[Prime] Panasonic Leica DG 100-400mm f/4-6.3 Lens $1,299 (was $2,499) Delivered @ Amazon AU

160

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

jshopper on 22/06/2021 - 08:49 amazon.com.au (214 clicks)
Last edited 22/06/2021 - 10:10 by 1 other user

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Another great Panasonic micro four thirds deal here.

Gets positive reviews all around, here's a good summary of it here:
https://www.photoreview.com.au/reviews/mirrorless-lenses/mir…

Price History at CamelCamelCamel.

This is part of Amazon Prime Day sale for 2021

Related Stores

Amazon AU

Marketplace

• 

  Buy2Much on 22/06/2021 - 08:59

  +1

  FYI, the focal length is the equivalent of FF 200-800mm, at less than 1/2 the weight of a FF 200-600mm!

  • 

    frowny on 22/06/2021 - 09:02

    +2

    Sure, but with the trade-off of background separation equal to an F/8-12.6 lens though

    • 

      jaygee on 22/06/2021 - 09:05

      +2

      Yep uh huh, I understood some of these words

      • 

        frowny on 22/06/2021 - 09:08

        The lower the 'F/stop', the more blurry, creamy background you get. This lens, being an equivalent F/8-12.6 will not have much blurry, creamy background at all.

        • 

          Foma2 on 22/06/2021 - 09:19

          +3

          @frowny: At that focal length everything will be blurry but your object.
          Probably more scientific way to say it is DOF will be minimal due to a very long focal length.

          • 

            frowny on 22/06/2021 - 09:32

            -1

            @Foma2: Depends, I've found shooting Sony at 400mm, the AF is good enough to lock onto animal eyes. With a lot of wildlife photography I'd like that creamy bokeh.

            Not disagreeing to say that DOF is the be-all-end-all, but if people wanted a long lens you could even grab a bridge camera.

            • 

              Buy2Much on 22/06/2021 - 09:47

              +2

              @frowny:

              but if people wanted a long lens you could even grab a bridge camera.

              That's even worse if DOF is important to you, most have 1" sensor or less.

              • 

                frowny on 22/06/2021 - 09:56

                @Buy2Much: Yeah, what I meant was if the only thing people wanted was a long lens, grab a bridge camera.

        • 

          Heaps for Cheaps on 22/06/2021 - 09:23

          @frowny: I guess, but a telephoto lens like this definitely goes a very long way to achieving that look if that's what a user is looking for.

          However, I wish this was parfocal.

      • 

        Buy2Much on 22/06/2021 - 09:46

        Yep uh huh, I understood some of these words

        This may helps https://www.dpreview.com/articles/2666934640/what-is-equival…

• 

  mito on 22/06/2021 - 09:03

  Anyone have experience using this lens on an Olympus body?

  • 

    demoiree on 22/06/2021 - 09:34

    +1

    it is quite obvious when you use continuous tracking , slower and less accurate focus performance than the Olympus equivalent

  • 

    Buy2Much on 22/06/2021 - 09:54

    +1

    I used it with an OMD MFT for still objects from a distance, even blood moon shots. It worked quite well. I have not tried on moving objects.

    • 

      demoiree on 22/06/2021 - 10:16

      +1

      Yeah still objects are ok , but the Olympus equivalent is faster(hunt less)