• expired

[NSW] Panasonic Lumix G7 + 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II Kit Lens for $599 In-Store @ Camera House (Broadway, Top Ryde or Hornsby)

80

Price: $599

ONLY Available at these locations and in-store:

Broadway Camera House
Top Ryde Camera House
Hornsby Camera House

A great deal on the Panasonic Lumix G7 mirrorless camera with Lumix G Vario 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II lens. Our competitors are selling the body only for $10 - $50 more. The lens bundled in this kit is $200 on it's own.

A few key features on this camera:
* 4K video at 24/30 fps
* Flip screen, turns 180 if you want to vlog etc.
* Microphone input
* 6.2 fps RAW with AF/AE, 8 fps locked AF/AE.
* 4K Photo Burst of 30fps (photos are limited to 8MP)

My first post here, so let me know if there's any guidelines or rules that I've broken please. Any suggestions for improvement are welcome.

Related Stores

Camera House
Camera House

closed Comments

  • I believe that should read 14-42mm lens

  • +4

    That's a horrible price.

    G7 is more than 4 years old….the recent Olympus EM10mkIII deal from DCW is 1000x better than this.

    Personally I wouldn't even pay $399 for this kit.

    • +3

      Agreed. In that deal ($599) Olympus 25mm 1.8 alone was worth $300

    • This: https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/493477

      Any decent review compared to the G7?

      Thanks

      • Check out dpreview - https://www.dpreview.com/products/panasonic/slrs/panasonic_d… - (rated 80% - silver award)

      • The G7 had shutter vibration issues, the em10 III is much newer. Same sensor but more improvements/fixes.. The em10 III also has in body image stabilization (so all lenses stabilized) the g7 lacks IBIS. The lack of AA filter also makes a huge difference in sharpness, it does make it a bit more susceptible to moire, but this is fixed automatically in the software.. (I have had this sensor in the g7 and in other bodies without the AA filter, it is a noticeable difference in clarity).

        Some differences here - https://www.apotelyt.com/compare-camera/olympus-e-m10-iii-vs…

        • The EM10 III is a better camera for sure, however it's also $300 more.

          • @bchdeals: yeah depends on the deals, I was just replying to askme69 wanting to compare the two..

  • How much with 45-150mm kit lens thrown in?

    • It's $749 with the 45-150mm included

Login or Join to leave a comment