This was posted 4 years 8 months 4 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Xiaomi Smartmi Anti-Pollution Air Sport Face Mask US $7.09 / AU $10.57 Delivered @ Tomtop

270
Xiaomi Smartmi Anti-Pollution Air Sport Face Mask US $7.09 / AU $10.57 Delivered @ TomtopAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
MarketingTomtop01 on 18/03/2020 - 19:00 tomtop.com (3064 clicks)
Last edited 18/03/2020 - 21:33 by 1 other user
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Xiaomi Eco-chain launched a new anti-pollution air mask. Effective block the dust and pm2.5 outside. Xiaomi Smartmi Anti-Pollution Air Sport Mask Block PM2.5 Haze Anti-haze Adjustable Ear Hanging 3D Design Comfortable with Ventilating Valve. Anti-Dust Women Men Face Mouth Masks with BREATHABLE TPU, Designed for meeting different demands on various conditions and relieving the suffocating feelings. Nano-fiber electret filtering technology, the air filter is apparently able to achieve PM2.5 filtration efficiency of up to 97%.

Main Features:

  • Xiaomi Smartmi Anti-Pollution Air Sport Mask.
  • Comes from Xiaomi Eco-chain.
  • Skin-friendly Soft memory TPU, Free to breath.
  • Isolated from air dust, PM2.5, Haze, pollen grain, automobile exhaust.
  • With the ventilating value, the mask is safe and comfortable to wear.
  • Compact appearance, and lightweight design, a perfect gift for outdoor sports.
Sports & Outdoors Mask Xiaomi

Related Stores

TomTop, Hong Kong
TomTop, Hong Kong

closed Comments

  • m9 on 18/03/2020 - 19:02
    +13

    the air filter is apparently able to achieve PM2.5 filtration efficiency of up to 97%

    Apparently?

    • iamhurtin on 18/03/2020 - 19:05
      +13

      It's Krusteriffic, Johnny Unitas! But is my upper lip supposed to bleed like this?

  • Kaise on 18/03/2020 - 19:03
    +34

    Will the virus be cured by the time these arrive?

    • tanastra on 18/03/2020 - 19:05

      Recurrent ??

  • UberIsCool on 18/03/2020 - 19:06
    -6

    Washing hands = Free

    • [Deactivated] on 18/03/2020 - 19:08
      +12

      these don't stop virus/bacteria (you need a n95/n99 mask), they're for pollution. Would have been handy back In January for the fires.

      • lolcoaster on 18/03/2020 - 19:11
        +2

        n95 masks are rated to block 95% of PM2.5 so these would be slightly better if the 97% rating is true

      • ash2000 on 18/03/2020 - 19:23
        +1

        you need a n95/n99 mask

        this is n95. I have one.

        It's just a standerd n95 disposable mask with a foam outer shell. The foam is just cosmetic.

        It's disposable after 18 hours of use.

        • Fishdog on 18/03/2020 - 19:31
          +3

          PM2.5 means the mask is rated for filtering particles 2.5 microns and larger. The coronavirus particles are closer to 0.1 microns in size. Therefore I doubt this mask will be very useful in these times.

          • nfr on 18/03/2020 - 19:34
            +15

            @Fishdog: Respiratory droplets are larger than the virus itself

          • lolcoaster on 18/03/2020 - 19:57
            +2

            @Fishdog: Even the non-n95 surgical masks can be of use in reducing risk.

            https://smartairfilters.com/en/blog/n95-mask-surgical-preven…

            • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:27

              @lolcoaster: While better than nothing, like a scarf or a bandana - wearing a surgical mask is only really effective for protecting others if you're infected compared to the efficacy of an N95 for self protection.

          • bargaino on 18/03/2020 - 20:00

            @Fishdog:

            The coronavirus particles are closer to 0.1 microns in size

            Irrelevant. They do not float free in the air, but in mucus/saliva droplets.

        • bargaino on 18/03/2020 - 19:59
          -2

          It's disposable after 18 hours of use.

          18 hours of Chinese smog?

          They don't suddenly stop working, but slowly get clogged and reduce effectiveness.
          In clean air, you may get much more use while retaining >90% effectiveness.

        • ChillBro on 18/03/2020 - 20:05
          +1

          So you can't wash them and reuse again? That's a shame.

        • ash2000 on 18/03/2020 - 20:35
          +3

          this is n95. I have one.

          Ive just found the packaging, says kn95 on front.

          https://imgur.com/fPWu6ou

          • mikokik5 on 18/03/2020 - 21:35
            +1

            @ash2000: Then that means its a fake N95..

            • ash2000 on 18/03/2020 - 22:04
              +2

              @mikokik5: Seems unlikely from xiaomi, but anything is possible.

              Frankly, I'd be buying a paper kn95 mask with exhaling valve, cheaper.

              Of course all masks claiming kn95 from China need to be viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism.

    • garage sale on 18/03/2020 - 19:31
      +2

      the big issue is air born droplets …. it attacks respiratory system ……. washing hand makes people feel safer but the big deal is air born droplets e.g on train, fight is supermarket to get toilet paper, etc.

      • homersyd on 18/03/2020 - 21:44

        ^^^ this! I dont get why some people think simply by washing hands would prevent being infected. +1

        • UberIsCool on 18/03/2020 - 22:48
          -1

          You and other paranoid mask people are the reason why medical staff don't have access to any. Every intelligent health professional in Australia are telling people you don't need a mask, you must be better educated than them

          • homersyd on 18/03/2020 - 23:40
            +5

            @UberIsCool: so are you saying all the countries that use wears are paranoid? eg. Taiwan, HK, China?
            Dont you think it's logically flawed that the medical staff needs them (ie. the do work to stop the spread to medical staff). So the masks only work for medical staff but wont work for normal people like u and me?

            • UberIsCool on 19/03/2020 - 00:37

              @homersyd: Medical staff have many patients constantly breathing on them all day and in close proximity. It’s like when you have an x-ray and they leave the room so they don’t expose themselves to X-rays all day.

              Wear one if it makes you feel safe, but touching your face without clean hands will be worse.

            • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:30

              @homersyd: Yeah, you know the one's that have the virus under wraps /s

      • UberIsCool on 18/03/2020 - 22:29

        Really? see many people sneezing in front of you? Coughing all over you? Air born droplets dissipate, you don't walk into them and suck them in.

        Mask pretend to make people safe. They are only good for medical workers who are in patient faces.

        • dcep on 18/03/2020 - 22:43
          +1

          what about in the lift …

          • UberIsCool on 18/03/2020 - 22:50
            -1

            @dcep: Like I said, they don't just float around. If you have to sneeze or cough, do it into your elbow.

            • homersyd on 18/03/2020 - 23:42
              +2

              @UberIsCool: I have only seen like 3 out 10 people who sneeze or cough and cover with their hands, let alone elbows. I agree if everyone follow that guideline, then the need for masks would greatly reduced however the majority of people dont so…

            • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:33
              +4

              @UberIsCool: Um, they don't just float around? Please visit https://www.who.int/ for some up to date facts - can float around for 3 hours after infected person as left the room… misinformation puts everyone at risk.

              • stonkered on 19/03/2020 - 10:15

                @ebaypus: I'm gonna believe a guy on the internet posting under UberlsCool before believe WHO.

  • Price Jack on 18/03/2020 - 19:08
    +6

    Only a matter of time before we see Xiaomi re-usable toilet paper…

    • tryagain on 18/03/2020 - 19:11
      +8

      They have bidets

    • FlipCrank on 18/03/2020 - 19:11
      +2

      No mask without replaceable filters are supposed to be resused.

      • ash2000 on 18/03/2020 - 19:29
        +2

        Yep, this is a regular paper n95 mask with a funky shell. No way of replacing the inner paper filter.

    • dan76n on 18/03/2020 - 19:16

      Already been done

    • chrism238 on 18/03/2020 - 19:37

      It's double-sided, after all.

  • DangerDave11 on 18/03/2020 - 19:13
    +1

    Actually curious if these are effective. Mask only needs to prevent airborne saliva particles from entering the mouth.

    • dcep on 18/03/2020 - 22:44
      +1

      you mean nose

      • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:34

        you mean eyes

  • canopus78 on 18/03/2020 - 19:16
    +6

    Just out of curiosity,
    why is everyone not wearing a mask?? seriously?

    • 87percent on 18/03/2020 - 19:20
      +17

      Because they’re next to impossible to buy

    • garage sale on 18/03/2020 - 19:34

      its the “i’m statistically safe” attitude “ and makes you feel safe, wearing a make makes you acknowledge you are vulnerable ….. you will see health care workers wearing them as they appreciate the risks.

      • homersyd on 18/03/2020 - 21:45
        +1

        No they dont, I can tell you first hand as my friend works in hospital. Only the so-called first line medical staff wear masks!!!!

        • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:36

          If its a third party that works in the hospital (your friend) the info certainly is not first hand.

    • Springfield on 18/03/2020 - 19:35

      It doesn't look cool and the coronavirus will toughen you up.

      • mckayver on 19/03/2020 - 03:53
        +3

        put hairs on your chest.

    • lysp on 18/03/2020 - 19:55

      why is everyone not wearing a mask?? seriously?

      Mask is mostly effective in 2 cases:

      1) When you are sick - so it prevents coughs, sneezes being passed on.

      2) You're a healthcare worker dealing with lots of people who are sick.

      When you don't fall into the above 2 categories:

      1) Wash your hands with soap.

      2) Don't touch your face / eyes / nose / mouth with your hands.

      • craigoss on 18/03/2020 - 20:07
        +13

        2) You're a healthcare worker dealing with lots of people who are sick.

        I don't believe that. If we had an abundance of masks we'd be encouraged to wear them but we don't so we aren't. That lines just thrown out there so we feel okay about not having them.

        • Clear on 18/03/2020 - 21:06
          +4

          I've been actively working in a COVID-19 clinic (my office became part of it). We are all required to wear masks and that's just the start of the protective equipment we have.

          • Smigit on 18/03/2020 - 22:30

            @Clear: A COVID-19 clinics one thing. Medical staff not running those specific clinics aren’t necessarily wearing masks however. I work in a hospital and most staff aren’t wearing masks, and the advice going out right now is most staff don’t need to.

            • Clear on 19/03/2020 - 15:40

              @Smigit: Yup generally only those are going to be in contact with patients or in those areas are required to wear one.

        • UberIsCool on 18/03/2020 - 22:56

          Lol, conspiracy man

          • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:43

            @UberIsCool: Likely he's just able to analyse facts and think critically for himself, unlike most of the unwashed masses

        • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:39

          This is exactly right craigoss, and also:
          1) When you are sick - so it prevents coughs, sneezes being passed on.

          Even an N100 mask will not protect others if it has an exhalation valve as most do.

      • canopus78 on 18/03/2020 - 20:24
        +7

        Do you seriously believe that those in China or Korea are wearing a mask just because they are Sick? I don't get that. just because you wear a mask that doesn't mean that you are sick. you prevent any potential harms by wearing it. I've seen some elderly coughing on a train without covering it with his elbow . he just Shot the cough with no barriers. that is the time that I thought i should start wearing a mask. you don't wear a mask not because you are sick we need to encourage others to wear a mask because we need to protect ourselves

        • krisspy on 18/03/2020 - 20:33
          +4

          You gonna wear goggles too?

          • MasterScythe on 18/03/2020 - 20:58
            +1

            @krisspy: Between my rigid scleral lenses and glasses; i think i already do :p

          • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:49

            @krisspy: Goggles would certainly add a layer of protection but not nearly as much as a mask would provide since, as we all know, when inhaling you actively and repeatedly intake a sizable volume of molecules internally from your surrounding environment.

        • MagicMushroom on 18/03/2020 - 20:59
          +1

          you prevent any potential harms by wearing it

          No, it could be meaningless depending on the use. e.g. flip the mask inside out (I've seen it)

        • UberIsCool on 18/03/2020 - 22:55

          Asians been wearing masks for years, way before any outbreaks. And still look what happened!

    • [Deactivated] on 18/03/2020 - 20:37
      +2

      Because the virus can enter through your eyes, also.

      Sure you didn't breathe it in, but it will just land in the mucous membranes in your eyes.

      This is why healthcare workers wear faceshields or the full face respirator units as well.

      • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:51

        Definitely, a faceshield or goggles would certainly add a layer of protection but not nearly as much as a mask would provide since, as we all know, when inhaling you actively and repeatedly intake a sizable volume of molecules internally from your surrounding environment.

    • UberIsCool on 18/03/2020 - 22:54

      Because they won't prevent you from getting the virus. It enters through the eyes and any small openings, ie under the mask if you aren't 100% clean shaven.

      If someone sneezes and it lands on your mask, you will remove the mask getting the germs on your hands and then you touch your face. Best to practice hand washing.

      • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:54

        Hand washing is good but a mask performs a different function. That's why it's crucial to also practice correct mask removal procedure. Eye protection would certainly add a layer of protection, but not nearly as much as a correctly worn mask would provide since, as we all know, when inhaling you actively and repeatedly intake a sizable volume of molecules internally from your surrounding environment.

    • JAKEBAB on 18/03/2020 - 23:13
      -1

      Because they're pointless unless your sick….. They're suppose to stop people spreading it.

      • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:56

        If they were pointless unless you're sick healthcare workers wouldn't wear them… Unless they were also sick.

    • PukeyLuke on 18/03/2020 - 23:28
      +2

      One of the problems is people don't know anything about mask safety, they think put it on wear it and they're safe.
      When they get home and take the mask off they touch the front of the mask without gloves on, collect all the potential mucus, saliva, virus onto their bare hands. And for the first time all day they then pick their nose because they haven't been able to do it all day because they've had a mask on, they then deliver a highly contagious finger into the most vulnerable hole in their body, this is how most air-borne viruses enter the body, up the nose then into the lungs.

  • mr_asstight on 18/03/2020 - 19:17
    -6

    Wuhan bioweapon flu safe?

    • Save Medicare on 18/03/2020 - 19:22
      +3

      We'll try and find some conspiracy nut safe ones just for you

      • aec on 18/03/2020 - 19:39

        LOL

  • Noobist45 on 18/03/2020 - 19:19
    +2

    Damn was hoping this was an actual useful product because it looks so cool.

    • MasterScythe on 18/03/2020 - 20:58

      It is; as useful as any other at least.

      Just expensive for a few hours of use.

      • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 04:59

        It is; as useful as any other at least.

        If it was certified by any regulatory body… perhaps.

  • KOBH on 18/03/2020 - 19:28

    I'll buy some if comes with FREE 3-6 days Priority Shipping.

  • Plentiful3271 on 18/03/2020 - 19:30

    Wondering how these will fit on a non-asian shaped faced? Anyone tried one?

    • garage sale on 18/03/2020 - 19:36
      +1

      there are many asian made things that wIll fit onto a non asian made face ….. have tried.

      • TEER3X on 18/03/2020 - 21:00
        +2

        like filipinas?

        • rodericb on 19/03/2020 - 12:43
          +1

          Hmmmm, found George Christenson.

    • Elision on 18/03/2020 - 19:51
      +1

      I have a largeish nose, most face masks sit oddly on me :( they seem to fit nicer on asian faces as they tend to have a flatter nose bridge, they kinda stick up oddly along the nose bridge on myself.

      • MrMoo on 18/03/2020 - 20:13
        +1

        The same way your sneakers fit a non asian shaped foot.

    • MasterScythe on 18/03/2020 - 21:00
      +2

      Thats a fair question.

      Im into the FPV hobby, and a lot of goggles dont clear our western noses.

      • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 05:01

        Agreed. +1 for FPV

  • Nanokillaz on 18/03/2020 - 19:49
    +1

    I can't find the replacement filters…

  • jaclarkaus on 18/03/2020 - 19:52
    -2

    PM 2.5 means it filers down to 2.5 micron …. not all that useful when coronavirus is .3 micron

    You need n95 mask, with is not 95% filtration, but at least 94% when tested with Sodium Chloride aerosol at a flow rate of 95
    litres/minute

    kind of a different measurement I think

    • lolcoaster on 18/03/2020 - 19:59

      https://smartairfilters.com/en/blog/n95-mask-surgical-preven…

      Even a surgical mask (not n95, not sealed) was effective in reducing the likelihood of catching the flu.

      • jaclarkaus on 18/03/2020 - 20:08
        +1

        I don't usually put much faith in non-government sites, although it's probably true, but talking specifically about the mask http://cec.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/567…

        • lolcoaster on 18/03/2020 - 20:15

          Well this is the study they cite: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19193267

          "Many countries are stockpiling face masks for use as a nonpharmaceutical intervention to control virus transmission during an influenza pandemic. We conducted a prospective cluster-randomized trial comparing surgical masks, non-fit-tested P2 masks, and no masks in prevention of influenza-like illness (ILI) in households. Mask use adherence was self-reported. During the 2006 and 2007 winter seasons, 286 exposed adults from 143 households who had been exposed to a child with clinical respiratory illness were recruited. We found that adherence to mask use significantly reduced the risk for ILI-associated infection, but <50% of participants wore masks most of the time. We concluded that household use of face masks is associated with low adherence and is ineffective for controlling seasonal respiratory disease. However, during a severe pandemic when use of face masks might be greater, pandemic transmission in households could be reduced."

      • Xizor on 18/03/2020 - 20:09
        +1

        Real world application is a bit different though. For example sitting next to or in front of someome infected for a period is high risk from air circulation. There are studies and cases from buses, taxis etc where they tracked that ppl got it. In such cases pm2.5 or not sealed will be inferior.

        • ebaypus on 19/03/2020 - 05:03

          Xizor Spot on

      • UberIsCool on 18/03/2020 - 22:59
        +1

        What? NO! A surgical mask is basically strong tissue paper. It's designed to stop water droplets from reaching a patient if you cough or sneeze during an operation when the have open wounds, not stop a virus from getting through the paper to the wearer

  • boonhowe on 18/03/2020 - 19:59
    +6

    This is a dust filter. Doesn't come with the water repellent layer needed right now against COVID19 (repelling droplets)

    • toobzy on 18/03/2020 - 20:27
      +3

      Well where do we get those then?

      • TEER3X on 18/03/2020 - 21:01
        +1

        can't we make some with a 3d printer?????

  • [Deactivated] on 18/03/2020 - 21:05
    +2

    This company is ridiculous

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join