist (German) means sh*t in English but can also mean manure, dung or muck. I have never heard about this, but after reading some reviews I think it is “Mist”. At least they are honest and call it like this, too.
Catchdeal, Techrific and BecexTech to offer refunds
13 December 2017
Online electronics retailers, BXT International Ltd (BecexTech) and TCF Global Ltd (which operates Techrific and CatchDeal) have admitted to contravening the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) and provided court-enforceable undertakings to the ACCC.Until September 2017, BecexTech, Techrific and CatchDeal advertised electronic goods such as mobile phones and tablet computers as 'new', when they were in fact refurbished.
Over the last year, the ACCC received 96 complaints about BecexTech, 34 complaints about Techrific and 60 complaints about CatchDeal.
BecexTech also admitted to misleading consumers about their rights by falsely claiming they were not bound by the Australian Consumer Law as they were incorporated overseas.
“When you sell a product as new but it is made of used parts, you are clearly breaching the law by making a false or misleading representation,” ACCC Deputy Chair Delia Rickard said.
“If you carry on a business in Australia, you are bound by the Australian Consumer Law. All Australian consumers are protected by consumer guarantees, and they cannot be limited or excluded.”
“If a product does not match descriptions made by a salesperson or on a business’ website, consumers can seek remedies from the retailer, including a replacement or a refund,” Ms Rickard said.
Both BXT International and TCF Global have undertaken to:
clarify when products are refurbished or are not Australian market versions of those products on their website
contact and offer redress to certain consumers who were either misled into purchasing refurbished products or were misled as to their rights under the ACL.
implement an ACL compliance program, including staff training and regular reviews;
publish a notice notifying consumers about these undertaking and not engage in this type of conduct any further.
BXT International has also undertaken to:cease its practice of ‘pre-selecting’ for purchase items additional to those which a consumer actually intends to purchase; and
revise its warranty policy to clarify it does not limit or exclude consumer guarantees.
The undertakings are available at www.accc.gov.auExamples of consumer complaints:
One consumer spent $608.95 on an Apple iPhone 6 from BecexTech, believing that the product was new. After the iPhone failed within three days, the consumer took the phone to an Apple store only to be told that that same phone had previously been purchased two years prior in the United States.
One consumer purchased from CatchDeal an iPhone 6 for $539 and an iPhone 6 Plus for $609 in March 2017. Both phones were contained the words ‘New Sealed Box’ in their titles. The consumer was later informed by Apple that both products were used and had previously been purchased in 2015. Both phones had been repaired with third party displays.
Another consumer purchased a Samsung Galaxy S5 for $449 from Techrific in February 2016, which was advertised as being in a ‘sealed box’. Within three months, the screen began to fail. The consumer took the phone to an authorised Samsung repairer who informed her that the phone was a refurbished model, and that the water damage indicator inside the phone had been replaced with a third party version. The consumer was given only a partial refund of $369.
The ACCC encourages people to use its complaint letter tool to email or write to a business in relation to their rights to a repair, replacement or refund.
Release number:
240/17
I think mymobile website have better deal and free shipping. I saw OnePlus 9 pro under 900 When I purchased pixel 6a from them.
How much will Oneplus 10 come out at? Its probably dropping in the next week or 2…