This was posted 4 years 9 months 19 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB USB 2.0 Flash Drive $10 @ Harvey Norman,Joyce Mayne,Domayne,Officeworks & Amazon AU

190
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB USB 2.0 Flash Drive $10 @ Harvey Norman,Joyce Mayne,Domayne,Officeworks & Amazon AU
Go to Deal
Optimus Prime on 28/02/2020 - 23:51 harveynorman.com.au (370 clicks)
Last edited 29/02/2020 - 09:48

Half Price Special.

Back up, share, and transfer files even when you’re on the move with the SanDisk Cruzer Blade USB 2.0 Flash Drive. Featuring a sleek and compact design, it fits easily inside your bag or purse.

Thanks to its 64GB capacity, the SanDisk Cruzer Blade USB 2.0 Flash Drive provides generous space for storing documents, software, multimedia, and more.
With support for drag-and-drop file backup, this USB flash drive lets you transfer data to and from a compatible device without hassle.
Showcasing a sleek red and black design, this SanDisk flash drive coordinates well aesthetically with many electronic devices.

Joyce Mayne
https://www.joycemayne.com.au/sandisk-cruzer-blade-64gb-usb-…

Domayne
https://www.domayne.com.au/sandisk-cruzer-blade-64gb-usb-2-0…

Amazon AU - Backorder (2- 5 weeks)
https://www.amazon.com.au/SanDisk-Cruzer-Blade-flash-drive/d…

Officeworks
https://www.officeworks.com.au/shop/officeworks/p/sandisk-cr…

Computing 64GB SanDisk USB Flash Drive

Related Stores

Harvey Norman
Harvey Norman

closed Comments

  • MuddyClear on 29/02/2020 - 00:19
    +6

    Must be crazy to buy USB 2.0.

    • chrism238 on 29/02/2020 - 00:35
      +2

      Especially for 64GB:
      https://3ejhwk43olqy1wq5bp2w3rkp-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-…

    • [Deactivated] on 29/02/2020 - 06:13

      You reckon that is the bottleneck? No way these do 480mbps.

      • ocoolio on 29/02/2020 - 08:09
        -2

        It is a bottleneck. You'll never be able to fill up 64gb with USB 2.0 speeds.

        Do. Not. Buy. You have been warned

        • [Deactivated] on 29/02/2020 - 08:33
          -2

          No it's not. USB2.0 is capable of 60 megabytes per second. These Cruzer Blades never come close to that. It's funny how you and others can't comprehend that the Cruzer Blade is just slow.

          • RichardF89 on 29/02/2020 - 09:38
            +1

            @[Deactivated]: Cruzer Blades speed is less than 10m/s. I have the 32g version. is was $4 last black friday

          • ocoolio on 29/02/2020 - 17:28
            -1

            @[Deactivated]: No, USB 2.0 has a theoretical maximum of 60 mb/s of the protocol itself - on paper.

            If you take into account the necessary implementation details (e.g., maximum packet size), the theoretical maximum that any real device can achieve is 50,7mb/s.

            This, again, is theoretical maximum of any real devices receiving the maximum 13 packets / microframe using the maximum packet size. Actual devices generally cannot receive more than ~10. The USB controllers on these keys are really poor quality, so it would be much lower than this, not even mentioning the poor quality (slow) memory modules.

            It is you who can't comprehend something.

            Source

            • [Deactivated] on 29/02/2020 - 21:07
              -1

              @ocoolio: You don't even know the difference between megabits and megabytes.

              Cruzer Blades wouldn't get beaten by other USB 2.0 drives if the USB 2.0 protocol was the bottleneck. It's not. You obviously haven't benchmarked read speeds from external HDD cache or SSD if you think they perform the same as a Cruzer Blade, bottlenecked by USB 2.0. You think 10MB per second is some sort of a limit when 30MB per second is quite possible. The Cruzer Blade is slow. Funny you can't deal with that fact. It's slow even compared with other USB 2.0 devices.

                • [Deactivated] on 01/03/2020 - 11:10

                  @ocoolio: You did: "Actual devices generally cannot receive more than ~10." Worked out what a megabyte is yet? You really don't understand things. You could bypass the USB 2.0 interface altogether and Cruzer Blades would still be slow. Your belief that they are fast and just being held back by USB 2.0 is ridiculous. There are plenty of USB 2.0 devices that outperform Cruzer Blades. You've obviously never even used an FTDI FT232H. LOL.

  • jackspratt on 29/02/2020 - 00:49

    Selfie?

  • xoom on 29/02/2020 - 06:52

    Same price at officeworks

  • ExtraSalt on 29/02/2020 - 06:54

    hard pass imo. I guess it'd be ok to have as a backup or a backup. you can get the Sandisk USB 3.0 version of this for not much more.

  • ozhunter on 29/02/2020 - 08:52
    -1

    Painfully slow. I guess it can be ok if you just want to store something small on it or only moving small files. Definitely too annoying to use for constantly moving large files.

  • TheDukeOfNukem on 29/02/2020 - 09:34
    +2

    These are great for the PlayStation Classic if anyone is still using them. Supposedly they need USB 2.0 and don't work with 3.0, though I've not tested it. Might upgrade from my 32gb one just for the heck of it, can never have too much space when it costs a tenner to double your whole thing. Cheers.

    • joshr2d2 on 29/02/2020 - 09:58

      The PlayStation Classic compatibility depends on how much power a USB requires, as the USB ports don't provide as much power as the USB2 spec requires. Some USB2 devices don't work and some USB3 do.

  • MuddyClear on 29/02/2020 - 17:51

    I wouldn’t go usb 3.0 either. It’s 3.1 or nothing!

  • killergreely on 03/03/2020 - 09:13

    Fine for recording on most TVs.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join