This was posted 4 years 1 month 12 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Dell S2719DC 27" USB-C Ultrathin 1440p DisplayHDR 600 Monitor $498.04 Delivered @ Dell

780
Dell S2719DC 27" USB-C Ultrathin 1440p DisplayHDR 600 Monitor $498.04 Delivered @ DellAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
TheHummingBird on 10/10/2020 - 15:52 dell.com (4517 clicks)
Last edited 22/10/2020 - 23:40 by 2 other users
EPP2020
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

This deal is back cheaper than before. I believe this is the cheapest price yet for this monitor. Use code QUT5

Design that shines. Any way you look.
A bright addition: Add brilliance to any space with the Dell’s brightest USB-C ultrathin monitori featuring a Corning Iris Glass light guide plate (LGP).

Made to fit in and stand out: This 27" ultrathin monitor has an elegant and state-of-the-art design. The slim stand base and thin profile—a mere 5.5mm at its thinnest and 29mm at its thickest—make it a perfect fit for various lifestyles and contemporary workspaces.

Take your view to the edge: With Dell’s InfinityEdge display, you’ll enjoy an expansive entertainment experience without borders. The gorgeous, edge-to-edge views on this virtually borderless display ensure that you’ll be immersed in the visuals, not distracted by the frame.

Brilliance any way you look: Gorgeous design features allow you to experience vivid colours in virtually any lighting environment.
Unmatched brightness: Your colours shine in any environment thanks to a peak brightness of 600 nits for the ultimate in contrast and clarity.
More detailed and stunning colours: A wide viewing angle enabled by In-Plane Switching technology, more than 99% sRGB, and 90% DCI-P3 colour coverage lets you see rich colours, greater depth, and a wider range of shades no matter where you sit. Plus, you’ll see it all in stunning Quad HD (2560x1440) resolution.
Entertainment without exceptions: Whether you’re watching a movie, playing a game or working on a presentation, you’ll see superb visuals. HDR movies shine like they were meant to.

22-Oct-2020 Coupon Updated QUT5 changed to EPP2020

Computing 27inch Computer Peripheral Dell LCD Monitor Monitor

Related Stores

Dell
Dell

closed Comments

  • parker2004au on 10/10/2020 - 16:03

    It says "Features VESA interface support", does anyone know if it's 75 or 100?

    • moseba on 10/10/2020 - 16:16

      Fairly sure this model doesn’t support a Vesa mount.

      • parker2004au on 10/10/2020 - 17:02

        Cheers

        Thanks mafroew as well

      • Bedgrub on 10/10/2020 - 20:03

        It doesn’t, but there is an aftermarket adaptor available.

    • mafroew on 10/10/2020 - 16:31
      +1

      VESA is an acronym for the name of the standards body (Video Electronics Standards Association).

      The "interface" is relating to how you connect to it.

      As the other comment stated, no VESA mount (aka FDMI)

      Link to manual

      • FLICKIT on 10/10/2020 - 17:15
        +4

        It seems silly not to have a Vesa mount in this day and age, but looking at the monitor they obviously wanted a sleek and sexy look, so I can understand why they have left it off..

        • skittlebrau on 11/10/2020 - 14:39

          Couldn't they just use a cover for the VESA mount area that sits flush with the rest of the rear of the display? Dell's done that before with their other monitors.

          • FLICKIT on 11/10/2020 - 15:48

            @skittlebrau: Dunno, but since it's marketed as an "ultra-thin" monitor it may be due to the extra thickness that would be needed to reinforce it all to handle a vesa mount…

      • get-innocuous on 10/10/2020 - 17:19

        surely VESA are taking the piss naming their mount FDMI when HDMI exists and is a completely different monitor-related thing.

        • [Deactivated] on 10/10/2020 - 21:53
          +2

          HDMI hasn't been around as long as FDMI and the previous version FPMPMI was around for more than 5 years before HDMI….. So….

  • fastnet on 10/10/2020 - 16:15

    I bought this around a month ago for $597 :(

    • TheHummingBird on 10/10/2020 - 16:17

      How do you rate this monitor based on your use?

      • fastnet on 10/10/2020 - 16:24
        +5

        It's great, bright and vibrant colours! I use it for WFH and some light gaming on the side and works well for that.

        One quirk I noticed was that FreeSync and HDR is only supported when using a HDMI connection. With USB-C these features are not available.

        I also noticed a few bright pixels 2 weeks after I bought the monitor and Dell promptly replaced it with a brand new monitor, great warranty service.

        • ATangk on 10/10/2020 - 17:06

          HDR only on HDMI… that kind of defeats the purpose of why I would get this particular type of monitor…

          • fastnet on 10/10/2020 - 17:22

            @ATangk: Reason is the DisplayPort version. This monitor supports DisplayPort 1.2 (over USB-C) but HDR is only supported on DisplayPort 1.4 and above.

            • ATangk on 10/10/2020 - 17:26

              @fastnet: I feel like some looking to buy this monitor would use it to supplement a laptop. For those, this monitor's appeal would be both HDR and the Usb-C passthrough feature, but itd be disappointing when they miss out on HDR unless they use HDMI, which most laptop users wont.

              • pennypincher on 11/10/2020 - 08:14

                @ATangk: Power Delivery on USB-C is only around 45W which isn't much. The macbook pro 15" needs 85W.

                • ATangk on 11/10/2020 - 10:25

                  @pennypincher: This is another reason why I was looking at the Philips b line monitors.

                • sangohan on 11/10/2020 - 15:28

                  @pennypincher: it mostly works in practise. Just takes a long time to charge (like 4-5hrs from empty to full, vs the normal mac charger which takes 1hr or so).

    • chinaman on 11/10/2020 - 11:49
      +1

      Get another? Dual set up!

  • mctubster on 10/10/2020 - 18:40
    +1

    Hmmm stand has no height adjust too …

    • Fobsessive on 10/10/2020 - 19:57

      Gotta cut costs somewhere, right?

    • mblack77 on 15/10/2020 - 22:36

      I have one of these, and unless you have a poor desk setup, it doesn't make much difference at all. I find the default heigh is perfect,

  • C0mbat on 10/10/2020 - 19:36

    I had this monitor for 18 months and swapped it for the Dell S3221QS recently. If you don't need 32" then most other things about this monitor are better. It's brighter, has better viewing angles and the colours are amazing. Plus the USB C power delivery is really handy. At this price it's an amazing deal.

  • Fobsessive on 10/10/2020 - 19:58

    600 nits, wow that's double the usual!

    • DeToxin on 10/10/2020 - 20:25
      +1

      That's pretty impressive tbh, I think I've read that "proper" HDR support should be 1000 nits but honestly I've just got a 400 nit screen and I have to turn the brightness down, even during the day in a well or room

      • get-innocuous on 10/10/2020 - 20:39

        600 is fine if it has good local dimming (which this doesn't, I don't think?). It's really about the difference between darks and brights

        • ATangk on 10/10/2020 - 23:40

          HDR 600 cert needs local dimming.

        • blonky on 11/10/2020 - 03:11

          Doesn’t mention FALD in the manual, only edge lit

          It’s a requirement of HDR600 to have local dimming - my guess is it has a couple of vertical zones to be compliant but they wouldn’t be effective at all

  • johangules on 10/10/2020 - 20:34

    this might be the cheapest hdr600 ips monitor

  • abuch47 on 10/10/2020 - 23:00

    Why is the hz never listed anywhere?

    • get-innocuous on 10/10/2020 - 23:02
      +1

      If it's not listed assume 60 (this one is 60Hz).

    • brosk1s on 10/10/2020 - 23:49

      If it's not a selling point, e.g. 144Hz, it doesn't get its own headline.

      The refresh rate is right in the tech specs, its not exactly hidden.

      Native Resolution

      QHD 2560 x 1440 at 60 Hz

  • NinjaE on 10/10/2020 - 23:29

    Quite low contrast ratio 1000:1 for an IPS montior, as far as I understand.
    I'm not very well-versed with monitors; is this bad and would I notice the effects?

    • ATangk on 10/10/2020 - 23:37
      +2

      Pretty sure 1000:1 is par for IPS

    • casho on 10/10/2020 - 23:39
      +3

      Most IPS get 1000:1 ; some might push to 1300. You need to go VA or OLED to get higher

  • d3sined on 11/10/2020 - 07:18

    Bought it for $100 more a couple months back! Amazing monitor for this price!!

  • Wolfofwallstreet on 11/10/2020 - 07:37

    How come this monitor which has a QHD resolution, 16.7 million colours and higher input lag is more expensive that the Dell 27 4K UHD Monitor - S2721QS which has 4K HDR, 1 billion colours and a better contrast ratio as well. This monitor has USB connection while the 4K monitor doesn't. So what is the big deal with USB connection monitor anyway? Can't people use HDMI/Display Port instead?

    • mctubster on 11/10/2020 - 08:11
      +1

      Single cable for display, peripherals and power delivery to a laptop.

    • TheHummingBird on 11/10/2020 - 08:17
      +1

      It appeals to a certain group of people who want one cable that can display and charge their laptop at the same time. It’s the price of convenience.

    • netsurfer on 11/10/2020 - 09:52
      +3

      This monitor is quoting HDR600. Generally, HDR600 is where proper HDR starts. HDR400 is a gimmick. It's a standard created to allow monitor makers to put HDR on monitors. You might think it is just 250 nits more. However, on IPS, good backlight costs more.

      Another feature is the USB-C with integrated Hub. However, all S-series monitors tend to cut corners one way or another. The USB-PD is 45W (and there is not enough info on how well the e-marking is done). Regardless, that's more work and more hardware. You can sort of get away with MBP 13 inch (using 45W USB-PD, not ideal, but doable). Lenovo laptops probably will show up with a warning stating it is not charging at a fast rate (assuming correct e-marking). The biggest issue is the limited DP 1.2 alt mode support, which means no HDR in USB-C/alt-mode. Also, no height adjustable stand nor VESA monitor mount support.

      This monitor is trying to entice two groups of people. People wanting USB-C/PD and HDR isn't a big deal when doing general work. The other group is people want HDR600. People in the first group could use HDMI to get HDR.

      Don't get me wrong, the S2721QS deal is good value for money. However, there is a reason Dell didn't put HDR400 in there officially. Also, that contrast ratio, is that static or dynamic? The 'fake' HDR marketing is working, but if we want to nitpick this monitor, we cannot really simply rate not even quite HDR400 (which is fake HDR anyway) to be = to HDR600.

      • Wolfofwallstreet on 11/10/2020 - 10:28

        Very well put explanation. Thanks champ.

      • Smaland on 11/10/2020 - 12:11

        Could you please recommend better monitor for MBP 13? My budget is $500-600. Thanks

        • netsurfer on 11/10/2020 - 15:24
          +1

          There is no USB-C monitor in <$600 price range that I would recommend. Technically, USB-C monitors cost more because:

          • The monitor needs to provide a chip to support USB-C/Alt-mode. Cheaper monitors won't opt for Thunderbolt 3 based chipset (too expensive).
          • USB-PD needs to be implemented, that adds cost to power circuit.
          • There is a trade off between bandwidth on the display side vs USB 3.0 data ports (USB-C port bandwidth is finite, you cannot allocate everything to display if you still want USB 3.0 data pass through). Apple branded 5K monitor can only offer USB 2.0 ports (very little bandwidth left once 5K display portion took majority of the bandwidth away).
          • A decent USB-C/USB-C cable needs to be included (as it needs to be good enough for power, and fast data). The e-marking better be flawless otherwise it could run into compatibility issue.
          • You then need to have decent specs to entice people to divert the attention away from those additional costs.

          USB-C, good in theory, buy consumers do pay the price if you really want full on USB-C.

        • [Deactivated] on 11/10/2020 - 16:55

          You can catch some great deals on AS NEW and REFURB units from Dell Outlet.
          Not very often recently for obvious reasons but last year U3419W was $659 delivered.
          I'd keep an eye if not in a hurry. It's a different story if need for WFH now.

          • netsurfer on 11/10/2020 - 17:11
            +2

            @[Deactivated]: When you look at it carefully, some key issues remain (but the USB-PD issue is addressed + a better stand):

            • 1 x USB Type-C (DisplayPort DP1.2 Alternate Mode,Power Delivery, and USB2.0): This again reflects what I mentioned. If you elected to go single USB-C port for the lot, the USB ports on the monitor drop to USB 2.0. This is due to chipset limitation, tech limitation on USB-C bandwidth (+ cost) and the ultrawide resolution requiring more bandwidth on the graphics side.
            • The monitor does offer USB upstream port(s) to alleviate the USB 2.0 issue, BUT for MBPs, that means you need to use 2 ports. If so, it somewhat defeats the USB-C single port advantage.
            • Yes, the 90W PD at least could save you one port and is more than enough for a 13 inch MBP.
            • No HDR support so this avoids DP 1.2 alt mode not having enough bandwidth to do HDR.
            • Height adjustable stand is good.

            I doubt the embedded USB hub is USB 3.1 gen 2 (most likely USB 3.1 gen 1 / 3.0). This means in the MBP world, it kinda feels like a downgrade connecting a second USB-C port to the monitor.

            Again, USB-C, good in theory. However, when you (i.e. Apple) strip out all other ports, you really wonder whether that's actually better or it's more about saving cost.

            • [Deactivated] on 11/10/2020 - 18:25

              @netsurfer: Yeah, I think you're correct here.
              I use it with MBP 15 with a single cable no problems though.
              Understand your point regarding USB 2.0 but it really depends what a person wanna use the USB hub for.
              If I needed USB 3 speed, I'd connect directly to Mac. For me, it's chargers, camera, gps and similar with no benefit from USB 3.
              Saying that, I barely use any directly connected peripheral devices. Storage and printers are network connected; USB sticks have almost no use for me.
              So I agree with what you're saying while taking into consideration that it's very individual what's important and not.

              • netsurfer on 11/10/2020 - 23:48
                +1

                @[Deactivated]: That's the thing. It makes sense for most people to compromise (due to price). Problem is, this whole USB-C is rather complicated and people don't look at it in depth.

                Most people don't care and don't understand USB-C/Alt mode fully. When you look at both monitors in depth, you cannot help but wonder whether Dell designed both monitors for the PCs. Hence, it is not pushing for / utilising full Thunderbolt 3 bandwidth. PC users won't mind the upstream ports. Or, one might argue Dell opted for the common denominator approach. Sensible business decision though.

                But, is that really right for people with MBPs and/or Intel NUCs or PCs with Thunderbolt 3 ports? To be fair, Apple also screwed up on a number of Apple USB-C accessories. Sure, if you have the latest revisions, Apple fixed them, but if you have the earlier versions… well… that's bad luck. At the end of the day, monitors utilising full TB3 bandwidth (in alt mode) do cost more (as 2X bandwidth requires more work and better chipset).

  • captain smash on 11/10/2020 - 08:38

    Dammit. If only it had vertical rotation

  • reggrundy on 12/10/2020 - 00:21
    +2

    Before you buy!

    Hey guys, I recently bought at 27" 4k Dell monitor, the deal was on OzB about a week ago. Same as this deal, it was from Dell. Delivery was estimated to arrive by the 15th of October, (SYD to BRIS). I got an email 4 days after the purchase confirmation saying delivery is now delayed to ~25th November. Not sure if this may apply to their other appliances, just be warned it could be a good month and a half before you receive your purchase.

  • mblack77 on 15/10/2020 - 22:39

    Cheaper to avoid this code and go through CashRewards for 6% off monitors, currently. Brings the price down to $492.80.

  • PoorFromOzBargains on 22/10/2020 - 18:36
    +1

    For today only (22/10/2020), you can instead use the code BONUS7 to bring the price down to $487.55, plus if you shop via CashRewards or ShopBack you'll get additional 3% cashback once tracking is confirmed. That works out to $472.92 out of pocket, making it a decent discount of $226 (if you believe the advertised $699 RRP)

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join