This was posted 3 years 4 months 9 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

50pk Disposable 3 Layers Face Mask $5.01, 100pk Disposable 3 Layers $8.49 Delivered @ Outbax Camping via eBay

1404
50pk Disposable 3 Layers Face Mask $5.01, 100pk Disposable 3 Layers $8.49 Delivered @ Outbax Camping via eBay
Go to Deal
Cashback
ChesoRepresent on 14/07/2021 - 08:27 ebay.com.au (6012 clicks)
Last edited 19/07/2021 - 20:44
PJULY15PJULY17

OzB's more favoured disposable mask just got cheaper with the code. Buy up to 4 for even more discount plus cashback incentives.

50pk Disposable 3 Layers Face Mask $4.90, 100pk Disposable 3 Layers $8.29 with Plus membership.

I believe shipping is free for anyone. but note the delivery times of about a week or more based on my area anyway.

EDIT: Thought it might be worth noting that the materials may have changed from the past, despite the item link being the same. The 'Meltblown' description on the item title is no longest listed (compared to when I bought it in Jan), but is still listed in "Materials" under Item Specifics. Will update again when I receive mine to compare it to the original, which honestly I had no issues with. These are still better than the ones they hand me at work, for example.

EDIT2: The masks are in and I am very disappointed to say they were definitely of an inferior quality, and almost a completely different item. As some commenters said before, it feels almost like tissue on some layers. The masks come vacuum sealed and compress into a small pack, which goes to show how much less material is being used now.

The better quality ones I bought in January were manufactured by "Sichuan diweiyi Electronic", but the new ones are from "Tainouer". If you're after a cloth in front of your face to avoid a fine, these will do but nothing more.

Original Coupon Deal

Health & Beauty Surgical Mask

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
Outbax
Outbax

closed Comments

  • MickBubba on 14/07/2021 - 08:48
    +4

    Thanks OP, living in Sydney, so we're going through them fairly quickly.

  • skinny on 14/07/2021 - 08:48
    +1

    I don't know if other have the same issue - I cannot add 50s or 100s to my card.. not sure if it is because I previously bought from these guys or out of stock

    update:

    get the following error for purchasing 1

    This item isn't available in the requested quantity. It may have been purchased already, or the listing has expired.

  • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 08:51
    +2

    Are these real 3M masks?

  • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 08:52
    +6

    How to identify fake and not fake:

    https://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/safety-alerts/safety-alerts/…

    • aedeau on 14/07/2021 - 09:30

      this seems like way too much work. probably better off just buying from a brick and mortar store where you can be reasonably sure they're legit.

      • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 09:32
        -3

        Buy from these guys:

        https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/637747

        https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/637303

        Wouldnt trust some brick n morter stores too, they are out there to just make a profit.

        • Ironh59 on 14/07/2021 - 11:13
          +6

          "they are out there to just make a profit"

          Like every other business in the free world.

          • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 11:25

            @Ironh59: Just stay at home, dont go out to do essential oil shopping at dusk.

            • Ironh59 on 14/07/2021 - 11:33

              @Turd: Can I borrow your biocharger then?

              • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 12:11

                @Ironh59: You can borrow my time machine and show the world how big of an issue this is back early Dec 2019

                • Ironh59 on 14/07/2021 - 12:54

                  @Turd: What does it have to do with business wanting to make profit in a free economy? (In case you have forgotten my first comment, which you replied to with a personal attack)

                  • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 13:00
                    +1

                    @Ironh59: At the expense of other's people's and the greater good's health?

                    It's like selling fake milk powder to mothers to feed to their newborns.
                    That is ok right? in a free economy?

                    • Ironh59 on 14/07/2021 - 14:18

                      @Turd: I don't think its a valid comparison. These masks are sold legally and are sold because there is a market for it. I don't think there is a market for fake milk powder.

                      • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 14:21

                        @Ironh59: you wouldnt know it's fake until someone tells you.

                        • Ironh59 on 14/07/2021 - 14:44

                          @Turd: Again you failed to see the point. I don't think people selling these masks claim to provide 100% protection from virus or stop any virus at all. Buyers are aware of that. Stretching your fake milk analogy a bit further, people selling fake milk claim for it to be real milk. I hope you see the difference.
                          I don't like repeating myself, so I will leave the conversation here. Have fun with you time machine.

                          • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 16:24

                            @Ironh59: Why so many people buying these masks? Because they are cheap and protect you?

                            • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 16:46

                              @Turd: My avatar is why.

      • Agret on 14/07/2021 - 09:38
        +2

        I bought the $22 for 50pk Australian Made at Chemist Warehouse and the quality is awful, the straps on them break off so easily I've destroyed a bunch of them just trying to get them out of the pack.

    • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 14:07

      DIY tests: https://jayaone.medium.com/how-to-know-if-your-mask-is-the-r…

    • astarman on 14/07/2021 - 20:50

      But these aren't even advertised as p2 mask ?
      So ..what's fake ?

  • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 08:54
    -1

    More info about buying masks

    https://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/safety-alerts/safety-alerts/…

    • vaski on 14/07/2021 - 09:36
      -1

      Good on you.

  • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 08:56
    -6

    Can't seem to find anything for TGA approval for these so called "masks"

    Will they help against Delta?

    • Big Lenny on 14/07/2021 - 09:05
      -2

      no masks work against Delta champ

      • morediscount on 14/07/2021 - 09:24
        +1

        what about carrying your own oxygen tank?

      • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 09:27
        +1

        this one listed isnt even approved or based on safework nsw the masks arent safe

        • astarman on 14/07/2021 - 20:51

          Doesn't nsw gov just tell you to wear a cloth mask ? Is that approved ?

          • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 22:07

            @astarman: It's just one small piece of what they tell you, no? Obviously if you have symptoms then the other advice is far more important

    • ForTheGreaterGood on 14/07/2021 - 17:12

      Staying at home might help against Delta. Unfortunately, there is no mask in the world which can guarantee (or even loosely promise) that it will limit the spread of the Delta variant from the wearer.

  • TheUsualSuspect on 14/07/2021 - 09:00

    Got a pack. Thanks OP.

  • Tyken on 14/07/2021 - 09:02
    +1

    Thanks OP!

    These should do the trick. The one's my workplace provides are 1 layer.

  • Dex38313 on 14/07/2021 - 09:11
    +13

    These r useless they had them on wa news and only offer 10% protection they held one up sprayed an aerosol in it and all the partials went straight through

    • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 09:29
      +8

      That;s what im trying to bring awarenes to.

      These look like useless masks.

      • DrDuck on 14/07/2021 - 10:11
        -1

        Good on you

    • activ8newbs on 14/07/2021 - 12:12

      When you say "these", do you mean this exact product from this outback camping eBay store?

      Or do you mean these disposable (often) light blue coloured masks in general?

      • Dex38313 on 14/07/2021 - 12:29
        -1

        It said any thing that does not have a ventalater built in

        • ashtrayc2c on 14/07/2021 - 19:30

          sooo. not "these"? since you haven't tested "these" yet?

          • Dex38313 on 14/07/2021 - 21:52

            @ashtrayc2c: Any mask not made in australia and it must have a ventilator built in it was wa 7 news they band them all

  • TigerWoops on 14/07/2021 - 09:25
    +3

    Costco face masks are best but price is 5 times more. I don't know the quality of this masks. Maybe this is better.

    https://www.healthcarexpress.com.au/mask-henry-schein-proced…

    These ones are best from my experience. I use masks 5 days pw since masks are mandatory.

    https://www.healthcarexpress.com.au/dental-xpress-products/m…

    • gobsmax on 14/07/2021 - 09:29

      Nice find. What did you pay for shipping?

      • mauricem on 14/07/2021 - 10:41

        I bought 2 boxes of 50 and shipping was free. Shipping for 1 box was $10. So basically a BOGOF deal!

    • doxxie on 14/07/2021 - 09:34

      ive read the HENRY SCHEIN ones are on the smaller side. but not sure.
      shipping looks about $10

  • vaski on 14/07/2021 - 09:30
    +2

    Extremely poor quality masks (the 3ply disposable ones), would not recommend these ones for the pandemic.

    • KRiSX on 14/07/2021 - 09:39
      +14

      or don't be a selfish piece of shit and do the right thing? if you actually have a medical reason not to thats fine, but just saying you do to get out of it is just plain wrong, just like all the pricks that walk around holding empty disposable coffee cups so they can have their mask under their chin like a (profanity)

        • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 14:21
          +2

          What scam is that exactly Dex? The one which has killed 3M worldwide - including doctors and health workers - and will leave many many more with lung lesions for life? We look forward to your dissertation on the spread of corona viruses in human populations. Coming soon is it?

          Interestingly (although probably not to you), in one report I read last week experts studying trends from this pandemic have now shifted to aerosol transmission as THE major mechansim for C19 spread, particularly for the Delta variant.

        • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 16:58

          Pity cops don't uphold the law any more (if they ever did). It's illegal for anyone other than an authorised health officer to demand proof of exemption. But we have shop keepers, checkout chicks, police and neighbourhood Karens alike demanding proof. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuLWiUSBNjE&t=193s (yes, listen from the timestamp, for the people who think I'm lying and have short attention spans).

          Cops fine exempted people anyway. So you have to go to court, and pay lawyers more than the fine itself, just to get a judge to agree with you and enforce the law again by overturning the fine.

        • crentist on 14/07/2021 - 18:11
          +1

          not required by law doesnt mean you shouldnt do it anyway

          or do you need a law telling you to wipe your arse too?

          • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 19:21

            @crentist: Reminds me of the old blonde with headphones breathe-in breathe-out joke. We should be eternally grateful that these flaccid 'outside the square' thinkers weren't around pre WW1 or WW2.

      • spuderump on 14/07/2021 - 10:45
        -4

        Coffee cup. Good idea! hadn't thought of that one.

        • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 17:36
          -3

          Thanks for pointing this out. Very interested in this. Does that apply in NSW? i.e. Is sipping water while walking through Coles a valid reason not to have a stupid face nappy blocking my airway suffocating me?

          I guess it doesn't matter though because cops are emulating WWII Brown Shirts regardless of what the law says. Fining people with exemptions, illegally demanding they provide proof, etc then you have to pay more to go to court than the fine to get justice.

          I hate wearing that stupid Huggies suffocation device and I think if Gladly Ticklingreptilians crossed my path I'd be arrested for hurling home truths at her over government brainwashing and lies. I struggle to get enough air to breathe, overheat, my eyes begin closing and I realised I was close to passing out. Ripped it off and realised I had pains in my chest, headaches. But thanks to a-hole cops who arrest in direct contradiction of Australian laws, I still wear it if I have to go out because I've run out of food. But I wear it incorrectly, wide open, so I can breathe cool unrestricted air but still avoid the #@$%^ toxic bridge-troll Karens.

          All over a fake pandemic, that kills nearly no-one below 85, with fake vaccines that have caused more deaths over the same period than all other vaccines combined, when simple preventatives AND treatments are available which are being rubbished and even outlawed by government because the PM has vaccine manufacture shares.

          I can hear it now… "But you can get an exemption!" Why the @#$% should I? Why should I drive a 60km round trip to my GP just to get PERMISSION TO BREATHE AIR, and then get arrested and fined by cops breaking the law anyway!? I didn't need to yesterday, I won't need to tomorrow when they remove these stupid ineffective restrictions (more people get infected in their HOME than outside), there's no cases in the vast majority of NSW, a whole TWO deaths in the entire country (apparently), and we know the 'deadly delta strain' is actually more infectious but LESS dangerous. So no lockdown before delta, but lockdowns after it!? The idiots are running the asylum.

          Then we have to contend with the sheep bleating 'follow the science'… except all the science from the same and more reliable/expert sources that disprove their 'facts'… including the guy who invented the PCR test telling governments they're using it wrong thus producing many false positives, the guy who invented mRNA warning it's not a vaccine and shouldn't be used as one, and the list goes on. BAAA!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuN4IT7TNtQ

          So sick of low-IQ sheep leaping over imaginary rocks because the one before them did, then claiming they're the 'informed' ones because they're following all the government mistakes and months-ago proven false assumptions.

          • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 17:41
            -2

            @[Deactivated]: Why am I not surprised I have a 'negger' before they could possibly had time to read the post? BAAA!!!

          • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 22:00

            @[Deactivated]: You have my sympathy - it's an enormous task wearing a mask. Makes what the ANZACs went through look like a picnic. /s

            You clearly haven't got a clue about the science as it stands and have a closed mind so I'll simply point out two of your obvious errors. "The guy who invented" the PCR test (he didn't) is presumably former Pfizer executive Michael Yeadon (?) - whose comments on many Covid issues (the epidemic's over, no second waves, vaccines cause female sterilisation, the PCR test results aren't valid and are being misused - something Fuellmich has also been claiming) have been debunked left right and centre.
            https://www.thejournal.ie/debunked-pfizer-employee-quotes-mi…
            https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/it-was-inevitable-that-anti…

            Who is this "guy who invented mRNA"? Presumably you mean Dr Robert Malone (who while a major contributor to its use in medicine, certainly didn't invent a naturally occurring acid unless he's THE creator reincarnated, in which case he shouldn't have left it to Kariko and Rossi to solve the problems). What did Malone say - apart from reasonably pointing out the experimental nature of mRNA vaccines and potential dangers? So far (important point) the evidence doesn't seem to warrant his energetic warnings.
            https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/…
            https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210712/Real-world-eviden…

            Time you stopped your sleepwalking tendencies and starting weighing up the evidence. There's plenty of it to wade through.

            PS QLD deserved the win, as much as it pains me to say.

          • Thundaja on 14/07/2021 - 23:00
            +1

            @[Deactivated]:

            Then we have to contend with the sheep bleating 'follow the science'… except all the science from the same and more reliable/expert sources that disprove their 'facts'…

            Here is a journal article (2020) concluding that face masks do not have a discernible impact on O2 saturation levels in individuals wearing masks vs not wearing masks:
            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662944/

            Here is another one from Nature (2020) concluding that “even without fit-testing, [masks] reduce the outward particle emission rates by 90% and 74% on average during speaking and coughing, respectively, compared to wearing no mask”:
            https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72798-7

            Please provide citable evidence to backup your own claims, because it’s pretty clear that you’re full of shit.

            Why should I drive a 60km round trip to my GP just to get PERMISSION TO BREATHE AIR

            See the above. This is laughable.

            • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 23:22
              +1

              @Thundaja: Can't see why it's such an onerous problem myself. Surely anyone who is adept at talking through his/her @rse must also be able to breathe through it?

            • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 23:49
              -1

              @Thundaja: Maybe you should now go back a bit further and look at what Fauci had to say about masks in relation to the Spanish Flu.

              I know what happens when I put the stupid thing on, and the relief upon removing it in the carpark. The headache goes in about 2 minutes, the pain in my chest went instantly, and the unrestricted air was like coming up for air from swimming underwater.

              You're what's laughable.

              • Thundaja on 15/07/2021 - 08:33
                +2

                @[Deactivated]: The science says otherwise as I’ve actually cited above. You’re still yet to product ANY credible evidence to the contrary. Link me to some reputable journal articles that prove your point. This should be easy for you if your “scientific” claims come “from the same and more reliable/expert sources”.

                Just because YOU experience those symptoms, does not give you the right to go around spreading BS that masks do not work/that people shouldn’t be “sheep” and wear a mask. Have you ever stopped to think that your symptoms are because of anxiety, and not related to the physical mask itself? There is no scientific basis to support what you’re saying.

                I have a family member with severe COPD. She is able to wear a mask perfectly fine despite her actual disease. And so I’m not a hypocrite, here is another paper that backs my claim:
                Effect of Face Masks on Gas Exchange in Healthy Persons and Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

              • [Deactivated] on 15/07/2021 - 12:08
                +1

                @[Deactivated]: What did Fauci say about the Spanish Flu exactly? He and his co-author did NOT say that masks caused most of the deaths as some Facebook liars and sociopaths claimed. If you want to read a summary of what they did conclude (secondary bacterial infection) check out the second link below. It will improve your knowledge and might even help to reduce your anxiety and physical over-reaction to mask wearing (you have my sympathy if that's what happens when you don a mask but it doesn't excuse your attitude to mask advice for the masses).
                https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/12/fac…
                https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/bacterial-pneu…

                Flu and corona are significantly different pathogens as you know. Our knowledge wrt transmission etc (largely based on actual experiences and data from this pandemic) has, unsurprisingly, improved from that which existed 100 years ago. Given these events are rare and governments and businesses usually have entirely different focuses that's entirely reasonable. Early in this pandemic advice was that transmission was probably most likely via close contact, touch etc. Now it appears that aerosol is the major agent, especially for the more contagious Delta variant. Science thankfully moves on as knowledge and experience is acquired.

                • [Deactivated] on 15/07/2021 - 20:12
                  -1

                  @[Deactivated]: LOL.

                  So you cite a link, which just above the supposed 'reliable' information, deliberately misquotes Trump to score cheap points. Well done. You've gone one scratch barely below the surface, using a site that proves on the very same page it cannot be trusted. Now go read the actual study without your blinders on to go two or more scratches deep to flip their false claim over again.

                  Second, even assuming I am mistaken, that the people you cite aren't ALSO misreading and twisting the study to say what THEY want it to say… SO WHAT. It still doesn't disprove the dozens of other reliable info, often from the SAME sources or equipment or practices they're deliberately using incorrectly, that demonstrate this 'deadly pandemic'… isn't deadly and isn't a pandemic.

                  Masks don't prevent infection (infection stats show the infected often wore masks).
                  Their vaccines don't qualify as vaccines (totally different science/function).
                  The virus isn't a pandemic (genuine pandemics don't skip the vast majority of entire age groups, mostly only people in the 80s with at least one but often two or more, co-morbidities).

                  And.
                  The.
                  List.
                  Goes.
                  On.

                  These are just a few simple truths, that much like yours only go one scratch deep but are actually REAL, that torpedo the false narrative of government and media.

                  Btw… Love how I've been living rent free in your head, how you've been itching to continue your personal vendetta from a few months ago under this thinly-veiled guise of 'fact checking'.

                  • Thundaja on 15/07/2021 - 21:27

                    @[Deactivated]:

                    just above the supposed 'reliable' information

                    These are reputable journals where scientific research is published.

                    Masks don't prevent infection (infection stats show the infected often wore masks).

                    This is completely false. See my links above.

                    It still doesn't disprove the dozens of other reliable info

                    You are still yet to provide ANY credible source to back up your claims. As I said above: Link me to some reputable journal articles that prove your point. The reason you haven’t is because you can’t.

                    I implore you to actually take a step back and consider this from all sides. Ensure that what you read is backed up by primary sources of information.

                  • [Deactivated] on 15/07/2021 - 23:18

                    @[Deactivated]: There are numerous similar links which will refute or totally demolish most of your beliefs (and possibly relieve your obvious paranoia and self-inflicted anxiety), take your pick Mr Faulty. I linked you to a summary of the Fauci study where there was no mention at all of masks, feel free to provide a link which shows otherwise. A quote which verifies what you were implying about masks would be a real bonus. Take your time.

                    While you're doing the basic research you should have done before parroting invented Facebook nonsense, you might like to start providing some actual specifics in your comments instead of your usual vague allusions to something you think you might have read - like "read what Fauci said about the Spanish Flu" (I did, you obviously didn't) , and what the "the inventor" of mRNA said about using that technology as a vaccine (I did read some of it - there's a huge amount to wade through - again you obviously either didn't or you couldn't work out why current data doesn't support his concerns). In short you're easily led and not inquisitive enough to read widely before forming an opinion.

                    Your comments are so fact free no-one with even a basic knowledge of the issues would need to assume anything other than "you're mistaken", which is actually a euphemism in your case because it's your choice to hold ignorant beliefs despite an enormous amount of credible information to the contrary. It's a trait commonly found in conspiracy theorists and right wing conservatives. Why that is will no doubt be the source of numerous future books and social studies in the future.

                    Your penultimate paragraph is a prime example. Here's a question for you. Why would democratic governments (left, right or centrist) and the media want to create a "false narrative" around the covid-19 pandemic?
                    It's patently absurd to suggest that they'd want to lock down communities and strangle businesses and economies.

                    As I said elsewhere, the world you embrace so credulously is one where facts are false, lies are truth, ignorance is a virtue, knowledge and learning is rejected, gullibility is encouraged, ignorance is a virtue, and honesty and integrity are ignored.

                  • [Deactivated] on 15/07/2021 - 23:45

                    @[Deactivated]:

                    the people you cite aren't ALSO misreading and twisting the study to say what THEY want it to say… SO WHAT.

                    Two simple solutions. (1) Learn to differentiate between credible sources and obviously tainted opinion. (2) Develop enough nous, skepticism and inquisitiveness to seek out unadulterated data and verified studies.

                    In this case do what any reasonable, educated adult would do and go to the primary source - the published paper. Here it is, knock yourself out trying to find out what Fauci said about the relationship between masks and morbidity during the Spanish Flu. Should be a five minute job. <ctrl-f> masks will bring up every mention of the word, then you can copy and paste the relevant bits which back up your vague claims.

                    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/

                  • [Deactivated] on 16/07/2021 - 11:21

                    @[Deactivated]: Since your google isn't working, here's just a few of the studies which show that masks are an effective tool to limit transmission. They aren't a silver bullet and need to be used in conjunction with other public health measures which most of us are familiar with.

                    https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2014564118

                    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31142-9/fulltext

                    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-br…
                    From the summary:
                    Experimental and epidemiological data support community masking to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The prevention benefit of masking is derived from the combination of source control and wearer protection for the mask wearer. The relationship between source control and wearer protection is likely complementary and possibly synergistic14, so that individual benefit increases with increasing community mask use.

                    https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/i…

                    https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6549/1439

                    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.6254…
                    A mathematical study of mask efficacy in Melb.

                    It's important to note that one study alone is not/may not be conclusive evidence/proof of any hypothesis or conclusion. Good studies rely on accurate and current data, proven methodologies, and the integrity and honesty of those involved. Together a collection of studies can provide a high level of confidence in the accuracy of conclusions. This is why evidence reviews and summary studies are regularly published.

                    In a new pandemic (the likes of which has not been seen in the 'modern' world) data is always accumulating and being assessed, knowledge is being acquired, and advice based on current understanding formed. That advice will, and (generally) should change according to circumstances and the latest science. Lies, mis- and dis-information and conspiracy theories put public health at significant risk.

    • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 09:46
      +3

      Head to India or Indonesia. Dare you to walk around without a mask

      • Dex38313 on 14/07/2021 - 10:04
        -8

        India wiped covid off the map they used ivamectem and no more flu . Don’t u watch real news

        • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 10:05
          +2

          You should tell Indonesia to do the same?

          • Dex38313 on 14/07/2021 - 10:07
            +1

            @Turd: Doo I have physical proof they have Rona or u watch to much msm

            • Turd on 14/07/2021 - 10:20
              +3

              @Dex38313: Cow piss works too I think?

        • bobzor on 14/07/2021 - 10:20

          That was the news from a social media post, which was proved wrong by another social media post.

        • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 11:05
          -1

          This explains about ivamectem.

          https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-shoul…

          Let’s use it on you, might eradicate…

        • smurftastic on 14/07/2021 - 12:00
          +1

          I'm from an Anglo Indian background(so mixed Indian and Eurpoean) and my wife is from a full Indian background.
          Both of us have families in Indian from which there have been multiple deaths on both sides attributed to the virus.
          So far anyone I've asked with family in India have at least one or two family members lost to the virus.
          The news is also that hospitals are not coping and basically you are only getting treated if you have a lot of money to pay the bribes.

          I also have family in Australia who work in Health and the stories they are telling me on what is happening (i.e. worry of the virologists, issues that COVID patients are having) is not something to brush off

          Though you may only be trolling for responses in which case you got me

          • lordra on 14/07/2021 - 22:59

            @smurftastic: Your personal messages are off. Let's catch up! @smurftastic

        • [Deactivated] on 14/07/2021 - 14:26

          That you Donnie-expotus?

          Covid is flu. Fact is fiction. Lies are truth. Ignorance is knowledge. Self-acquired stupidity is honourable.

      • spuderump on 14/07/2021 - 10:41

        With pleasure. I am so scared to catch a cold where I need a test to tell me if I have it and to be treated with 14 days at home.

    • crentist on 14/07/2021 - 18:09

      yea good one mate. you can also say you got tourettes and keep being a cun't
      see whoops i got tourettes dont get upset you selfish d'ckhead

  • Klang on 14/07/2021 - 09:36
    +2

    Same seller but cheaper after discount. Packet of 10.

    200 pieces - $15.69
    https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/274434011606?hash=item3fe58ab1d6…

    100 pieces - $8.22
    https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/293655799364?hash=item445f3fe644…

    50 pieces - $4.90
    https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/124263679200?hash=item1ceeb144e0…

  • altiarlio on 14/07/2021 - 09:37

    Got 4 of the 100s at 33.50

  • GordonD on 14/07/2021 - 09:43
    +9

    OzBargainers should be aware that there are sellers of things who are meticulous that the thing they are selling meets the appropriate standards and meet the claimed specification. Companies like Aldi and CostCo are in this category.

    And there are sellers who simply buy from the cheapest supplier who claims to meet the standards and specs, whether or not it does, and sells it as if it is a fact that it does. From the evidence of other products Outbax Camping sells it is hard not to conclude it is in this category.

    So if you just want to be seen to be wearing a mask, fair enough, this product may be the one for you. But if you want to be protected by being sure the masks you are buying really does work as they are supposed to, perhaps you should buy them from someone who sources its products from suppliers you can be sure make them to meet the necessary standards and specs, not to the lowest price.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join