• expired

AKG 3169H00020 K72 Closed Back Monitoring & Studio Headphone $54.78 (RRP $139) Delivered @ Amazon AU

90
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Price just dropped from the usual mid $70s on Amazon down to an all time low according to camelcamelcamel
https://au.camelcamelcamel.com/product/B01AYSNHVQ?active=priā€¦

Not a bad wired set but certainly not audiophile material. They are light and comfortable with large rounded cans that produce pretty reasonable sound for the price. Got a set for my partner whom has been using the everyday for work and they have worked flawlessly for just under a year now.

Review here
https://www.whathifi.com/au/akg/k72/review

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
This is part of Black Friday / Cyber Monday deals for 2021

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace

closed Comments

  • +5

    "large rounded cans" Nice

    • +1

      I prefer the natural look personally

  • Don't do this to your ears.

    Also, do not trust What HIFI, ever. I don't think they've written a 3-star review for years.

    • Could you please explain what this is supposed to tell me?

      • +1

        Bass bloat with a mid-bass dip, huge issues in the lower mids, upper mids then disappear, shrill highs.

        Cheap, congested, crappy v-shape. Consider some of the following closed backs instead, in order of preference:

        AKG K371
        Shure SRH-840

        Shure SRH-440
        Takstar Pro 82 v2

        AKG K361
        Cooler Master MH751

        .
        .
        .

        AKG K275

        • Oh wow, amazing you can tell all this from a graph.

          Cheers for the info

          • @Gorian4: When things are more controlled, it's hard to separate out much of anything from graphs, but when it's this out of control (10 dB disparities) it just overwhelms the senses.

            +10dB = twice as loud

    • I don't think they've written a 3-star review for years

      Not true

  • +2

    "whom"? more like whomst've

Login or Join to leave a comment